“Making” Your Numbers: Engendering Organizational Control Through a Ritual of Quantification

References

• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2004) Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Res. 21(2):271–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahrens T, Chapman CS (2007) Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 32(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2007) Unraveling HRM: Identity, ceremony, and control in a management consulting firm. Organ. Sci. 18(4):711–723.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Oliver RL (1987) Perspectives on behavior-based versus outcome-based salesforce control systems. J. Marketing 51(4):76–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anteby M (2008) Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant. Organ. Sci. 19(2):202–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyris C (1952) The Impact of Budgets on People (Controllership Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (1985) Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management 24(2):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barker JR (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3):408–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker HS (1998) Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You’re Doing It (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner B, Ambos B (2013) A question of legitimacy? A dynamic perspective on multinational firm control. Organ. Sci. 24(3):773–795.Link, Google Scholar
• Brunsson N (1990) Deciding for responsibility and legitimation: Alternative interpretations of organizational decision-making. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 15(1/2):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB (2001) Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. 12(1):19–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardinal LB, Sitkin SB, Long CP (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Covaleski MA, Dirsmith MW (1983) Budgeting as a means for control and loose coupling. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 8(4):323–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Vol. 2 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges B, Jacobsson B (1989) Budget in a cold climate. Accounting, Organ., Soc. 14(1/2):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dacin MT, Munir K, Tracey P (2010) Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1393–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Jong BA, Bijlsma-Frankema KM, Cardinal LB (2014) Stronger than the sum of its parts? The performance implications of peer control combinations in teams. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1703–1721.Link, Google Scholar
• Denis JL, Langley A, Rouleau L (2006) The power of numbers in strategizing. Strategic Organ. 4(4):349–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards RC, Edwards R (1979) Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds1. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Stevens ML (1998) Commensuration as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 24:313–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Stevens ML (2008) A sociology of quantification. Eur. J. Sociol. 49(3):401–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ezzamel M, Willmott H (1998) Accounting for teamwork: A critical study of group-based systems of organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):358–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauré B, Rouleau L (2011) The strategic competence of accountants and middle managers in budget making. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 36(3):167–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):727–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes RL (2000) Deeply into the Bone: Re-Inventing Rites of Passage (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Hochschild AR (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Hope J, Fraser R (2003) Who needs budgets? Harvard Bus. Rev. (February):108–115. [Reprint R0302J.]Google Scholar
• Hopwood AG (1972) An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. J. Accounting Res. 10:156–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.Link, Google Scholar
• Islam G (2014) Organizational ritual: Rupture, repetition, and the institutional event. Mir R, Willmott H, Greenwood M, eds. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 542–549.Google Scholar
• Islam G, Zyphur M (2009) Rituals in organizations: A review and expansion of current theory. Group Organ. Management 34(1):114–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC (2003) Paying people to lie: The truth about the budgeting process. Eur. Financial Management 9(3):379–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Prashantham S, Floyd SW, Bourque N (2010) The ritualization of strategy workshops. Organ. Stud. 31(12):1589–1618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kownatzki M, Walter J, Floyd SW, Lechner C (2013) Corporate control and the speed of strategic business unit decision making. Acad. Management J. 56(5):1295–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreutzer M, Walter J, Cardinal LB (2015) Organizational control as antidote to politics in the pursuit of strategic initiatives. Strategic Management J. 36(9):1317–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda G (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Lampland M (2010) False numbers as formalizing practices. Soc. Stud. Sci. 40(3):377–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libby T, Lindsay RM (2010) Beyond budgeting or budgeting reconsidered? A survey of North-American budgeting practice. Management Accounting Res. 21(1):56–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lofland J, Lofland LH (1995) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis (Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Marginson D, Ogden S (2005) Coping with ambiguity through the budget: The positive effects of budgetary targets on managers’ budgeting behaviours. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 30(5):435–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin J (1992) Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazmanian M, Beckman CM, Harmon E (2016) Ethnography across the work boundary: Benefits and considerations for organizational studies. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 262–271.Google Scholar
• Michaud V (2014) Mediating the paradoxes of organizational governance through numbers. Organ. Stud. 35(1):75–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michel A (2011) Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):325–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller P (2001) Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. Soc. Res. 68(2):379–396.Google Scholar
• Miller P, Power M (2013) Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):557–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerhoff BG (1977) We don’t wrap herring in a printed page: Fusion, fictions and continuity in secular ritual. Moore SF, Myerhoff BG, eds. Secular Ritual (Van Gorcum, Amsterdam), 199–226.Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Olson JP (1970) Local budgeting, decision-making or a ritual act? Scand. Political Stud. 5(A5):85–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1991) Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management Information Tech. 1(1):9–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1977) The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):95–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Emmanuel C, Otley D, Merchant K, eds. Readings in Accounting for Management Control (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG, Maguire MA (1975) Organizational control: Two functions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(4):559–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parmigiani A, Howard-Grenville J (2011) Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):413–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (1993) Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and the micro-production of macro-order. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 18(7):605–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez LF-R, Robson K (1999) Ritual legitimation, de-coupling and the budgetary process: Managing organizational hypocrisies in a multinational company. Management Accounting Res. 10(4):383–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quattrone P (2015) Governing social orders, unfolding rationality, and Jesuit accounting practices a procedural approach to institutional logics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(3):411–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgway VF (1956) Dysfunctional consequences of performance measurements. Admin. Sci. Quart. 1(2):240–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons R (1995) Control in an age of empowerment. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(2):80–88.Google Scholar
• Sitkin S, Cardinal L, Bijlsma-Frankema K (2010) Introduction and history. Control in Organizations: New Directions in Theory and Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith A, Stewart B (2011) Organizational rituals: Features, functions and mechanisms. Internat. J. Management Rev. 13(2):113–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snell SA (1992) Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Acad. Management J. 35(2):292–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley J (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Holt, Rinehart and Wilson, New York).Google Scholar
• Stanko TL, Beckman CM (2015) Watching you watching me: Boundary control and the problem of capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Acad. Management J. 58(3):712–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Taylor FW (1913) The Principles of Scientific Management (Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Trice HM, Beyer JM (1984) Studying organizational culture through rites and ceremonials. Acad. Management Rev. 9(4):653–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner V (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Transaction Publishers, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar
• Turner VW (1975) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Turner KL, Makhija MV (2006) The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):197–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979a) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):539–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979b) The self, the situation and the rules of interpersonal relations. Bennis W, Van Maanen J, Schein EH, Steele FI, eds. Essays in Interpersonal Dynamics (Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL), 43–101.Google Scholar
• Verran H (2010) Number as an inventive frontier in knowing and working Australia’s water resources. Anthropological Theory 10(1–2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar