Gender Differences in Pay Levels: An Examination of the Compensation of University Presidents

References

• Agarwal S, Qian W, Reeb DM, Sing TF (2016) Playing the boys game: Golf buddies and board diversity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):272–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Altonji JG, Blank RM (1999) Race and gender in the labor market. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3C (North Holland, New York), 3143–3259.Google Scholar
• Anderson DJ, Binder M, Krause K (2003) The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 56(2):273–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. Leadership Quart. 21(6):1086–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arulampalam W, Booth AL, Bryan ML (2007) Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 60(2):163–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3):399–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barbezat DA, Hughes JW (2005) Salary structure effects and the gender pay gap in academia. Res. Higher Ed. 46(6):621–640.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS (1967) Human Capital and the Personal Distribution of Income: An Analytical Approach (Institute of Public Administration, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Belliveau MA (2005) Blind ambition? The effects of social networks and institutional sex composition on the job search outcomes of elite coeducational and women’s college graduates. Organ. Sci. 16(2):134–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Cohen BP, Zelditch M Jr (1972) Status characteristics and social interaction. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 37(3):241–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Goldin C, Katz LF (2010) Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(3):228–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitektine A (2011) Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Acad. Management Rev. 36(1):151–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bizjak JM, Lemmon ML, Naveen L (2008) Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? J. Financial Econom. 90(2):152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2000) Gender differences in pay. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):75–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Kahn LM (2007) The gender pay gap: Have women gone as far as they can? Acad. Management Perspect. 21(1):7–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boivie S, Graffin SD, Oliver AG, Withers MC (2016) Come aboard! Exploring the effects of directorships in the executive labor market. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1681–1706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA, Fernandez-Mateo I (2017) Leaning out: How negative recruitment experiences shape women’s decisions to compete for executive roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(3):405–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brookhart MA, Schneeweiss S, Rothman KJ, Glynn RJ, Avorn J, Stürmer T (2006) Variable selection for propensity score models. Amer. J. Epidemiology 163(12):1149–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budig MJ, England P (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 66(2):204–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang S-J, Chung J (2017) A quasi-experimental approach to the multinationality-performance relationship: An application to learning-by-exporting. Global Strategy J. 7(3):257–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conyon MJ, Core JE, Guay WR (2011) Are U.S. CEOs paid more than U.K. CEOs? Inferences from risk-adjusted pay. Rev. Financial Stud. 24(2):402–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook A, Glass C (2014) Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? Strategic Management J. 35(7):1080–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Cannella AA, Reilly GP, Yoder ME (2007) Executive compensation: A multidisciplinary review of recent developments. J. Management 33(6):1016–1072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Eirich GM, Pittinsky M (2010) Compensation benchmarking, leapfrogs, and the surge in executive pay. Amer. J. Psych. 115(6):1671–1712.Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• England P, Hermsen JM, Cotter DA (2000) The devaluation of women’s work: A comment on Tam. Amer. J. Psych. 105(6):1741–1751.Google Scholar
• Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Psych. 113(1):1–40.Google Scholar
• Ezzamel M, Watson R (1998) Market comparison earnings and the bidding-up of executive cash compensation: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Acad. Management J. 41(2):221–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faulkender M, Yang J (2010) Inside the black box: The role and composition of compensation peer groups. J. Financial Econom. 96(2):257–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Campero S (2017) Gender sorting and the glass ceiling in high-tech firms. ILR Rev. 70(1):73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Friedrich C (2011) Gender sorting at the application interface. Indust. Relations J. Econom. Soc. 50(4):591–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez RM, Mors ML (2008) Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Soc. Sci. Res. 37(4):1061–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Fernandez RM (2016) Bending the pipeline? Executive search and gender inequality in hiring for top management jobs. Management Sci. 62(12):3636–3655.Link, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B (1990) Gender differences in current and starting salaries: The role of performance, college major, and job title. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 43(4):418–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gould JA, Kulik CT, Sardeshmukh SR (2018) Trickle-down effect: The impact of female board members on executive gender diversity. Human Resources Management 57(4):931–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP (2013) Falls from grace and the hazards of high status the 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):313–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo S, Fraser MW (2010) Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Block CJ, Martell RF (1995) Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? J. Soc. Behav. Personality 10(6):237–252.Google Scholar
• Higgins MC, Gulati R (2003) Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organ. Sci. 14(3):244–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Hill AD, Upadhyay AD, Beekun RI (2015) Do female and ethnically diverse executives endure inequity in the CEO position or do they benefit from their minority status? An empirical examination. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1115–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoobler JM, Lemmon G, Wayne SJ (2014) Women’s managerial aspirations: An organizational development perspective. J. Management 40(3):703–730.Google Scholar
• Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Lemmon G (2009) Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Acad. Management J. 52(5):939–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huffman ML, Velasco SC (1997) When more is less: Sex composition, organizations, and earnings in U.S. firms. Work Occupations 24(2):214–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaschik S (2007) Should U.S. News make presidents rich? Inside Higher Ed (March 19), https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/03/19/should-us-news-make-presidents-rich.Google Scholar
• Jeong S-H, Harrison DA (2017) Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1219–1252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi A (2014) By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(2):202–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter RM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• King BG, McDonnell M-H (2015) Good firms, good targets: The relationship among corporate social responsibility, reputation, and activist targeting. Tsutsui K, Lim A, eds. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Global World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 430–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King G, Nielsen R (2016) Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• King EB, Botsford W, Hebl MR, Kazama S, Dawson JF, Perkins A (2012) Benevolent sexism at work: Gender differences in the distribution of challenging developmental experiences. J. Management 38(6):1835–1866.Google Scholar
• Kovacs B, Sharkey AJ (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulich C, Trojanowski G, Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Renneboog LDR (2011) Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Management J. 32(3):301–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lang GE, Lang K (1988) Recognition and renown: The survival of artistic reputation. Amer. J. Psych. 94(1):79–109.Google Scholar
• Lee PM, James EH (2007) She’-e-os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management J. 28(3):227–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Dahm PC (2017) Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Acad. Management J. 60(2):402–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levanon A, England P, Allison P (2009) Occupational feminization and pay: Assessing causal dynamics using 1950–2000 U.S. census data. Soc. Forces 88(2):865–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Xia J, Lin Z (2017) Cross-border acquisitions by state-owned firms: How do legitimacy concerns affect the completion and duration of their acquisitions? Strategic Management J. 38(9):1915–1934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, King BG (2013) Keeping up appearances: Reputational threat and impression management after social movement boycotts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(3):387–419.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonnell M-H, King BG (2018) Order in the court: How firm status and reputation shape the outcomes of employment discrimination suits. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):61–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Atwater LE (2003) Does whom you work with matter? Effects of referent group gender and age composition on managers’ compensation. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):725–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paik Y, Woo H (2017) The effects of corporate venture capital, founder incumbency, and their interaction on entrepreneurial firms’ R&D investment strategies. Organ. Sci. 28(4):670–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Perretti F, Negro G (2006) Filling empty seats: How status and organizational hierarchies affect exploration vs. exploitation in team design. Acad. Management J. 49(4):759–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J, Davis-Blake A (1987) Understanding organizational wage structures: A resource dependence approach. Acad. Management J. 30(3):437–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Psych. 98(4):829–872.Google Scholar
• Reskin B, Roos PA (1990) Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations (Temple University Press, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Rhee M, Haunschild PR (2006) The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the U.S. automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 17(1):101–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Rider CI, Negro G (2015) Organizational failure and intraprofessional status loss. Organ. Sci. 26(3):633–649.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1033–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosette AS, Tost LP (2010) Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):221–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (1973) The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. J. Appl. Psych. 57(2):95–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein VE (1975) Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. J. Appl. Psych. 60(3):340–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz M (2011) Getting presidential compensation right. Trusteeship 19(6), https://www.agb.org/trusteeship/2011/novemberdecember/getting-presidential-compensation-right.Google Scholar
• Serafeim G, Bernstock L, Brown S, Zheng C (2017) The Calvert diversity report 2017: Examining the cracks in the ceiling. Report, Eaton Vance, London.Google Scholar
• Shin T (2014) Explaining pay disparities between top executives and nonexecutive employees: A relative bargaining power approach. Soc. Forces 92(4):1339–1372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Shane S, Di Gregorio D (2003) The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. 49(4):478–496.Link, Google Scholar
• Smidts A, Pruyn ATH, Van Riel CBM (2001) The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1051–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen E (1994) Comparable Worth: Is It a Worthy Policy? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O (2014) Status and reputation: Synonyms or separate concepts? Strategic Organ. 12(1):62–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tosi HL, Werner S, Katz JP, Gomez-Mejia LR (2000) How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. J. Management 26(2):301–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade JB, Porac JF, Pollock TG, Graffin SD (2006) The burden of celebrity: The impact of CEO certification contests on CEO pay and performance. Acad. Management J. 49(4):643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer D, Winter‐Ebmer R (2005) A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. J. Econom. Surveys 19(3):479–511.Crossref, Google Scholar