Product Adaptation During New Industry Emergence: The Role of Start-Up Team Preentry Experience

References

• Abernathy W, Utterback J (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. 80:40–47.Google Scholar
• Adner R, Helfat CE (2003) Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):1011–1025.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Shah SK (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Tripsas M (2011) Technology and industry evolution. S. Shane, ed. Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 3–56.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Campbell BA, Franco AM, Ganco M (2016) What do I take with me? The mediating effect of spin-out team size and tenure on the founder–firm performance relationship. Acad. Management J. 59(3):1060–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar MB (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22:197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aitken HGJ (1994) Allocating the spectrum: The origins of radio regulation. Tech. Culture 35(4):686–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison P (2002) Bias in fixed-effects Cox regression with dummy variables. Working paper, Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD (2014) Event History and Survival Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison PD, Christakis NA (2006) Fixed-effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociol. Methodology 36(1):155–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman M (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson PK, Gill RD (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Ann. Statist. 10:1100–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey EE, Helfat CE (2003) External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial Decision Econom. 24(4):347–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayus BL, Agarwal R (2007) The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategies in explaining firm survival. Management Sci. 53(12):1887–1902.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benson CL, Magee CL (2014) On improvement rates for renewable energy technologies: Solar PV, wind turbines, capacitors, and batteries. Renewable Energy 68:745–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide A (2003) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Bingham C, Eisenhardt K (2011) Rational heuristics: What firms explicitly learn from their process experiences. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bingham C, Eisenhardt K, Furr N (2007) What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 1(1):27–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blossfeld H-P, Rohwer G (1995) Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NH).Google Scholar
• Bowman E, Helfat CE (2001) Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management J. 22:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier J (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists (Cambridge University Press, West Nyack, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradford T (2006) Solar Revolution: The Economic Transformation of the Global Energy Industry (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bremner RP, Eisenhardt KM (2019) Experimentation, bottlenecks and organizational form: Innovation and growth in the nascent drone industry. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt K (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42:1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG (2004) Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. J. Managment 30(6):749–778.Google Scholar
• Carroll G, Bigelow LS, Seidel M-DL, Tsai LB (1996) The fates of de novo and de alio producers in the American automobile industry 1885-1981. Strategic Management J. 17(7):117–137.Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (1991) Managerial resources and rents. J. Management. 17(1):155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C, Suarez FF, Utterback JM (1998) Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. 44(12):207–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Cleves M, Gutierrez RG, Gould W, Marchenko YV (2010) An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata, 3rd ed. (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 34:187–200.Google Scholar
• Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1095–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):159–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Eggers J (2013) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Martin J (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21:1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7(2):136–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Tabrizi B (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40:84–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K, Furr N, Bingham C (2010) Micro-foundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Acad. Management J. 32(3):543–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Superior strategy in entrepreneurial settings: Thinking, doing, and the logic of opportunity. Strategy Sci. 2(4):246–257.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978-1998. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fern MJ, Cardinal LB, O’Neill HM (2012) The genesis of strategy in new ventures: Escaping the constraints of founder and team knowledge. Strategic Management J. 33(4):427–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortune A, Mitchell W (2012) Unpacking firm exit at the firm and industry levels: The adaptation and selection of firm capabilities. Strategic Management J. 33(7):794–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR (2009) Cognitive flexibility: The adaptive reality of concrete organization change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Furr N, Bradford T (2008) PV Innovation in North America (Greentech Media, Boston).Google Scholar
• Furr N, Kapoor R (2018) Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 39(1):33–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr N, Cavarretta F, Garg S (2012) Who changes course? The role of domain knowledge and novel framing in making technology changes. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):236–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M (2013) Cutting the Gordian knot: The effect of knowledge complexity on employee mobility and entrepreneurship. Strategic Management J. 34(6):666–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganco M, Agarwal R (2009) Performance differentials between diversifying entrants and entrepreneurial start-ups: A complexity approach. Acad. Management Rev. 34(2):228–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Levinthal DA, Rivkin JW (2005) Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: The power of analogy. Strategic Management J. 26(8):691–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick C (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37(1):9–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gort M, Klepper S (1982) Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. 92(367):630–653.Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(Winter Special Issue):109–122.Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2011) Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms. Strategic Management J. 32(1):103–114.Google Scholar
• Gruber M (2010) Exploring the origins of organizational paths: Empirical evidence from newly founded firms. J. Management 36(5):1143–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2010) From minds to markets: How human capital endowments shape market opportunity identification of technology start-ups. J. Management 38(5):1429–1449.Google Scholar
• Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2013) Escaping the prior knowledge corridor: What shapes the number and variety of market opportunities identified before market entry of technology start-ups? Organ. Sci. 24(1):280–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):334–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick DC, Mason PA (1984) Upper-echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top-managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Campo-Rembado M (2016) Integrative capabilities, vertical integration, and innovation over successive technology lifecycles. Organ. Sci. 27(2):249–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Helfat C, Lieberman M (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS (2000) Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):961–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35:9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Huff JO, Huff AS, Thomas H (1992) Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management J. 13:55–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, de Rassenfosse G (2017) Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 68(6):1360–1374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd ed. (John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Acad. Management J. 51(4):672–695.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Murray F, Henderson R (2003) Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnology. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):203–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Furr N (2015) Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants’ technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management J. 36(3):416–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khessina OM (2003) Entry mode, technological innovation and firm survival in the worldwide optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Khessina OM, Carroll GR (2008) Product demography of de novo and de alio firms in the optical disk drive industry, 1983–1999. Organ. Sci. 19(1):25–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2019) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Klepper S (2002) The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change. 11(4):645–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Simons KL (2000) Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management J. 21:997–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Sleeper S (2005) Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. 51(8):1291–1306.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3):383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin DY, Wei LJ (1989) The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84:1074–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn PA (2010) Electricity from Sunlight: An Introduction to Photovoltaics (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Eisenhardt KM (2019) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective design of a business model. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print May 24, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219852349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta S (2010) PV Technology, Production and Cost Outlook: 2010-2015 (Greentech Media, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Moeen M (2017) Entry into nascent industries: Disentangling a firm’s capability portfolio at the time of investment vs. market entry. Strategic Management J. 38(10):1986–2004.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murmann JP, Frenken K (2006) Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Res. Policy. 35(7):925–952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap-Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 11(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt K (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell WW, Sandholtz K (2009) Chance, necessité, et naïveté: Ingredients to create a new organizational form. Padgett JF, Powell WW, eds. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets (Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM), 379–433.Google Scholar
• Prentice RL, Williams BJ, Peterson AV (1981) On the regression analysis of multivariate time failure data. Biometrika 68:373–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt K (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power and agency in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK, Agarwal R, Echambadi R (2019) Jewels in the crown: Motivations and team building processes of employee entrepreneurs. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Champaign.Google Scholar
• Sommer SC, Loch CH, Dong J (2009) Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in startup companies: An empirical study. Organ. Sci. 20(1):118–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Suarez FF, Utterback JM (1995) Dominant designs and the survival of firms. Strategic Management J. 16(6):415–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyogg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DE, Eden L, Hitt MA, Miller SR (2007) Experience of emerging market firms: The role of cognitive bias in developed market entry and survival. Management Internat. Rev. 47(6):845–867.Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Unravelling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management J. 18(Special Issue):119–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM (1996) Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Suarez FF (1993) Innovation, competition, and industry structure. Res. Policy 22(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincenti WG (1994) The retractable airplane landing gear and the Northrop “anomaly”: Variation-selection and the shaping of technology. Tech. Culture 35(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JR (1992) How sustainable is your competitive advantage? Calif. Management Rev. 34(3):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woody T (2010) Silicon Valley’s solar innovators retool to catch up to China. New York Times (October 12), https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/business/energy-environment/13solar.html.Google Scholar
• Wu B, Wan Z, Levinthal DA (2013) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1257–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar