Discontinuities in the Value of Relational Capital: The Effects on Employee Entrepreneurship and Mobility

References

• Aderant (2015) Your partner compensation system can be better: Here's how. White paper, Aderant Holdings, Inc., Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Gambardella A, Olson DM (2016a) Employee mobility and entrepreneurship a virtual special issue. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E11–E21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Ganco M, Ziedonis RH (2009) Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. 30(13):1349–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Campbell BA, Franco A, Ganco M (2016b) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder-firm performance relationship. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1060–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barattieri A, Basu S, Gottschalk P (2014) Some evidence on the importance of sticky wages. Amer. Econom. J.: Macroeconom. 6(1):70–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Davis BA, Bielby WT (1986) The Structure of opportunity: How promotion ladders vary within and among organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(2):248–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker A (2011) Marriage of lobby shops and law firms is uneasy but lucrative. Washington Post (March 7), http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/04/AR2011030405688.html.Google Scholar
• Becker BE, Huselid MA (2006) Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? J. Management 32(6):898–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Benz M, Frey BS (2008) Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica 75(298):362–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bermiss YS, Greenbaum BE (2016) Loyal to whom? The effect of relational embeddedness and managers’ mobility on market tie dissolution. Admin. Sci. Quart. 6(2):254–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Bombardini M, Trebbi F (2014) Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(12):3885–3920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan J (2016a) Here are some of the self-driving startups to watch in 2017. Recode (December 29), https://www.recode.net/2016/12/29/14102028/self-driving-startups-2017.Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan J (2016b) Uber has lost three of its top self-driving engineers. Recode (December 12), https://www.recode.net/2016/12/12/13920558/uber-self-driving-cmu-top-engineers-leave.Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2009) cem: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanes i Vidal J, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C (2012) Revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Schankerman M, Van Reenen J (2013) Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81(4):1347–1393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blyler M, Coff RW (2003) Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies. Strategic Management J. 24(7):677–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res. Policy 32(1):69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Rogan M (2015) Coordinating complex work: Knowledge networks, partner departures, and client relationship performance in a law firm. Management Sci. 62(8):2392–2411.Link, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byun H, Frake J, Agarwal R (2018) Specialization as insurance: Specialization and social capital in the U.S. lobbying industry. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1803–1833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Coff RW, Kryscynski D (2012a) Re-thinking competitive advantage from human capital. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):376–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Kryscynski D, Olson DM (2017) Bridging strategic human capital and employee entrepreneurship research: A labor market frictions approach. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):344–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012b) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(2):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Somaya D (2013) Alumni effects and relational advantage: The impact on outsourcing when a buyer hires employees from a supplier’s competitors. Acad Management J. 56(6):1578–1600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Agarwal R, Campbell BA (2012) Heterogeneity in turnover: The effect of relative compensation dispersion of firms on the mobility and entrepreneurship of extreme performers. Strategic Management J. 33(12):1411–1430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnahan S, Kryscynski D, Olson D (2017) When does corporate social responsibility reduce employee turnover? Evidence from attorneys before and after 9/11. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1932–1962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassar G (2010) Are individuals entering self‐employment overly optimistic? an empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations. Strategic Management J. 31(8):822–840.Google Scholar
• Cheng S, Long JS (2007) Testing for IIA in the multinomial logit model. Sociol. Methods Res. 35(4):583–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1999) When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (2010) The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management J. 31(7):711–733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drutman L (2015) The Business of America Is Lobbying: How Corporations Became Politicized and Politics Became More Corporate (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duso T (2005) Lobbying and regulation in a political economy: evidence from the US cellular industry. Public Choice 122(3/4):251–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Zenger TR (2013) What is a relationship worth? Repeated exchange and the development and deployment of relational capital. Organ. Sci. 25(1):222–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Klein PG (2012) Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2014) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 26(2):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Ganco M (2013) Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 34(6):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans JS, Stern S (2003) The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 32(2):333–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Nanda A, Prats MJ (2009) Does individual performance affect entrepreneurial mobilty: Empirical evidence from the financial analysts market. J. Financial Transformation 25:95–105.Google Scholar
• Gubler T (2019) Connected, but qualified? Social affiliations, human capital, and service professional performance. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Gubler T, Cooper R (2018) Socially advantaged? How social affiliations influence access to valuable service professional transactions. Working paper, University of California, Riverside, Riverside.Google Scholar
