Managing Autonomy in Industrial Research and Development: A Project-Level Investigation

References

• Agarwal R, Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Shah SK (2014) Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user and employee innovators. Res. Policy 43(7):1109–1133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J. Political Econom. 105(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Dewatripont M, Stein J (2008) Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):617–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G, Kranton R (2008) Identity, supervision, and work groups. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 98(2):212–217.Google Scholar
• Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. 62(5):777–795.Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2001) Odd couple: Making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. J. Management Stud. 38(7):995–1018.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1988) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1):123–167.Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Hill KG, Hennessey BA, Tighe EM (1994) The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(5):950–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Silverman B (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):929–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belezon S, Rios L (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Graff Zivin J, Manso G (2011) Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND J. Econom. 42(3):527–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailyn L (1985) Autonomy in the industrial R&D laboratory. Human Resource Management 24(2):129–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartling B, Fehr E, Herz H (2014) The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica 82(6):2005–2039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and nations. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) The organization of firms across countries. Quart. J. Econom. 127(4):1663–1705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Lemos R, Sadun R, Scur D, Van Reenen J (2014) JEEA-FBBVA Lecture 2013: The new empirical economics of management. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 12(4):835–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2011) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castanias RP, Helfat CE (2001) The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Management 27(6):661–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Chang P, Yeh CA (2004) Study of career needs, career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intentions of R&D personnel. Career Development Internat. 9:424–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christie AA, Joye MP, Watts RL (2003) Decentralization of the firm: Theory and evidence. J. Corporate Finance 9(1):3–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1997) Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):374–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coff RW (1999) When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organ. Sci. 10(2):119–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Coff RW, Kryscynski D (2011) Invited editorial: Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital–based competitive advantages. J. Management 37(5):1429–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Sauermann H (2007) Schumpeter’s prophecy and individual incentives as a driver of innovation. Malerba F, Brusoni S, eds. Perspectives on Innovation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 73–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Deci EL (1975) Intrinsic Motivation (Plenum Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delbecq AL, Mills PK (1985) Managerial practices that enhance innovation. Organ. Dynam. 14(1):24–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dessein W (2002) Authority and communication in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(4):811–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrajska M, Billinger S, Karim S (2015) Delegation within hierarchies: How information processing and knowledge characteristics influence the allocation of formal and real decision authority. Organ. Sci. 26(3):687–704.Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker PF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. Calif. Management Rev. 41(2):79–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Manso G (2013) Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Sci. 59(7):1496–1513.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J. Law Econom. 26(2):301–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagné M, Deci EL (2005) Self‐determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26(4):331–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Giuri P, Luzzi A (2007) The market for patents in Europe. Res. Policy 36(8):1163–1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Panico C, Valentini G (2015) Strategic incentives to human capital. Strategic Management J. 36(1):37–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Imbens G (2013) Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions. NBER Working Paper w19614, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Giuri P, Brusoni S, Crespi G, Francoz D, Gambardella A, Garcia-Fontes W, Geuna A, et al.. (2007) Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Res. Policy. 36(8):1107–1127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn MA (1996) Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Acad. Management Rev. 21(4):1081–1111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17:109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grenny J, Patterson K, Maxfield D, McMillan R, Switzler A (2013) Influencer: The New Science of Leading Change (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Haans RF, Pieters C, He ZL (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psych. 60(2):159–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1980) Work Redesign (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Harhoff D, Scherer FM, Vopel K (2003) Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Res. Policy 32(8):1343–1363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid MA (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. 38(3):635–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M, Greenhaus JH, Parasuraman S (1991) Career orientations of MIS employees: An empirical analysis. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 15:151–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1992) Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 251–274.Google Scholar
• Katz R (2004) Motivating professionals in organizations. Katz R, ed. The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation (Oxford University Press, New York), 3–20.Google Scholar
• Kerr S (1975) On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Acad. Management J. 18(4):769–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn A (1993) Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Lacetera N (2009) Different missions and commitment power in R&D organizations: Theory and evidence on industry–university alliances. Organ. Sci. 20(3):565–582.Link, Google Scholar
• Leana CR (1986) Predictors and consequences of delegation. Acad. Management J. 29(4):754–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leana CR (1987) Power relinquishment vs. power sharing: Theoretical clarification and empirical comparison of delegation and participation. J. Appl. Psych. 72(2):228–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer M (1999) Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Res. Policy 29(3):409–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R (1992) Hierarchy: The economics of managing. J. Econom. Literature 30(3):1382–1415.Google Scholar
• Riley SM, Michael SC, Mahoney JT (2017) Human capital matters: Market valuation of firm investments in training and the role of complementary assets. Strategic Management J. 38(9):1895–1914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2010) A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Cohen WM (2010) What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Sci. 56(12):2134–2153.Link, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Schriesheim CA, Neider LL, Scandura TA (1998) Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Acad. Management J. 41(3):298–318.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Zhou J, Oldham GR (2004) The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? J. Management 30(6):933–958.Google Scholar
• Spenner KI (1990) Skill: Meanings, methods and measures. Work Occup. 17(4):399–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science, vol. 1 (Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad. Management Rev. 15(4):666–681.Google Scholar
• Torrisi S, Gambardella A, Giuri P, Harhoff D, Hoisl K, Mariani M (2016) Used, blocking and sleeping patents: Empirical evidence from a large-scale inventor survey. Res. Policy 45(7):1374–1385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH, Jago AG (1988) Managing participation: A critical dimension of leadership. J. Management Development 7(5):32–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wruck KH, Jensen MC (1994) Science, specific knowledge, and total quality management. J. Accounting Econom. 18(3):247–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl G (1994) Leadership in Organizations, 3rd ed. (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Yukl G, Fu PP (1999) Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. J. Organ. Behav. 20(2):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenger TR (1994) Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. 40(6):708–729.Link, Google Scholar