Paradise of Novelty—Or Loss of Human Capital? Exploring New Fields and Inventive Output

References

• Ahmadpoor M, Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TJ, Marquis DG (1964) Positive and negative biasing sets: The effects of prior experience on research performance. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management EM-11(4):158–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alterman I (1985) New era for covenants not to compete. Michigan Bar J. (March), 258–259.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM. Componential theory of creativity. (2013) In: Kessler EH, ed., Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 134–139.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD (2001) Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 19(1):2–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke JS (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Veugelers R (2015) Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Indust. Corporate Change 24(6):1215–1246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arts S, Cassiman B, Gomez JC (2018) Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management J. 39(1):62–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Fons-Rosen C, Graff Zivin J (2015) Does science advance one funeral at a time? NBER Working Paper 21788, MIT Sloan Management School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Fleming L, Manso G (2017) Independent boards and innovation. J. Financial Econom. 123(3):536–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balsmeier B, Assaf M, Chesebro T, Fierro G, Johnson K, Johnson S, Li G, et al. (2018) Machine learning and natural language processing applied to the patent corpus. J. Econom. Management Strategy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Ben-David J (1960) Roles and innovation in medicine. Amer. J. Sociol. 65(6):557–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res. Policy 32(1):69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bullard P (1985) Michigan Antitrust Reform Act: House Bill 4993, third analysis. M.S.A. Sec.: 1–4.Google Scholar
• Callaert J, Grouwels J, Van Looy B (2011) Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying scientific publications within non-patent references. Scientometrics 91(2):383–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D (1960) Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psych. Rev. 67:380–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Bruggeman J (2009) Knowledge specialization, knowledge brokerage and the uneven growth of technology domains. Soc. Forces 88(2):607–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Lanza A (2017) Deconstructing the outsider puzzle: The legitimation journey of novelty. Organ. Sci. 28(6):965–992.Link, Google Scholar
• Chai S (2017) Near misses in the breakthrough discovery process. Organ. Sci. 28(3):411–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognit. Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R (2014) Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects? Strategic Management J. 35(14):1230–1248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conti R, Gambardella A, Mariani M (2014) Learning to be Edison: Inventors, organizations, and breakthrough inventions. Organ. Sci. 25(3):833–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Darwin CR (1869) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 5th ed. (John Murray, London).Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11:147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E (2001) Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(4):795–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47:117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2002) Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs: The story of Hewlett Packard’s thermal inkjet. Indust. Corporate Change 11(5):1059–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frensch PA, Sternberg RJ (1989) Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In Sternberg RJ, ed., Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Erlbaum, Hillside, NJ), 157–188.Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Schankerman M (2015) Patents and cumulative innovation: Causal evidence from the courts. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):317–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garmaise MJ (2009) Ties that truly bind: Noncompetition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 27(2):376–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gieryn TF, Hirsh RF (1983) Marginality and innovation in science. Soc. Stud. Sci. 13(1):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilfillan SC (1935) The Sociology of Invention (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Guimera R, Uzzi B, Spiro J, Amaral LAN (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722):697–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. Rand J. Econom. 36:16–38.Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes JR (1989) The Complete Problem Solver (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hoisl K, Rassenfosse G (2014) Knowledge fit and productivity gains from employee mobility. DRUID Society Conference 2014, Copenhagen, 1–34.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Software for coarsened exact matching. J. Statist. Software 30(13):1–27.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones BF (2009) The burden of knowledge and the death of the renaissance man: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(1):283–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–990.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung HJ, Jeongsik L (2016) The quest for originality: A new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1725–1753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Tripsas M (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 37(5):790–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2014) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehoe RR, Tzabbar D (2015) Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strategic Management J. 36(5):709–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database 1975–2010. Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Google Scholar
• Luchins AS, Luchins EH (1959) Rigidity of Behavior: A Variational Approach to the Effect of Einstellung (University of Oregon Press, Eugene).Google Scholar
• Malsberger BM (1996) Covenants Not to Compete: A State-by-State Survey (The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Marx M (2011) The firm strikes back: Non-compete agreements and the mobility of technical professionals. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(5):695–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Fleming L (2012) Noncompetes: Barriers to exit and entry? In Stern S, Lerner J, eds. National Bureau of Economic Research Innovation Policy and the Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 39–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Singh J, Fleming L (2015) Regional disadvantage? Employee non-compete agreements and brain drain. Res. Policy 44(2):394–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mokyr J (2002) The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97:453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R, Rothschild M (1975) On the allocation of effort. J Econom. Theory 10(3):358–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49:751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. 49(1):39–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1939) Business Cycles (McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1983) Discovery, invention, and development: Human creative thinking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80(14):4569–4571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (1999) Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (Oxford, New York).Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith A (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Fleming L (2004) Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy 33(10):1615–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr EP, Balasubramanian N, Sakakibara M (2018) Screening spinouts? How noncompete enforceability affects the creation, growth, and survival of new firms. Management Sci. 64(2):552–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. NBER Technical Working Paper 284, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52(5):873–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzabbar D, Silverman BS, Aharonson BS (2015) Learning by hiring or hiring to avoid learning? J. Management Psych. 30(5):550–564.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward TB (1995) What’s old about new ideas? In Smith SM, Ward, TB, Finke RA, eds., The Creative Cognition Approach (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 157–178.Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (1999) Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg RJ, ed., Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, New York), 226–250.Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1998) Recombinant growth. Quart. J. Econom. 113(2):331–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wezel F, Cattani G, Pennings J (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar