Previous and Prospective Career Mobility, Client Capture, and Compromised Professional Judgment: The Withholding of Known Relevant Prior Art by Patent Lawyers on Behalf of Their Clients

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1312

References

  • Abbott A (1983) Professional ethics. Amer. J. Sociol. 88(5):855–885.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Kwon S-W (2002) Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. 27(1):17–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Gambardella A, Olson DM (2016) Employee mobility and entrepreneurship: A virtual special issue. Strategic Management J. 37(13):E11–E21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alcacer J, Gittelman M, Sampat B (2009) Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Res. Policy 38(2):415–427.Google Scholar
  • Alvesson M (2000) Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge-intensive companies. J. Management Stud. 37(8):1101–1124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Loewenstein G (1997) Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. J. Econom. Perspectives 11(1):109–126.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamber EM, Iyer VM (2007) Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing J. Practice Theory 26(2):1–24.Google Scholar
  • Bazerman MH, Loewenstein G, Moore DA (2002) Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Bus. Rev. 80(11):96–102, 134.Google Scholar
  • Blanes J, Draca M, Fons-Rosen C (2012) Revolving door lobbyists. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(7):3731–3748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2012) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(2):238–249.Google Scholar
  • Casciaro T, Piskorski MJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(2):167–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Certo ST, Busenbark JR, Woo Hs, Semadeni M (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. 37(13):2639–2657.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y-K (1995) Revolving doors and the optimal tolerance for agency collusion. RAND J. Econom. 26(3):378–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clifford RD (2013) Is it time for a Rule 11 for the patent bar? IDEA 53:351.Google Scholar
  • Cornaggia J, Cornaggia KJ, Xia H (2016) Revolving doors on Wall Street. J. Financial Econom. 120(2):400–419.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cotropia CA (2009) Modernizing patent law’s inequitable conduct doctrine. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 24:723–783.Google Scholar
  • Cotropia CA, Lemley MA, Sampat B (2013) Do applicant patent citations matter? Res. Policy 42(4):844–854.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delong A (2001) Retaining legal talent. Capital Univ. Law Rev. 29:893–902.Google Scholar
  • Dinovitzer R, Gunz HP, Gunz SP (2014) Reconsidering lawyer autonomy: The nexus between firm, lawyer, and client in large commercial practice. Amer. Bus. Law J. 51(3):661–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Empson L (2007) Managing the Modern Law Firm: New Challenges, New Perspectives (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Empson L, Chapman C (2006) Partnership vs. corporation: Implications of alternative forms of governance in professional service firms. Greenwood R, Suddaby R, eds. Professional Service Firms, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 24 (Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 139–170.Google Scholar
  • Esterling KM (2009) The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Google Scholar
  • Flores ES, Warren SE (1999) Inequitable conduct, fraud, and your license to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Texas Intellectual Property Law J. 8:299–330.Google Scholar
  • Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH (1989) Coming of age in a corporate law firm: The economics of associate career patterns. Stanford Law Rev. 41(3):567–595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwood R, Hinings CR, Brown J (1990) “P2-form” strategic management: Corporate practices in professional partnerships. Acad. Management J. 33(4):725–755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gunz HP, Gunz SP (2008) Client capture and the professional service firm. Amer. Bus. Law J. 45(4):685–721.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Ziedonis RH (2001) The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1):101–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper W8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Harhoff D, Scherer FM, Vopel K (2003) Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Res. Policy 32(8):1343–1363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harhoff D, Narin F, Scherer FM, Vopel K (1999) Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(3):511–515.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hricik D (2000) Intellectual property litigation in the 21st century: The risks and responsibilities of attorneys and firms prosecuting patents for different clients in related technologies. Texas Intellectual Property Law J. 8:331–355.Google Scholar
  • Jaffe AB, Lerner J (2004) Patent prescription: A radical cure for the ailing [US patent policy]. Spectrum IEEE 41(12):38–43.Google Scholar
  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1979) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz E (2001) Bias in conditional and unconditional fixed effects logit estimation. Political Anal. 9(4):379–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy P (2008) A Guide to Econometrics (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Keren G (1987) Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration study. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):98–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JYR, Steensma KH (2017) Employee mobility, spin‐outs, and knowledge spill‐in: How incumbent firms can learn from new ventures. Strategic Management J. 38(8):1626–1645.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiser E (1999) Comparing varieties of agency theory in economics, political science, and sociology: An illustration from state policy implementation. Sociol. Theory 17(2):146–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampe R (2012) Strategic citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):320–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemley M (2000) Rational ignorance at the patent office. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 95:1495.Google Scholar
  • Lennox C (2005) Audit quality and executive officers’ affiliations with CPA firms. J. Accounting Econom. 39(2):201–231.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln JR (1984) Analyzing relations in dyads problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research. Sociol. Methods Res. 13(1):45–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer KJ, Somaya D, Williamson IO (2012) Firm-specific, industry-specific, and occupational human capital and the sourcing of knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1311–1329.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merges RP, Nelson RR (1990) On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Rev. 90(4):839–916.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitnick BM (2011) Capturing “Capture”: Developing a Normative Theory of Fiducial Regulation (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK).Google Scholar
  • Moeen M, Somaya D, Mahoney JT (2013) Supply portfolio concentration in outsourced knowledge-based services. Organ. Sci. 24(1):262–279.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naiker V, Sharma DS (2009) Former audit partners on the audit committee and internal control deficiencies. Accounting Rev. 84(2):559–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neumann J (2011) Credit raters join the rated. Wall Street Journal (December 2), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970204397704577072762687915268.Google Scholar
  • Phillips DJ (2002) A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: The parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(3):474–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regan MC (1997) Professional reputation: Looking for the good lawyer. South Texas Law Rev. 39:549–579.Google Scholar
  • Reitzig M, Wagner S (2010) The hidden costs of outsourcing: Evidence from patent data. Strategic Management J. 31(11):1183–1201.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rider CI, Tan D (2015) Labor market advantages of organizational status: A study of lateral partner hiring by large U.S. law firms. Organ. Sci. 26(2):356–372.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Salant DJ (1995) Behind the revolving door: A new view of public utility regulation. RAND J. Econom. 26(3):362–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampat BN (2010) When do applicants search for prior art? J. Law Econom. 53(2):399–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro SP (2003) Bushwhacking the ethical high road: Conflict of interest in the practice of law and real life. Law Soc. Inquiry 28(1):104–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma A (1997) Professional as agent: Knowledge asymmetry in agency exchange. Acad. Management Rev. 22(3):758–798.Google Scholar
  • Somaya D (2012) Patent strategy and management: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Management 38(4):1084–1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Nordenflycht A (2010) What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Management Rev. 35(1):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner RP, Parchomovsky G (2005) Patent portfolios. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 154(1):6–15.Google Scholar
  • Wagner S, Hoisl K, Thoma G (2014) Overcoming localization of knowledge—The role of professional service firms. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1671–1688.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wartick SL (2002) Measuring corporate reputation definition and data. Bus. Soc. 41(4):371–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wholey DR (1985) Determinants of firm internal labor markets in large law firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30(3):318–335.Google Scholar
  • Wiersema MF, Bowen HP (2009) The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management J. 30(6):679–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson OE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (Free Press, New York), 131–156.Google Scholar
  • Wolfson M (1985) Empirical Evidence of Incentive Problems and Their Mitigation in Oil and Gas Tax Shelter Programs (HBS Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.