When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation

References

• Aggarwal VA, Siggelkow N, Singh H (2011) Governing collaborative activity: Interdependence and the impact of coordination and exploration. Strategic Management J. 32(7):705–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augier M, Sarasvathy SD (2004) Integrating evolution, cognition and design: Extending Simonian perspectives to strategic organization. Strategic Organ. 2(2):169–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baier VE, March JG, Saetren H (1986) Implementation and ambiguity. Scand. J. Management Stud. 2(3):197–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker J, Tjosvold D, Andrews IR (1988) Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization. J. Management Stud. 25(2):167–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA (1982) How multinational organizations evolve. J. Bus. Strategy 3(1):20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S (1989) Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1986) Common agency. Econometrica 54(4):923–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P, Dewatripont M (2013) Authority in organizations. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 342–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman E, Kogut B (1995) Redesigning the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM, Obel B, DeSanctis G (2011) Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chi T, Nystrom P (1998) An economic analysis of matrix structure, using multinational corporations as an illustration. Managerial Decision Econom. 19(3):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Davis S, Lawrence PR (1977) Matrix (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Dessein W, Santos T (2006) Adaptive organizations. J. Political Econom. 114(5):956–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit AK (1998) The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Doz YL, Kosonen M (2008) Fast Strategy: How Strategic Agility Will Help You Stay Ahead of the Game (Wharton School Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Durkheim E (1933) The Division of Labor in Society (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004a) Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):404–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2004b) Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. 50(2):159–173.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA (2009) Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals. Organ. Sci. 20(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK, Levinthal DA, Roy RR (2008) The dual role of modularity: Innovation and imitation. Management Sci. 54(5):939–955.Link, Google Scholar
• Fayol H (1949) General and Industrial Administration (Pitman, New York).Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford RC, Randolph WA (1992) Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management. J. Management 18(2):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1977) Organization Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (2009) Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work: How IBM, Procter & Gamble and Others Design for Success (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Gavetti G (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organ. Sci. 16(6):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2007) Redefining Global Strategy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gibbons R (2005) Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 58(2):200–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goold M, Campbell A (1987) Strategies and Styles: The Role of the Centre in Managing Diversified Corporations (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Goold M, Campbell A (2002) Designing Effective Organizations: How to Create Structured Networks (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Miller D (2010) Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(4):78–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadalupe M, Li H, Wulf J (2013) Who lives in the C-suite? Organizational structure and the division of labor in top management. Management Sci. 60(4):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):250–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1996) Competing for the Future (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Herzberg FI (1966) Work and the Nature of Man (World Publishing, Cleveland).Google Scholar
• Kauffman SA (1993) The Origins of Order (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight K (1976) Matrix organization: A review. J. Management Stud. 13(2):111–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Larson EW, Gobeli DH (1987) Matrix management: Contradictions and insights. Calif. Management Rev. 29(4):126–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Revised ed. (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lenox MJ, Rockart SF, Lewin AY (2006) Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of firm and industry profits. Management Sci. 52(5):757–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sosn, New York).Google Scholar
• Martin NH (1956) Differential decisions in the management of an industrial plant. J. Bus. 29(4):249–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mihm J, Loch CH, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA (2010) Hierarchical structure and search in complex organizations. Management Sci. 56(5):831–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH (1984) A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Sci. 30(10):1161–1183.Link, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Morris PW, Pinto JK, Söderlund J (2011) The Oxford Handbook of Project Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: A dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ. Sci. 13(5):547–566.Link, Google Scholar
• Noda T, Bower JL (1996) Strategy making as iterated processes of resource allocation. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):159–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s way. J. Organ. Design 4(2):2–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. 49(3):290–311.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2007) Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. 53(7):1068–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Rumelt RP (1974) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Sengul M, Gimeno J (2013) Constrained delegation: Limiting subsidiaries’ decision rights and resources in firms that compete across multiple industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):420–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Levinthal DA (2003) Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. 14(6):650–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. 16(2):101–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2006) When exploration backfires: Unintended consequences of multilevel organizational search. Acad. Management J. 49(4):779–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1947) Administrative Behavior (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. 69(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (2000) Can there be a science of complex systems? Bar-Yam Y, ed. Unifying Themes in Complex Systems: Proceedings of the International Conference on Complex Systems, Vol. 1 (Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA), 3–14.Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) The Wealth of Nations (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London).Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Lindkvist L, DeFillippi R (2004) Project-based organizations, embeddedness and repositories of knowledge: Editorial. Organ. Stud. 25(9):1475–1489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Turner AN, Lawrence PR (1965) Industrial Jobs and the Worker: An Investigation of Response to Task Attributes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar