Moving off the Map: How Knowledge of Organizational Operations Empowers and Alienates

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1277

References

  • Barley SR (2008) Coalface institutionalism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 491–518.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13(5):653–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J (2011) The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organ. Sci. 22(4):817–834.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J, Casciaro T (2012) Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Acad. Management J. 55(2):381–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battilana J, D’Aunno T (2009) Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. TB Lawrence, R Suddaby, B Leca, eds. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 31–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger P, Pullberg S (1966) Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness (New Left Review, New York).Google Scholar
  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Anchor Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Besharov ML, Smith WK (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Management Rev. 39(3):364–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory Soc. 14(6):723–744.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1993) Sociology in Question (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Braganza A (2001) Radical Process Change (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Cattani G, Ferriani S (2008) A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organ. Sci. 19(6):824–844.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clemens ES, Cook JM (1999) Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25(1):441–466.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coser LA (1965) Men of Ideas: A Sociologist’s View (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Creed WD, DeJordy R, Lok J (2010) Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1336–1364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport TH (1993) Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Amer. J. Sociol. 103(4):962–1023.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewick P, Silbey S (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories of Popular Legal Consciousness (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewick P, Silbey S (2003) Narrating social structure: Stories of resistance to legal authority. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(6):1328–1372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furnari S (2014) Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):439–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR (1996) Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Acad. Managment. Rev. 21(4):1022–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Acad. Management J. 49(1):27–48.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for a Business Revolution (Harper Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hammer M, Stanton SA (1995) The Reengineering Revolution: A Handbook (HarperBusiness, New York).Google Scholar
  • Haveman HA, Rao H (1997) Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 102(6):1606–1651.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):398–422.Google Scholar
  • Janicik GA, Larrick RP (2005) Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(2):348–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P (2004) Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organ. Stud. 25(4):529–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2015) Strategy tools‐in‐use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management J. 36(4):537–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2011) Challenging Operations: Medical Reform and Resistance in Surgery (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2012) Making the cut: Using status-based countertactics to block social movement implementation and microinstitutional change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 23(6):1546–1570.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Knorr-Cetina K (1997) Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory Culture Soc. 14(4):1–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotter JP (1996) Leading Change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Kraatz MS, Block ES (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage, London), 243–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz MS, Moore JH (2002) Executive migration and institutional change. Acad. Management J. 45(1):120–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leblebici H, Salancik G, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(3):333–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lockett A, Currie G, Finn R, Martin G, Waring J (2014) The influence of social position on sensemaking about organizational change. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1102–1129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lofland J (1966) Doomsday Cult (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Lynch M (2013) Postscript ontography: Investigating the production of things, deflating ontology. Soc. Stud. Sci. 43(3):444–464.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(1):9–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK, Zuckerman H, Sci S, eds. (1973) Institutionalized Patterns of Evaluation in Science. N. W. Storer (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Meyer AD, Brooks GR, Goes JB (1990) Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: Organizational responses to discontinuous change. Strategic Management J. 11:93–110.Google Scholar
  • Meyer RE, Höllerer MA, Jancsary D, van Leeuwen T (2013) The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):489–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerson D (2001) Tempered Radicals (Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Meyerson D, Scully M (1995) Crossroads: Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organ. Sci. 6(5):585–600.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nigam A, Huising R, Golden B (2016) Explaining the selection of routines for change during organizational search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):551–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nigam A, Sackett E, Golden B (2015) The role of outside consultants in shaping hospital organizational change. Waldorff SB, Pedersen AR, Fitzgerald L, Ferlie E, eds. Managing Change, Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare Series (Palgrave Macmillan, London), 121–135.Google Scholar
  • Otto P, Struben J (2004) Gloucester fishery: Insights from a group modeling intervention. System Dynam. Rev. 20(4):287–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pache AC, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrozzo DP, Stepper JC (1994) Successful Reengineering (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pollner M (1987) Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pollner M, Emerson RM (2001) Ethnomethodology and ethnography. Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, Lofland J, Lolfand L, eds. Handbook of Ethnography (Sage, Los Angeles), 118–135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG (2000) The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):456–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schutz A (1962) Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. Natanson M, ed. Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, Phaenomenologica (Collection Publiée Sous le Patronage des Centres d'Archives-Husserl), vol. 11 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 3–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seo M-G, Creed DW (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):222–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sewell WH Jr (1992) A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sgourev S (2013) How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1601–1617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smith D (2001) Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Stud. Cultures Organ. Soc. 7(1):159–198.Google Scholar
  • Voronov M, Yorks L (2015) “Did you notice that?” Theorizing differences in the capacity to apprehend institutional contradictions. Acad. Management Rev. 40(4):563–586.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu KH (2013) Institutionalization in the context of institutional pluralism: Politics as a generative process. Organ. Stud. 34(1):105–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.