Do Accelerators Work? If So, How?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1304

References

  • Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Tripsas M (2008) Technology and industry evolution. Shane S, ed. The Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK), 1–55.Google Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Echambadi R, Franco AM, Sarkar M (2004) Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. 47(4):501–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amezcua A, Grimes M, Bradley S, Wiklund J (2013) Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business incubated firms, 1994–2007. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1628–1654.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L, Epple DN (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–924.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashford SJ, Cummings LL (1983) Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 32(3):370–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P, Ding W, Stuart T (2009) The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. 57(4):637–676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JA, Li SX, Usher JM (2000) Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(4):766–801.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM (2006) The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Acad. Management J. 49(4):741–758.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Haunschild PR (2002) Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(1):92–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Burton MD, O’Reilly C (2007) Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing 22(2):147–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bermiss YS, Hallen BL, McDonald R, Pahnke EC (2017) Entrepreneurial beacons: The Yale endowment, run‐ups, and the growth of venture capital. Strategic Management J. 38(3):545–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bingham CB, Davis JP (2012) Learning sequences: Their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Management J. 55(3):611–641.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bird S, Klein E, Loper E (2009) Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit (O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA).Google Scholar
  • Brander JA, Amit R, Antweiler W (2002) Venture‐capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs. the value‐added hypothesis. J. Econom. Management Strategy 11(3):423–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown SL, Eisenhardt KM (1997) The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton MD, Sorensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventrasca MJ, eds. Res. Sociol. Organ. 19:229–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cai J, Szeidl A (2017) Interfirm relationships and business performance. Quart. J. Econom. 133(3):1229–1282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2019) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision-making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3249.Google Scholar
  • Chatterji A, Delecourt S, Hasan S, Koning R (2019) When does advice impact startup performance? Strategic Management J. 40(3):331–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji AK (2009) Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management J. 30(2):185–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen PL, Williams C, Agarwal R (2012) Growing pains: Pre‐entry experience and the challenge of transition to incumbency. Strategic Management J. 33(3):252–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen S (2013) What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations 8(3–4):19–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen SL, Bingham CB, Hallen BL (2019a) The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(7):1781–1797.Google Scholar
  • Cohen SL, Fehder D, Hochberg YV, Murray F (2019b) The design of startup accelerators. Res. Policy 48(7):1781–1797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dencker JC, Gruber M, Shah SK (2009) Pre-entry knowledge, learning, and the survival of new firms. Organ. Sci. 20(3):516–537.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Denrell J (2003) Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. 14(3):227–243.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutt N, Hawn O, Vidal E, Chatterji A, McGahan A, Mitchell W (2016) How open system intermediaries address institutional failures: The case of business incubators in emerging-market countries. Acad. Management J. 59(3):818–840.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, McManus SE (2007) Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1246–1264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Roberts EB (2012) Are you experienced or are you talented? When does innate talent vs. experience explain entrepreneurial performance? Strategic Entrepreneurship J. 6(3):207–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eesley CE, Hsu DH, Roberts EB (2014) The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1798–1817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB (1990) Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(3):504–529.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD, Kramer RM (2003) Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments. Acad. Management J. 46(3):283–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feld B, Mendelson J (2012) Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Fitza M, Matusik SF, Mosakowski E (2009) Do VCs matter? The importance of owners on performance variance in start‐up firms. Strategic Management J. 30(4):387–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2006) What you are is what you like—Similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. J. Bus. Venturing 21(6):802–826.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franke N, Gruber M, Harhoff D, Henkel J (2008) Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start‐up teams: Trade‐offs, knock‐out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 32(3):459–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garg S, Eisenhardt K (2017) Unpacking the CEO-board relationship: How strategy-making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1828–1858.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Levinthal D (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(1):113–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2007) On the origin of strategy: Action and cognition over time. Organ. Sci. 18(3):420–439.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gehman J, Glaser VL, Eisenhardt KM, Gioia D, Langley A, Corley KG (2017) Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. J. Management Inquiry 27(3):284–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick CJ (1994) Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Acad. Management J. 37(1):9–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb B, Kirsch D, Miller DA (2007) Was there too little entry during the dot com era? J. Financial Econom. 86(1):100–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzalez-Uribe J, Leatherbee M (2017) The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(4):1566–1603.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gorman M, Sahlman WA (1989) What do venture capitalists do? J. Bus. Venturing 4(4):231–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graebner ME, Eisenhardt KM (2004) The seller’s side of the story: Acquisition as courtship and governance as syndicate in entrepreneurial firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):366–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham PG (2012) How Y Combinator started. Y Combinator. http://old.ycombinator.com/start.html.Google Scholar
  • Graham PG (2014) Y Combinator’s Paul Graham sits down with Jason at LAUNCH Festival 2014. Calacanis J, ed. This Week in Startups. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMqgiXLjvRs.Google Scholar
  • Graham PG (2016) Paul Graham on doing things right by accident. Harris A, Manalac K, eds. Startup School Radio. https://blog.ycombinator.com/paul-graham-startup-school-radio-interview/.Google Scholar
  • Gruber M, MacMillan IC, Thompson JD (2008) Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management. Sci. 54(9):1652–1665.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R (1995) Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):619–652.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R, Sytch M (2007) Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(1):32–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackett SM, Dilts DM (2004) A real options-driven theory of business incubation. J. Tech. Transfer 29(1):41–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments? Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(4):685–718.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurial firms obtain investment ties. Acad. Management J. 55(1):35–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild PR, Miner AS (1997) Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(3):472–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellmann T, Puri M (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start‐up firms: Empirical evidence. J. Finance 57(1):169–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirano K, Imbens GW (2001) Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Service Outcomes Res. Methodology 2(3):259–278.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal. 15(3):199–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochberg YV (2016) Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy Econom. 16:25–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. J. Finance 62(1):251–301.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance 59(4):1805–1844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu DH (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Res. Policy 36(5):722–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang L, Pearce JL (2015) Managing the unknowable: The effectiveness of early-stage investor gut feel in entrepreneurial investment decisions. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):634–670.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G (1991) Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. 2(1):88–115.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Anal. 20(1):1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingram P, Baum JA (1997) Opportunity and constraint: Organizations’ learning from the operating and competitive experience of industries. Strategic Management J. 18(S1):75–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M (2003) The role of network resources in market entry: Commercial banks’ entry into investment banking, 1991–1997. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(3):466–497.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson KS (2007) How Techstars was born. Denver Post (May 18), https://www.denverpost.com/2007/05/18/how-techstars-was-born/.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2015) Mixing quantitative and qualitative research. Elsbach KD, Kramer R, eds., Handbook of Innovative Qualitative Research Methods: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 423–433.Google Scholar
  • Kaplan SN, Strömberg PE (2004) Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. J. Finance 59(5):2177–2210.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R, Thatchenkery S, Christensen MQ, Zenios S (2017) Is there a doctor in the house? Expert product users, organizational roles, and innovation. Acad. Management J. 60(6):2415–2437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kempner R, Roberts PW (2015) Aren’t accelerators great? Maybe… Wall Street Journal (April 10), https://blogs.wsj.com/accelerators/2015/04/10/randall-kempner-and-peter-roberts-arent-accelerators-great-maybe/.Google Scholar
  • Kerr WR, Lerner J, Schoar A (2014) The consequences of entrepreneurial finance: Evidence from angel financings. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):20–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J-YJ, Miner AS (2007) Vicarious learning from the failures and near-failures of others: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. Acad. Management J. 50(3):687–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee PM, Pollock TG, Jin K (2011) The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation. Strategic Organ. 9(1):33–69.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • McDonald R, Eisenhardt K (2019) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Admin. Sci. Quart. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarland DA, Lewis K, Goldberg A (2016) Sociology in the era of big data: The ascent of forensic social science. Amer. Sociol. 47(1):12–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath RG, MacMillan IC (1995) Discovery driven planning. Harvard Bus. Rev. 73(July-August):44–54.Google Scholar
  • Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller P, Bound K (2011) The Startup Factories: The Rise of Accelerator Programmes to Support New Technology Ventures (NESTA, London).Google Scholar
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldaña J (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Mindruta D, Moeen M, Agarwal R (2016) A two‐sided matching approach for partner selection and assessing complementarities in partners’ attributes in inter‐firm alliances. Strategic Management J. 37(1):206–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitsuhashi H, Greve HR (2009) A matching theory of alliance formation and organizational success: Complementarity and compatibility. Acad. Management J. 52(5):975–995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ozmel U, Reuer JJ, Gulati R (2013) Signals across multiple networks: How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Acad. Management J. 56(3):852–866.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pahnke E, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Who takes you to the dance? How funding partners influence innovative activity in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petty JS, Gruber M (2011) “In pursuit of the real deal”: A longitudinal study of VC decision making. J. Bus. Venturing 26(2):172–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piezunka H, Dahlander L (2015) Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Acad. Management J. 58(3):856–880.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (1993) A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(4):829–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):458–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):116–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raffiee J, Feng J (2014) Should I quit my day job? A hybrid path to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 57(4):936–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rider CI (2012) How employees’ prior affiliations constrain organizational network change: A study of U.S. venture capital and private equity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(3):453–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ries E (2011) The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses (Crown Business, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth AE, Sotomayer M (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Rothaermel FT, Deeds DL (2004) Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management. J. 25(3):201–221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel FT, Thursby M (2005) University–incubator firm knowledge flows: Assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Res. Policy 34(3):305–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza HJ (1992) When do venture capitalists add value? J. Bus. Venturing 7(1):9–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seed-DB (2017) Seed DB database of seed accelerators. Accessed June 26, 2019, https://www.seed-db.com/accelerators.Google Scholar
  • Shane S, Stuart T (2002) Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Manageent Sci. 48(1):154–170.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shrout PE, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small ML (2011) How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Rev. Sociol. 37:57–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sørensen M (2007) How smart is smart money? A two‐sided matching model of venture capital. J. Finance 62(6):2725–2762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stam W (2010) Industry event participation and network brokerage among entrepreneurial ventures. J. Management Stud. 47(4):625–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strang D, Macy MW (2001) In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):147–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stross R (2012) The Launch Pad: Inside Y Combinator: Silicon Valley’s Most Exclusive School for Startups (Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Stuart TE, Hoang H, Hybels RC (1999) Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):315–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Techstars (2016) Accelerate your business and build connections that last a lifetime. Accessed October 5, 2017, https://web.archive.org/web/20170623222407/http://www.techstars.com/startup-accelerator/.Google Scholar
  • Teodorescu MH (2017) Machine learning methods for strategy research. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  • Tom M (2016) One-third of U.S. startups that raised a Series A in 2015 went through an accelerator. Pitchbook blog (February 5), https://pitchbook.com/news/articles/one-third-of-us-startups-that-raised-a-series-a-in-2015-went-through-an-accelerator.Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B, Lancaster R (2003) Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. 49(4):383–399.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vissa B (2012) Agency in action: Entrepreneurs’ networking style and initiation of economic exchange. Organ. Sci. 23(2):492–510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • ycombinator.com (2005) Y Combinator: Summer Founders Program. Accessed October 5, 2017, http://web.archive.org/web/20050324101335/http://ycombinator.com:80/sfp.html.Google Scholar
  • Yin RK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Younger S, Fisher G (2020) The exemplar enigma: New venture image formation in an emergent organizational category. J. Bus. Venturing 35(1), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.09.002.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu S (2019) How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures? Management Sci., ePub ahead of print October 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3256.Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Sgourev SV (2006) Peer capitalism: Parallel relationships in the U.S. economy. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(5):1327–1366.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.