When the General Meets the Particular: The Practices and Challenges of Interorganizational Knowledge Reuse

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1196

References

  • Anand N, Gardner HK, Morris T (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: Emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad. Management J. 50(2):406–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Armbrüster T (2006) The Economics and Sociology of Management Consulting (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arnaud G (1998) The obscure object of demand in consultancy: A psychoanalytic perspective. J. Management Psych. 13(7):469–484.Google Scholar
  • Arrow K (1974) The Limits of Organization (W. W. Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Barley SR, Bechky BA (1994) In the backrooms of science: The work of technicians in science labs. Work Occupations 21(1):85–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barzun J (1982) Critical Questions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Christensen CM, Wang D, Van Bever D (2013) Consulting on the cusp of disruption. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(10):106–114.Google Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1): 128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3): 352–364.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M (2006) Charting a path toward integrated solutions. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):39–48.Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elkjaer B, Flensburg P, Mouritsen J, Willmott H (1991) The commodification of expertise: The case of systems development consulting. Account. Management Inform. Tech. 1(2):139–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischhoff B (1980) For those condemned to study the past: Reflections on historical judgment. Shweder RA, Fiske DW, eds. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, Vol. 4 (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 50–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith JR (2002) Organizing to deliver solutions. Organ. Dynam. 31(2):194–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2005) When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. 26(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Hansen MT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management J. 28(11):1133–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. 13(3):232–248.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T (1999) What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(2):106–116.Google Scholar
  • Hitt MA, Biermant L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Acad. Management J. 44(1):13–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kipping M, Armbrüster T (2002) The burden of otherness: Limits of consultancy interventions in historical case studies. Kipping M, Engwall L, eds. Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 203–221.Google Scholar
  • Kipping M, Engwall L, eds. (2002) Management Consulting: Emergence and Dynamics of a Knowledge Industry (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Orlikowski WJ (2009) Understanding shifting power relations within and across organizations: A critical genre analysis. Acad. Management J. 52(4):672–703.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maister DH (2007) Managing the Professional Service Firm (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • March JG (1991a) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991b) Organizational consultants and organizational research. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 19(1–2):20–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (2011) The Ambiguities of Experience (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Markus LM (2001) Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(1):57–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McEvily SK, Chakravarthy B (2002) The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 23(4):285–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKelvey B (2006) Van De Ven and Johnson’s “engaged scholarship”: Nice try, but … . Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):822–829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKenna C (2006) The World’s Newest Profession: Management Consulting in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mors ML (2010) Innovation in a global consulting firm: When the problem is too much diversity. Strategic Management J. 31(8):841–872.Google Scholar
  • Nelson RL (1981) Practice and privilege: Social change and the structure of large law firms. Law Soc. Inquiry 6(1):97–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nordin F, Kowalkowski C (2010) Solutions offerings: A critical review and reconceptualisation. J. Service Management 21(4):441–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Okhuysen GA, Eisenhardt KM (2002) Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. 13(4):370–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2013) The Knowing-Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarvary M (1999) Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California Management Rev. 41(2):95–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sawhney M, Wolcott RC, Arroniz I (2006) The 12 different ways for companies to innovate. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(3):75–81.Google Scholar
  • Sherer PD (1995) Leveraging human assets in law firms: Human capital structures and organizational capabilities. ILR Rev. 48(4):671–691.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Storbacka K (2011) A solution business model: Capabilities and management practices for integrated solutions. Indust. Marketing Management 40(5):699–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sturdy A (1997) The consultancy process—An insecure business? J. Management Stud. 34(3):389–413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sturdy A, Clark T, Fincham R, Handley K, (2009) Between innovation and legitimation—boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy. Organization 16(5):627–653.Google Scholar
  • Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. 44(5):996–1004.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tuli KR, Kohli AK, Bharadwaj SG (2007) Rethinking customer solutions: From product bundles to relational processes. J. Marketing 71(3):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE (2006) Nice try, Bill, but… there you go again. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):830–832.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wise R, Baumgartner P (1999) Go downstream: The new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5):133–141.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.