Noise as Signal in Learning from Rare Events

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1179

References

  • Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Clark KB (1991) Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. 37(3):267–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, Boston).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Greve H (2007) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 years and counting: Introduction and impact. Organ. Sci. 18(3):337–349.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Dahlin KB (2007) Aspiration performance and railroads’ rates of experiential and vicarious learning from train wrecks and crashes. Organ. Sci. 18(3):368–385.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC, Ingram P (1998) Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. 44(7):996–1016.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Haunschild PR (2002) Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):92–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bennett VM, Snyder J (2017) The empirics of learning from failure. Strategy Sci. 2(1):1–12.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bohn RE (1995) Noise and learning in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 41(1):31–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chuang Y-T, Baum JAC (2003) It’s all in the name: Failure-induced learning by multiunit chains. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):33–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cimpanu C (2016) Medical equipment crashes during heart procedure because of antivirus scan. Softpedia (May 3), http://news.softpedia.com/news/medical-equipment-crashes-during-heart-procedure-because-of-antivirus-scan-503642.shtml-ixzz4KKqyP7Bj.Google Scholar
  • Creswell JW (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Dahlin KB, Chuang YT, Roulet TJ (2018) Opportunity, motivation and ability to learn from failures and errors: Review, synthesis and ways to move forward. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):252–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Holan PM, Phillips N (2004) Remembrance of things past? The dynamics of organizational forgetting. Management Sci. 50(11):1603–1613.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delporte C (2011) Top of the news: Guidant fined, given probation for defective heart devices. Medical Product Outsourcing 9(1):14–16.Google Scholar
  • Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J (2008) Superstitious behaviour as a byproduct of intelligent adaptation. Hodgkinson GP, Starbuck WH, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Decision Making (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 271–286.Google Scholar
  • Denrell J, Le Mens G (2016) Information sampling, belief synchronization and collective illusions. Management Sci. 63(2):528–547.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J, Fang C, Levinthal DA (2004) From T-mazes to labyrinths: Learning from model-based feedback. Management Sci. 50(10):1366–1378.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai V (2015) Learning through the distribution of failures within an organization: Evidence from heart bypass surgery performance. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1032–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai VM, Maslach D, Madsen P (2018) Organizational learning from failure: Present theory and future inquiries. Argote L, Levine JM, eds. Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Diehl E, Sterman JD (1995) Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(2):198–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dillon RL, Tinsley CH, Madsen PM, Rogers EM (2016) Organizational correctives for improving recognition of near-miss events. J. Management 42(3) 671–697.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diwas K, Staats BR, Gino F (2013) Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 59(11):2435–2449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dye KC, Eggers JP, Shapira Z (2014) Trade-offs in a tempest: Stakeholder influence on hurricane evacuation decisions. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1009–1025.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Egelman CD, Epple D, Argote L, Fuchs E (2017) Learning by doing in multiproduct manufacturing: Variety, customizations, and overlapping product generations. Management Sci. 63(2):405–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenkranz M (2016) Heart machine crashes mid-procedure because it was busy checking itself for viruses. Mic (May 9), https://mic.com/articles/142989/heart-machine-crashes-mid-procedure-because-it-was-busy-checking-itself-for-viruses-.yB80QitjP.Google Scholar
  • Eig J (1998) How Danny died. Chicago Magazine (November), 62–82.Google Scholar
  • Flesch R (1948) A new readability yardstick. J. Appl. Psych. 32(3):221–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Dunbar RLM, Bartel CA (2011) Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 22(3):587–601.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Greve H, Levinthal D (2012) The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geddes LA (1995) Handbook of Electrical Hazards and Accidents (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • George G, Osinga EC, Lavie D, Scott BA (2016) Big data and data science methods for management research. Acad. Management J. 59(6):1493–1507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson CB (2017) Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the mixed method research. Organ. Res. Methods 20(2):193–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gong Y, Zhang Y, Xia J (2017) Do firms learn more from small or big successes and failures? A test of the outcome-based feedback learning perspective. J. Management, ePub ahead of print January 30, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316687641.Google Scholar
  • Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioural Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greve H, Taylor A (2000) Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):54–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Sullivan BN (2002) Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):609–643.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman AJ, Ocasio W (2001) Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organ. Sci. 12(4):414–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Baum JAC (1997) Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):75–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Joseph J, Gaba V (2015) The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management J. 36(13):1960–1978.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kacperczyk A, Beckman CM, Moliterno TP (2014) Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):228–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J-YJ, Miner AS (2007) Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 50(3):687–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J-Y, Kim J-YJ, Miner AS (2009) Organizational learning from extreme performance experience: The impact of success and recovery experience. Organ. Sci. 20(6):958–978.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knott AM, Posen HE (2005) Is failure good? Strategic Management J. 26(7):617–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunreuther H, Bowman EH (1997) A dynamic model of organizational decision making: Chemco revisited six years after Bhopal. Organ. Sci. 8(4):404–413.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Labianca G, Fairbank JF, Andrevski G, Parzen M (2009) Striving toward the future: Aspiration-performance discrepancies and planned organizational change. Strategic Organ. 7(4):433–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Labib A, Read M (2013) Not just rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic: Learning from failures through. Risk Reliability Anal. 51(1):397–413.Google Scholar
  • Lampel J, Shamsie J, Shapira Z (2009) Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 20(5):835–845.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant TK, Shapira Z (2008) Managerial reasoning about aspirations and expectations. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 66(1):60–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré MA, Tsikriktsis N (2006) Organizational learning curves for customer dissatisfication: Heterogeniety across airlines. Management Sci. 52(3):352–366.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 4:319–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Q, Maggitti PG, Smith KG, Tesluk PE, Katila R (2013) Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Acad. Management J. 56(3):893–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman MB, Asaba S (2006) Why do firms imitate each other? Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):366–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM (2009) These lives will not be lost in vain: Organizational learning from disaster in U.S. coal mining. Organ. Sci. 20(5):861–875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Desai V (2010) Failing to learn? The effects of failure and success on organizational learning in the global orbital launch vehicle industry. Acad. Management J. 53(3):451–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen PM, Dillon RL, Tinsley CH (2016) Airline safety improvement through experience with near-misses: A cautionary tale. Risk Anal. 36(5):1054–1066.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Shapira Z (1992) Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psych. Rev. 99(1):172–183.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Sproull LS, Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maslach D (2016) Change and persistence with failed technological innovation. Strategic Management J. 37(4):714–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massini S, Lewin AY, Greve H (2005) Innovators and imitators: Organizational reference groups and adoption of organizational routines. Res. Policy 34(10):1550–1569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miner AS, Kim J-Y, Holzinger IW, Haunschild P (1999) Fruits of failure: Organizational failure and population level learning. Miner AS, Anderson P, eds. Population-Level Learning and Industry Change, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 16 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 187–220.Google Scholar
  • Moliterno TP, Beck N, Beckman CM (2014) Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1684–1702.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Wuebker R, Zenger T (2017) Problems, theories, and governing the crowd. Strategic Organ. 15(2):275–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. J. Management Stud. 26(4):397–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problematic search—A review and research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 12(1):208–251.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rahmandad H (2008) Effect of delays on complexity of organizational learning. Management Sci. 54(7):1297–1312.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ref O, Shapira Z (2017) Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and well below and above it. Strategic Management J. 38(7):1416–1434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning NP, Sterman JD (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):265–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shinkle GA (2012) Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals: Building on the past and aiming for the future. J. Management 38(1):415–455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinclair G, Klepper S, Cohen W (2000) What’s experience got to do with it? Sources of cost reduction in a large specialty chemicals producer. Management Sci. 46(1):28–45.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin SB (1992) Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 231–266.Google Scholar
  • Srinivasan R, Haunschild P, Grewal R (2007) Vicarious learning in new product introductions in the early years of a converging market. Management Sci. 53(1):16–28.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck WH (2009) Cognitive reactions to rare events: Perceptions, uncertainty, and learning. Organ. Sci. 20(5):925–937.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Patterson K (2014) Asymmetries in experiential and vicarious feedback: Lessons from the hiring and firing of baseball managers. Sociol. Sci. 1(May):178–198.Google Scholar
  • Strike VM, Rerup C (2016) Mediated sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 59(3):880–905.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tamuz M (2001) Learning disabilities for regulators: The perils of organizational learning in the air transportation industry. Admin. Soc. 33(3):276–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler RH (2011) Show us the data. (It’s ours, after all.) New York Times (April 23), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/business/24view.html.Google Scholar
  • Thompson P (2007) How much did the liberty shipbuilders forget? Management Sci. 53(6):908–918.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P (2012) The relationship between unit cost and cumulative quantity and the evidence for organizational learning-by-doing. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turner SF, Cardinal LB, Burton RM (2017) Research design for mixed methods: A triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organ. Res. Methods 20(2):243–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (2016) MAUDE: Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience. Accessed September 13, 2016, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/TextSearch.cfm.Google Scholar
  • Vaughan D (1996) The Challenger Launch Decision: Risk Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Vissa B, Greve HR, Chen W-R (2010) Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organ. Sci. 21(3):696–712.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2000) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M (2009) Superstitious learning with rare strategic decisions: Theory and evidence from corporate acquisitions. Organ. Sci. 20(5):894–908.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.