Marshallian Forces and Governance Externalities: Location Effects on Contractual Safeguards in Research and Development Alliances

References

• Adegbesan JA, Higgins MJ (2011) The intra-alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management J. 32(2):187–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Cockburn I, McHale J (2006) Gone but not forgotten: Knowledge flows, labor mobility, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography 6(5):571–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) PERSPECTIVE—Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, Varmus H (2014) Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(16):5773–5777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Chung W (2007) Location strategies and knowledge spillovers. Management Sci. 53(5):760–776.Link, Google Scholar
• Alcácer J, Zhao M (2012) Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Sci. 58(4):734–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Almazan A, De Motta A, Titman S, Uysal V (2010) Financial structure, acquisition opportunities, and firm locations. J. Finance 65(2):529–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arruñada B, Garicano L, Vázquez L (2001) Contractual allocation of decision rights and incentives: The case of automobile distribution. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 17(1):257–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(3):630–640.Google Scholar
• Baptista R (2000) Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 18(3):515–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baptista R, Swann P (1998) Do firms in clusters innovate more? Res. Policy 27(5):525–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J, Quélin BV (2006) Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: An empirical investigation. J. Management Stud. 43(8):1775–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner M, Waldfogel J (2008) Close to you? Bias and precision in patent-based measures of technological proximity. Res. Policy 37(9):1556–1567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) A macrosociological theory of social structure. Amer. J. Sociol. 83(1):26–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlino G, Kerr WR (2015) Agglomeration and innovation. Duranton G, Henderson JV, Strange WC, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 5 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 350–404.Google Scholar
• Casper S (2007) How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable?: Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster. Res. Policy 36(4):438–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casper S, Murray F (2005) Careers and clusters: Analyzing the career network dynamic of biotechnology clusters. J. Engrg. Tech. Management 22(1):51–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung W, Kalnins A (2001) Agglomeration effects and performance: A test of the Texas lodging industry. Strategic Management J. 22(10):969–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coval JD, Moskowitz TJ (1999) Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. J. Finance 54(6):2045–2073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl MS, Pedersen CØ (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: Myth or reality? Res. Policy 33(10):1673–1686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeCarolis DM, Deeds DL (1999) The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. 20(10):953–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, Hill CWL (1996) Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. J. Bus. Venturing 11(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. Henderson JV, Thisse JF, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 1st ed., Vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2063–2117.Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Glaeser EL, Kerr WR (2010) What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1195–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Cooper AC, Baik Y (2006) Geographic cluster size and firm performance. J. Bus. Venturing 21(2):217–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL (2003) Location and organizing strategy: Exploring the influence of location on the organization of pharmaceutical research. Baum JAC, Sorenson O, eds. Geography and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 20) (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 49–87.Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P, Thomas C (2008) Strategic interaction across countries and multinational agglomeration: An application to the cement industry. Management Sci. 54(12):1980–1996.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE (2009) Contracting for innovation: Vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration. Columbia Law Rev. 109(3):431–502.Google Scholar
• Glaeser EL, Kallal HD, Scheinkman JA, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J. Political Econom. 100(6):1126–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J, Scharfstein D (2005) Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance 60(2):577–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon P, McCann IR (2000) Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Stud. 37(3):513–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstone M, Hornbeck R, Moretti E (2010) Identifying agglomeration spillovers: Evidence from winners and losers of large plant openings. J. Political Econom. 118(3):536–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Nickerson JA (2008) Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organ. Sci. 19(5):688–708.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lavie D, Singh H (2009) The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1213–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ha H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad. Management J. 48(2):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy 31(4):477–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Hesen G (2007) Contract law and the governance of inter‐firm technology partnerships—an analysis of different modes of partnering and their contractual implications. J. Management Stud. 44(3):342–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn J, Lorenz–Orlean S, van Kranenburg H (2009) Inter-firm technology transfer: Partnership-embedded licensing or standard licensing agreements? Indust. Corporate Change 18(3):529–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helsley RW, Strange WC (2007) Agglomeration, opportunism, and the organization of production. J. Urban Econom. 62(1):55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iammarino S, McCann P (2006) The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers. Res. Policy 35(7):1018–1036.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (1996) Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12671–12677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones A (2007) Minimizing leakage of value from R&D alliances. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 6(9):711–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joskow PL (1988) Asset specificity and the structure of vertical relationships: Empirical evidence. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):95–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kandori M (1992) Social norms and community enforcement. Rev. Econom. Stud. 59(1):63–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Mang PY (2003) Exploiting technological opportunities: The timing of collaborations. Res. Policy 32(2):317–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krugman PR (1991) Geography and Trade (Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium; MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lanjouw JO, Schankerman M (2004) Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. 114(495):441–465.Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1995) Patenting in the shadow of competitors. J. Law Econom. 38(2):463–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2010) Contractibility and the design of research agreements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):214–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Shane H, Tsai A (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. 67(3):411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the U.S. patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macaulay S (1963) Non-contractual relations in business: A preliminary study. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 28(1):55–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Boerner CS (2006) Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade-offs and performance in development. Strategic Management J. 27(9):845–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A (1920) Principles of Economics (The McMillan Company, London).Google Scholar
