On the Emergence of Collective Psychological Ownership in New Creative Teams

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Altman I, Haythorn WW (1967) The ecology of isolated groups. Behav. Sci. 12(3):168–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SE, Williams LJ (1996) Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. J. Appl. Psych. 81(3):282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):20–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashforth BE, Harrison SH, Corley KG (2008) Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. J. Management 34(3):325–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baer M, Brown G (2012) Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 118(1):60–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker FD, Mayo C (1971) Delineating personal distance and territoriality. Environ. Behav. 3(4):375–381.Google Scholar
• Becker TE (2005) Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organ. Res. Methods 8(3):274–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beggan JK, Brown EM (1994) Association as a psychological justification for ownership. J. Psych. 128(4):365–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Chou CP (1987) Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16(1):78–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blader SL, Tyler TR (2009) Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 94(2):445–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bolino M, Valcea S, Harvey J (2010) Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 83(2):325–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brockner J, Higgins ET, Low MB (2004) Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. J. Bus. Venturing 19(2):203–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown BB (1987) Territoriality. Stokols D, Altman I, eds. Handbook of Environmental Psychology (Wiley, New York), 505–531.Google Scholar
• Brown G (2009) Claiming a corner at work: Measuring employee territoriality in their workspaces. J. Environ. Psych. 29(1):44–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Baer M (2015) Protecting the turf: The effect of territorial marking on others’ creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 100(6):1785–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Robinson SL (2007) The dysfunction of territoriality in organizations. Langen-Fox J, Cooper CL, Klimoski RJ, eds. Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms (Edward Elger Publishing, Northampton, MA), 252–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Robinson SL (2011) Reactions to territorial infringement. Organ. Sci. 22(1):210–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown G, Lawrence TB, Robinson SL (2005) Territoriality in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 30(3):577–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson KD, Wu J (2012) The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organ. Res. Methods 15(3):413–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnevale DG (1995) Trustworthy Government: Leadership and Management Strategies for Building Trust and High Performance (Jossey-Bass, New York).Google Scholar
• Catmull E, Wallace A (2014) Creativity, Inc: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D (2001) Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ. Res. Methods 4(1):62–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen XP, Yao X, Kotha S (2009) Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Acad. Management J. 52(1):199–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi HS, Thompson LL (2006) Membership change in groups: Implications for group creativity. Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. Thompson LL, Choi HS, eds. Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 87–107.Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, van Knippenberg D (2005) The possessive self as a barrier to conflict resolution: Effects of mere ownership, process accountability, and self-concept clarity on competitive cognitions and behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(3):345–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Weingart LR (2003) Task vs. relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 88(4):741–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Wit FRC, Greer LL, Jehn KA (2012) The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 97(2):360–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeTienne DR (2010) Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. J. Bus. Venturing 25(2):203–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks KT, Cummings LL, Pierce JL (1996) Psychological ownership in organizations: Conditions under which individuals promote and resist change. Woodman RW, Pasmore WA, eds. Research in Organizational Change and Development (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–23.Google Scholar
• Dittmar H (1992) The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is to Be (St. Martin's Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1996) Organizing for innovation. Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord W, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies (Sage, London), 424–439.Google Scholar
• Durkheim E (1957) Professional Ethics and Civil Morals (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning: Outcome improvement, task mastery, and group process. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):269–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ericksen J, Dyer L (2004) Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(3):438–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman DC (1984) The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. 9(1):47–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman M, Cummings JN (2003) Multiple imputation for missing data: Making the most of what you know. Organ. Res. Methods 6(3):282–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foo MD, Sin HP, Yiong LP (2006) Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures. Strategic Management J. 27(4):389–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford JK, MacCallum RC, Tait M (1986) The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psych. 39(2):291–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furby L (1980a) Collective possession and ownership: A study of its judged feasibility and desirability. Soc. Behav. Personality 8(2):165–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furby L (1980b) The origins and early development of possessive behavior. Political Psych. 2(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2007) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2011) Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations? Organ. Psych. Rev. 1(2):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ (1988) Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Acad. Management J. 31(1):9–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gersick CJ, Hackman JR (1990) Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 47(1):65–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J, Folta TB, Cooper AC, Woo CY (1997) Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):750–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham WJ, Cooper WH (2013) Taking credit. J. Bus. Ethics 115:403–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Siino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.Link, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2014) Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1256–1283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison SH, Rouse ED (2015) An inductive study of feedback interactions over the course of creative projects. Acad. Management J. 58(2):375–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessey BA, Amabile TM (2010) Creativity. Annual Rev. Psych. 61(1):569–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinkin TR (1998) A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organ. Res. Methods 1(1):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hmieleski KM, Ensley MD (2007) A contextual examination of new venture performance: Entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism. J. Organ. Behav. 28(7):865–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24(5):623–641.Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Reid SA (2006) Social identity, self‐categorization, and the communication of group norms. Comm. Theory 16(1):7–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ilgen DR, Hollenbeck JR, Johnson M, Jundt D (2005) Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Rev. Psych. 56(1):517–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaacson W (2014) The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Mannix EA (2001) The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Management J. 44(2):238–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller RT (2001) Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 44(3):547–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kidder T (2016) A Truck Full of Money: One Man’s Quest to Recover from Great Success (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (2000) From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods 3(3):211–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klotz AC, Hmieleski KM, Bradley BH, Busenitz LW (2014) New venture teams: A review of the literature and roadmap for future research. J. Management 40(1):226–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight AP, Eisenkraft N (2015) Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. J. Appl. Psych. 100(4):1214–1227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SJ, Gully SM, Nason ER, Smith EM (1999) Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. Ilgen DR, Pulakos ED, eds. The Changing Nature of Work Performance: Implications for Staffing, Personnel Actions, and Development (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 240–292.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SJ, Gully SM, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (1996) Team leadership and development: Theory, principles, and guidelines for training leaders and teams. Beyerlein M, Johnson D, Beyerlein S, eds. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership (Elsevier Science, New York), 251–289.Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Ilgen DR (2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 7(3):77–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SW, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G (2013) Advancing multilevel research design capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organ. Res. Methods 16(4):581–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW, Welsh MA, Dehler GE, Green SG (2002) Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of product management. Acad. Management J. 45(3):546–564.Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ (2009) Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 18(1):16–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mael F, Ashforth BE (1992) Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J. Organ. Behav. 13(2):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), 54–66.Google Scholar
• Mezrich B (2009) The Accidental Billionaires: The Founding of Facebook, a Tale of Sex, Money, Genius, and Betrayal (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Morrison EW (2011) Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):373–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW (1979) The measurement of organizational commitment. J. Vocational Behav. 14(2):224–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller JS, Kamdar D (2011) Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. J. Appl. Psych. 96(2):263–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Ostroff C, Kozlowski SW (1992) Organizational socialization as a learning process: The role of information acquisition. Personnel Psych. 45(4):849–874.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearsall MJ, Venkataramani V (2015) Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: The interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):735–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV (2017) From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Management Rev. 42(1):53–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Jussila I (2010) Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration. J. Organ. Behav. 31(6):810–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Jussila I (2011) Psychological Ownership and the Organizational Context: Theory, Research Evidence, and Application (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Jussila I, Li D (2017) Development and validation of an instrument for assessing collective psychological ownership in organizational field settings. J. Management Organ. 24(6):776–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT (2001) Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 26(2):298–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Curran PJ, Bauer DJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 31(4):437–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt PC, Budd LG (1975) Territoriality and privacy in married and unmarried cohabitating couples. J. Soc. Psych. 97(1):67–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouse ED (2013) Kill your darlings? Experiencing, maintaining, and changing psychological ownership in creative work. Doctoral dissertation, Carroll School of Management, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
• Rudmin FW, Berry JW (1987) Semantics of ownership: A free-recall study of property. Psych. Record 37(2):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt E, Rosenberg J (2014) How Google Works (Hachette Book Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Schwab DP (1980) Construct validity in organizational behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 2(1):3–43.Google Scholar
• Sheremata WA (2000) Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):389–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shermer M (2014) Surviving statistics: How the survivor bias distorts reality. Sci. Amer. 311(3):94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spector PE, Brannick MT (2011) Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organ. Res. Methods 14(2):287–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Rafaeli A (1988) Untangling the relationship between displayed emotions and organizational sales: The case of convenience stores. Acad. Management J. 31(3):461–487.Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL (1947) Multiple Factor Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Tyler TR, Blader SL (2003) The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 7(4):349–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Walle D, Van Dyne L, Kostova T (1995) Psychological ownership: An empirical examination of its consequences. Group Organ. Management 20(2):210–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Der Vegt GS, Bunderson JS (2005) Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Acad. Management J. 48(3):532–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne L, Pierce JL (2004) Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 25(4):439–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner SH, Parker CP, Christiansen ND (2003) Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psych. 56(4):847–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walton RE, Dutton JM (1969) The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and review. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(1):73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar