Balancing Professional Prototypes Increases the Valuation of Women in Male-Dominated Professions

References

• Alexandre JD, Waldzus S, Wenzel M (2016) Complex inclusive categories of positive and negative valence and prototypicality claims in asymmetric intergroup relations. British J. Soc. Psych. 55(3):457–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel CA, Wiesenfeld BM (2013) The social negotiation of group prototype ambiguity in dynamic organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):503–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL (2007) Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):991–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blashill AJ, Powlishta KK (2009) Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles 61(11–12):783–793.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brescoll VL, Dawson E, Uhlmann EL (2010) Hard won and easily lost the fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psych. Sci. 21(11):1640–1642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2015) The economics daily, women’s earnings compared with men’s earnings in 2014. Report, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (2018) Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Accessed July 25, 2019, https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm.Google Scholar
• Cable DM, DeRue DS (2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. J. Appl. Psych. 87(5):875–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cejka MA, Eagly AH (1999) Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personal Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(4):413–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers DW (1983) Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw‐a‐scientist test. Sci. Ed. 67(2):255–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Polzer JT, Barsade SG, Neale MA (1998) Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):749–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Davies PG, Steele CM (2009) Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 97(6):1045–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheryan S, Plaut VC, Handron C, Hudson L (2013) The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69:58–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chetkovich CA (1997) Real Heat: Gender and Race in the Urban Fire Service (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Danbold F, Huo YJ (2015) No longer “all-American”? Whites’ defensive reactions to their numerical decline. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 6(2):210–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danbold F, Huo YJ (2017) Men’s defense of their prototypicality undermines the success of women in STEM initiatives. J. Emperiment. Soc. Psych. 72(September):57–66.Google Scholar
• Delsohn S (1996) The Fire Inside: Firefighters Talk About Their Lives (Harper Collins, New York).Google Scholar
• Derks B, Ellemers N, van Laar C, De Groot K (2011) Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee? British J. Soc. Psych. 50(3):519–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desmond M (2006) Becoming a firefighter. Ethnography 7(4):387–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekman AB, Brown ER, Johnston AM, Clark EK (2010) Seeking congruity between goals and roles a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psych. Sci. 21(8):1051–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A. The origins and effects of corporate diversity programs. Roberson QM, ed. Oxford Handbook of Diversity and Work (Oxford University Press, New York), 253–281.Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Ashford SJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 35(4):627–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Karau SJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psych. Rev. 109(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger J, Plant EA, Hartwig MK, Vossen JJ, Columb CJ, Brewer LE (2018) Do gender differences in perceived prototypical computer scientists and engineers contribute to gender gaps in computer science and engineering? Sex Roles 78(1–2):40–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Meyerson DE (2010) An organizational approach to undoing gender: The unlikely case of offshore oil platforms. Res. Organ. Behav. 30:3–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensmenger NL (2012) The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Cuddy AJ, Glick P, Xu J (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 82(6):878–902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galinsky AD, Todd AR, Homan AC, Phillips KW, Apfelbaum EP, Sasaki SJ, Richeson JA, Olayon JB, Maddux WW (2015) Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity a policy perspective. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 10(6):742–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay AC (2011) Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(1):109–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall EV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW (2015) Gender profiling a gendered race perspective on person–position fit. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 41(6):853–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardison CM, Lim N, Keller KM, Marquis JP, Payne LA, Bozick R, Mariano LT, et al.. (2015) Recommendations for Improving the Recruiting and Hiring of Los Angeles Firefighters (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA).Google Scholar
• Haynes HJG, Stein GP (2014) US Fire Department Profile 2013. Report, National Fire Protection Association Fire Analysis and Research Division, Quincy, MA.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (1983) Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. Res. Organ. Behav. 5:269–298.Google Scholar
• Heilman ME (2001) Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):657–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Haynes MC (2005) No credit where credit is due: attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. J. Appl. Psych. 90(5):905–916.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heilman ME, Wallen AS, Fuchs D, Tamkins MM (2004) Penalties for success: reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):416–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helgesen S (1990) The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Herring C (2009) Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(2):208–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hulett DM, Bendick M, Thomas SY, Moccio F (2008) A National Report Card on Women in Firefighting (International Association of Women in Fire & Emergency Services, Madison, WI).Google Scholar
• Inesi ME, Cable DM (2015) When accomplishments come back to haunt you: The negative effect of competence signals on women’s performance evaluations. Personnel Psych. 68(3):615–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson C, Dowd TJ, Ridgeway CL (2006) Legitimacy as a social process. Annual Rev. Sociol. 32(1):53–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson KL, Freeman JB, Pauker K (2012) Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 102(1):116–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Trauth E, Kvasny L, McPherson S (2013) Exploring the differences among IT majors and non-majors: modeling the effects of gender role congruity, individual identity, and it self efficacy on IT career choices. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Kaiser CR, Major B, Jurcevic I, Dover TL, Brady LM, Shapiro JR (2013) Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(3):504–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Galinsky AD, Thompson L (2002) Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(2):386–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psych. Bull. 137(4):616–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof AL (1996) Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personality Psych. 49(1):1–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown AL, Zimmerman RD, Johnson EC (2005) Consequences of individual’s fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personality Psych. 58(2):281–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Marini M, Lehr SA, Cerruti C, Shin JE, Joy-Gaba JA, Teachman BA, Wojcik SP, Koleva SP, Frazier RS, et al.. (2014) Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 143(4):1765–1785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legault L, Gutsell J, Inzlicht M (2011) Ironic effects of antiprejudice messages: How motivational interventions can reduce (but also increase) prejudice. Psych. Sci. 22(12):1472–1477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenton AP, Bruder M, Sedikides C (2009) A meta-analysis on the malleability of automatic gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 33(2):183–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewin K (1935) A Dynamic Theory of Personality (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Lips HM (2013) The gender pay gap: Challenging the rationalizations. Perceived equity, discrimination, and the limits of human capital models. Sex Roles 68(3–4):169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lord RG, Brown DJ, Harvey JL, Hall RJ (2001) Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Leadership Quart. 12(3):311–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Heilman ME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psych. 91(4):777–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClean E, Martin SR, Emich KJ, Woodruff T (2017) The social consequences of voice: An examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1869–1891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Muchinsky PM, Monahan CJ (1987) What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary vs. complementary models of fit. J. Vocational Behav. 31(3):268–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mummendey A, Wenzel M (1999) Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 3(2):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oakes PJ, Haslam SA, Turner JC (1994) Stereotyping and Social Reality (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• O’Neill OA, Rothbard N (2017) Is love all you need? The effects of emotional culture, suppression, and work-family conflict on firefighter risk taking and health. Acad. Management J. 60(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plaut VC, Thomas KM, Goren MJ (2009) Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities? Psych. Sci. 20(4):444–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt MG (2017) Trust Under Fire: Trustworthiness as Temporal-Spatial Sensemaking in Early Work Relationships Among Firefighters (Boston College, Boston).Google Scholar
• Prentice DA, Carranza E (2002) What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psych. Women Quart. 26(4):269–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns V, Eibach RP (2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59(5–6):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richards Z, Hewstone M (2001) Subtyping and subgrouping: Processes for the prevention and promotion of stereotype change. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(1):52–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway CL, Li YE, Erickson KG, Backor K, Tinkler JE (2009) How easily does a social difference become a status distinction? Gender matters. Amer. Soc. Rev. 74(1):44–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 104(3):192–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosener JB (1995) America’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 5(6):359–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Fairchild K (2004) Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 87(2):157–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (1999) Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 77(5):1004–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Glick P (2001) Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. J. Soc. Issues 57(4):743–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan MK, Haslam SA (2007) The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):549–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sczesny S, Formanowicz M, Moser F (2016) Can gender-fair language reduce gender stereotyping and discrimination? Frontiers Psych. 7(25):1–11.Google Scholar
• Siy JO, Cheryan S (2016) Prejudice masquerading as praise the negative echo of positive stereotypes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 42(7):941–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith ER (1998) Mental representation and memory. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, New York), 391–445.Google Scholar
• Smith ER, Semin GR (2007) Situated social cognition. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 16(3):132–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan WG, Ybarra O, Morrison KR (2009) Intergroup threat theory. Nelson TD, ed. Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (Psychology Press, New York), 43–59.Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Sy T, Shore LM, Strauss J, Shore TH, Tram S, Whiteley P, Ikeda-Muromachi K (2010) Leadership perceptions as a function of race-occupation fit: The case of Asian Americans. J. Appl. Psych. 95(5):902–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tost LP (2011) An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Acad. Management Rev. 36(4):686–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1987) A self-categorisation theory. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS, eds. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorisation Theory (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 42–67.Google Scholar
• Waldzus S, Mummendey A, Wenzel M, Weber U (2003) Toward tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(1):31–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wenzel M, Mummendey A, Waldzus S (2007) Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 18(1):331–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wessel JL, Hagiwara N, Ryan AM, Kermond CM (2014) Should women applicants “man up” for traditionally masculine fields? Effectiveness of two verbal identity management strategies. Psych. Women Quart. 39(2):243–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandello JA, Bosson JK (2013) Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psych. Men Masculinity 14(2):101–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch JG Jr, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):197–206.Crossref, Google Scholar