Pivoting Isn’t Enough? Managing Strategic Reorientation in New Ventures

References

• Adner R, Kapoor R (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves. Strategic Management J. 37(4):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Helfat CE (2009) Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. 20(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Management Rev. 19(4):645–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvarez SA, Barney JB, Anderson P (2013) Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organ. Sci. 24(1):301–317.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(4):604–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C, Nelson AJ, Tripsas M (2016) “Who are you?… I really wanna know”: Product meaning and competitive positioning in the nascent synthesizer industry. Strategy Sci. 1(3):163–183.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron E (2015) The B-school lean startup revolution is underway. Fortune (May 4), http://fortune.com/2015/05/04/mba-lean-startup-movement/.Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednar MK (2012) Watchdog or lapdog? A behavioral view of the media as a corporate governance mechanism. Acad. Management J. 55(1):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide AV (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The ‘simple rules’ that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(5):63–72.Google Scholar
• Bowman EH, Singh H (1993) Corporate restructuring: Reconfiguring the firm. Strategic Management J. 14(S1):5–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Grove AS (2007) Let chaos reign, then rein in chaos—repeatedly: Managing strategic dynamics for corporate longevity. Strategic Management J. 28(10):965–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning 43(2):195–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen EL, Katila R, McDonald R, Eisenhardt KM (2010) Life in the fast lane: Origins of competitive interaction in new vs. established markets. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1527–1547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Bower JL (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. 17(3):197–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Hall T, Dillon K, Duncan DS (2016) Know your customers’ “Jobs” to be done. Harvard Bus. Rev. 94(9):54–62.Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Tripsas M (2018) Managing technological transitions by building bridges. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2319–2342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Di Stefano G (2018) A universe of stories: Mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change. Strategic Management J. 39(3):664–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSantola A, Gulati R (2017) Scaling: Organizing and growth in entrepreneurial ventures. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):640–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunford R, Jones D (2000) Narrative in strategic change. Human Relations 53(9):1207–1226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Paolella L (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1100–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Ries E, Dillard S (2013) Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup. Background note 812-095, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR (2006) Internet companies’ growth strategies: Determinants of investment intensity and long‐term performance. Strategic Management J. 27(12):1183–1204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenno RF (1978) Home Style: House Members in their Districts (Little, Brown and Company, Boston).Google Scholar
• Fisher G, Kotha S, Lahiri A (2016) Changing with the time: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy and new venture life cycles. Acad. Management Rev. 41(3):383–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–267.Google Scholar
• Furr NR (2019) Product adaptation during new industry emergence: The role of start-up team pre-entry experience. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Dyer JH (2014) The Innovator’s Method: Adapting the Lean Startup into Your Organization (Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Cavarretta F, Garg S (2012) Who changes course? The role of domain knowledge and novel framing in making technology changes. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):236–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao C, Zuzul T, Jones G, Khanna T (2017) Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation‐based view of long‐run survival. Strategic Management J. 38(11):2147–2167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R, Schildt HA, Lant TK (2014) Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1479–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA, Navis C (2013) Categories, identities, and cultural classification: Moving beyond a model of categorical constraint. J. Management Stud. 50(6):1124–1137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes M (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurses K, Ozcan P (2015) Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the U.S. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1709–1739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Acad. Management J. 55(1):35–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampel CE, Tracey P, Weber K (2019) The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Acad. Management J., ePub ahead of print April 4, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon DJ (2018) When the Fed speaks: Arguments, emotions, and the microfoundations of institutions. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print May 14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218777475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon DJ, Green SE, Goodnight GT (2015) A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1):76–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Carlos WC (2018) From farms to fuel tanks: Stakeholder framing contests and entrepreneurship in the emergent U.S. biodiesel market. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print November 14, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2989.Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Sine WD (2014) Clear and present danger: Planning and new venture survival amid political and civil violence. Strategic Management J. 35(5):773–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan MT, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G (1985) Temporal stability and response-order biases in participant descriptions of organizational decisions. Acad. Management J. 28(4):943–950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Power DJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. 6(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jick TD (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):602–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Chen EL, Piezunka H (2012) All the right moves: How entrepreneurial firms compete effectively. Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(2):116–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.Link, Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):25–48.Google Scholar
• Kim BK, Jensen M (2011) How product order affects market identity: Repertoire ordering in the U.S. opera market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(2):238–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim L (2016) Why startup pivots almost never work. Inc. Magazine (December 5), https://www.inc.com/larry-kim/why-startup-pivots-almost-never-work.html.Google Scholar
• Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2018) What is a pivot? How and when entrepreneurial firms make decisions about strategic change. Working paper, The Wharton School, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Stern L, Anderson J (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1633–1651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leatherbee M, Katila R (2019) The lean startup method: Team composition, hypothesis-testing, and early-stage business models. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Hiatt SR, Lounsbury M (2017) Market mediators and the trade-offs of legitimacy-seeking behaviors in a nascent category. Organ. Sci. 28(3):447–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) Innovation blindness: Culture, frames, and cross-boundary problem construction in the development of new technology concepts. Organ. Sci. 22(2):347–369.Link, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6-7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD (2007) Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1107–1132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Hsu DH (2015) Strategic ‘switchbacks’: Dynamic commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy 44(10):1815–1826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Gans JS, Hsu DH (2014) Dynamic commercialization strategies for disruptive technologies: Evidence from the speech recognition industry. Management Sci. 60(12):3103–3123.Link, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Eisenhardt K (2019) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and the effective design of a business model. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print May 24, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219852349.Google Scholar
• McGrath RG, MacMillan IC (1995) Discovery driven planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(July/August):44–54.Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Miner AS, Bassof P, Moorman C (2001) Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):304–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F, Tripsas M (2004) The exploratory processes of entrepreneurial firms: The role of purposeful experimentation. Baum J, McGahan A, eds. Business Strategy Over the Industry Life Cycle, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 21 (Elsevier JAI, Amsterdam), 45–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Acad. Management Rev. 36(3):479–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA, Tushman ML (2008) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:185–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies, and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan P, Santos FM (2015) The market that never was: Turf wars and failed alliances in mobile payments. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1486–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke, et al.. (2015).Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Boyd RL, Jordan K, Blackburn K (2015) The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 (Pennebaker Conglomerates, Austin, TX).Google Scholar
• Petkova AP, Rindova VP, Gupta AK (2013) No news is bad news: Sensegiving activities, media attention, and venture capital funding of new technology organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(3):865–888.Link, Google Scholar
• Pfarrer MD, Pollock TG, Rindova VP (2010) A tale of two assets: The effects of firm reputation and celebrity on earnings surprises and investors’ reactions. Acad. Management J. 53(5):1131–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R (2018) Technology reemergence: Creating new value for old technologies in Swiss mechanical watchmaking, 1970-2008. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print May 16, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218778505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA, Tushman ML (2019) Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print February 14, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):29–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rhee EY, Fiss PC (2014) Framing controversial actions: Regulatory focus, source credibility, and stock market reaction to poison pill adoption. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1734–1758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Dalpiaz E, Ravasi D (2011) A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organ. Sci. 22(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Ferrier WJ, Wiltbank R (2010) Value from gestalt: How sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets. Strategic Management J. 31(13):1474–1497.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2006) How can a strategist analyze the parts of a firm’s strategy? Background Note 9-706-431, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schon DA, Rein M (1994) Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Shih WC, Kaufman SP, Spinola D (2007) Netflix. Case 607-138 (revised April 2009), Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Silverman J (2017) In our cynical age, no one fails anymore—everybody ‘pivots.’ New York Times (August 29), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/29/magazine/in-our-cynical-age-no-one-fails-anymore-everybody-pivots.html.Google Scholar
• Sinofsky S, Iansiti M (2010) One Strategy: Organization, Planning, and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Small M (2009) How many cases do i need? Ethnography 10(1):5–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow DA, Benford RD (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. Morris AD, Mueller CM, eds. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT), 133–155.Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2010) We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Acad. Management J. 53(3):477–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S, Dholakia U (2012) Explaining employee engagement with strategic change implementation: A meaning-making approach. Organ. Sci. 23(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1965) Social structure and organizations. March JG, ed. Handbook of Organizations (Rand McNally, Chicago), 142–193.Google Scholar
• Swidler A (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 51(2):273–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Foster WM, Trank CQ (2010) Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. Adv. Strategic Management 27:147–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomke SH (2003) Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation (Harvard Business Press, Vancouver, Canada).Google Scholar
• Tomz M, Van Houweling RP (2009) The electoral implications of candidate ambiguity. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 103(1):83–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripsas M (1997) Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Indust. Corporate Change 6(2):341–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Sonenshein S, Boje D (2016) Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):495–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Dacin MT (2011) The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue. Organ. Sci. 22(2):287–298.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Graebner ME (2010) A matter of appearances: How corporate leaders manage the impressions of financial analysts about the conduct of their boards. Acad. Management J. 53(1):15–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (1998) The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(1):127–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2011) Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 22(2):449–463.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Ishihara M, Lounsbury M (2013) Overcoming the illegitimacy discount: Cultural entrepreneurship in the U.S. feature film industry. Organ. Stud. 34(12):1747–1776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Amit R (2008) The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management J. 29(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zott C, Huy QN (2007) How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):70–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, Von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Edmondson AC (2017) The advocacy trap: When legitimacy building inhibits organizational learning. Acad. Management Discovery 3(3):302–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2019) Understanding start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print April 17, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219843486.Google Scholar