The Impact of Overconfidence and Ambiguity Attitude on Market Entry

References

• Abdellaoui M, Baillon A, Placido L, Wakker PP (2011) The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(2):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Blau DM, Falk A, Robin J-M, Taber CR (2006) How to do empirical economics. Investigaciones Econom. 30(2):179–206.Google Scholar
• Artinger S, Powell TC (2016) Entrepreneurial failure: Statistical and psychological explanations. Strategic Management J. 37(6):1047–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T (2003) The return to independent invention: Evidence of unrealistic optimism, risk seeking or skewness loving? Econom. J. (London) 113(484):226–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Herz H, Nanda R, Weber RA (2014) Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(3):49–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Mata J, Santos-Pinto L (2015) Skewness seeking: Risk loving, optimism or overweighting of small probabilities? Theory Decision 78(2):189–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baillon A (2008) Eliciting subjective probabilities through exchangeable events: An advantage and a limitation. Decision Anal. 5(2):76–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1988) Compensation and incentives: Practice vs. theory. J. Finance 43(3):593–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber BM, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quart. J. Econom. 116(1):261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benz M, Frey BS (2004) Being independent raises happiness at work. Swedish Econom. Policy Rev. 11(2):95–134.Google Scholar
• Bernardo AE, Welch I (2001) On the evolution of overconfidence and entrepreneurs. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(3):301–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolger F, Pulford BD, Colman AM (2008) Market entry decisions. Experiment. Psych. 55(2):113–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A, Stauf J (2015) Social responsibility promotes conservative risk behavior. Eur. Econom. Rev. 74:109–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen J, Qiu Z, Li Y (1994) Robust tolerance for ambiguity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 57(1):155–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruhin A, Santos-Pinto L, Staubli D (2018) How do beliefs about skill affect risky decisions? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 150:350–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burks SV, Carpenter JP, Goette L, Rustichini A (2013) Overconfidence and social signalling. Rev. Econom. Stud. 80(3):949–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Busenitz LW, Barney JB (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. J. Bus. Venturing 12(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabantous L (2007) Ambiguity aversion in the field of insurance: Insurers’ attitude to imprecise and conflicting probability estimates. Theory Decision 62(3):219–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cain DM, Moore DA, Haran U (2015) Making sense of overconfidence in market entry. Strategic Management J. 36(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caliendo M, Fossen FM, Kritikos AS (2009) Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs: New evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Bus. Econom. 32(2):153–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Weber M (1992) Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):325–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Hogarth RM (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 19(1–3):7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Case A, Paxson C (2008) Stature and status: Height, ability, and labor market outcomes. J. Political Econom. 116(3):499–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charness G, Karni E, Levin D (2013) Ambiguity attitudes and social interactions: An experimental investigation. J. Risk Uncertainty 46(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen C (2013) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Christofferson SA, McNish RS, Sias DL (2004) Where mergers go wrong. McKinsey Quart. (2):92–99.Google Scholar
• Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC (1988) Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J. Bus. Venturing 3(2):97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds. Strategic Management J. 33(6):611–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Csaszar FA (2013) Strategic decision making. Kessler EH, ed. Encyclopedia of Management Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 775–778.Google Scholar
• Dimmock SG, Kouwenberg R, Wakker PP (2016) Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample. Management Sci. 62(5):1363–1380.Link, Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky G (2010) Entrepreneurial optimism in the market for technological inventions. Organ. Sci. 21(1):150–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75:643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Laboratory experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326(5952):535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss NJ (2003) Selective intervention and internal hybrids: Interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organ. Sci. 14(3):331–349.Link, Google Scholar
• Fox CR, See KS (2003) Belief and preference in decision under uncertainty. Hardman D, Macchi L, eds. Reasoning and Decision Making: Current Trends and Perspectives (Wiley, New York), 273–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galasso A, Simcoe TS (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Sci. 57(8):1469–1484.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodie AS (2005) The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling. J. Gambling Stud. 21(4):481–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodie AS, Young DL (2007) The skill element in decision making under uncertainty: Control or competence? Judgment Decision Making 2(3):189–203.Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grieco D, Hogarth RM (2004) Excess entry, ambiguity seeking, and competence: An experimental investigation. UPF Economics and Business Working Paper 778, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Grinblatt M, Keloharju M (2009) Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. J. Finance 64(2):549–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guilbault RL, Bryant FB, Brockway JH, Posavac EJ (2004) A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 26(2–3):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton B (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Shepherd DA, Griffin D (2006) A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 52(2):160–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 4(1):5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herz H, Schunk D, Zehnder C (2014) How do judgmental overconfidence and overoptimism shape innovative activity? Games Econom. Behav. 83:1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ (1985) Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 11(4):719–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Einhorn HJ (1990) Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Sci. 36(7):780–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Howell WC (1971) Uncertainty from internal and external sources: A clear case of overconfidence. J. Exp. Psych. 89(2):240–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hvide HK, Panos GA (2014) Risk tolerance and entrepreneurship. J. Financial Econom. 111(1):200–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1988) Experimental Economics: A Psychological Perspective (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D (1993) Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. 39(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Lovallo D, Sibony O (2011) Before you make that big decision. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(6):50–60.Google Scholar
• Karelaia N, Hogarth RM (2010) The attraction of uncertainty: Interactions between skill and levels of uncertainty in market-entry games. J. Risk Uncertainty 41(2):141–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keck S, Diecidue E, Budescu DV (2014) Group decisions under ambiguity: Convergence to neutrality. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 103:60–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppe HJ, Weber M (1995) Judged knowledge and ambiguity aversion. Theory Decision 39(1):51–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom RE, Laffont J-J (1979) A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J. Political Econom. 87(4):719–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilka M, Weber M (2001) What determines the shape of the probability weighting function under uncertainty? Management Sci. 47(12):1712–1726.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein WM, Cerully JL, Monin MM, Moore DA (2010) Ability, chance, and ambiguity aversion: Revisiting the competence hypothesis. Judgment Decision Making 5(3):192–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit (Hart, Schaffner & Marx, New York).Google Scholar
• Koellinger P, Minniti M, Schade C (2007) I think I can, I think I can: Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior. J. Econom. Psych. 28(4):502–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B (1980) Reasons for confidence. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Learn. 6(2):107–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Galinsky AD (2003) The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 91(1):69–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick RP (2004) Debiasing. Koehler DJ, Harvey N, eds. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Blackwell, Maiden, MA), 316–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovallo D, Sibony O (2010) The case for behavioral strategy. McKinsey Quart. 2(1):30–43.Google Scholar
• Machina MJ, Siniscalchi M (2014) Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. Machina M, Viscusi K, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 729–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan J (1992) The overconfidence effect in marketing management predictions. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):329–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J. Finance 60(6):2661–2700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2008) Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. J. Financial Econom. 89(1):20–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• Masulis RW, Wang C, Xie F (2007) Corporate governance and acquirer returns. J. Finance 62(4):1851–1889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mellers B, Ungar L, Baron J, Ramos J, Gurcay B, Fincher K, Scott SE, et al.. (2014) Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psych. Sci. 25(5):1106–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles RP (2003) The Warren Buffett CEO: Secrets from the Berkshire Hathaway Managers (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1994) Comparing equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):441–459.Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Healy PJ (2008) The trouble with overconfidence. Psych. Rev. 115(2):502–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore DA, Klein WM (2008) Use of absolute and comparative performance feedback in absolute and comparative judgments and decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 107(1):60–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Obloj T, Sengul M (2012) Incentive life-cycles: Learning and the division of value in firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):305–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Odean T (1999) Do investors trade too much? Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1279–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Packard MD, Clark BB, Klein PG (2017) Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organ. Sci. 28(5):840–856.Link, Google Scholar
• Piazza A (2017) From founders to funders: Generalized reciprocity and the reproduction of homophily in angel investing. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Leiblein MJ, Chen JS (2018) Toward a behavioral theory of real options: Noisy signals, bias, and learning. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1112–1138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell TC, Lovallo D, Fox CR (2011) Behavioral strategy. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1369–1386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Seale DA, Erev I, Sundali JA (1998) Equilibrium play in large group market entry games. Management Sci. 44(1):119–141.Google Scholar
• Raven J (2000) The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psych. 41(1):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenberg M (1989) Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, CT).Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Schoemaker PJ (1992) Managing overconfidence. Sloan Management Rev. 33(2):7–17.Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD, Menon AR, Kuechle G (2013) Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: Serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio. Small Bus. Econom. 40(2):417–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW (1994) Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 67(6):1063–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon M, Houghton SM (2003) The relationship between overconfidence and the introduction of risky products: Evidence from a field study. Acad. Management J. 46(2):139–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon M, Shrader RC (2012) Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. J. Bus. Venturing 27(3):291–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2010) eBay’s crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Sci. 56(7):1060–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Stewart WH Jr, Roth PL (2001) Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):145–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Kim T (2013) Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1214–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Trautmann ST, van de Kuilen G (2015) Ambiguity attitudes. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 89–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wakker PP (2010) Prospect Theory: For Risk and Ambiguity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 54(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu B, Knott AM (2006) Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Sci. 52(9):1315–1330.Link, Google Scholar