When Collaboration Bridges Institutions: The Impact of University–Industry Collaboration on Academic Productivity

References

• Agarwal R, Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein JC (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahmadpoor M, Jones BF (2017) The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science 357(6351):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP (1998) Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 35(4):427–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. Nelson RR, ed. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 609–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding WW, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff, Zivin JS, Sampat BN (2012) The diffusion of scientific knowledge across time and space. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 107–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(January):69–89.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2012) Simultaneous discoveries as a research tool: Method and promise. Working paper, London Business School. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2329605.Google Scholar
• Bikard M (2018) Made in academia: The effect of institutional origin on inventors’ attention to science. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print June 20, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1206.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS (2015) Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Sci. 61(7):1473–1495.Link, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Causino N, Campbell EG, Louis KS (1996) Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences—An industry survey. New England J. Med. 334(6):368–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Campbell EG, Anderson MS, Causino N, Louis K (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 277(15):1224–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush V (1945) Science: The endless frontier. Transactions Kansas Acad. Sci. (1903-) 48(3):231–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell EG, Weissman JS, Causino N, Blumenthal D (2000) Data withholding in academic medicine: Characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials. Res. Policy 29(2):303–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell EG, Clarridge BR, Gokhale M, Birenbaum L, Hilgartner S, Holtzman NA, Blumenthal D (2002) Data withholding in academic genetics: Evidence from a national survey. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 287(4):473–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I, Henderson R (1998) Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):157–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W, Nelson R, Walsh J (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Cozzens SE (1989) Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY).Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki D, Grimpe C, Toole AA (2014) Delay and secrecy: Does industry sponsorship jeopardize disclosure of academic research? Indust. Corporate Change 24(1):251–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P, David PA (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy 23(5):487–521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Este P, Perkmann M (2011) Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. J. Tech. Transfer 36(3):316–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JA (2010a) Industry induces academic science to know less about more. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):389–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans JA (2010b) Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge. Social Stud. Sci. 40(5):757–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J, MacGarvie M (2009) Academic collaboration and organizational innovation: The development of research capabilities in the US pharmaceutical industry, 1927–1946. Indust. Corporate Change 18(5):929–961.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1933–1963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman JL, Jensen K, Murray F (2012) Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine. Res. Policy. 41(2):276–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B (2008) The effect of government contracting on academic research: Does the source of funding affect scientific output? Res. Policy 37(1):41–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heller MA, Eisenberg RS (1998) Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698–701.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong L, Page SE (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(46):16385–16389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N (2009) Different missions and commitment power in R&D organizations: Theory and evidence on industry-university alliances. Organ. Sci. 20(3):565–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee YS (2000) The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. J. Tech. Transfer 25(2):111–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li GC, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Amy ZU, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Jones LM, Anderson MS, Blumenthal D, Campbell EG (2001) Entrepreneurship, secrecy, and productivity: A comparison of clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty. J. Tech. Transfer 26(3):233–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1995) Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. Rev. Econom. Statist. 77(1):55–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 22(6):635–659.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Mindruta D (2013) Value creation in university-firm research collaborations: A matching approach. Strategic Management J. 34(6):644–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Nelson RR, Sampat BN, Ziedonis AA (2001) The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Res. Policy 30(1):99–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(September):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Stern S (2007) Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?: An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. 63(4):648–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. J. Political Econom. 67(3):297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R (1982) The role of knowledge in R&D efficiency. Quart. J. Econom. 97(3):453–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2004) Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. 15(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Walsh K (2009) The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Indust. Corporate Change 18(6):1033–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’Este P, Fini R, et al. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Cohen WM (2013) Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Sci. 59(2):504–525.Link, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2010) A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1994) Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N, Nelson R (1994) American universities and technical advance in industry. Res. Policy 23(3):323–348.Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Google Scholar
• Shibayama S, Walsh JP, Baba Y (2012) Academic entrepreneurship and exchange of scientific resources—Material transfer in life and materials sciences in Japanese universities. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(5):804–830.Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link A (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res. Policy 32(1):27–48.Google Scholar
• Stephan P (1996) The economics of science. J. Econom. Lit. 34(3):1199–1235.Google Scholar
• Stephan P (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Strack V, Calistri A, Craig S, Popova E, Göttlinger HG (2003) AIP1/ALIX is a binding partner for HIV-1 p6 and EIAV p9 functioning in virus budding. Cell 114(6):689–699.Google Scholar
• Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tartari V, Breschi S (2012) Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Indust. Corporate Change 21(5):1117–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F (2017) Understanding team knowledge production: The interrelated roles of technology and expertise. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print July 28, https://doi.org.10.1287/mnsc.2017.2789Google Scholar
• Teodoridis F, Bikard M, Vakili K (2018) Creativity at the knowledge frontier: The impact of specialization in fast- and slow-paced domains. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print July 30, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218793384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2002) Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Sci. 48(1):90–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Toole AA, Czarnitzki D (2010) Commercializing science: Is there a university ‘brain drain’ from academic entrepreneurship? Management Sci. 56(9):1599–1614.Link, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B, Spiro J (2005) Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(2):447–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vakili K (2016) Collaborative promotion of technology standards and the impact on innovation, industry structure, and organizational capabilities: Evidence from modern patent pools. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1504–1524.Link, Google Scholar
• von Schwedler UK, Stuchell M, Müller B, Ward DM, Chung HY, Morita E, Wang HE, et al.. (2003) The protein network of HIV budding. Cell 114(6):701–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams HL (2013) Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome. J. Political Econom. 121(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Armstrong JS (2002) Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. 48(1):138–153.Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker LG, Darby MR, Brewer MB (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar