Future-Time Framing: The Effect of Language on Corporate Future Orientation

References

• Aguilera RV, Jackson G (2010) Comparative and international corporate governance. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):485–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):836–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Okhuysen GA, Perlow LA (2001) Taking time to integrate temporal research. Acad. Management Rev. 26(4):512–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos P, Bylund E (2013) Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognit. Sci. 37(2):286–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athanasopoulos P, Bylund E, Montero-Melis G, Damjanovic L, Schartner A, Kribbe A, Riches N, Thierry G (2015) Two Languages, two minds—Flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psych. Sci. 26(4):518–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arruñada B (2010) Protestants and Catholics: Similar work ethic, different social ethic. Econom. J. 120(547):890–918.Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff-Zivin JS, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bansal P, DesJardine M (2014) Business sustainability: It’s about time. Strategic Organ. 12(1):70–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barner-Rasmussen W, Ehrnrooth M, Koveshnikov A, Mäkelä K (2014) Cultural and language skills as resources for boundary spanning within the MNC. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(7):886–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckert J (2016) Imagined Futures. Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bena J, Ferreira MA, Matos P, Pires P (2017) Are foreign investors locusts? The long-term effects of foreign institutional ownership. J. Financial Econom. 126(1):122–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlin B, Kay P (1969) Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
• Bluedorn AC (2002) The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordia S, Bordia P (2014) Employees’ willingness to adopt a foreign functional language in multilingual organizations: The role of linguistic identity. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(4):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boroditsky L (2001) Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psych. 43(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boroditsky L (2011) How languages construct time. Dehaene S, Brannon E, eds. Space, Time, and Number in the Brain: Searching for the Foundations of Mathematical Thought (Elsevier, London), 333–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brannen MY, Piekkari R, Tietze S (2014) The multifaceted role of language in international business: Unpacking the forms, functions and features of a critical challenge to MNC theory and performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):495–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler R (1995) Time in organizations: Its experience, explanations and effects. Organ. Stud. 16(6):925–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bylund E, Athanasopoulos P (2017) The Whorfian time warp: Representing duration through the language hourglass. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 146(7):911–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Pan CH, Statman M (2016) Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? J. Corporate Finance 41:591–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cantwell J (2009) Location and the multinational enterprises. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(1):35–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MK (2013) The effect of language on economic behavior: Evidence from savings rates, health behaviors, and retirement assets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):690–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen WR (2008) Determinants of firms’ backward- and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organ. Sci. 19(4):609–622.Link, Google Scholar
• Chhokar JS, Brodbeck FC, House RJ, eds. (2013) Culture and Leadership Across the World—The GLOBE Book of in-Depth Studies of 25 Societies (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Cho TS, Hambrick DC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organ. Sci. 17(4):453–469.Link, Google Scholar
• Chrisman JJ, Patel PC (2012) Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Acad. Management J. 55(4):976–997.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F, Kuhn T, Cornelissen JP, Clark T (2011) Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 32(9):1149–1170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornelissen JP, Werner MD (2014) Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):181–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D (2016) Time, space and intertemporal choice: Why approaching the future makes for short-term thinking. Acad. Management Proc. 2016(1):13590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuypers IR, Ertug G, Hennart JF (2015) The effects of linguistic distance and lingua franca proficiency on the stake taken by acquirers in cross-border acquisitions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(4):429–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl Ö (2000) The grammar of future time reference in European languages. Dahl Ö, ed. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), 309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Andrade RG (1995) The Development of Cognitive Anthropology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desender K, Aguilera RV, Crespí-Cladera R, García-Cestona MA (2013) When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management J. 34(7):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow D, Cuypers IR, Ertug G (2016) The effects of within-country linguistic and religious diversity on foreign acquisitions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 47(3):319–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dryer M, Haspelmath M, eds. (2013) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Liepzig), http://wals.info/.Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2013) Cognition and capabilities: A multi-level perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):293–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans V (2013) Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrell A, Liang H, Renneboog L (2016) Socially responsible firms. J. Financial Econom. 122(3):585–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C, Bansal P (2017) Does a long-term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1827–1847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flecken M, Carroll M, von Stutterheim C (2014) Grammatical aspect influences motion event perception: Findings from a cross-linguistic nonverbal recognition task. Language Cognit. 6(1):45–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flecken M, Athanasopoulos P, Kuipers JR, Thierry G (2015) On the road to somewhere: Brain potentials reflect language effects on motion event perception. Cognition 141(Aug):41–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Lit. 40(2):351–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glimcher P, Kable J, Louie K (2007) Neuroeconomic studies of impulsivity: Now or just as soon as possible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(2):142–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of category constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godfrey PC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 30(4):777–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus. Soc. 39(3):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2008) A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals. Acad. Management J. 51(3):476–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guillen M (2001) The Limits of Convergence: Globalization and Organizational Change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Guler I, Guillen M, Macpherson J (2002) Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of the ISO 9000 quality certificates. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo W, Yu T, Gimeno J (2017) Language and competition: Communication vagueness, interpretation difficulties, and market entry. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2073–2098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):193–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management J. 22(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Neeley TB, Cramton CD (2014) Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global groups. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):536–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofstede GH (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Hofstede GH (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Hsu PH, Li F, Lin TC (2017) Why do innovative firms hold more cash? The international evidence. SSRN working paper, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2643536.Google Scholar
• Janssens M, Steyaert C (2014) Re-considering language within a cosmopolitan understanding: Toward a multilingual franca approach in international business studies. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):623–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P (2005) Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008a) Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. 51(4):672–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008b) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Orlikowski WJ (2013) Temporal work in strategy making. Organ. Sci. 24(4):965–995.Link, Google Scholar
• Kay P, Kempton W (1984) What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? Amer. Anthropol. 86(1):65–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh PS, Reeb DM (2015) Missing R&D. J. Accounting Econom. 60(1):73–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh PS, Qian C, Wang H (2014) Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1464–1482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh PS, Reeb DM, Zhao W (2017) CEO confidence and unreported R&D. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 31, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2809.Link, Google Scholar
• Kostova T (1999) Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):308–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T, Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Acad. Management J. 45(1):215–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulich C, Haslam S, Renneboog L, Ryan M, Trojanowski G (2011) Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Management J. 32(3):301–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuznetsov A, Kuznetsova O (2014) Building professional discourse in emerging markets: Language, context and the challenge of sensemaking. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):583–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) Law and finance. J. Political Econom. 106(6):1113–1155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laverty KJ (1996) Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Acad. Management Rev. 21(3):825–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Wulf J (2007) Innovation and incentives: Evidence from corporate R&D. Rev. Econom. Stat. 89(4):634–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Renneboog L (2017) On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. J. Finance 72(2):853–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Bhattacharya CB (2006) Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Marketing 70(4):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Glynn MA, Davis GF (2007) Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):925–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Tilcsik A (2013) Imprinting: Toward a multilevel theory. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):193–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Toffel M, Zhou Y (2016) Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organ. Sci. 27(2):483–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J (2008) “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath RG (1997) A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):974–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller SJ, Hickson DJ, Wilson DC (1999) Decision-making in organizations. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord WR, eds. Managing Organizations: Current Issues (Sage, London), 43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller KD, Arikan AT (2004) Technology search investments: Evolutionary, option reasoning, and option pricing approaches. Strategic Management J. 25(5):473–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monterosso J, Luo S (2010) An argument against dual valuation system competition: Cognitive capacities supporting future orientation mediate rather than compete with visceral motivations. J. Neurosci. Psych. Econom. 3(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (1997) Toward an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. 18(1):187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W (2011) Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1286–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W, Joseph J (2005) An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macroperspectives in strategy process. Adv. Strategic Management 22:39–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi V, Vaara E (2012) Language policies and practices in wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries: A recontextualization perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(9):808–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez EO, Tavits M (2017) Language shares people’s time perspective and support for future-oriented policies. Amer. J. Political Sci. 61(3):715–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piekkari R, Oxelheim L, Randøy T (2015) The silent board: How language diversity may influence the work processes of corporate boards. Corporate Governance 23(1):25–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H (1990) Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Acad. Management Rev. 15(2):224–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Fiona W, Douglas P, Alaina K (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Bettis RA (1986) The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. 7(6):485–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiche BS, Harzing AW, Pudelko M (2015) Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(5):528–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Renneboog L, Spaenjers C (2012) Religion, economic attitudes, and household finance. Oxford Econom. Papers 64(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberson D, Davidoff J, Davies I, Shapiro L (2004) The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study. J. Experiment. Psych. 133(4):554–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts S, Winters J, Chen K (2015) Future tense and economic decisions: Controlling for cultural evolution. PLoS One 10(7):e0132145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robichaud D, Giroux H, Taylor JR (2004) The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):617–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selmier WT II, Newenham-Kahindi A, Oh CH (2015) Understanding the words of relationships: Language as an essential tool to manage CSR in communities of place. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(2):153–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi W, Prescott JE (2011) Sequence patterns of firms’ acquisition and alliance behaviour and their performance implications. J. Management Stud. 48(5):1044–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2012) A matter of time: Temporal perspectives in organizational responses to climate change. Organ. Stud. 33(11):1537–1563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slawinski N, Bansal P (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organ. Sci. 26(2):531–549.Link, Google Scholar
• Souder D, Bromiley P (2012) Explaining temporal orientation: Evidence from the durability of firms’ capital investments. Strategic Management J. 33(5):550–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W, Milliken E (1988) Executive perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. Hambrick D, ed. The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying Top Managers (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 35–65.Google Scholar
• Sun SL, Peng MW, Lee RP, Tan W (2015). Institutional open access in the home country and outward internationalization. J. World Bus. 50(1):234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M, Harzing AW (2014) The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):508–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thieroff R (2000) On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. Dahl Ö, ed. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe (Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin), 309–328.Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Stutterheim C, Andermann M, Carroll M, Flecken M, Schmiedtová B (2012) How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics 50(4):833–867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Whittington R (2007) Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye. Organ. Stud. 28(10):1575–1586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whorf BL (1956) The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. Carroll JB, ed. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 134–159.Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Wang J, Bailer C, Cherkassky V, Just MA (2017) Commonality of neural representations of sentences across languages: Predicting brain activation during Portuguese sentence comprehension using an English-based model of brain function. NeuroImage 146(1):658–666.Crossref, Google Scholar