Taking Stock of the Ability to Change: The Effect of Prior Experience

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1181

References

  • Adler PS, Clark KB (1991) Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. 37(3):267–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TJ, Cohen SI (1969) Information flow in research and development laboratories. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(1):12–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P, Dokko G, Rosenkopf L (2003) Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy 32(2):301–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand V, Manz CC, Glick WH (1998) An organizational memory approach to information management. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):796–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (2013) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–947.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Miron-Spektor E (2011) Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1123–1137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1974) The Limits of Organization (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Augier M, Teece DJ (2009) Dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in business strategy and economic performance. Organ. Sci. 20(2):410–421.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Batt R (2002) Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Acad. Management J. 45(3):587–597.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bettis RA, Prahalad CK (1995) The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management J. 16(1):5–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boh WF, Slaughter SA, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK, de Figueiredo RJP Jr, Rawley E (2016) Learning on the job? Employee mobility in the asset management industry. Management Sci. 62(10):2804–2819.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen MD, Bacdayan P (1994) Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4):554–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):522–537.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr ED, Argote L, Epple D (1995) The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. 41(11):1750–1762.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dess GG, Shaw JD (2001) Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):446–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dokko G, Wilk SL, Rothbard NP (2009) Unpacking prior experience: How career history affects job performance. Organ. Sci. 20(1):51–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JM, Thomas A (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Winslow AB, Bohmer RMJ, Pisano GP (2003) Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. 34(2):197–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D, Argote L, Murphy K (1996) An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. 44(1):77–86.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Felin T, Foss NJ, Heimeriks KH, Madsen TL (2012) Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. J. Management Stud. 49(8):1351–1374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, Agarwal R, Gopal A (2016) The role of individual and organizational expertise in adoption of new practices. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Greve HR (1998) Performance aspirations, and risky change organizational change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):58–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hedberg B (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH, eds. Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 3–27.Google Scholar
  • Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories firm R&D in petroleum. Management Sci. 40(12):1720–1747.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. 24(10):997–1010.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital in professional on strategy and performance service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Pisano GP (2006) The firm specificity of individual performance: Evidence from cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 52(4):473–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huckman RS, Staats BR, Upton DM (2009) Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services. Management Sci. 55(1):85–100.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kacmar KM, Andrews MC, Van Rooy DL, Steilberg RC (2006) Sure everyone can be replaced … but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Acad. Management J. 49(1):133–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalnins A, Mayer KJ (2004) Franchising, ownership, and experience: A study of pizza restaurant survival. Management Sci. 50(12):1716–1728.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klein JI (1989) Parenthetic learning in organizations: Toward the unlearning of the unlearning model. J. Management Stud. 26(3):291–308.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):997–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S, Sleeper S (2005) Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. 51(8):1291–1306.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klimoski R, Mohammed S (1994) Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? J. Management 20(2):403–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knott AM (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Management Sci. 47(3):430–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. 21(3):405–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1996) What firms do? Coordination, identify, and learning. Organ. Sci. 7(5):502–518.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):308–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M, Tsikriktsis N (2006) Organizational learning curves for customer dissatisfaction: Heterogeneity across airlines. Management Sci. 52(3):352–366.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence M (2018) Trailblazing vs holding up the learning curve: Choosing templates for new practice transfer. Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(1):111–125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D, Rerup C (2006) Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 17(4):502–513.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD, List JA, Syverson C (2013) Toward an understanding of learning by doing: Evidence from an automobile assembly plant. J. Political Econom. 121(4):643–681.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewin K (1951) Cartwright D, ed. Field Theory in Social Science (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lewis K, Lange D, Gillis L (2005) Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organ. Sci. 16(6):581–598.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman MB (1984) The learning curve and pricing in the chemical processing industries. RAND J. Econom. 15(2):213–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madsen TL, Mosakowski E, Zaheer S (2003) Knowledge mobility: Of inflows nondisruptive of experience. Organ. Sci. 14(2):173–191.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nelson R, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Newstrom JW (1983) The management of unlearning: Exploding the “clean slate” fallacy. Training Development J. 37(8):36–39.Google Scholar
  • Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1984) To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organ. Dynamics 12(4):53–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP (1994) Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):85–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Bohmer RMJ, Edmondson AC (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Price JL (1977) The Study of Turnover (Iowa State University Press, Ames).Google Scholar
  • Rapping L (1965) Learning and World War II production functions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 47(1):81–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rerup C (2005) Learning from past experience: Footnotes on mindfulness and habitual entrepreneurship. Scand. J. Management 21(4):451–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbloom RS, Christensen CM (1994) Technological discontinuities, organizational capabilities, and strategic commitments. Indust. Corporate Change 3(3):655–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Johnson JL, Lockhart DE (2005) Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Acad. Management J. 48(4):594–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staw BM (1980) The consequences of turnover. J. Occupational Behav. 1(4):253–273.Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management J. 28(13):1319–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P (2012) The relationship between unit cost and cumulative quantity and the evidence for organizational learning-by-doing. J. Econom. Perspect. 26(3):203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ton Z, Huckman RS (2008) Managing the impact of employee turnover on performance: The role of process conformance. Organ. Sci. 19(1):56–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. 41(4):464–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML (1977) Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(4):587–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML (1978) Technical communication in R&D laboratories: The impact of project work characteristics. Acad. Management J. 21(4):624–645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber RA, Camerer CF (2003) Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. 49(4):400–415.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner DM (1987) Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Mullen B, Goethals GR, eds. Theories of Group Behavior (Springer, New York), 185–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiersma E (2007) Conditions that shape the learning curve: Factors that increase the ability and opportunity to learn. Management Sci. 53(12):1903–1915.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter SG (2000) The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. 21(10):981–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yelle LE (1979) The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. 10(2):302–328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U, Kogut B (1995) Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. 6(1):76–92.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zenger TR, Lawrence BS (1989) Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Acad. Management J. 32(2):353–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.