Head, Heart, or Hands: How Do Employees Respond to a Radical Global Language Change over Time?

References

• Andruff H, Carraro N, Thompson A, Gaudreau P, Louvet B (2009) Latent class growth modeling: A tutorial. Tutorials Quant. Methods Psych. 5(1):11–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2014) Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in MPlus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. MPlus Web Notes: No 21, Version 2. Accessed June 6, 2017, https://www.statmodel.com/download/asparouhov_muthen_2014.pdf.Google Scholar
• Bakk Z, Vermunt JK (2016) Robustness of stepwise latent class modeling with continuous distal outcomes. Structural Equation Modeling 23(1):20–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V (2013) Changes in employees’ job characteristics during an enterprise system implementation: A latent growth modeling perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 37(4):1113–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balogun J, Bartunek JM, Do B (2015) Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organ. Sci. 26(4):960–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Adams NE (1977) Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy Res. 1(4):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Schunk DH (1981) Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 41(3):586–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsade SG, O’Neill OA (2014) What’s love got to do with it? A longitudinal study of the culture of companionate love and employee and client outcomes in a long-term care setting. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(4):551–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, DeWall CN, Zhang L (2007) How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personalicy Soc. Psych. Rev. 11(2):167–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaudry A, Pinsonneault A (2010) The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(4):689–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker TE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 8(3):274–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bindl UK, Parker SK, Totterdell P, Hagger-Johnson G (2012) Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to pro- active goal regulation. J. Appl. Psych. 97(1):134–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bordia S, Bordia P (2015) Employees’ willingness to adopt a foreign functional language in multilingual organizations: The role of linguistic identity. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(4):415–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brief AP, Butcher AH, Roberson L (1995) Cookies, disposition, and job attitudes: The effects of positive mood-inducing events and negative affectivity on job satisfaction in a field experiment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 62(1):55–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carver CS, Scheier MF (1990) Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. Higgins ET, Sorrentino RM, eds. Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York), 3–52.Google Scholar
• Crawford JR, Henry JD (2004) The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British J. Clinical Psych. 43(3):245–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freed BF, Segalowitz N, Dewey DP (2004) Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Stud. Second Language Acquisition 26(2):275–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frijda NH (1986) The Emotions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Fugate M, Soenen G (2018) Predictors and processes related to employees’ change-related compliance and championing. Personnel Psych. 71(2):109–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross JJ (2008) Emotion regulation. Lewis M, Haviland-Jones JM, Barrett LF, eds. Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed. (Guilford Press, New York), 497–513.Google Scholar
• Harzing AW, Pudelko M (2013) Language competencies, policies and practices in multinational corporations: A comprehensive review and comparison of Anglophone, Asian, Continental European and Nordic MNCs. J. World Bus. 48(1):87–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Neeley TB, Cramton CD (2014) Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):536–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huy QN (2002) Emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):31–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huy QN, Corley KG, Kraatz MS (2014) From support to mutiny: Shifting legitimacy judgments and emotional reactions impacting the implementation of radical change. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1650–1680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Izard CE (1993) Four systems for emotion activation: Cognitive and noncognitive processes. Psych. Rev. 100(1):68–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Izard CE (2007) Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 2(3):260–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung T, Wickrama KAS (2008) An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(1):302–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelloway EK, Gottlieb BH, Barham L (1999) The source, nature, and direction of work and family conflict: A longitudinal investigation. J. Occupational Health Psych. 4(4):337–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim TG, Hornung S, Rousseau DM (2011) Change-supportive employee behavior: Antecedents and the moderating role of time. J. Management 37(6):1664–1693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Bartunek JM, Mueller J, Huy QN (2017) Time in strategic change research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):1005–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1991) Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Amer. Psych. 46(8):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lebel RD (2017) Moving beyond fight and flight: A contingent model of how the emotional regulation of anger and fear sparks proactivity. Acad. Management Rev. 42(2):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lo Y, Mendell N, Rubin D (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88(3):767–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lubke G, Muthén BO (2007) Performance of factor mixture models as a function of model size, criterion measure effects, and class-specific parameters. Structural Equation Modeling 14(1):26–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacIntyre PD, Dörnyei Z, Clément R, Noels KA (1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language J. 82(4):545–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S, Ozcelik H (2004) Toxic decision processes: A study of emotion and organizational decision making. Organ. Sci. 15(4):375–393.Link, Google Scholar
• Martin AJ, Jones ES, Callan VJ (2005) The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. 14(3):263–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCroskey JC (1992) Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Comm. Quart. 40(1):16–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCroskey JC, Richmond VP (1987) Willingness to communicate. McCroskey JC, Daly JA, eds. Personality and Interpersonal Communication (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 119–131.Google Scholar
• McLachlan G, Peel D (2000) Finite Mixture Models (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLaughlin B, Nayak N (1989) Processing a new language: Does knowing other languages make a difference? Dechert H, Raupach M, eds. Interlingual processes (Narr, Tübingen, Germany), 5–14.Google Scholar
• Miller VD, Johnson JR, Grau J (1994) Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. J. Appl. Comm. Res. 22(1):59–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra AK, Spreitzer GM (1998) Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing: The roles of trust, empowerment, justice and work redesign. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):567–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Maïano C, Nagengast B, Marsh HW, Morizot J, Janosz M (2011) General growth mixture analysis of adolescents’ developmental trajectories of anxiety: The impact of untested invariance assumptions on substantive interpretations. Structural Equation Modeling 18(4):613–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2012) MPLUS (7) (Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles). http://statmodelcom.Google Scholar
• Nagin DS (2005) Group-Based Modeling of Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neeley TB (2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(2):476–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Neeley TB (2017) The Language of Global Success: How a Common Tongue Transforms Multinational Organizations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Neeley TB, Dumas TL (2016) Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Acad. Management J. 59(1):14–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TWH, Lucianetti L (2016) Within-individual increases in innovative behavior and creative, persuasion, and change self-efficacy over time: A social-cognitive theory perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 101(1):14–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling 14(4):535–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreg S, Bartunek J, Lee G, Do B (2018) An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Acad. Management Rev. 43(1):43–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreg S, Vakola M, Armenakis A (2011) Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 47(4):461–524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parrott WG (2002) The functional utility of negative emotions. Feldman Barrett L, Salovey P, eds. The Wisdom in Feeling: Psychological Processes in Emotional Intelligence (Guilford, New York), 341–359.Google Scholar
• Piderit SK (2000) Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Acad. Management Rev. 25(4):783–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafferty AE, Griffin MA (2006) Perceptions of organizational change: A stress and coping perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):1154–1162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rafferty AE, Jimmieson NL, Armenakis AA (2013) Change readiness: A multilevel review. J. Management 39(1):110–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reiche BS, Harzing AW, Pudelko M (2015) Why and how does shared language affect subsidiary knowledge inflows? A social identity perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 46(5):528–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satorra A, Bentler P (1999) A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Technical report, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6(2):461–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin J, Taylor MS, Seo MG (2012) Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Acad. Management J. 55(3):727–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Nelson LD, Simmons JP (2014) P-curve: A key to the file drawer. J. Experiment. Psych. General 143(2):534–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U, Simmons JP, Nelson LD (2015) Better p-curves: Making p-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious p-hacking: A reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015). J. Experiment. Psych. General 144(6):1146–1152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solinger ON, van Olffen W, Roe RA, Hofmans J (2013) On becoming (un)committed: A taxonomy and test of newcomer onboarding scenarios. Organ. Sci. 24(6):1640–1661.Link, Google Scholar
• Staw BM (1981) The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Management Rev. 6(4):577–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeuchi R, Yun S, Russell JEA (2002) Antecedents and consequences of the perceived adjustment of Japanese expatriates in the USA. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 13(8):1224–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M (2015) Leading across language barriers: Managing language-induced emotions in multinational teams. Leadership Quart. 26(4):606–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M (2017) The influence of language differences on power dynamics in multinational teams. J. World Bus. 52(1):45–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tenzer H, Pudelko M, Harzing AW (2014) The impact of language barriers on trust formation in multinational teams. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):508–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Tienari J, Piekkari R, Säntti R (2005) Language and the circuits of power in a merging MNC. J. Management Stud. 42(3):595–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vermunt JK (2010) Longitudinal research using mixture models. van Montfort K, Oud JHL, Satorra A, eds. Longitudinal Research with Latent Variables (Springer, Heidelberg), 119–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss HM, Cropanzano R (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:1–74.Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2000) The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strategic Management J. 21(10/11):981–996.Crossref, Google Scholar