Why Do Firms Suffer Differently from Input Stigmatization? The Costs of Removing Stigmatized Inputs

References

• Bansal P, Clelland I (2004) Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Acad. Management J. 47(1):93–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bash D, Walsh D (2006) Bush vetoes embryonic stem-cell bill. CNN.com. Accessed February 10, 2017, http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/19/stemcells.veto/.Google Scholar
• Beder S (2002) Putting the boot in. Ecologist 32(3):24–28.Google Scholar
• Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, Yolton K, Ye X, Dietrich KN, Lanphear BP (2011) Impact of early-life bisphenol A exposure on behavior and executive function in children. Pediatrics 128(5):873–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Safford S (2008) The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):460–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campa JM, Kedia S (2002) Explaining the diversification discount. J. Finance 57(4):1731–1762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell (2016) Press release: Campbell to remove BPA from packaging by mid-2017. Accessed March 28, 2016, https://www.campbellsoupcompany.com/newsroom/press-releases/campbell-to-remove-bpa-from-packaging-by-mid-2017/.Google Scholar
• Cantwell JA, Gambardella A, Granstrand O (2004) Technological and corporate diversification. Cantwell JA, Gambardella A, Granstrand O, eds. The Economics and Management of Technological Diversification (Routledge, London), 116–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook E (1990) Global environmental advocacy: Citizen activism in protecting the ozone layer. Ambio 19(6):334–338.Google Scholar
• ConAgra (2015) ConAgra foods removes BPA from cans across portfolio. Accessed November 21, 2017, http://www.conagrabrands.com/news-room/news-conagra-foods-removes-bpa-from-cans-across-portfolio-2072842.Google Scholar
• Cress DM, Snow DA (1996) Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 61(6):1089–1109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crilly D, Hansen M, Zollo M (2016) The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Acad. Management J. 59(2):705–729.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL (1996) Does isomorphism legitimate? Acad. Management J. 39(4):1024–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse DL, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. Sage Handbook Organ. Institutionalism 49:77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Den Hond F, De Bakker FG (2007) Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):901–924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devers CE, Dewett T, Mishina Y, Belsito CA (2009) A general theory of organizational stigma. Organ. Sci. 20(1):154–171.Link, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopalan N (2011) An environmental perspective on diversification: The effects of chemical relatedness and regulatory sanctions. Acad. Management J. 54(1):97–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diestre L, Rajagopalan N (2014) Toward an input-based perspective on categorization: Investor reactions to chemical accidents. Acad. Management J. 57(4):1130–1153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrajska M, Billinger S, Karim S (2015) Delegation within hierarchies: How information processing and knowledge characteristics influence the allocation of formal and real decision authority. Organ. Sci. 26(3):687–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Durand R, Vergne JP (2015) Asset divestment as a response to media attacks in stigmatized industries. Strategic Management J. 36(8):1205–1223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Lenox MJ (2006) Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management J. 27(8):765–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Sutton RI (1992) Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Acad. Management J. 35(4):699–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (1998) The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification. Strategic Management J. 19(7):611–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd SW, Lane PJ (2000) Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):154–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fortune (2016) Many popular canned foods still use controversial chemical. Accessed March 30, 2016, http://fortune.com/2016/03/30/bpa-campbell-del-monte-cans/.Google Scholar
• Ganz M (2000) Resources and resourcefulness: Strategic capacity in the unionization of California agriculture, 1959-1966. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(4):1003–1062.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giebel LB (2005) Stem cells—a hard sell to investors. Natl. Biotechnology 23(7):798–800.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert CG (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. 48(5):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Maguire S (2010) Discourse, field-configuring events and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1365–1392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison K (1999) Racing to the top or the bottom? Industry resistance to eco‐labelling of paper products in three jurisdictions. Environ. Politics 8(4):110–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heese J, Krishnan R, Moers F (2016) Selective regulator decoupling and organizations’ strategic responses. Acad. Management J. 59(6):2178–2204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Eisenhardt KM (2004) Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1217–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Grandy JB, Lee BH (2015) Organizational responses to public and private politics: An analysis of climate change activists and U.S. oil and gas firms. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1769–1786.Link, Google Scholar
• Hudson BA (2008) Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):252–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasper JM, Poulsen JD (1995) Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Soc. Problems 42(4):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jonsson S, Buhr H (2011) The limits of media effects: Field positions and cultural change in a mutual fund market. Organ. Sci. 22(2):464–481.Link, Google Scholar
• Julian SD, Ofori-Dankwa JC, Justis RT (2008) Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures. Strategic Management J. 29(9):963–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S (2012) Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units. Strategic Organ. 10(4):333–365.Google Scholar
