The Private Scope in Public–Private Collaborations: An Institutional and Capability-Based Perspective

References

• Ahuja G, Yayavaram S (2011) Perspective—Explaining influence rents: The case for an institutions-based view of strategy. Organ. Sci. 22(6):1631–1652.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Mayer KJ (2007) Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1060–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Zenger TR (2012) Capabilities, transaction costs, and firm boundaries. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1643–1657.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Felin T, Foss N, Zenger T (2012) Organizational economics of capability and heterogeneity. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1213–1226.Link, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management. 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barringer BR, Harrison JS (2000) Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. J. Management. 26(3):367–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett J, Iossa E (2006) Delegation of contracting in the private provision of public services. Rev. Indust. Organ. 29(1/2):75–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonardi J-P, Hillman AJ, Keim GD (2005) The attractiveness of political markets: Implications for firm strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):397–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bovaird T (2004) Public–private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. Internat. Rev. Admin. Sci. 70(2):199–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown TL, Potoski M (2003) Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Admin. Rev. 63(2):153–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral S, Lazzarini SG, Azevedo PF (2013) Private entrepreneurs in public services: A longitudinal study of outsourcing and statization in prisons. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(1):6–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacciatori E, Jacobides MG (2005) The dynamic limits of specialization: Vertical integration reconsidered. Organ. Stud. 26(12):1851–1883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chacar AS, Newburry W, Vissa B (2010) Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(7):1119–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chong E, Saussier S, Silverman BS (2015) Water under the bridge: Determinants of franchise renewal in water provision. J. Law Econom. Organ. 31(suppl 1):i3–i39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A (2002) Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review. J. Human Res. 37(4):696–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engel E, Fischer R, Galetovic A (2013) The basic public finance of public-private partnerships. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Investment Bank (2011) Study on PPP Legal & Financial Frameworks in the Mediterranean Partner Countries (EIB, Luxembourg).Google Scholar
• Evans P, Rauch JE (1999) Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 64(5):748–765.Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR (2012) Institutions, capabilities, and contracts: Make or buy in the electric utility industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1264–1281.Link, Google Scholar
• García-Canal E, Guillén MF (2008) Risk and the strategy of foreign location choice in regulated industries. Strategic Management J. 29(10):1097–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geddes RR (1997) Ownership, regulation, and managerial monitoring in the electric utility industry. J. Law Econom. 40(1):261–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George G, McGahan AM, Prabhu J (2012) Innovation for inclusive growth: Toward a theoretical framework and a research agenda. J. Management Stud. 49(4):661–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lavie D, Singh H (2009) The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1213–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hammami M, Ruhashyankiko JF, Yehoue E (2006) Determinants of public-private partnerships in infrastructure. Working paper, IMF, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Hanson JK, Sigman R (2013) Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. Presentation, American Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting, September 3–6, American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Hart OD (2003) Incomplete Contracts and Public Ownership: Remarks, and an application to public–private partnerships. Econom. J. 113(486):C69–C76.Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2000) The institutional environment for multinational investment. J. Law Econom. Organ. 16(2):334–364.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ (2006) Governance issues in public private partnerships. Internat. J. Project Management 24(24):537–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henisz WJ, Zelner BA (2005) Legitimacy, interest group pressures, and change in emergent institutions: The case of foreign investors and host country governments. Acad. Management Rev. 30(2):361–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermelo FD, Vassolo R (2010) Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1457–1473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hodge G, Greve C (2007) Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Admin. Rev. 67(3):545–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holburn GL, Zelner BA (2010) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management J. 31(3):1290–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoopes DG, Madsen TL, Walker G (2003) Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management J. 24(10):889–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inoue C, Lazzarini S, Musacchio A (2013) Leviathan as a minority shareholder: Firm-level implications of equity purchases by the state. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1775–1801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iossa E, Martimort D (2012) Risk allocation and the costs and benefits of public-private partnerships. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):442–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG (2006) The architecture and design of organizational capabilities. Indust. Corporate Change 15(1):151–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26(5):395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Dyer JH, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2009) Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996–2008. Working Paper No. 4978, World Bank Policy Research, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Palepu K (2000) The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Acad. Management J. 43(3):268–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivleniece I, Quelin BV (2012) Creating and capturing value in public-private ties: A private actor’s perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(2):272–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivleniece I, Cabral S, Lazzarini SG, Quelin BV (2017) Public-private collaboration: A review and avenues for further research. Ragozzino R, Mesquita L, Reuer JJ, eds. Public‐Private Collaboration: A Review and Avenues for Further Research (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 224–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2010) Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. Eur. Management Rev. 7(1):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein PG, Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2013) Capabilities and strategic entrepreneurship in public organizations. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(1):70–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwak YH, Chih Y, Ibbs CW (2009) Toward a comprehensive understanding of public-private partnerships for infrastructure development. Calif. Management Rev. 51(2):51–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenway SA, Murtha TP (1994) The state as a strategist in international business research. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 25(3):513–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy B, Spiller PT (1994) The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. J. Law Econom. Organ. 10(2):201–246.Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Henderson JE (2012) The influence of relational experience and contractual governance on the negotiation strategy in buyer–supplier disputes. J. Oper. Management. 30(5):382–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahoney JT, McGahan AM, Pitelis CN (2009) The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. 20(6):1034–1052.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer KJ, Salomon RM (2006) Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. 49(5):942–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Zaheer A (1999) Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1133–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Zelner BA, Barney JB (2013) Entrepreneurship in the public interest: Introduction to the special issue. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 7(1):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer KE, Estrin S, Bhaumik SK, Peng MW (2009) Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management J. 30(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moszoro MW, Spiller PT (2012) Third-party opportunism and the nature of public contracts. Working Paper No. 18636, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Musacchio A, Lazzarini SG (2014) Reinventing State Capitalism (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD (2010) Dedicated Public‐Private Partnership Units: A Survey of Institutional and Governance Structures (OECD Publishing, Paris).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng MW, Sun SL, Pinkham B, Chen H (2009) The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad. Management Perspect. 23(3):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinzon E (2016) Effects of nonlinear models with interactions of discrete and continuous variables: Estimating, graphing, and interpreting. The Stata Blog. Accessed March 2, 2018, https://blog.stata.com/2016/07/12/effects-for-nonlinear-models-with-interactions-of-discrete-and-continuous-variables-estimating-graphing-and-interpreting/.Google Scholar
• PPIAF–World Bank Institute (2012) Public‐Private Partenerships: Reference Guide Version 1.0 (World Bank, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Quelin BV, Kivleniece I, Lazzarini S (2017) Public-private collaboration, hybridity and social value: Toward new theoretical perspectives. J. Management Stud. 54(6):763–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangan S, Samii R, Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Constructive partnerships: When alliances between private firms and public actors can enable creative strategies. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):738–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera–Santos M, Rufín C (2010) Odd couples: Understanding the governance of firm–NGO alliances. J. Bus. Ethics 94(1):55–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (1994) Benefits of narrow business strategies. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1330–1349.Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiller PT (2010) Regulation: A transaction cost perspective. Calif. Management Rev. 52(2):147–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano GP, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valero V (2015) Government opportunism in public‐private partnerships. J. Public Econom. Theory 17(1):111–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R (2012) Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects. Stata J. 12(2):308–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1999) Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspective. J. Law Econom. Organ. 15(1):306–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelner BA, Henisz WJ, Holburn GL (2009) Contentious implementation and retrenchment in neoliberal policy reform: The global electric power industry, 1989–2001. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):379–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3):339–351.Link, Google Scholar