Avoiding High Opportunism Is Easy, Achieving Low Opportunism Is Not: A QCA Study on Curbing Opportunism in Buyer–Supplier Relationships

References

• Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Argyres N (1995) Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 28(3):337–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Bercovitz J, Mayer K (2007) Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organ. Sci. 18(1):3–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Armour HO, Teece DJ (1980) Vertical integration and technological innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(3):470–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S, Wernerfelt B (1986) Technical change, competition and vertical integration. Strategic Management J. 7(4):347–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barzel Y (1982) Measurement cost and the organization of markets. J. Law Econom. 25(1):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell RG, Filatotchev I, Aguilera RV (2014) Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Acad. Management J. 57(1):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M, Anderson E (1999) Buyer supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organ. Sci. 10(4):460–481.Link, Google Scholar
• Buckley P, Casson M (1976) The Future of Multinational Enterprise (Macmillan and Co., London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caren N, Panofsky A (2005) TQCA: A technique for adding temporality to qualitative comparative analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 34(2):147–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson SJ, Madhok A, Wu T (2006) Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Acad. Management J. 49(5):1058–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosno JL, Dahlstrom R (2008) A meta-analytic review of opportunism in exchange relationships. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(2):191–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom R, Nygaard A (1999) An empirical investigation of ex post transaction costs in franchised distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 36(2):160–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Rahman N (2002) Opportunism dynamics in strategic alliances. Contractor FJ, Lorange P, eds. Cooperative Strategies and Alliance (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 89–118.Google Scholar
• Das TK, Rahman N (2010) Determinants of partner opportunism in strategic alliances: A conceptual framework. J. Bus. Psych. 25(1):55–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng BS (2002) Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(3):445–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Han S (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management J. 25(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds DL, Hill CWL (1998) An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Bus. Venturing 14:141–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsetz H (1988) The theory of the firm revisited. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 4(1):141–161.Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):269–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliason SR, Stryker R (2009) Goodness-of-fit tests and descriptive measures in fuzzy-set analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 38(1):102–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman M, Levinthal D (1991) History dependence and professional relationships: Ties that bind. Res. Sociol. Organ. 8:119–153.Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1180–1198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2009) Case studies and the configurational analysis of organizational phenomena. Byrne D, Ragin CC, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Case-Based Methods (Sage, London), 424–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Sharapov D, Cronqvist L (2013) Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-n QCA and econometric analysis. Political Res. Quart. 66(1):191–198.Google Scholar
• Geyskens I, Steenkamp JBEM, Kumar N (2006) Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. 49(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T, Misangyi VF, Fiss PC (2013) The two QCAs: From a small-N to a large-N set-theoretic approach. Res. Sociol. Organ. 38:49–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greckhamer T, Misangyi VF, Elms H, Lacey R (2008) Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate and business-unit effects. Organ. Res. Methods 11(4):695–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Sytch M (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):32–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handley SM, Angst CM (2015) The impact of culture on the relationship between governance and opportunism in outsourcing relationships. Strategic Management J. 36(1):1412–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Handley SM, Benton WC (2012) The influence of exchange hazards and power on opportunism in outsourcing relationships. J. Oper. Management. 30(1/2):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins TG, Pohlen TL, Prybutok VR (2013) Buyer opportunism in business – to – business exchange. Indust. Marketing Management 42(8):1266–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide JB (1994) Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. J. Marketing 58(1):71–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide JB, John G (1990) Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer–supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. 27(1):24–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide JB, Wathne KH, Rokkan AI (2007) Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes. J. Marketing Res. 44(8):425–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G, Mellewigt T (2009) Choice and performance of governance mechanisms: Matching alliance governance to asset type. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1025–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huo B, Wang Z, Tian Y (2016) The impact of justice on collaborative and opportunistic behaviors in supply chain relationships. Internat. J. Production Econom. 177:12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap SD, Anderson E (2003) Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. 49(12):1684–1701.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi AW, Stump RL (1999a) The contingent effect of specific asset investments on joint action in manufacturer-supplier relationships: An empirical test of the moderating role of reciprocal asset investments, uncertainty, and trust. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 27(3):291–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi AW, Stump RL (1999b) Determinants of commitment and opportunism: Integrating and extending insights from transaction cost analysis and relational exchange theory. Canadian J. Admin. Sci. 16(4):334–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim M (2013) Many roads lead to Rome: Implications of geographic scope as a source of isolating mechanisms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 44(9):898–921.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, MacDuffie JP, Ragin C (2004) Prototypes and strategy: Assigning causal credit using fuzzy sets. Eur. Management Rev. 1(2):114–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Cavusgil ST (2006) Enhancing alliance performance: The effects of contractual-based vs. relational-based governance. J. Bus. Res. 59(8):896–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legewie N (2013) An introduction to applied data analysis with qualitative comparative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 14(3):15.Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2006) Opportunism in cooperative alliances: Conditions and solutions. Shenkar O, Reuer JJ, eds. Handbook of Strategic Alliances (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 55–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y (2007) Are joint venture partners more opportunistic in a more volatile environment? Strategic Management J. 28(1):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Liu Y, Yang Q, Maksimov V, Hou J (2015) Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer – supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunism. J. Bus. Res. 68(3):607–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Richman BD (2008) Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics 10(1):1–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martinez JI, Jarillo JC (1989) The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 20(3):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx A (2006) Toward more robust model specification in QCA: Results from a methodological experiment. COMPASSS Working paper Series 2006-43 (AP University College Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium).Google Scholar
• Masten SE (1984) The organization of production: Evidence from the aerospace industry. J. Law Econom. 27(2):403–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten SE, Saussier S (2002) Econometrics of contracts: An assessment of developments in the empirical literature on contracting. Brousseau E, Glachant JM, eds. The Economics of Contracts: Theories and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 273–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ (2009) Construct validity and other empirical issues in transaction cost economics research. Bergh DD, Ketchen DJ, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, vol. 5 (Emerald, Bingley, UK), 213–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendel JM, Ragin CC (2011) FsQCA: Dialog between Jerry M. Mendel and Charles C. Ragin. USC-SIPI Report 411, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Misangyi VF, Acharya AG (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1681–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteverde K, Teece DJ (1982) Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry. Bell J. Econom. 13(1):206–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noordewier TG, John G, Nevin JR (1990) Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. J. Marketing 54(4):80–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction costs examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Shen W, Podsakoff P (2006) The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research. Res. Methodology Strategy Management 3:197–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (1998) Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. 19(9):853–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ (2013) Managing contracts for fairness in buyer-supplier exchanges. Strategic Management J. 35(10):1508–1527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Sciences (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2006) Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Anal. 14(3):291–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC, Fiss PC (2008) Net effects analysis vs. configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. Ragin CC, ed. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 190–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC, Rihoux B (2004) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative Methods. Newsletter of the Amer. Political Sci. Assoc. Organized Section on Qualitative Methods 2:3–12.Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Ariño A (2002) Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances. J. Management 28(1):47–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer J, Devarakonda S (2015) Mechanisms of hybrid governance: administrative committees in non-equity alliances. Acad. Management J. 59(2):510–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rihoux B (2003) Bridging the gap between the qualitative and quantitative worlds? A retrospective and prospective view on qualitative comparative analysis. Field Methods 15(4):351–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Oh WY, Martynov A, Poppo L (2014) The many futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Management 40(1):193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider C, Grofman B (2006) It might look like a regression equation... but it’s not! An intuitive approach to the representation of QCA and FS/QCA results. Working paper, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
• Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2010) Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy sets. Comparative Sociol. 9(3):397–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider MR, Schulze-Bentrop C, Paunescu M (2010) Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41:246–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwellnus G (2013) Eliminating the influence of irrelevant cases on the consistency and coverage of necessary and sufficient conditions in fuzzy-set QCA. Working paper (University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria).Google Scholar
• Senior Vice President Corporate Sector Purchasing and Logistics, Automotive Business Castings Actuation and Controls (2017) Interview by Thomas Mellewigt. Tape recording, April 12. Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
• Stump RL, Heide JB (1996) Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. J. Marketing Res. 33(4):431–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The Psychology of Survey Response (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vice President Corporate Sector Purchasing and Logistics, Automotive Business Electronic Components (2017) Interview by Thomas Mellewigt. Tape recording, April 12. Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
• Vice President Corporate Sector Purchasing and Logistics, Project Management Diesel Systems (2017) Interview by Thomas Mellewigt. Tape recording, April 12. Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
• Villena VH, Craighead CW (2017) On the same page? How asymmetric buyer – supplier relationships affect opportunism and performance. Production Oper. Management 26(3):491–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagemann C, Schneider CQ (2010) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: Agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociol. 9(3):376–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G, Weber D (1984) A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Admin. Sc. Quart. 29(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walter SG, Walter A, Müller D (2015) Formalization, communication quality and opportunistic behavior in R&D alliances between competitors. J. Product Innovation Management 32(6):954–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton M (1997) When your partner fails you. Fortune (May 26) 135(10):151–154.Google Scholar
• Wathne KH, Heide JB (2000) Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. J. Marketing 64(4):36–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Cote JA, Buckley MR (1989) Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact? J. Appl. Psych. 74(3):462–468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Zhou KZ, Xu D (2012) How foreign firms curtail local supplier opportunism in China: Detailed contracts, centralized control, and relational governance. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 43(7):677–692.Crossref, Google Scholar