• Hancock JI, Allen DG, Bosco FA, McDaniel KR, Pierce CA (2013) Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. J. Management 39(3):573–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G (2007) The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. 28(4):331–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Firm-specific capital and turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(6):1246–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Williams C (2012) Structural knowledge: How executive experience with structural composition affects intrafirm mobility and unit reconfiguration. Strategic Management J. 33(6):681–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2012) Technology and corporate scope: Firm and rival innovation as antecedents of corporate transactions. Strategic Management J. 33(4):347–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2013) Entrepreneurial action, unique assets, and appropriation risk: Firms as a means of appropriating profit from capability creation. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1765–1781.Link, Google Scholar
• Krause DR, Handfield RB, Tyler BB (2007) The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. J. Oper. Management 25(2):528–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon S-W, Adler PS (2014) Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):412–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee GK, Lieberman MB (2010) Acquisition vs. internal development as modes of market entry. Strategic Management J. 31(2):140–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee T, Mitchell TR, Wise L, Fireman S (1996) An unfolding model of voluntary turnover. Acad. Management J. 39(1):5–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR (1994) An alternative approach: The unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Rev. 19(1):51–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Hom PW, Eberly MB, Li JJ, Mitchell TR (2017) On the next decade of research in voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee TW, Mitchell TR, Holtom BC, McDaneil LS, Hill JW (1999) The unfolding model of voluntary turnover: A replication and extension. Acad. Management J. 42(4):450–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leech BL (2013) Lobbyists at Work (Apress, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(5):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine BJ (2009) The Art of Lobbying: Building Trust and Selling Policy (CQ Press, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu CC, Srivastava SB (2015) Stamps of power and conflict: Imprinting and influence in the US Senate, 1973–2009. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY), 11754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowensohn J 2015. Uber gutted Carnegie Mellon’s top robotics laboratory to build self-driving cars. The Verge (May 19), https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2015/5/19/8622831/uber-self-driving-cars-carnegie-mellon-poached.Google Scholar
• Mawdsley J, Somaya D (2015) Strategy and strategic alignment in professional service firms. Empson L, Muzio D, Broschak J, Hinings B, eds. Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 213–237.Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2016) Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Management 42(1):85–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mawdsley JK, Somaya D (2018) Demand-side strategy, relational advantage, and partner-driven corporate scope: The case for client-led diversification. Strategic Management J. 39(7):1834–1859.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobley WH (1977) Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. J. Appl. Psych. 62(2):237–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyberg A (2010) Retaining your high performers: Moderators of the performance-job satisfaction-voluntary turnover relationship. J. Appl. Psych. 95(3):440–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyberg AJ, Wright PM (2015) 50 years of human capital research: Assessing what we know, exploring where we go. Acad. Management Perspect. 29(3):287–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennings JM, Lee K, van Witteloostuijn A (1998) Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution. Acad. Management J. 41(4):425–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):474–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Portes A (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffiee J (2017) Employee mobility and interfirm relationship transfer: Evidence from the mobility and client attachments of United States federal lobbyists, 1998–2014. Strategic Management J. 38(10):2019–2040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffiee J, Coff R (2016) Micro-foundations of firm-specific human capital: When do employees perceive their skills to be firm-specific? Acad. Management J. 59(3):766–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M (2014) Executive departures without client losses: The role of multiplex ties in exchange partner retention. Acad. Management J. 57(2):563–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Hill CW (2005) Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 16(1):52–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Schneider J (2014) Senate Committees: Categories and Rules for Committee Assignments (Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Seabright MA, Levinthal DA, Fichman M (1992) Role of individual attachments in the dissolution of interorganizational relationships. Acad. Management J. 35(1):122–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somaya D, Williamson I, Lorinkova N (2008) Gone but not lost: The different performance impacts of employee mobility between cooperators vs. competitors. Acad. Management J. 51(5):936–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr E, Ganco M, Campbell B (2018) Strategic human capital management in the context of cross-industry and within-industry mobility frictions. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2226–2254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swider BW, Boswell WR, Zimmerman RD (2011) Examining the job search-turnover relationship: The role of embeddedness, job satisfaction, and available alternatives. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):432–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (2003) Expert talent and the design of (professional services) firms. Indust. Corporate Change 12(4):895–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK (2014) Chicken, or the egg, or both? The interrelationship between a firm’s inventor specialization and scope of technologies. Strategic Management J. 35(5):723–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Polidoro F (2013) A competition‐based explanation of collaborative invention within the firm. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1186–1208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wezel FC, Cattani G, Pennings JM (2006) Competitive implications of interfirm mobility. Organ. Sci. 17(6):691–709.Link, Google Scholar
• Zelenski D (2002) Talent agents, personal managers, and their conflicts in the new Hollywood. Southern California Law Rev. 76:979–1002.Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar