Technology Counteroffensive Strategies: Toward an Ex Ante View of Technology Substitution

References

• Abernathy W, Clark K (1985) Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy 14(1):3–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. 23(8):667–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Snow D (2010) Old technology responses to new technology threats: Demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Indust. Corporate Change 19(5):1655–1675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bigelow L, Nickerson JA (2013) Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower’s dilemma. Strategic Management J. 36(2):216–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Association of American Publishers (2020) AAP StatShot annual report: Book publishing revenues up slightly to $25.93 billion in 2019. Accessed December 7, 2020, https://publishers.org/news/aap-statshot-annual-report-book-publishing-revenues-up-slightly-to-25-93-billion-in-2019/.Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Ranganathan R (2013) Divergent reactions to convergent strategies: Investor beliefs and analyst reactions during technological change. Organ. Sci. 24(2):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burford N, Shipilov A, Furr N (2021) How ecosystem structure affects firm performance in response to a negative shock to interdependencies. Strategic Management J. 43(1):30–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (1992) Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve. Parts I and II. Production Oper. Management 1(4):334–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Tripsas M (2018) Managing technical transitions by building bridges. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2319–2342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cozzolino A, Rothaermel FT (2018) Discontinuities, competition, and cooperation: Coopetitive dynamics between incumbents and entrants. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3053–3085.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dattee B (2007) Challenging the S-curve: Patterns of technological substitution. Working paper, EMLYON, Écully, France.Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11(3):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers J (2013) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eklund J, Kapoor R (2019) Pursuing the new while sustaining the current: Incumbent strategies and firm value during the nascent period of industry change. Organ. Sci. 30(2):383–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Foster R (1986) The S-Curve: A New Forecasting Tool Innovation: The Attacker’s Advantage (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Furr N (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team pre-entry experience. Organ. Sci. 30(5):1076–1096.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Kapoor R (2018) Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 39(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Snow D (2015a) Inter-generational hybrids: Spillbacks, spillforwards, and surviving technological discontinuities. Organ. Sci. 6(2):475–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Snow D (2015b) The Prius approach: How hybrid technologies help companies survive disruption and shape the future. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(11):103–109.Google Scholar
• Furr N, Kapoor R, Eisenhardt KM (2024) Ecosystem bottlenecks and industry evolution Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Garret M (2015) Carburetor: The greatest auto part ever? Speedhunters (January 22), https://www.speedhunters.com/2015/01/carburetor-the-greatest-auto-part-ever/.Google Scholar
• Geroski PA (2000) Models of technology diffusion. Res. Policy 29(4):603–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C (2006) Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organ. Sci. 17(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Gilfillan SC (1935) Inventing the Ship: A Study of the Inventions Made in Her History Between Floating Log and Rotorship (Follett, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gold A (2017) What was the last car in America sold with a carburetor? Autotrader (January 13), https://www.autotrader.com/oversteer/what-was-last-car-america-sold-carburetor-260855.Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1957) Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harley CK (1988) Ocean freight rates and productivity, 1740–1913: The primacy of mechanical invention reaffirmed. J. Econom. History 48(4):851–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1995) Of life cycles real and imaginary: The unexpectedly long old age of optical lithography. Res. Policy 24(4):631–643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes T (1983) Networks of Power (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacob BA, Lefgren L (2003) Are idle hands the devil’s workshop? Incapacitation, concentration and juvenile crime. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(5):1560–1577.Google Scholar
• Jacob B, Lefgren L, Moretti E (2007) The dynamics of criminal behavior evidence from weather shocks. J. Human Resources 42(3):489–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr N (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Tucci CL (2002) Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of new market capabilities. Management Sci. 48(2):171–186.Link, Google Scholar
• Lenharth WH (2007) The Amazing Rambler Rebel (Back Channel Press, Portsmouth, NH).Google Scholar
• Levinthal D (1998) The slow pace of rapid technological change: Gradualism and punctuation in technological change. Indust. Corporate Change 7(2):217–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2010) Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch CH, Huberman BA (1999) A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Sci. 45(2):160–177.Link, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V, Peterson RA (1985) Models for Innovation Diffusion (SAGE Publications, Inc., Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson A, Anthony C, Tripsas M (2023) “If I could turn back time”: Occupational dynamics, technology trajectories, and the reemergence of the analog music synthesizer. Admin. Sci. Quart. 68(2):551–599.Google Scholar
• Norbye JP (1981) The 100 Greatest American Cars (TAB Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA).Google Scholar
• Porac JF, Thomas H, Wilson F, Paton D, Kanfer A (1995) Rivalry and the industry model of Scottish knitwear producers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):203–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1980) Competitive Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R (2019) Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970–2008. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):576–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli RL (2020) Reinventing retail: The novel resurgence of independent bookstores. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) The Diffusion of Innovation, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1976) Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom RS (2000) Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):1083–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hill CW (2005) Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothwell R, Zegveld W (1985) Reindustrialization and Technology (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY).Google Scholar
• Sahal D (1981) Patterns of Technological Innovation (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Sanderson SW, Simons KL (2014) Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Res. Policy 43(10):1730–1746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seibert L (2020) Are carburetors dead? Engine Builder (February 28), https://www.enginebuildermag.com/2020/02/are-carburetors-dead/.Google Scholar
• Sine WD, David RJ (2003) Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Res. Policy 32(2):185–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow D (2004) Three Essays on Old and New Technologies (University of California, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback JM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback J, Von Gruben P, Kang HY (2018) The hybrid trap: Why most efforts to bridge old and new technology miss the mark. Sloan Management Rev. 59(3):52–60.Google Scholar
• Taylor A (2010) The next generation: Technology adoption and integration through internal competition in new product development. Organ. Sci. 21(1):23–41.Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(2):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unravelling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(special issue):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (2008) Customer preference discontinuities: A trigger for radical technological change. Management Decision Econom. 29(2–3):79–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M, Gavetti G (2000) Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1147–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(3):439–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM (1996) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Wu B, Wan Z, Levinthal DA (2013) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1257–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young HP (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1899–1924.Crossref, Google Scholar