• Karim S, Kaul A (2015) Structural recombination and innovation: Unlocking internal knowledge synergy through structural change. Organ. Sci. 26(2):439–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Karim S, Carroll TN, Long CP (2016) Delaying change: Examining how industry and managerial turbulence impact structural realignment. Acad. Management J. 59(3):791–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2000) Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s Responsible Care Program. Acad. Management J. 43(4):698–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King AA, Lenox MJ (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Sci. 48(2):289–299.Link, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008a) A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2008b) A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Bus. Soc. 47(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King BG (2011) The tactical disruptiveness of social movements: Sources of market and mediated disruption in corporate boycotts. Soc. Problems 58(4):491–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitschelt HP (1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British J. Political Sci. 16(1):57–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight G, Greenberg J (2002) Promotionalism and subpolitics: Nike and its labor critics. Management Comm. Quart. 15(4):541–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luders J (2006) The economics of movement success: Business responses to civil rights mobilization. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(4):963–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luke RD, Begun JW, Pointer DD (1989) Quasi firms: Strategic interorganizational forms in the healthcare industry. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):9–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maguire S, Hardy C (2009) Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Acad. Management J. 52(1):148–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus AA, Goodman RS (1991) Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Acad. Management J. 34(2):281–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markides XC, Williamson PJ (1996) Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource based view. Acad. Management J. 39(2):340–367.Google Scholar
• Meyer DS, Minkoff DC (2004) Conceptualizing political opportunity. Soc. Forces 82(4):1457–1492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer DS, Staggenborg S (1996) Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. Amer. J. Sociol. 101(6):1628–1660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DJ (2006) Technological diversity, related diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 27(7):601–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Hariharan S (1991) Diversified expansion by large established firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 15(1):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Pache AC, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, Dean TJ (2015) Firm responses to social movement pressures: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management J. 36(7):1093–1104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer T (2010) A dynamic model of supplier switching. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(2):697–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piazza A, Perretti F (2015) Categorical stigma and firm disengagement: Nuclear power generation in the United States, 1970–2000. Organ. Sci. 26(3):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Piscitello L (2004) Corporate diversification, coherence and economic performance. Indust. Corporat Change 13(5):757–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polletta F, Jasper JM (2001) Collective identity and social movements. Annual Rev. Sociol. 27(1):283–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rawley E (2010) Diversification, coordination costs, and organizational rigidity: Evidence from microdata. Strategic Management J. 31(8):873–891.Google Scholar
• Robins J, Wiersema M (1995) A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 16(4):277–299.Google Scholar
• Rowley TI, Moldoveanu M (2003) When will stakeholder groups act? An interest-and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Acad. Management Rev. 28(2):204–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Steensma HK (2001) The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1149–1168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurman R (2004) Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Soc. Problems 51(2):243–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schurman R, Munro W (2009) Targeting capital: A cultural economy approach to understanding the efficacy of two anti–genetic engineering movements. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(1):155–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2006) A paradox of synergy: Contagion and capacity effects in mergers and acquisitions. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):962–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J (2007) Contingent political capital and international alliances: Evidence from South Korea. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(4):621–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2001) Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Acad. Management J. 44(4):838–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine WD, Lee BH (2009) Tilting at windmills? The environmental movement and the emergence of the US wind energy sector. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(1):123–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun P, Mellahi K, Thun E (2010) The dynamic value of MNE political embeddedness: The case of the Chinese automobile industry. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 41(7):1161–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Supply Chain Insights (2014) The supply chain index: Improving strength, balance and resiliency. Accessed October 15, 2017, http://supplychaininsights.com/the-supply-chain-index/.Google Scholar
• Tickner J (1999) A review of the availability of plastic substitutes for soft PVC in toys. Report, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell.Google Scholar
• Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM (2009) Bisphenol-A and the great divide: A review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocrine Rev. 30(1):75–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner SM, Friedl G (2007) Supplier switching decisions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 183(2):700–717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb JW, Tihanyi L, Ireland RD, Sirmon DG (2009) You say illegal, I say legitimate: Entrepreneurship in the informal economy. Acad. Management Rev. 34(3):492–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Heinze KL, DeSoucey M (2008) Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes in the movement for grass-fed meat and dairy products. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):529–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber K, Rao H, Thomas LG (2009) From streets to suites: How the anti-biotech movement affected German pharmaceutical firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):106–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westphal JD, Zajac EJ (2001) Decoupling policy from practice: The case of stock repurchase programs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):202–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zavyalova A, Pfarrer MD, Reger RK, Shapiro DL (2012) Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Acad. Management J. 55(5):1079–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar