What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Polidoro F, Mitchell W (2009) Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9):941–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. (2008) Network Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Shipilov AV, Rowley TJ (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):697–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bode E (2004) The spatial pattern of localized R&D spillovers: An empirical investigation for Germany. J. Econom. Geography 4(1):43–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bondonio D (1998) Predictors of accuracy in perceiving informal social networks. Soc. Networks 20(4):301–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP (2005) The state of organizational social network research today. Working paper, Department of Organization Studies, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Foster PC (2003) The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management 29(6):991–1013.Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS (2011) On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1168–1181.Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323(5916):892–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bothner MS, Kim YK, Smith EB (2012) How does status affect performance? Status as an asset vs. status as a liability in the PGA and NASCAR. Organ. Sci. 23(2):416–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Birkinshaw J (2008) Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Acad. Management J. 51(3):577–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouquet C, Morrison A, Birkinshaw J (2009) International attention and multinational enterprise performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(1):108–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA (2013) Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. J. Organ. Behav. 34(S1):82–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brashears ME, Quintane E (2015) The microstructures of network recall: How social networks are encoded and represented in human memory. Soc. Networks 41(May):113–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer DD (1997) No associative biases in the first name cued recall procedure for eliciting personal networks. Soc. Networks 19(4):345–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calloway M, Morrissey JP, Paulson RI (1993) Accuracy and reliability of self-reported data in interorganizational networks. Soc. Networks 15(4):377–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T (1998) Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Soc. Networks 20(4):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Carley KM, Krackhardt D (1999) Positive affectivity and accuracy in social network perception. Motivation Emotion 23(4):285–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collet F, Philippe D (2014) From hot cakes to cold feet: A contingent perspective on the relationship between market uncertainty and status homophily in the formation of alliances. J. Management Stud. 51(3):406–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cylus J, Mladovsky P, McKee M (2012) Is there a statistical relationship between economic crises and changes in government health expenditure growth? An analysis of twenty-four European countries. Health Services Res. 47(6):2204–2224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dekker J, de Hart P, eds. (2009) Vrijwilligers in Meervoud: Civil Society En Vrijwilligerswerk (Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague).Google Scholar
• De Mast J (2007) Agreement and kappa-type indices. Amer. Statistician 61(2):148–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diana RA, Reder LM, Arndt J, Park H (2006) Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 13(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar RIM (2003) The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Rev. Anthropol. 32:163–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1992) Filling in the blanks—A theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Soc. Psych. Quart. 55(2):118–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawronski B, Creighton LA (2013) Dual process theories. Carlston DE, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition (Oxford University Press, New York), 282–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D, Markman AB (1997) Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. Amer. Psych. 52(1):45–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gower JC, Legendre P (1986) Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J. Classification 3(1):5–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Cline TW, Davies A (2003) Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. J. Consumer Psych. 13(3):187–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RFJ, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han J, Van Dongen K (2015) Friendship network centrality and the performance of soccer players: The role of cognitive accuracy. Human Performance 28(3):265–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT, Haas MR (2001) Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G (2006) Evaluative schemas and the attention of critics in the US film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 15(3):467–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huckman RS, Zinner DE (2008) Does focus improve operational performance? Lessons from the management of clinical trials. Strategic Management J. 29(2):173–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hung SC (2005) The plurality of institutional embeddedness as a source of organizational attention differences. J. Bus. Res. 58(11):1543–1551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2):348–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Livingston BA, Liao H (2011) Perceived similarity, proactive adjustment, and organizational socialization. J. Vocational Behav. 78(2):225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D (2008) Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1988) Predicting with networks—Nonparametric multiple-regression analysis of dyadic data. Soc. Networks 10(4):359–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1990) Assessing the political landscape—Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(2):342–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lhuillery S, Pfister E (2011) Do firms know the scope of their R&D network? An empirical investigation of the determinants of network awareness on French survey data. Indust. Innovation 18(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1133–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Lin SJ (2015) Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments. Strategic Management J. 36(13):2000–2020.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius lungens and orientation involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D, Borgatti SP, Davis J (2014) Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Brass DJ, Labianca G, Mehra A, Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, eds. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bradford, UK), 135–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(July):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Osman M (2004) An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 11(6):988–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Milward HB (1995) A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Fish A, Sydow J (2007) Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. J. Management 33(3):479–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pulakos ED, Wexley KN (1983) The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. Acad. Management J. 26(1):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Carnabuci G (2017) How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1343–1360.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 104(3):192–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Padula G (2008) Investigating the microstructure of network evolution: Alliance formation in the mobile communications industry. Organ. Sci. 19(5):669–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Rowley TJ, Baum JAC (2004) Sophistication of interfirm network strategies in the Canadian investment banking industry. Scand. J. Management 20(1–2):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shipilov AV, Li SX, Greve HR (2011) The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1418–1434.Link, Google Scholar
• Simpson B, Markovsky B, Steketee M (2011) Power and the perception of social networks. Soc. Networks 33(2):166–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan BN (2010) Competition and beyond: Problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organ. Sci. 21(2):432–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Walker G (1984) The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):598–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Liere DW, Koppius OR, Vervest PHM (2008) Network horizon: An information-based view on the dynamics of bridging positions. Baum JAC, Rowley TJ, eds. Network Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 595–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS, Newman MEJ (2002) Identity and search in social networks. Science 296(5571):1302–1305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, George VP (2004) Reach out or reach within? Performance implications of alliances and location in biotechnology. Managerial Decision Econom. 25(6–7):437–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, Gozubuyuk R, Milanov H (2010) It’s the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Acad. Management Perspect. 24(1):62–77.Crossref, Google Scholar