• Martin R (2000) Institutional approaches in economic geography. Sheppard E, Barnes TJ, eds. A Companion to Economic Geography (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK), 77–94.Google Scholar
• Martin X, Salomon RM, Wu Z (2010) The institutional determinants of agglomeration: A study in the global semiconductor industry. Indust. Corporate Change 19(6):1769–1800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskell P (2001) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster. Indust. Corporate Change 10(4):921–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Nickerson JA (2005) Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. 16(3):225–242.Link, Google Scholar
• McCann BT, Folta TB (2008) Location matters: Where we have been and where we might go in agglomeration research. J. Management 34(3):532–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCann BT, Folta TB (2011) Performance differentials within geographic clusters. J. Bus. Venturing 26(1):104–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCann BT, Reuer JJ, Lahiri N (2016) Agglomeration and the choice between acquisitions and alliances: An information economics perspective. Strategic Management J. 37(6):1085–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1):91–103.Link, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A, Roberts PW (2004) Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 25(8-9):779–799.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen–Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1989) Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 5(1):109–126.Google Scholar
• Phene A, Fladmoe‐Lindquist K, Marsh L (2006) Breakthrough innovations in the US biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management J. 27(4):369–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Tallman S (2012) Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(1):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Ahuja G, Mitchell W (2011) When the social structure overshadows competitive incentives: The effects of network embeddedness on joint venture dissolution. Acad. Management J. 54(1):203–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Simon and Schuster, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 76(6):77–90.Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2000) Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Econom. Development Quart. 14(1):15–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pouder R, St. John CH (1996) Hot spots and blind spots: Geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1192–1225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith–Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen‐Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences1. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(4):1132–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prevezer M (1997) The dynamics of industrial clustering in biotechnology. Small Bus. Econom. 9(3):255–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Vanneste BS (2009) Trust and governance: Untangling a tangled web. Acad. Management Rev. 34(1):11–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Devarakonda S (2016) Mechanisms of hybrid governance: Administrative committees in non-equity alliances. Acad. Management J. 59(2):510–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Zollo M, Singh H (2002) Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 23(2):135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007a) Financial contracting in biotech strategic alliances. J. Law Econom. 50(3):559–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007b) Network effects in the governance of strategic alliances. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 23(1):242–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M, Sorenson O (2014) Picking a (poor) partner a relational perspective on acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):301–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romer P (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5):71–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(2):377–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 4 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 2119–2171.Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (2000) Competition and human capital accumulation: A theory of interregional specialization and trade. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. 30(4):373–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rugman AM, Verbeke A (2003) Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic management perspectives. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 34(2):125–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Sable M (2007) The impact of the biotechnology industry on local economic development in the Boston and San Diego metropolitan areas. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change 74(1):36–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A (1994) Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM, Flyer F (2000) Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management J. 21(12):1175–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith DG (2005) The exit structure of strategic alliances. Univ. Illinois Law Rev. 2005(1):303–318.Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Rogan M (2014) (When) do organizations have social capital? Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:261–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(6):1546–1588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Storper M (1997) The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Tallman S, Phene A (2007) Leveraging knowledge across geographic boundaries. Organ. Sci. 18(2):252–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Tallman S, Jenkins M, Henry N, Pinch S (2004) Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):258–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw–Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University vs. corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(4):674–698.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ, Macher JT (2011) An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Management J. 54(1):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1971) The vertical integration of production: Market failure considerations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 61(2):112–123.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A, McEvily B, Perrone V (1998) Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. 9(2):141–159.Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Reuer JJ, Singh H (2002) Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. 13(6):701–713.Link, Google Scholar