Learning by Seconding: Evidence from National Science Foundation Rotators

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1245

References

  • Agrawal A, McHale J, Oettl A (2017) How stars matter: Recruiting and peer effects in evolutionary biology. Res. Policy 46(4):853–867.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TJ (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information Within the R&D Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. 45(7):905–917.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2008) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ). Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P, Levine JM, Moreland RL (2000) Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1971) The economic implications of learning by doing. Hahn FH, ed. Readings in the Theory of Growth: A Selection of Papers from the Review of Economic Studies (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 131–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Zivin JSG, Wang J (2010) Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):549–589.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker W, Faulkner RR (2009) Social capital, double embeddedness, and mechanisms of stability and change. Amer. Behav. Sci. 52(11):1531–1555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bercovitz J, Feldman M (2008) Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organ. Sci. 19(1):69–89.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beyer JM, Hannah DR (2002) Building on the past: Enacting established personal identities in a new work setting. Organ. Sci. 13(6):636–652.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Black LJ, Carlile PR, Repenning NP (2004) A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley’s study of CT scanning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):572–607.Google Scholar
  • Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau FD, Currie JM, Croson RT, Ginther DK (2010) Can mentoring help female assistant professors? Interim results from a randomized trial. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 100(May):348–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borjas GJ, Doran KB (2012) The collapse of the Soviet Union and the productivity of American mathematicians. Quart. J. Econom. 3(1):1143–1203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borjas GJ, Doran KB (2015) Which peers matter? The relative impacts of collaborators, colleagues, and competitors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 97(5):1104–1117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brogaard J, Engelberg J, Parsons CA (2014) Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):251–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan TY, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Learning from peers: Knowledge transfer and sales force productivity growth. Marketing Sci. 33(4):463–484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang Y-Y, Gong Y, Peng MW (2012) Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Acad. Management J. 55(4):927–948.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury P (2017) Innovation outcomes in a distributed organization: Intrafirm mobility and access to resources. Organ. Sci. 28(2):339–354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole JR, Cole S (1972) The ortega hypothesis. Science 178(4059):368–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Criscuolo P (2005) On the road again: Researcher mobility inside the R&D network. Res. Policy 34(9):1350–1365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Custer RL, Loepp F, Martin GE (2000) NSF funded projects: Perspectives of project leaders. J. Tech. Ed. 12(1):61–74.Google Scholar
  • Dahlander L, McFarland DA (2013) Ties that last tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(1):69–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • David H (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond AM Jr (1999) Does federal funding” crowd in” private funding of science? Contemporary Econom. Policy 17(4):423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dryden H, Rice A (2008) Using guidelines to support secondment: a personal experience. J. Nursing Management 16(1):65–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duce RA, Benoit‐Bird KJ, Ortiz J, Woodgate RA, Bontempi P, Delaney M, Gaines SD, Harper S, Jones B, White LD (2012) Myths in funding ocean research at the National Science Foundation. EOS Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union 93(51):533–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M, Desrochers P, Bercovitz J (2014) Knowledge for the world: A brief history of commercialization at Johns Hopkins University. Allen TJ, O'Shea R, eds. Building Technology Transfer Within Research Universities: An Entrepreneurial Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 156–191.Google Scholar
  • Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, Lovett M, O’Sullivan P (2010) Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Medical Ed. Online 15(1): http://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063.Google Scholar
  • Foss NJ, Husted K, Michailova S (2010) Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. J. Management Stud. 47(3):455–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furman JL, Stern S (2011) Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1933–1963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ge C, Huang KW, Png IP (2016) Engineer/scientist careers: Patents, online profiles, and misclassification bias. Strategic Management J. 37(1):232–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geuna A (2015) Global Mobility of Research Scientists: The Economics of Who Goes Where and Why (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Godart FC, Shipilov AV, Claes K (2014) Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity. Organ. Sci. 25(2):377–400.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Mukharlyamov V, Xuan Y (2016) The cost of friendship. J. Financial Econom. 119(3):626–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gorman ME (2011) Doing science, technology and society in the National Science Foundation. Sci. Engrg. Ethics 17(4):839–849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray PH, Meister DB (2004) Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Sci. 50(6):821–834.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld DH, Mannix EA, Williams KY, Neale MA (1996) Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 67(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gruenfeld DH, Martorana PV, Fan ET (2000) What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):45–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargreaves Heap SP, Zizzo DJ (2009) The value of groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):295–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho Y-P, Ruan Y, Hang C-C, Wong P-K (2016) Technology upgrading of small-and-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through a manpower secondment strategy—A mixed-methods study of Singapore’s T-Up program. Technovation 57:21–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horta H, Veloso FM, Grediaga R (2010) Navel gazing: Academic inbreeding and scientific productivity. Management Sci. 56(3):414–429.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2008) Matching for causal inference without balance checking. Working paper, University of Milan, Milan.Google Scholar
  • Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen AC, Tsang EWK (2005) Social capital networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. 30(1):146–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain A (2016) Learning by hiring and change to organizational knowledge: Countering obsolescence as organizations age. Strategic Management J. 37(8):1667–1687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jha Y, Welch EW (2010) Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering. Res. Policy 39(9):1174–1184.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kachra A, White RE (2008) Know‐how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management J. 29(4):425–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane AA, Argote L, Levine JM (2005) Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 96(1):56–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kivleniece I, Quelin BV (2012) Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):272–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kretschmer H (1997) Patterns of behaviour in coauthorship networks of invisible colleges. Scientometrics 40(3):579–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kretschmer H (1999) A new model of scientific collaboration part 1. Theoretical approach. Scientometrics 46(3):501–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kundra R, Kretschmer H (1999) A new model of scientific collaboration part 2. Collaboration patterns in Indian medicine. Scientometrics 46(3):519–528.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laband DN, Tollison RD (2000) Intellectual collaboration. J. Political Econom. 108(3):632–662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N, Cockburn IM, Henderson R (2004) Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Adv. Strategic Management 21:133–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Cross R (2004) The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. 50(11):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li P, Marrongelle K (2013) Having Success with NSF: A Practical Guide (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lichtenberg FR (1987) The effect of government funding on private industrial research and development: A re-assessment. J. Indust. Econom. 36(1):97–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyles MA, Salk JE (1996) Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 27(5):877–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manz CC, Sims HP Jr (1981) Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 6(1):105–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mas A, Moretti E (2009) Peers at work. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(1):112–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McCullough J (1994) The role and influence of the US National Science Foundation’s program officers in reviewing and awarding grants. Higher Ed. 28(1):85–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen MA, Cannella AA (2004) Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. 47(5):735–746.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mervis J (2013) Special report: Can NSF put the right spin on rotators? Part 1. Science (October 23), http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/10/special-report-can-nsf-put-right-spin-rotators-part-1.Google Scholar
  • Mervis J (2016a) To save money, NSF requires university cost-sharing for rotators. Science (October 21), https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/save-money-nsf-requires-university-cost-sharing-rotators.Google Scholar
  • Mervis J (2016b) NSF proposes changes in use of costly rotators for senior positions. Science (September 1), https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/09/nsf-proposes-changes-use-costly-rotators-senior-positions.Google Scholar
  • Meyer BD (1995) Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 13(2):151–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minbaeva DB (2007) Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations. Management Internat. Rev. 47(4):567–593.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molina‐Morales FX, Martínez‐Fernández MT (2009) Too much love in the neighborhood can hurt: How an excess of intensity and trust in relationships may produce negative effects on firms. Strategic Management J. 30(9):1013–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller‐Parker G (2007) ‘Rotators’ in the National Science Foundation’s geosciences directorate. EOS Trans. Amer. Geophysical Union 88(18):200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muscio A, Quaglione D, Vallanti G (2013) Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Res. Policy 42(1):63–75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paruchuri S, Nerkar A, Hambrick DC (2006) Acquisition integration and productivity losses in the technical core: Disruption of inventors in acquired companies. Organ. Sci. 17(5):545–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Phelps C, Heidl R, Wadhwa A (2012) Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):1115–1166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, McEvily B (2003) Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(2):240–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R, Singh PV, Krishnan R (2015) Forgotten third parties: Analyzing the contingent association between unshared third parties, knowledge overlap, and knowledge transfer relationships with outsiders. Organ. Sci. 26(5):1400–1414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J. Political Econom. 98(5, Part 2):S71–S102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salomon R, Martin X (2008) Learning, knowledge transfer, and technology implementation performance: A study of time-to-build in the global semiconductor industry. Management Sci. 54(7):1266–1280.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon HA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):125–134.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 20(7):595–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J (2005) Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. 51(5):756–770.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J, Agrawal A (2011) Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. Management Sci. 57(1):129–150.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Slavova K, Fosfuri A, De Castro JO (2016) Learning by hiring: the effects of scientists’ inbound mobility on research performance in academia. Organ. Sci. 27(1):72–89.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Song J, Almeida P, Wu G (2003) Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. 49(4):351–365.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Ding WW (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences1. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(1):97–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Podolny JM (1996) Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. 17(S1):21–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR (2012) Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Management J. 55(2):314–338.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tambe P, Hitt LM (2013) Job hopping, information technology spillovers, and productivity growth. Management Sci. 60(2):338–355.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt MC, Ogden TY, Neale MA (2003) Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. 49(4):464–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tsui AS, Egan TD, O’Reilly CA III (1992) Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):549–579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman ML, Katz R (1980) External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Sci. 26(11):1071–1085.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D (2009) When does scientist recruitment affect technological repositioning? Acad. Management J. 52(5):873–896.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waldinger F (2010) Quality matters: The expulsion of professors and the consequences for PhD student outcomes in Nazi Germany. J. Political Econom. 118(4):787–831.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waldinger F (2012) Peer effects in science: Evidence from the dismissal of scientists in Nazi Germany. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(2):838–861.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang D (2015) Activating cross-border brokerage: Interorganizational knowledge transfer through skilled return migration. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(1):133–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young A (1991) Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Quart. J. Econom. 106(2):369–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.