Gender and Organization Science: Introduction to a Virtual Special Issue

References

• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA (2012) Engendering inequity? How social accounts create vs. merely explain unfavorable pay outcomes for women. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1154–1174.Link, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M (2015) The leader-in-social-network schema: Perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1210–1225.Link, Google Scholar
• Byrne A, Barling J (2017) When she brings home the job status: Wives’ job status, status leakage, and marital instability. Organ. Sci. 28(2):177–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardador MT (2017) Promoted up but also out? The unintended consequences of increasing women’s representation in managerial roles in engineering. Organ. Sci. 28(4):597–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ (2015) Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions. Organ. Sci. 26(2):311–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Castilla EJ, Benard S (2010) The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):543–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper M (2016) Why women (sometimes) don’t help other women. The Atlantic (June 23), https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/queen-bee/488144/.Google Scholar
• Correll SJ (2004) Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(1):93–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis S, Lee M, Ramarajan L, Battilana J (2017) Blurring the boundaries: The interplay of gender and local communities in the commercialization of social ventures. Organ. Sci. 28(5):819–839.Link, Google Scholar
• Duguid M (2011) Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(1):104–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duguid MM, Loyd DL, Tolbert PS (2012) The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organ. Sci. 23(2):386–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Elvira MM, Graham ME (2002) Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects. Organ. Sci. 13(6):601–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Fine C (2017) Testosterone Rex: Myths of Sex, Science, and Society (W.W. Norton & Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Gibson DE, Lawrence BS (2010) Women’s and men’s career referents: How gender composition and comparison level shape career expectations. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1159–1175.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin J (1990) Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in organizations. Organ. Sci. 1(4):339–359.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald ML, Keeves GD, Westphal JD (2018) One step forward, one step back: White male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO. Acad. Management J. 61(2):405–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGinn KL, Milkman KL (2013) Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1041–1060.Link, Google Scholar
• Merluzzi J (2017) Gender and negative network ties: Exploring difficult work relationships within and across gender. Organ. Sci. 28(4):636–652.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE (1998) Feeling stressed and burned out: A feminist reading and re-visioning of stress-based emotions within medicine and organization science. Organ. Sci. 9(1):103–118.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson JN (2014) Are women really more risk-averse than men? A re-analysis of the literature using expanded methods. J. Econom. Surveys 29(3):566–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rattan A, Savani S, Komarraju M, Morrison M, Boggs CL, Ambady N (2018) Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive STEM sense of belonging. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 115(1):54–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16(3):243–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubineau B, Fernandez RM (2015) Tipping points: The gender segregating and desegregating effects of network recruitment. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1646–1664.Link, Google Scholar
• Seron C, Silbey SS, Cech E, Rubineau B (2016) Persistence is cultural: Professional socialization and the reproduction of sex segregation. Work Occupations 43(2):178–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton GM, Cohen GL (2007) A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 92(1):82–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams M, Polman E (2014) Is it me or her? How gender composition evokes interpersonally sensitive behavior on collaborative cross-boundary projects. Organ. Sci. 26(2):334–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Woetzel J, Madgavkar A, Ellingrud K, Labaye E, Devillard S, Kutcher E, Manyika J, Dobbs R, Krishnan M (2015) The power of parity: How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth. Report, McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey & Company, New York. Accessed July 17, 2018, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/how-advancing-womens-equality-can-add-12-trillion-to-global-growth.Google Scholar
• Wood W, Eagly AH (2002) A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psych. Bull. 128(5):699–727.Crossref, Google Scholar