Safeguarding from the Sharks: Board Representation in Minority Equity Partnerships

References

• Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance 62(1):217–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams RB, Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2010) The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. J. Econom. Literature 48(1):58–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adegbesan JA, Higgins MJ (2011) The intra‐alliance division of value created through collaboration. Strategic Management J. 32(2):187–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management J. 21(3):317–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert C (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corp.: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7):521.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand BN, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. 21(3):295–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand J, Oriani R, Vassolo RS (2010) Alliance activity as a dynamic capability in the face of a discontinuous technological change. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1213–1232.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Bercovitz J, Mayer KJ (2007) Complementarity and evolution of contractual provisions: An empirical study of IT services contracts. Organ. Sci. 18(1):3–19.Link, Google Scholar
• Arino A, De La Torre J (1998) Learning from failure: Toward an evolutionary model of collaborative ventures. Organ. Sci. 9(3):306–325.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 24(1):91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. 21(3):267–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baysinger B, Butler H (1985) Corporate governance and the board of directors: Performance effects of changes in board composition. J. Law Econom. Organ. 1(1):101–124.Google Scholar
• Baysinger BD, Hoskisson RE (1990) The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Acad. Management Rev. 15(1):72–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boeker W, Wiltbank R (2005) New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organ. Sci. 16(2):123–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Boone A, Casares Field L, Karpoff J, Raheja C (2007) The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis. J. Financial Econom. 85(1):66–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Westphal JD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Acad. Management J. 44(4):639–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Certo ST, Daily CM, Dalton DR (2001) Signaling firm value through board structure: An investigation of initial public offerings. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 26(2):33–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):329–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox Pahnke E, McDonald R, Wang D, Hallen B (2015) Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1334–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL (1998) Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management J. 19(3):269–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S, Sen PK, Sengupta S (1998) Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Acad. Management J. 41(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopalan N (2012) Are all sharks dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 33(10):1115–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005a) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management J. 26(10):947–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2005b) When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34(5):615–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2006) When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):753–772.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G, Shaver JM (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management J. 30(10):1045–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Lerner J (2009) Exclusivity, contingent control rights, and the design of internet portal alliances. J. Law Econom. Organ. 28(1):45–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellstrand AE, Tihanyi L, Johnson JL (2002) Board structure and international political risk. Acad. Management J. 45(4):769–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Field L, Lowry M, Mkrtchyan A (2013) Are busy boards detrimental? J. Financial Econom. 109(1):63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garćia-Canal E (1996) Contractual form in domestic and international strategic alliances. Organ. Stud. 17(5):773–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Genentech (1994) Annual report. Accessed February 20, 2017, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/318771/0000318771-95-000005.txt.Google Scholar
• Geringer JM, Hebert L (1989) Control and performance of international joint ventures. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 20(2):235–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberger AS (1964) Econometric Theory (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J (2000) The determinants of corporate venture capital success: Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. Morck R, ed. Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 17–54.Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lavie D, Singh H (2009) The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management J. 30(11):1213–1233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Katila R, Rosenberger JD (2014) How do social defenses work? A resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1078–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hellmann T (2002) A theory of strategic venture investing. J. Financial Econom. 64(2):285–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):96–118.Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (2003) Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Econom. Policy Rev. 9(1):8–26.Google Scholar
• Hernandez E, Sanders WG, Tuschke A (2015) Network defense: Pruning, grafting, and closing to prevent leakage of strategic knowledge to rivals. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1233–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillman AJ, Dalziel T (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):383–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2005) The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Acad. Management J. 48(2):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivanov VI, Xie F (2010) Do corporate venture capitalists add value to start-up firms? Evidence from IPOs and acquisitions of VC-backed companies. Financial Management 39(1):129–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Dyer J, Singh H (2002) Alliance capability, stock market response, & long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management J. 23(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Strömberg P (2003) Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(2):281–315.Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Lee JM (2013) Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management J. 34(3):274–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Rosenberger J, Eisenhardt K (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms & corp. relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):295–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khanna T, Gulati R, Nohria N (1998) The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management J. 19(3):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2008) R&D/returns causality: Absorptive capacity or organizational IQ. Management Sci. 54(12):2054–2067.Google Scholar
• Kor YY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management J. 27(11):1081–1099.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Seth A (1998) The design of coordination and control mechanisms for managing joint venture-parent relationships. Strategic Management J. 19(6):579–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1994) Venture capitalists and the decision to go public. J. Financial Econom. 35(3):293–316.Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Malmendier U (2010) Contractibility and the design of research agreements. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):214–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Merges RP (1998) The control of technology alliances: An empirical analysis of the biotechnology industry. J. Indust. Econom. 46(2):125–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Shane H, Tsai A (2003) Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. J. Financial Econom. 67(3):411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linck JS, Netter JM, Yang T (2008) The determinants of board structure. J. Financial Econom. 87(2):308–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumineau F, Malhotra D (2011) Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution. Strategic Management J. 32(5):532–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Boerner CS (2006) Experience and scale and scope economies: Trade-offs and performance in development. Strategic Management J. 27(9):845–865.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maddala GS (1983) Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variable Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Maula MVJ, Autio E, Murray GC (2009) Corporate venture capital and the balance of risks and rewards for portfolio companies. J. Bus. Venturing 24(3):274–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell W, Singh K (1996) Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strategic Management J. 17(3):169–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mjoen H, Tallman S (1997) Control and performance in international joint ventures. Organ. Sci. 8(3):257–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):77–91.Google Scholar
• Nicholson S, Danzon P, McCullough J (2005) Biotech‐pharmaceutical alliances as a signal of asset and firm quality. J. Bus. 78(4):1433–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE (1997) Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. J. Law Econom. Organ. 13(2):387–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Sampson RC (2004) The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):723–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oxley JE, Wada T (2009) Alliance structure and the scope of knowledge transfer: Evidence from U.S.-Japan agreements. Management Sci. 55(4):635–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Park HD, Steensma HK (2012) When does corporate venture capital add value for new ventures? Strategic Management J. 33(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1989) Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. J. Law Econom. Organ. 5(1):109–126.Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuer JJ, Zollo M, Singh H (2002) Post-formation dynamics in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. 23(2):135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007a) Financial contracting in biotech strategic alliances. J. Law Econom. 50(3):559–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson DT, Stuart TE (2007b) Network effects in the governance of strategic alliances. J. Law Econom. Organ. 23(1):242–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenstein J (1988) The board and strategy: Venture capital and high technology. J. Bus. Venturing 3(2):159–170.Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT (2001) Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7):687–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Boeker W (2008) Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management J. 29(1):47–77.Google Scholar
• Ryall M, Sampson R (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from tech. development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Sampson RC (2007) R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Acad. Management J. 50(2):364–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2009) Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management J. 30(3):233–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sears J, Hoetker G (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(1):48–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terza JV, Basu A, Rathouz PJ (2008) Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: Addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling. J. Health Econom. 27(3):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanneste BS, Puranam P (2010) Repeated interactions and contractual detail: Identifying the learning effect. Organ. Sci. 21(1):186–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Wadhwa A, Phelps C, Kota S (2016) Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation. J. Bus. Venturing 31(1):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber L, Mayer KJ, Macher JT (2011) An analysis of extendibility and early termination provisions: The importance of framing duration safeguards. Acad. Management J. 54(1):182–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1984) Corporate governance. Yale Law J. 93(7):1197–1230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan A, Gray B (1994) Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative case study. Acad. Management J. 37(6):1478–1517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Pearce JA (1989) Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. J. Management 15(2):291–334.Crossref, Google Scholar