Where Do Stars Come From? The Role of Star vs. Nonstar Collaborators in Creative Settings

References

• Ahmed S, Wallace KM, Blessing LT (2003) Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Res. Engrg. Design 14(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainley P, Rainbird H, eds. (2014) Apprenticeship: Toward a New Paradigm of Learning (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
• Angrist J, Pischke J (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, McEvily B, Reagans R (2003) Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. 49(4):571–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin J, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek JM (1984) Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bechky B (2003) Sharing meaning across communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Bédard J, Chi MTH (1992) Expertise. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 1(4):135–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blossfeld HP, Rohwer G (1995) Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Casual Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bode C, Singh J, Rogan M (2015) Corporate social initiatives and employee retention. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1702–1720.Link, Google Scholar
• Bordage G, Zacks R (1984) The structure of medical knowledge in the memories of medical students and general practitioners: Categories and prototypes. Medical Ed. 18(6):406–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Bus. Rev. (June):84–92.Google Scholar
• Brunner R, Emery S, Hall R (2008) Do You Matter? How Great Design Will Make People Love Your Company (FT Press, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues 8(2):5–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 10(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Catmull E, Wallace A (2014) Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Chan TH, Mihm J, Sosa ME (2017) On styles in product design: An analysis of U.S. design patents. Management Sci. 64(3):1230–1249.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Adamson C (2015) Innovation: Integration of random variation and creative synthesis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):461–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Sci. 5(2):121–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins R (1998) The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Cox D (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Series B 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
• Cross N (2003) The expertise of exceptional designers. Cross N, Edmonds E, eds. Expertise in Design (Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia), 427–441.Google Scholar
• Cross N (2004) Expertise in design: An overview. Design Stud. 25(5):427–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: Flow and The Psychology of Discovery and Invention (HarperCollins Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Dahan E, Mendelson H (2001) An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. 47(1):102–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Piezunka H (2014) Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Res. Policy 43(5):812–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Eckert CM, Stacey MK (2003) Adaptation of sources of inspiration in knitwear design. Creativity Res. J. 15(4):355–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst H (2001) Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Res. Policy 30(1):143–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst H, Leptien C, Vitt J (2000) Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 47(2):184–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fujiwara-Greve T, Greve HR (2000) Organizational ecology and job mobility. Soc. Forces 79(2):547–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gargiulo M, Ertug G, Galunic C (2009) The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(2):299–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Godart FC, Maddux WW, Shipilov AV, Galinsky AD (2015) Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Acad. Management J. 58(1):195–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grigoriou K, Rothaermel FT (2014) Structural microfoundations of innovation: The role of relational stars. J. Management 40(2):586–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee LE (2009) Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 20(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer JT, Elfenbein HA (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):82–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):324–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey S (2015) Synthesis in action: Response to Chen and Adamson. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):464–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho CH (2001) Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: Differences between novices and experts. Design Stud. 22(1):27–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Romer PM (2002) Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janis IL (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lloyd P, Scott P (1994) Discovering the design problem. Design Stud. 15(2):125–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long-Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddux WW, Galinsky AD (2009) Cultural borders and mental barriers: The relationship between living abroad and creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 96(5):1047–1061.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Jaffee J, Tortoriello M (2012) Not all bridging ties are equal: Network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23(2):547–563.Google Scholar
• McFayden MA, Cannella AA (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 47(5):735–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D, Mengis J, Swan J (2012) Understanding the role of objects in cross-disciplinary collaboration. Organ. Sci. 23(3):612–629.Link, Google Scholar
• Obstfeld D (2005) Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):100–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Shalley CE (2003) The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 28(1):89–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R (2005) Preferences, identity, and competition: Predicting tie strength from demographic data. Management Sci. 51(9):1374–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Singh PV, Krishnan R (2015) Forgotten third parties: Analyzing the contingent association between unshared third parties, knowledge overlap, and knowledge transfer relationships with outsiders. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1400–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Rodan S, Galunic C (2004) More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management J. 25(6):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1934) The Theory of Economic Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Seidel VP, O’Mahony S (2014) Managing the repertoire: Stories, metaphors, prototypes, and concept coherence in product innovation. Organ. Sci. 25(3):691–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Simcoe TS, Waguespack DM (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (1999) Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Singh J, Agrawal A (2010) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J, Fleming L (2010) Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. 56(1):41–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2011) Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME (2014) Realizing the need for rework: From task interdependence to social networks. Production Oper. Management 23(8):1312–1331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart JA (2005) Social status in an open-source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(5):823–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton R, Hargadon A (1996) Brainstorming groups in context : Effectiveness in a product design firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):685–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Svejenova S, Mazza C, Planellas M (2007) Cooking up change in haute cuisine: Ferran Adriá as an institutional entrepreneur. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):539–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M (2014) The social underpinnings of absorptive capacity: The moderating effects of structural holes on innovation generation based on external knowledge. Strategic Management J. 36(4):586–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Krackhardt D (2010) Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Management J. 53(1):167–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, McEvily B, Krackhardt D (2015) Being a catalyst of innovation: The role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organ. Sci. 26(2):423–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.Link, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Shiff G, Melamed R (2009) The “names game”: Harnessing inventors, patent data for economic research. Ann. Econom. Statist. 93/94:79–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT (2011) Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• USPTO (2015) United States Patent and Trademark Office. Accessed January 10, 2018, https://www.uspto.gov/patents-getting-started/general-information-concerning-patents.Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342(6157):468–472.Google Scholar
• Vera D, Crossan M (2005) Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organ. Sci. 16(3):203–224.Link, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, Tyre M (1995) How “learning by doing” is done: Problem identification in novel process equipment. Res. Policy 24(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (1999) Creativity and knowledge: A challenge of theories. Sternberg RJ, O’Hara LA, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 226–250.Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar