On the Relationship Between Firms and Their Legal Environment: The Role of Cultural Consonance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1250

References

  • Air Bag Conversation (1971) Nixon Presidential Materials, Conversation #488-15 (Segment 7). Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Yorba Linda, CA.Google Scholar
  • American Motors Corp (1968) American Motors Corp. Annual Report 1967, American Motors Corp., Southfield, MI.Google Scholar
  • Ansari S, Wijen F, Gray B (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organ. Sci. 24(4):1014–1040.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Molnár V (2012) Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Acad. Management J. 55(3):515–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arun R, Suresh V, Madhavan CV, Murthy MN (2010) On finding the natural number of topics with latent dirichlet allocation: Some observations. Proc. Pacific-Asia Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Springer, Berlin), 391–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bail C (2014) The cultural environment: Measuring culture with big data. Theory Soc. 43(3):465–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (2007) Corporations, democracy, and the public good. J. Management Inquiry 16(3):201–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (2010) Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organ. Stud. 31(6):777–805.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron JN, Dobbin FR, Jennings PD (1986) War and peace: The evolution of modern personnel administration in U.S. industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(2):350–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G, Stigler GJ (1974) Law enforcement, malfeasance, and the compensation of enforcers. J. Legal Stud. 3(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benford RD, Snow DA (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:611–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bermiss YS, Zajac EJ, King BG (2014) Under construction: How commensuration and management fashion affect corporate reputation rankings. Organ. Sci. 25(2):591–608.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Binder AJ (2009) Contentious Curricula: Afrocentrism and Creationism in American Public Schools (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blei D (2012) Probabilistic topic models. Comm. ACM 55(4):77–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blei D, Ng A, Jordan M (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(1):993–1022.Google Scholar
  • Bobbit P, Calabresi G (1978) Tragic Choices—The Conflicts Society Confronts in the Allocation of Tragically Scarce Resources (WW Norton and Co., New York).Google Scholar
  • Bonardi J, Keim G (2005) Corporate political strategies for widely salient issues. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):555–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonilla T, Grimmer J (2013) Elevated threat levels and decreased expectations: How democracy handles terrorist threats. Poetics 41(6):650–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S, Everett M, Freeman L (2002) Ucinet for Windows. Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA.Google Scholar
  • Burris V (2001) The two faces of capital: Corporations and individual capitalists as political actors. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(3):361–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley KM (1994) Extracting culture through textual analysis. Poetics 22(4):291–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley KM, Columbus D, Landwehr P (2013) Automap user’s guide 2013. Technical Report CMU-ISR-13-105, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  • Carpenter D, Moss D (2013) Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casella G, George E (1992) Explaining the Gibbs sampler. Amer. Statistician 46(3):167–174.Google Scholar
  • Claybrook J, Bollier D (1985) The hidden benefits of regulation: Disclosing the auto safety payoff. Yale J. Regulation 3(1):87–131.Google Scholar
  • Clegg S, Courpasson D, Phillips N (2006) Power and Organizations (Pine Forge Press, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Collins SC (2004) Sexual harassment and police discipline: Who’s policing the police? Policing 27(4):512–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook K, Shortell S, Conrad D, Morrisey M (1983) A theory of organizational response to regulation: The case of hospitals. Acad. Management Rev. 10(2):332–336.Google Scholar
  • Cordz D (1966) The face in the mirror at General Motors. Fortune 74(3):117.Google Scholar
  • Cost of Government Regulation to the Consumer (1978) Hearings Before the Subcommittee for Consumers of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, United States Senate, 95th Cong., 2nd Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Crandall RW, Gruenspecht HK, Keeler TE, Lave LB (1986) Regulating the Automobile (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Creswell J (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Los Angeles), 208–227.Google Scholar
  • Croidieu G, Kim PH (2017) Labor of love. Amateurs and lay-expertise legitimation in the early U.S. radio field. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(1):1–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culpepper PD (2010) Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dal Bo E (2006) Regulatory capture: A review. Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy 22(2):203–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis G (2005) Firms and environments. Smelser N, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 478–502.Google Scholar
  • De Figueiredo J (2002) Lobbying and information in politics. Bus. Politics 4(2):125–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Figueiredo J (2009) Integrated political strategy. Adv. Strategic Management 26:459–486.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delmas M, Lim J, Nairn-Birch N (2015) Corporate environmental performance and lobbying. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(2):175–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deveaud R, SanJuan E, Bellot P (2014) Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Doc. Numérique 17(1):61–84.Google Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F (2009) Inventing Equal Opportunity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Kelly E (2007) How to stop harassment: Professional construction of legal compliance in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 112(4):1203–1243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domhoff GW (1998) Who Rules America? (Mayfield, Mountain View, CA).Google Scholar
  • Dreiling MC (2000) The class embeddedness of corporate political action: Leadership in defense of the NAFTA. Soc. Problems 47(1):21–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dressler WW, Borges CD, Balieiro MC, dos Santos JE (2005) Measuring cultural consonance: Examples with special reference to measurement theory in anthropology. Field Methods 17(4):331–355.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eastman JW (1984) Styling vs. Safety: The American Automobile Industry and the Development of Automotive Safety, 1900-1966 (University Press of America, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1990) Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in the American workplace. Amer. J. Sociol. 95(6):1401–1440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB (1992) Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. Amer. J. Sociol. 97(6):1531–1576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB (2007) Overlapping fields and constructed legalities: The endogeneity of law. O’Brien J, ed. Private Equity, Corporate Governance and the Dynamics of Capital Market Regulation (World Scientific, Singapore), 55–90.Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Petterson S (1999) Symbols and substance in organizational response to civil rights law. Res. Soc. Stratification Mobility 17:107–135.Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Stryker R (2005) A sociological approach to law and the economy. Smelser NJ, Swedberg R, eds. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 527–551.Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger H (1999) The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):406–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Krieger LH, Eliason SR, Albiston CR, Mellema V (2011) When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(3):888–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Google Scholar
  • Etzion D, Davis G (2008) Revolving doors? A network analysis of corporate officers and US government officials. J. Management Inquiry 17(3):157–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farjoun M (2002) The dialectics of institutional development in emerging and turbulent fields: The history of pricing conventions in the on-line database industry. Acad. Management J. 45(5):848–874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Favereau O, Lazega E (2002) Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization: Markets, Networks, and Heirarchies (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Federal Role in Traffic Safety (1965) Hearings before the Subcommittee on Executive Reorganization of the Committee on Government Operations, United States Senate, 89th Cong., 1st Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Fitzgerald Rodriguez J (2018) A week before truly driverless cars become legal in CA, no companies have filed for permit. San Francisco Examiner (March 26), http://www.sfexaminer.com/week-truly-driverless-cars-become-legal-ca-no-companies-filed-permit/.Google Scholar
  • Fligstein N, McAdam D (2011) Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociol. Theory 29(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford Motor Co (1967) Ford Motor Co. Annual Report 1966, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI.Google Scholar
  • Ford Motor Co (1979) Ford Motor Co. Annual Report 1978, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, MI.Google Scholar
  • Funk R, Hirschman D (2015) Beyond nonmarket strategy: market actions as corporate political activity. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):32–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel Y, Lang T (2015) The Unmanageable Consumer (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Gargiulo M (1993) Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R, Rappa M (1994) A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: The case of cochlear implants. Organ. Sci. 5(3):344–362.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gehman J, Trevino L, Garud R (2013) Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Acad. Management J. 56(1):84–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gherardi S, Nicolini D (2002) Learning the trade: A culture of safety in practice. Organization 9(2):191–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gioia DA (1992) Pinto fires and personal ethics: A script analysis of missed opportunities. J. Bus. Ethics 11(5/6):379–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giorgi S (2017) The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. J. Management Stud. 54(5):711–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giorgi S, Weber K (2015) Marks of distinction: Framing and audience appreciation in the context of investment advice. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):333–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray G, Silbey S (2014) Governing inside the organization: Interpreting regulation and compliance. Amer. J. Sociol. 120(1):96–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF (1989) Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation Policy Anal. 11(3):255–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings C (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffiths T, Steyvers M (2002) A probabilistic approach to semantic representation. Gray W, Schunn C, eds. Proc. 24th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ), 381–386.Google Scholar
  • Griffiths T, Steyvers M (2003) Prediction and semantic association. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 15:11–18.Google Scholar
  • Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(suppl 1):5228–5235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guillén MF (1994) Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hadani M, Schuler D (2013) In search of El Dorado: The elusive financial returns on corporate political investments. Strategic Management J. 34(2):165–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haddon W, Suchman E, Klein D (1964) Accident Research: Methods and Approaches (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ (2000) Disaggregating and explaining corporate political activity: Domestic and foreign corporations in national politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 94(4):891–903.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen WL, Mitchell NJ, Drope JM (2005) The logic of private and collective action. Amer. J. Politcal Sci. 49(1):150–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A (2015) From what happened to what happens. Using microhistorical case studies to build grounded theory in organization studies. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart DM (2004) “Business” is not an interest group: On the study of companies in American national politics. Annual Rev. Political Sci. 7(1):47–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herrmann RO (1970) Consumerism: Its goals, organizations and future. J. Marketing 34(4):55–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt S, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiatt SR, Sine WD, Tolbert PS (2009) From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(4):635–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A, Hitt M (1999) Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):825–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillman A, Keim G, Schuler D (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. J. Management 30(6):837–857.Google Scholar
  • Hirsch PM, Lounsbury M (1997) Ending the family quarrel. Amer. Behav. Sci. 40(4):406–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann T (1999) Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Proc. 22nd Annual Internat. SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM Press, New York), 50–57.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann T (2001) Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Machine Learn. 42(1/2):177–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holburn GLF, Vanden Bergh RG (2014) Integrated market and nonmarket strategies: Political campaign contributions around merger and acquisition events in the energy sector. Strategic Management J. 35(3):450–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holt DJ (2005) 100 Years of Vehicle Safety Development (SAE International, Warrendale, PA).Google Scholar
  • Huising R, Silbey S (2011) Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation. Regulation Governance 5(1):14–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hultman NE, Koomey JG (2007) The risk of surprise in energy technology costs. Environmental Res. Lett. 2(3):034002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Rao H (2004) Store wars: The enactment and repeal of anti‐chain‐store legislation in america. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):446–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Silverman BS (2016) The cultural contingency of structure: Evidence from entry to the slave trade in and around the abolition movement. Amer. J. Sociol. 122(3):755–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Rao H, Silverman BS (2012) History in strategy research: What, why, and how? Kahl SJ, Silverman BS, Cusumano MA, eds. History and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 29 (Emerald Group, Bingley, UK), 241–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Yue LQ, Rao H (2010) Trouble in store: Probes, protests, and store openings by Wal‐Mart, 1998-2007. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(1):53–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2015) Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management J. 36(4):537–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnneseen HG (1984) Historical perspective on seat belt restraint systems. SAE Technical Paper 840393, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • Jones C, Maoret M, Massa FG, Svejenova S (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture” 1870–1975. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1523–1545.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kalev A, Shenhav Y, De Vries D (2008) The state, the labor process, and the diffusion of managerial models. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(1):1–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S, Jarzabkowski P (2006) Using strategy tools in practice—How tools mediate strategizing and organizing. AIM Research Working Paper No. 047, Advanced Institute of Management Research, London.Google Scholar
  • Kellogg K (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly E, Dobbin F (1999) Civil rights law at work: Sex discrimination and the rise of maternity leave policies. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):455–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy JF (1962) Special message to the Congress on protecting the consumer interest, March 15. Online by Peters G and Woolley JT, the American Presidency Project, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  • Kent RW (2003) Air bag development and performance. SAE Technical Paper, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • King BG, Felin T, Whetten DA (2010) Perspective—Finding the organization in organizational theory: A meta-theory of the organization as a social actor. Organ. Sci. 21(1):290–305.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kratzke SR (1995) Regulatory history of automatic crash protection in FMVSS 208. SAE Technical Paper 950865, SAE International, Warrendale, PA.Google Scholar
  • Kolko G (1963) The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900-1916 (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).Google Scholar
  • Laumann EO, Knoke D (1987) The Organizational State : Social Choice in National Policy Domains (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).Google Scholar
  • Leblebici H, Salancik G, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee BH (2009) The infrastructure of collective action and policy content diffusion in the organic food industry. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1247–1269.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Litrico JB, David R (2017) The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Framing trajectories and field settlement. Acad. Management J. 60(3):986–1015.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luger S (2000) Corporate Power, American Democracy, and the Automobile Industry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Luhn H (1959) Potentialities of Auto-encoding of Scientific Literature (International Business Corporation Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY).Google Scholar
  • Mahon J, Waddock S (1992) Strategic issues management: An integration of issue life cycle perspectives. Bus. Soc. 31(1):19–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG (2006) Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence. Strategic Management J. 27(3):201–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marquis C, Huang Z (2009) The contingent nature of public policy and the growth of U.S. commercial banking. Acad. Management J. 52(6):1222–1246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall EA (2013) Defining population problems: Using topic models for cross-national comparison of disciplinary development. Poetics 41(6):701–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mashaw JL, Harfst DL (1990) The Struggle for Auto Safety (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matousek M (2018) A self-driving Uber struck and killed a woman—Here's a look at how its autonomous cars work. Business Insider UK (March 19), http://uk.businessinsider.com/uber-self-driving-car-kills-woman-tech-explained-2018-3.Google Scholar
  • McCallum A (2002) Mallet: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. Open source software. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.Google Scholar
  • Michel JB, Shen YK, Aiden AP, Veres A, Gray MK, Pickett JP, Hoiberg D, et al.. (2011) Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014):176–182.Google Scholar
  • Miller IM (2013) Rebellion, crime and violence in Qing China, 1722–1911: A topic modeling approach. Poetics 41(6):626–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H, Waters JA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management J. 6(3):257–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milyo J, Primo D, Groseclose T (2000) Corporate PAC campaign contributions in perspective. Bus. Politics 2(1):75–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS (1992) The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS (2004) Berle and Means revisited: The governance and power of large U.S. corporations. Theory Soc. 33(5):579–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS (2013) The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Mizruchi MS, Fein LC (1999) The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):653–683.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr J, Bogdanov P (2013) Introduction—Topic models: What they are and why they matter. Poetics 41(6):545–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohr JW, Wagner-Pacifici R, Breiger RL (2013) Graphing the grammar of motives in national security strategies: Cultural interpretation, automated text analysis and the drama of global politics. Poetics 41(6):670–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan DL (1998) Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Res. 8(3):362–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nader R (1965) Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-In Dangers of the American Automobile (Grossman, New York).Google Scholar
  • National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act Amendments (1976) Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Finance of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 94th Cong., 2nd Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • New York Times (1971) A.A.A. ends cooperation with Nader's investigation; leaders of auto club view inquiry as effort to blacken its reputation and steer it into consumer activism. (August 29), 54.Google Scholar
  • New York Times (1979) 4 Studies conclude that Chrysler was damaged by regulatory costs. Special to The New York Times. (August 17), 12.Google Scholar
  • Nixon R (1972) Statement about signing the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act, October 21. Online by Peters G and Woolley JT, the American Presidency Project, University of California, Santa Barbara .Google Scholar
  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oliver C, Holzinger I (2008) The effectiveness of strategic political management: A dynamic capabilities framework. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):496–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oreskes N, Conway E (2010) Defeating the merchants of doubt. Nature 465:686–687.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oreskes N, Conway E (2011) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury Publishing USA, New York).Google Scholar
  • Palmer K, Oates W, Portney P (1995) Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J. Econom. Perspect. 9(4):119–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Passive Restraint Rule (1977) Hearings before the Subcommittee for Consumers of the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, United States Senate, 95th Cong., 1st Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Pelzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J. Law Econom. 19(2):211–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):711–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perrow C (1999) Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Perrow C (2005) Using organizations: The case of FEMA. Homeland Security Affairs J. 1(2). Available at https://www.hsaj.org/articles/687.Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik G (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Popping R (2000) Computer-Assisted Text Analysis (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14(3):130–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter T (1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Posner EA (2001) Controlling agencies with cost-benefit analysis: A positive political theory perspective. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 68(4):1137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H (1998) Caveat emptor: The construction of nonprofit consumer watchdog organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):912–961.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Giorgi S (2006) Code breaking: How entrepreneurs exploit cultural logics to generate institutional change. Res. Organ. Behav. 27:269–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(4):795–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regulatory Reform (1976) Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 94th Congress, 2nd Session, vol. 4 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), 446.Google Scholar
  • Ross J, Staw BM (1993) Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Acad. Management J. 36(4):701–732.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roy WG (1997) Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • S. Rep. No. 94-690 (1976) The 1976 Joint economic report: Report of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States, on the January 1976 economic report of the president, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Schneiberg M, Bartley T (2001) Regulating American industries: Markets, politics and the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):101–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott W (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (Sage Publications, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Selznick P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Selznick P, Nonet P, Vollmer H (1969) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
  • Shaffer B, Quasney TJ, Grimm CM (2000) Firm level performance implications of nonmarket actions. Bus. Soc. 39(2):126–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Short JL, Toffel MW (2007) Coerced confessions: Self-policing in the shadow of the regulator. J. Law Econom. Organ. 24(1):45–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? the environmental movement and the emergence of the U.S. wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sine WD, Haveman HA, Tolbert PS (2005) Risky business? Entrepreneurship in the new independent-power sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):200–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soule SA, King BG (2006) The stages of the policy process and the equal rights amendment, 1972–1982. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1871–1909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soule S, Olzak S (2004) When do movements matter? The politics of contingency and the equal rights amendment. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(4):473–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spillman L (2012) Solidarity in Strategy: Making Business Meaningful in American Trade Associations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L (1992) Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: An introduction. Health Ed. Behav. 19(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  • Steinmetz G (1999) State/Culture: State-Formation after the Cultural Turn (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Steyvers M, Griffiths T (2007) Probabilistic topic models. Landauer T, McNamara D, Dennis S, Kintsch W, eds. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis (Psychology Press, New York), 424–440.Google Scholar
  • Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. 2(1):3–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton JR, Dobbin F, Meyer JW, Scott WR (1994) The legalization of the workplace. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(4):944–971.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talesh SA (2009) The privatization of public legal rights: How manufacturers construct the meaning of consumer law. Law Soc. Rev. 43(3):527–562.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarrow SG (1989) Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965-1975 (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • The Automobile Industry and Its Impact upon the Nation’s Economy (1975) Hearings before the Automobile Industry Task Force of the Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, 94th Cong., 1st Session, Part 1 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Thornton PH, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 1st ed. (SAGE Publications Ltd., London), 99–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilly C (1992) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990 (Wiley-Blackwell, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tilly C (1995) To explain political processes. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(6):1594–1610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tilly C, Goodin RE (2006) It depends. Goodin RE, ed. Oxford Handbooks Political Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toyota Motor Corporation (2012) Recall problems emerge. 75 Years of Toyota. Accessed May 3, 2018, http://www.toyota-global.com/company/history_of_toyota/75years/text/entering_the_automotive_business/chapter2/section1/item1.html.Google Scholar
  • Traffic Safety (1966) Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. House of Representatives, 89th Cong., 2nd Session (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Van Dyke N, Soule S, Taylor V (2004) The targets of social movements: Beyond a focus on the state. Myers DJ, Cress DM, eds. Authority in Contention, Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, vol. 25 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 27–51.Google Scholar
  • Viscusi WK, Vernon JM, Harrington JE (1995) Economics of Regulation and Antitrust (MIT press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Vogel D (1989) Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Walker E, Rea C (2014) The political mobilization of firms and industries. Annual Rev. Sociol. 40:281–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker ET (2009) Privatizing participation: Civic change and the organizational dynamics of grassroots lobbying firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):83–105.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker ET (2012) Putting a face on the issue: Corporate stakeholder mobilization in professional grassroots lobbying campaigns. Bus. Soc. 51(4):561–601.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walker ET (2014) Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallach HM, Mimno DM, McCallum A (2009) Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 22:1973–1981.Google Scholar
  • Weiss E (1967) A Critique of Consumerism: A Study (Doyle Dane Bernbach, New York).Google Scholar
  • Zajac E, Westphal J (1994) The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management J. 15(S1):121–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zald MN, Lounsbury M (2010) The wizards of Oz: Towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organ. Stud. 31(7):963–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.