Knowledge Sources and Operational Problems: Less Now, More Later

References

• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22:197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22:521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247:920–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Silverman BS (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1994) Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 24:91–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav. Res. 46(3):399–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA (2013) Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, Dowell G, King AA (2012) Environmental capabilities and corporate strategy: Exploring acquisitions among US manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 33(9):1053–1071.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berchicci L, Dowell G, King AA (2017) Environmental performance and the market for corporate assets. Strategic Management J. 38(12):2444–2464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Genakos C, Sadun R, Reenen JV (2012) Management practices across firms and countries. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):12–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P, Rau D (2016) Operations management and the resource based view: Another view. J. Oper. Management 41:95–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassiman B, Veugelers R (2006) In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 52(1):68–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre-entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christmann P (2000) Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Acad. Management J. 43(4):663–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Rev. Econom. Statist. 78(2):232–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Malerba F (2001) Is the tendency to variation a chief cause of progress? Indust. Corporate Change 10(3):587–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2000) Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, O’Mahony S, Gann DM (2016) One foot in, one foot out: How does individuals’ external search breadth affect innovation outcomes? Strategic Management J. 37(2):280–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1095–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Marchi S, Hamilton J (2006) Assessing the accuracy of self-reported data: An evaluation of the toxics release inventory. J. Risk Uncertainity 32:57–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doshi AR, Dowell GWS, Toffel MW (2013) How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management J. 34(10):1209–1231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res. Policy 11:147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dutt N (2013) Identifying Search Space (Proquest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
• Dutt N, King AA (2014) The judgment of garbage: End-of-pipe treatment and waste reduction. Management Sci. 60(7):1812–1828.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012) All experience is not created equal: Learning, adapting, and focusing in product portfolio management. Strategic Management J. 33(3):315–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2018) EPA finalizes action promoting greater transparency on certain chemicals used in cleaners, detergents. Retrieved July 1, 2018, https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-finalizes-action-promoting-greater-transparency-certain-chemicals-used-cleaners.Google Scholar
• Felin T, Zenger TR (2014) Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Res. Policy 43(5):914–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ, Frederiksen L, Rullani F (2016) Problem-formulation and problem-solving in self-organized communities: How modes of communication shape project behaviors in the free open-source software community. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2589–2610.Google Scholar
• Funk MJ, Westreich D, Wiesen C, Stürmer T, Brookhart MA, Davidian M (2011) Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. Amer. J. Epidemiology 173(7):761–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic DC, Rodan S (1998) Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. 19(12):1193–1201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45:113–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golovko E, Valentini G (2011) Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 42(3):362–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RFJ, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (1994) Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Sci. 40:1720–1747.Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27:32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoang H, Rothaermel FT (2010) Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management J. 31(7):734–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20:1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Winter SG (2005) The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. 26:395–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45:1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King A (1999) Retrieving and transferring embodied data: Implications for the management of interdependence within organizations. Management Sci. 45(7):918–935.Link, Google Scholar
• King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Acad. Management J. 43:698–716.Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2001) Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J. Indust. Ecology 5:105–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ, Terlaak A (2005) The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Acad. Management J. 48:1091–1106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA (2007) Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. 18:39–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Knudsen T, Levinthal DA, Winter SG (2014) Hidden but in plain sight: The role of scale adjustment in industry dynamics. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1569–1584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Lamin A, Ramos MA (2016) R&D investment dynamics in agglomerations under weak appropriability regimes: Evidence from Indian R&D labs. Strategic Management J. 37(3):604–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K (2012) Keep searching and you’ll find: What do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? Industrial Corporate Change 21(5):1181–1220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence M (2018) Taking stock of the ability to change: The effect of prior experience. Organ. Sci. 29(3):489–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010a) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. 31:224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010b) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X, Zhou YM (2017) Offshoring pollution while offshoring production? Strategic Management J. 38(11):2310–2329.Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Chacar AS (2003) Organizing for technological innovation in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Geography and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 20 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 317–340.Google Scholar
• Lind JT, Mehlum H (2010) With or without U? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 72(1):109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Love JH, Roper S, Vahter P (2014) Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1703–1716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP (1997) The road to “root cause”: Shop-floor problem-solving at three auto assembly plants. Management Sci. 43(4):479–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT (2006) Technological development and the boundaries of the firm: A knowledge-based examination in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 52(6):826–843.Link, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29(4):741–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin X, Mitchell W (1998) The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res. Policy 26:753–771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McElheran K (2015) Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case(s) of e-business adoption. Management Sci. 61(6):1197–1216.Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1995) Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. 19(2):179–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen PS, Bloch WC (2005) Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (Organisation for Economic Cooporation and Development, Paris).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh).Google Scholar
• Nickerson J, Yen CJ, Mahoney JT (2012) Exploring the problem-finding and problem-solving approach for designing organizations. Acad. Management Perspect. 26(1):52–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—the problem-solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6):617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1):14–37.Link, Google Scholar
• O’Brien J, Folta T (2009) Sunk costs, uncertainty and market exit: A real options perspective. Indust. Corporate Change 18(5):807–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pil FK, Cohen SK (2006) Modularity: Implications for imitation, innovation, and sustained advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):995–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano GP (1996) Learning-before-doing in the development of new process technology. Res. Policy 25(7):1097–1119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Singh H, Zollo M (2006) Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 49(2):263–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichstein T, Salter A (2006) Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Indust. Corporate Change 15(4):653–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernán MÁ, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11(5):550–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockart SF, Dutt N (2015) The rate and potential of capability development trajectories. Strategic Management J. 36(1):53–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22:287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. 25(3):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouvinen P (2002) R&D-productivity dynamics: Causality, lags, and “dry holes.” J. Appl. Econom. 5(1):123–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salvato C (2009) Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organ. Sci. 20(2):384–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Sanders WG, Carpenter MA (2003) Strategic satisficing? A behavioral-agency theory perspective on stock repurchase program announcements. Acad. Management J. 46(2):160–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer FM (1982) Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Rev. Econom. Statist. 64(4):627–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd ed. (Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1982) Models of Bounded Rationality, Volume 2: Behavioral Economics and Business Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Fleming L (2004) Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Res. Policy 33(10):1615–1634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stan M, Vermeulen F (2012) Selection at the gate: Difficult cases, spillovers, and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):796–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Stettner U, Lavie D (2014) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1903–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevenson WJ (2017) Operations Management, 12th ed. (McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York).Google Scholar
• Stuart TE (2000) Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. 21(8):791–811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):27–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Venkatraman N (2005) Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management J. 26(2):97–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terjesen S, Patel PC (2017) In search of process innovations: The role of search depth, search breadth, and the industry environment. J. Management 43(5):1421–1446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terlaak A, King AA (2006) The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 Quality Management Standard: A signaling approach. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60:579–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman ML, Rosenkopf L (1996) Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U.S. cement industry. Management Sci. 42(7):939–953.Link, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valentini G (2012) Measuring the effect of M&A on patenting quantity and quality. Strategic Management J. 33(3):336–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vivero RL (2002) The impact of process innovations on firm’s productivity growth: The case of Spain. Appl. Econom. 34(8):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Islam M (2017) Cross-regional R&D collaboration and local knowledge spillover. Alcácer J, Kogut B, Thomas C, Yeung BY, eds. Geography, Location, and Strategy, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 36 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 343–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar