The Double-Edged Sword of Jurisdictional Entrenchment: Explaining Human Resources Professionals’ Failed Strategic Repositioning

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1282

References

  • Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A (1991) The future of professions: Occupation and expertise in the age of organization. Tolbert PS, Barley SR, eds. Professions and Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 8 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 17–42.Google Scholar
  • Agar M (1980) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Anteby M (2010) Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the U.S. commerce in cadavers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(4):606–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK, DiBenigno J (2016) Three lenses on occupations and professions in organizations: Becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):183–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashcraft K (2013) The glass slipper: “Incorporating” occupational identity in management studies. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):6–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney JB, Wright PM (1998) On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management 37(1):31–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003a) Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Amer. J. Sociol. 109(3):720–752.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003b) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA, Chung D (2018) Latitude or latent control? How occupational embeddedness and control shape emergent coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):607–636.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL (2002) Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Beer M (1997) The transformation of the human resource function: Resolving the tension between a traditional administrative and a new strategic role. Human Resource Management 36(1):49–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bidwell M, Keller JR (2014) Within or without? How firms combine internal and external labor markets to fill jobs. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1035–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau JW, Ramstad PM (2007) Beyond HR (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Bromley P, Meyer JW (2017) “They are all organizations”: The cultural roots of blurring between the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Adm. Soc. 49(7):939–966.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cappelli PH (2015) Why we love to hate HR…and what HR can do about it. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(July/August):54–61.Google Scholar
  • Charan R (2014) It’s time to split HR. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(7):33–34.Google Scholar
  • Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  • Child J, Fulk J (1982) Maintenance of occupational control: The case of professions. Work Occupation 9(2):155–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen L, Burton MD, Lounsbury M (2016) Bringing jobs back in: Toward a new multi-level approach to the study of work and organizations. Cohen LE, Burton MD, Lounsbury M, eds. The Structuring of Work in Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 47 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 1–22.Google Scholar
  • Corbin JM, Strauss A (2007) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. (Sage, Los Angeles).Google Scholar
  • Dane E (2010) Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):579–603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiBenigno J (2018) Anchored personalization in managing goal conflict between professional groups: The case of U.S. Army mental health care. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):526–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F (2009) Inventing Equal Opportunity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobbin F, Sutton JR (1998) The strength of a weak state: The rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(2):441–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker P (1954) The Principles of Management (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB (2016) Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS (1999) The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(2):406–454.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eyal G (2013) For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):863–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freidson E (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge (Dodd, Mead & Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Freidson E (1984) The changing nature of professional control. Annual Rev. Sociol. 10(1):1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freidson E (2001) Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Galperin RV (2019) Organizational powers: Contestation of professional jurisdiction with innovation in retail medicine. Working paper, Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  • Hammonds KH (2005) Why we hate HR. Fast Company 97(8):40–47.Google Scholar
  • Haug M (1975) The deprofessionalization of everyone? Sociol. Focus 8(3):197–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heaphy ED (2013) Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1291–1315.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Heizmann H, Fox S (2017) O partner, where art thou? A critical discursive analysis of HR managers’ struggle for legitimacy. Internat. J. Human Resource Management, ePub ahead of print April 9, https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1314974.Google Scholar
  • Hughes EC (1971) The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ),Google Scholar
  • Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2015) To hive or to hold? Producing professional authority through scut work. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):263–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson SE, Schuler RS, Jiang K (2014) An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):1–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby SM (2004) Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in the 20th Century (Psychology Press, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jamous H, Peloille B (1970) Professions or self-perpetuating systems? Changes in the French university-hospital system. Jackson JA, ed. Professions and Professionalization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Kahl SJ, King BG, Liegel G (2016) Occupational survival through field-level task integration: Systems men, production planners, and the computer, 1940s–1990s. Organ. Sci. 27(5):1084–1107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufman BE (2008) Managing the Human Factor: The Early Years of Human Resource Management in American Industry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2014) Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(5):912–941.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EE (2007) Why HR practices are not evidence-based. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1033–1036.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EE, Boudreau JW (2012) Effective Human Resource Management: A Global Analysis (Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
  • Legge K (2005) Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities, anniv. ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, London).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lengnick-Hall ML, Lengnick-Hall CA, Andrade LS, Drake B (2009) Strategic human resource management: The evolution of the field. Human Resource Management Rev. 19(2):64–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mirza P (2005) With justice for all. HR Magazine 50(13):36.Google Scholar
  • Morrill C (2017) Institutional change through interstitial emergence: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in U.S. law, 1970-2000. Brazilian J. Socio-Legal Stud. 4:10–36.Google Scholar
  • Mundy JC (2012) Why HR still isn’t a strategic partner. Harvard Bus. Rev. (July 5), https://hbr.org/2012/07/why-hr-still-isnt-a-strategic-partner.Google Scholar
  • Muzio D, Brock DM, Suddaby R (2013) Professions and institutional change: Toward an institutionalist sociology of the professions. J. Management Stud. 50(5):699–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelsen BJ, Barley SR (1997) For love or money? Commodification and the construction of an occupational mandate. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):619–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson A, Irwin J (2014) “Defining what we do—All over again”: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/Internet-search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57(3):892–928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Cohen Y (1984) Determinants of internal labor markets in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(4):550–572.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pine KH, Mazmanian M (2017) Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice. Acad. Management J. 60(2):720–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pohler D, Willness C (2014) Balancing interests in the search for occupational legitimacy: The HR professionalization project in Canada. Human Resource Management 53(3):467–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raelin JA (1985) The basis for the professional’s resistance to managerial control. Human Resource Management 24(2):147–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritzer G, Trice HM (1969) An Occupation in Conflict: A Study of the Personnel Manager (Humphrey Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rothwell WJ, Prescott RK, Taylor MW (2008) Human Resource Transformation: Demonstrating Strategic Leadership in the Face of Future Trends (Davies-Black Publishing, Mountain View, CA).Google Scholar
  • Sandefur RL (2015) Elements of professional expertise: Understanding relational and substantive expertise through lawyers’ impact. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 80(5):909–933.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholtz KW (2012) Making standards stick: A theory of coupled vs. decoupled compliance. Organ. Stud. 33(5–6):655–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholtz KW, Burrows TN (2016) Compliance police or business partner? Institutional complexity and occupational tensions in human resource management. Cohen LE, Burton MD, Lounsbury M, eds. The Structuring of Work in Organizations, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 47 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 161–191.Google Scholar
  • Small ML (2009) How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1):5–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sturdy A, Handley K, Clark T, Fincham R (2009) Management Consultancy: Boundaries and Knowledge in Action (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tichy NM, Fombrun CJ, Devanna MA (1982) Strategic human resource management. Sloan Management Rev. 23(2):47–61.Google Scholar
  • Ulrich D, Beatty D (2001) From partners to players: Extending the HR playing field. Human Resource Management 40(4):293–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich D, Brockbank W (2005) The HR Value Proposition (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Ulrich D, Kryscynski D, Brockbank W, Ulrich M (2017) Victory Through Organization: Why the War for Talent Is Failing Your Company and What You Can Do About It (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ulrich D, Allen J, Brockbank W, Younger J, Nyman M (2009) HR Transformation: Building Human Resources from the Outside In (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Vallas SP (2003) Why teamwork fails: Obstacles to workplace change in four manufacturing plants. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):223–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vallas SP (2006) Empowerment redux: Structure, agency, and the remaking of managerial authority. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(6):1677–1717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waisberg I, Nelson A (2018) When the general meets the particular: The practices and challenges of interorganizational knowledge reuse. Organ. Sci. 29(3):432–448.Google Scholar
  • Wilensky HL (1964) The professionalization of everyone? Amer. J. Sociol. 70(2):137–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wright C (2008) Reinventing human resource management: Business partners, internal consultants and the limits to professionalization. Human Relations 61(8):1063–1086.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright AL, Zammuto RF, Liesch PW (2017) Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Acad. Management J. 60(1):200–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zetka JR Jr (2003) Surgeons and the Scope (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X (2005) The institutional logic of occupational prestige ranking: Reconceptualization and reanalyses. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):90–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.