Relational Misperceptions in the Workplace: New Frontiers and Challenges

References

• Adler PS, Kwon SW (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afifi WA, Burgoon JK (2000) The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Comm. Res. 26(2):203–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agneessens F, Wittek R (2012) Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Soc. Networks 34(3):333–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almaatouq A, Radaelli L, Pentland A, Shmueli E (2016) Are you your friends’ friend? Poor perception of friendship ties limits the ability to promote behavioral change. PLoS One 11(3):e0151588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Berdahl JL (2002) The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(6):1362–1377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C, Ames DR, Gosling SD (2008) Punishing hubris: The perils of overestimating one’s status in a group. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(1):90–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson KJ (2010) Students’ stereotypes of professors: An exploration of the double violations of ethnicity and gender. Soc. Psych. Ed. 13(4):459–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson LM, Pearson CM (1999) Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):452–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Bradfield M (2000) Perceived victimization in the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics. Organ. Sci. 11(5):525–537.Link, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Tripp TM, Bies RJ (2001) How employees respond to personal offense: The effects of blame attribution, victim status, and offender status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):52–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE (1997) Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian J. Admin. Sci. 14(2):126–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachman GF, Guerrero LK (2006) Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 23(6):943–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Back MD, Kenny DA (2010) The social relations model: How to understand dyadic processes. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 4(10):855–870.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Evans K, Oldham GR, Boasso A (2015) The social network side of individual innovation: A meta-analysis and path-analytic integration. Organ. Psych. Rev. 5(3):191–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balkundi P, Kilduff M (2006) The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. Leadership Quart. 17(4):419–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball B, Newman MEJ (2013) Friendship networks and social status. Net Sci. 1(1):16–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing Social Networks (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Bozeman DP, Kacmar KM (1997) A cybernetic model of impression management processes in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Process. 69(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brands RA (2013) Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. J. Organ. Behav. 28(S1):S82–S103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brion S, Anderson C (2013) The loss of power: How illusions of alliance contribute to powerholders’ downfall. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121(1):129–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brion S, Lount RB Jr, Doyle SP (2015) Knowing if you are trusted: Does meta-accuracy promote trust development? Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 6(7):823–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brower HH, Lester SW, Korsgaard MA, Dineen BR (2009) A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. J. Management 35(2):327–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Hale HL (1988) Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Comm. Monographs 55(1):58–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgoon JK, Stern LA, Dillman L (1995) Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes? The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:345–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2005) Brokerage and Closure? An Introduction to Social Capital (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Byron K (2008) Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byron K, Laurence GA (2015) Diplomas, photos, and tchotchkes as symbolic self-representations: Understanding employees’ individual use of symbols. Acad. Management J. 58(1):298–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campagna R, Dirks K, Robinson S, Kudesia R, Crossley C (2014) Who trusts you? Do you know? Determinants and implications of trust meta-accuracy. Presentation, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 4, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Carley KM, Krackhardt D (1996) Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Soc. Networks 18(1):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson EN (2016) Meta-accuracy and relationship quality: Weighing the costs and benefits of knowing what people really think about you. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 111(2):250–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson EN, Kenny DA (2012) Meta-accuracy: Do we know how others see us? Vazire S, Wilson TD, eds. Handbook of Self-Knowledge (Guilford Press, New York), 242–257.Google Scholar
• Carmeli A, Ben-Hador B, Waldman DA, Rupp DE (2009) How leaders cultivate social capital and nurture employee vigor: Implications for job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1553–1561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter DR, DeChurch LA, Braun MT, Contractor NS (2015) Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):597–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T, Carley KM, Krackhardt D (1999) Positive affectivity and accuracy in social network perception. Motivation Emotion 23(4):285–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Church AT, Katigbak MS, Mazuera Arias R, Rincon BC, Vargas-Flores J, Ibáñez-Reyes J, Wang L, Alvarez JM, Wang C, Ortiz FA (2014) A four-culture study of self-enhancement and adjustment using the social relations model: Do alternative conceptualizations and indices make a difference? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 106(6):997–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colbert AE, Bono JE, Purvanova RK (2016) Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1199–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DePaulo BM, Fisher JD (1980) The costs of asking for help. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 1(1):23–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dindia K, Canary DJ (1993) Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 10(2):163–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 45(2):331–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning D (2005) Self-Insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself (Psychology Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Eby LT, Allen TD, Evans SC, Ng T, DuBois DL (2008) Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. J. Vocational Behav. 72(2):254–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenkraft N, Elfenbein HA, Kopelman S (2017) We know who likes us, but not who competes against us: Dyadic meta-accuracy among work colleagues. Psych. Sci. 28(2):233–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein HA, Eisenkraft N, Ding WW (2009) Do we know who values us? Dyadic meta-accuracy in the perception of professional relationships. Psych. Sci. 20(9):1081–1083.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Vitak J, Gray R, Lampe C (2014) Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. J. Comput. Comm. 19(4):855–870.Google Scholar
• Enzle ME, Anderson SC (1993) Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(2):257–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang R, Landis B, Zhang Z, Anderson MH, Shaw JD, Kilduff M (2015) Integrating personality and social networks: A meta-analysis of personality, network position, and work outcomes in organizations. Organ. Sci. 26(4):1243–1260.Link, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Taylor SE (1991) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Lake VKB (2008) If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(1):128–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gable SL, Reis HT, Downey G (2003) He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psych. Sci. 14(2):100–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gangestad SW, Snyder M (2000) Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psych. Bull. 126(4):530–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardner WL, Martinko MJ (1988) Impression management in organizations. J. Management 14(2):321–338.Google Scholar
• Gaucher D, Wood JV, Stinson DA, Forest AL, Holmes JG, Logel C (2012) Perceived regard explains self-esteem differences in expressivity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 38(9):1144–1156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Rosenkopf L (2015) Shrouded in structure: Challenges and opportunities for a friction-based view of network research. Organ. Sci. 26(2):622–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibson KR (2018) Can i tell you something? How disruptive self-disclosure changes who “we” are. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):570–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glomb TM, Laio H (2003) Interpersonal aggression in work groups: Social influence, reciprocal, and individual effects. Acad. Management J. 46(4):486–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 6(2):219–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graffin SD, Haleblian JJ, Kiley JT (2016) Ready, AIM, acquire: Impression offsetting and acquisitions. Acad. Management J. 59(1):232–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. 78(6):1360–1380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greitemeyer T, Sagioglou C (2018) When positive ends tarnish the means: The morality of nonprofit more than of for-profit organizations is tainted by the use of compliance techniques. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 76:67–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Han J, Van Dongen K (2015) Friendship network centrality and the performance of soccer players: The role of cognitive accuracy. Human Performance 28(3):265–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaphy ED, Dutton JE (2008) Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):137–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay LR, Afifi WA, Samter W (2000) The role of expectations in effective genetic counseling. J. Genetic Counseling 9(2):95–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Shah PP (1997) Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(4):775–790.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen-Campbell LA, Graziano WG (2001) Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. J. Personality 69(2):323–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jussim L, Coleman LM, Lerch L (1987) The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(3):536–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA (2004) PERSON: A general model of interpersonal perception. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(3):265–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, DePaulo BM (1993) Do people know how others view them?: An empirical and theoretical account. Psych. Bull. 114(1):145–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM (2010) The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad. Management J. 53(5):943–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Galinsky AD, Gallo E, Reade JJ (2016) Whatever it takes to win: Rivalry increases unethical behavior. Acad. Management J. 59(5):1508–1534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D (2008) Organizational network perceptions vs. reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):15–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P, Bernard H (1974) Catij: A new sociometric and its application to a prison living room. Human Organ. 33(4):335–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim T, McFee E, Olguin DO, Waber B, Pentland A (2012) Sociometric badges: Using sensor technology to capture new forms of collaboration. J. Organ. Behav. 33(3):412–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenig BL, Kirkpatrick LA, Ketelaar T (2007) Misperception of sexual and romantic interests in opposite-sex friendships: Four hypotheses. Personal Relationships 14(3):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korsgaard MA, Brower HH, Lester SW (2015) It isn’t always mutual: A critical review of dyadic trust. J. Management 41(1):47–70.Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D (1987) Cognitive social structures. Soc. Networks 9(2):109–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer RM (1998) Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 2(4):251–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW (1989) The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psych. Bull. 106(3):395–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumbasar E, Rommey AK, Batchelder WH (1994) Systematic biases in social perception. Amer. J. Sociol. 100(2):477–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labianca G, Brass DJ (2006) Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):596–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers J, Galinsky AD, Gordijn EH, Otten S (2008) Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach. Psych. Sci. 19(6):558–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lammers J, Stoker JI, Rink F, Galinsky AD (2016) To have control over or to be free from others? The desire for power reflects a need for autonomy. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(4):498–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau DC, Lam LW, Wen SS (2014) Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self‐evaluative perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 35(1):112–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leary MR, Tambor ES, Terdal SK, Downs EL (1995) Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 68(3):518–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemay EP Jr, Dudley KL (2009) Implications of reflected appraisals of interpersonal insecurity for suspicion and power. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35(12):1672–1686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, McAllister DJ, Bies RJ (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):438–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Sparrowe RT (2000) An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. 85(3):407–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Livi S, Kenny DA, Albright L, Pierro A (2008) A social relations analysis of leadership. Leadership Quart. 19(2):235–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusher D, Robins G, Pattison PE, Lomi A (2012) “Trust me”: Differences in expressed and perceived trust relations in an organization. Soc. Networks 34(4):410–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malloy TE, Janowski CL (1992) Perceptions and metaperceptions of leadership: Components, accuracy, and dispositional correlates. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 18(6):700–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marineau JE (2017) Trust and distrust network accuracy and career advancement in an organization. Group Organ. Management 42(4):487–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV (1990) Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. 16:435–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dixon AL, Brass DJ, Robertson B (2006) The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organ. Sci. 17(1):64–79.Link, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, Melwani S, Rothman NB (2017) The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. J. Management 43(6):1789–1819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS (2016) Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Personality Psych. 69(2):311–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollica KA, Gray B, Treviño LK (2003) Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organ. Sci. 14(2):123–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray SL, Holmes JG, MacDonald G, Ellsworth PC (1998) Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(6):1459–1480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray SL, Rose P, Bellavia GM, Holmes JG, Kusche AG (2002) When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 83(3):556–573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogolsky BG, Bowers JR (2013) A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 30(3):343–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olk PM, Gibbons DE (2010) Dynamics of friendship reciprocity among professional adults. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 40(5):1146–1171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peeters, Czapinski (1990) Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 1(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1981) Power in Organizations (Pitman, Boston).Google Scholar
• Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pronin E (2008) How we see ourselves and how we see others. Science 320(5880):1177–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Verbos AK (2007) Positive relationships in action: Relational mentoring and mentoring schemas in the workplace. Dutton J, Ragins BR, eds. Exploring Positive Relationships at Work: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 91–116.Google Scholar
• Ralston DA (1985) Employee ingratiation: The role of management. Acad. Management Rev. 10(3):477–487.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salamon SD, Robinson SL (2008) Trust that binds: The impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. J. Appl. Psych. 93(3):593–601.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schyns B, Day D (2010) Critique and review of leader-member exchange theory: Issues of agreement, consensus, and excellence. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 19(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sias PM, Heath RG, Perry T, Silva D, Fix B (2004) Narratives of workplace friendship deterioration. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 21(3):321–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sin HP, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2009) Understanding why they don’t see eye to eye: An examination of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. J. Appl. Psych. 94(4):1048–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sluss DM, Ashforth BE (2007) Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 32:9–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ES, Menon T, Thompson L (2012) Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23(1):67–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Snyder M (1974) Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(4):526–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinson DA, Cameron JJ, Wood JV, Gaucher D, Holmes JG (2009) Deconstructing the “reign of error”: Interpersonal warmth explains the self-fulfilling prophecy of anticipated acceptance. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 35(9):1165–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swann WB Jr (2012) Self-verification theory. Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (Sage, London), 23–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swift SA, Moore DA (2011) The three faces of overconfidence in organizations. De Cremer D, Van Dick R, Murnigham JK, eds. Social Psychology and Organizations (Taylor & Francis, Oxford, UK), 147–184.Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Brown JD (1988) Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psych. Bull. 103(2):193–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper BJ (2007) Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Management 33(3):261–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibaut JW, Kelley HH (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Uehara ES (1995) Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. J. Soc. Personal Relationships 12(4):483–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Labianca G, Brass DJ, Kass E, Scholten L (2003) The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational justice. Organ. Sci. 14(6):738–753.Link, Google Scholar
• Vazire S (2010) Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(2):281–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vazire S, Carlson EN (2011) Others sometimes know us better than we know ourselves. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 20(2):104–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber JM, Malhotra D, Murnighan JK (2005) Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. Res. Organ. Behav. 26:75–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West TV, Dovidio JF, Pearson AR (2014) Accuracy and bias in perceptions of relationship interest for intergroup and intragroup roommates. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 5(2):235–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams M (2016) Being trusted: How team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross‐boundary relationships. J. Organ. Behav. 37(3):346–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wills TA (1981) Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psych. Bull. 90(2):245–271.Crossref, Google Scholar