From Logic Acceptance to Logic Rejection: The Process of Destabilization in Hybrid Organizations

References

• Ashforth BE, Reingen PH (2014) Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(3):474–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ball SJ (2007) Education PLC: Understanding Private Sector Participation in Public Sector Education (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. 1(3):220–247.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Lee M (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing. Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Management Ann. 8(1):397–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Besharov ML, Mitzinneck B (2017) On hybrids and hybrid organizing: A review and roadmap for future research. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 128–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A-C, Model J. (2015) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1658–1685.Google Scholar
• Bednarek R, Paroutis S, Sillince J (2017) Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organ. Stud. 38(1):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besharov ML (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1485–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binder A (2007) For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory Society 36(6):547–571.Google Scholar
• Bonti M (1997) La problematicità organizzativa nelle società miste. Organizzazione Sanitaria 6:14–22.Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Cardinal L, Sitkin S, Long C (2004) Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. 15(4):411–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Chreim S, Williams BE, Hinings CR (2007) Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. Acad. Management J. 50(6):1515–1539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg S, Courpasson D, Phillips DJ (2006) Power and Organizations (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• D’Aunno T, Sutton RI, Price RH (1991) Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Acad. Management J. 34(3):636–661.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D (2016) Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at alessi. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):347–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deephouse D, Bundy J, Tost LP, Suchman M (2017) Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, London), 27–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowling B, Powell M, Glendinning C (2004) Conceptualising successful partnerships. Health Soc. Care Community 12(4):309–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugato M (1998) Società e joint ventures nella gestione dei servizi sanitari. Sanita Pubblica 5:517–535.Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson R, Fretz R, Shaw L (1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M, Hawkins C (2005) The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Acad. Management J. 48(1):117–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiorentini G (2000) Società a capitale misto nell’offerta di servizi sanitari. Mercato Concorrenza e Regole 2(1):85–111.Google Scholar
• Freidson E (1986) Professional Powers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford R (1991) Bringing society back in symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Hinings CR, Suddaby R (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Management J. 45(1):58–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta E, Lounsbury M (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):317–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Maguire S (2017) Institutional entrepreneurship and change in fields. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA), 261–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward ML, Hambrick DC (1997) Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of ceo hubris. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):103–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinings CR, Logue DM, Zietsma C (2017) Fields, institutional infrastructure and governance. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence T, Meyer R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, London), 163–189.Google Scholar
• Hodge GA, Greve C (2007) Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Admin. Rev. 67(3):545–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes EC (1956) The making of a physician - general statement of ideas and problems. Human Organ. 14(4):21–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jommi C, Cantù E, Anessi-Pessina E (2001) New funding arrangements in the italian national health service. Internat. J. Health Planning Management 16(4):347–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jourdan J, Durand R, Thornton PH (2017) The price of admission: Organizational deference as strategic behavior. Amer. J. Sociol. 123(1):232–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2008) Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organ. Sci. 19(5):729–752.Link, Google Scholar
• Kimberly JR, Bouchikhi H (1995) The dynamics of organizational development and change: How the past shapes the present and constrains the future. Organ. Sci. 6(1):9–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Kitchener M (2002) Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: The case of academic health centre mergers. Organ. Stud. 23(3):391–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage Publishing, Newbury Park, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maarse H (2006) The privatization of healthcare in europe: An eight-country analysis. J. Health Politics Policy Law 31(5):981–1014.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martimort D, Pouyet J (2008) To build or not to build: Normative and positive theories of public-private partnerships. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):393–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson CM, Sauder M (2013) Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Admin. Sci. Quart. 58(2):165–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Pache A-C, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad. Management Rev. 35(3):455–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache A-C, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdy JM, Gray B (2009) Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Acad. Management J. 52(2):355–380.Google Scholar
• Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):65–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raffaelli R, Glynn MA (2014) Turnkey or tailored? Relational pluralism, institutional complexity, and the organizational adoption of more or less customized practices. Acad. Management J. 57(2):541–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramus T, Vaccaro A, Brusoni S (2017) Institutional complexity in turbulent times: Formalization, collaboration, and the emergence of blended logics. Acad. Management J. 60(4):1253–1284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao H, Kenney M (2008) New forms as settlements. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Sage Publishing, London), 352–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Golden-Biddle K, Germann K (2006) Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Acad. Management J. 49(5):977–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Hinings B (2009) Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ. Stud. 30(6):629–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Hinings CR (2005) The recomposition of an organizational field: Healthcare in alberta. Organ. Stud. 26(3):351–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Jones C (2016) Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organ. 14(4):441–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott R, Ruef M, Mendel P, Caronna C (2000) Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory Soc. 37(5):427–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2013) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests and Identities, 4th ed. (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1949) Tva and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Selznick P (1996) Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(2):270–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Jarzabkowski P (2013) Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations 66(10):1279–1309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R (2012) From practice to field: Multi-level model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad. Management J. 55(4):877–904.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smets M, Jarzabkowski P, Burke G, Spee P (2015) Reinsurance trading in lloyd’s of london: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Acad. Management J. 58(3):932–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad. Management J. 57(6):1592–1623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML (2019) Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):1–44.Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Besharov ML, Wessels AK, Chertok M (2012) A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Acad. Management Learn. Ed. 11(3):463–478.Google Scholar
• Souitaris V, Zerbinati S, Liu G (2012) Which iron cage? Endo- and exoisomorphism in corporate venture capital programs. Acad. Management J. 55(2):477–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective. A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organ. Sci. 22(1):60–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, York JG (2017) An identity-based approach to social enterprise. Acad. Management Rev. 42(3):437–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yescombe ER (2011) Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• York JG, Hargrave TJ, Pacheco DF (2016) Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Management J. 59(2):579–610.Crossref, Google Scholar