Inspiring, Yet Tiring: How Leader Emotional Complexity Shapes Follower Creativity

References

• Aaker J, Drolet A, Griffin D (2008) Recalling mixed emotions. J. Consumer Res. 35(2):268–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity (Westview Press, Boulder, CO).Google Scholar
• Ashby FG, Isen AM, Turken AU (1999) A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psych. Rev. 106(3):529–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2008) A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psych. Bull. 134(6):779–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baas M, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2011) Creative production by angry people peaks early on, decreases over time, and is relatively unstructured. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 47(6):1107–1115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (2007) Self-regulation, ego depletion, and motivation. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 1(1):115–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Vohs KD (2016) Strength model of self-regulation as limited resource: Assessment, controversies, update. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 54:78–128.Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Schmeichel BJ, DeWall CN, Vohs KD (2008) Is the concious self a help, a hindrance, or an irrelevance to the creative process? Adv. Psych. Res. 6:137–152.Google Scholar
• Beal DJ (2015) ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 2:383–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Trougakos JP, Weiss HM, Dalal RS (2013) Affect spin and the emotion regulation process at work. J. Appl. Psych. 98(4):593–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Weiss HM, Barros E, MacDermid SM (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. J. Appl. Psych. 90(6):1054–1068.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker TE, Atinc G, Breaugh JA, Carlson KD, Edwards JR, Spector PE (2016) Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. J. Organ. Behav. 37(2):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bledow R, Rosing K, Frese M (2013) A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity. Acad. Management J. 56(2):432–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breevaart K, Bakker ABB, Demerouti E, Derks D (2016) Who takes the lead? A multi-source diary study on leadership, work engagement, and job performance. J. Organ. Behav. 37(3):309–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 21(2):230–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunce D, West M (1994) Changing work environments: Innovative coping responses to occupational stress. Work Stress 8(4):319–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byron K, Khazanchi S, Nazarian D (2010) The relationship between stressors and creativity: A meta-analysis examining competing theoretical models. J. Appl. Psych. 95(1):201–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carette B, Anseel F (2012) Epistemic motivation is what gets the learner started. Industry Organ. Psych. 5(3):306–309.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis MA (2009) Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(1):25–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008a) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):739–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA, van Knippenberg D (2008b) Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 12(1):22–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRue DS, Ashford SJ, Myers CG (2012) Learning agility: In search of conceptual clarity and theoretical grounding. Industry Organ. Psych. 5(3):258–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duhigg C (2018) Dr. Elon and Mr. Musk: Life inside Tesla’s production hell. Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-tesla-life-inside-gigafactory/.Google Scholar
• Eisenbeiss SA, van Knippenberg D, Boerner S (2008) Transformational leadership and team innovation: Integrating team climate principles. J. Appl. Psych. 93(6):1438–1446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ekman P, Cordaro D (2011) What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Rev. 3(4):364–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang X, van Kleef GA, Sauter DA (2018) Person perception from changing emotional expressions: Primacy, recency, or averaging effect? Cognition Emotion 32(8):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Filipowicz A, Barsade S, Melwani S (2011) Understanding emotional transitions: The interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(3):541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer AH, Roseman IJ (2007) Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(1):103–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher CD, To ML (2012) Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 33(7):865–877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 23:1–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitness J (2000) Anger in the workplace: An emotion script approach to anger episodes between workers and their superiors, co-workers and subordinates. J. Organ. Behav. 21(2):147–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons GM, Finkel EJ (2010) Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directives Psych. Sci. 19(2):101–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frijda N (1986) The Emotions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Gabriel AS, Podsakoff NP, Beal DJ, Scott BA, Sonnentag S, Trougakos JP, Butts MM (2019) Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organ. Res. Methods 22(4):969–1006.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM (2008) Creativity in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1:439–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• George JM, Zhou J (2007) Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Acad. Management J. 50(3):605–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gocłowska M, Baas M, Crisp RJ, De Dreu CKW (2014) Whether social schema violations help or hurt creativity depends on need for structure. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 40(8):959–971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagger MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NLD (2010) Ego gepletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 136(4):495–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansbrough TK, Lord RG, Schyns B (2015) Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings. Leadership Quart. 26(2):220–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hareli S, Hess U (2010) What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition Emotion 24(1):128–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hareli S, Shomrat N, Hess U (2009) Emotional vs. neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion 9(3):378–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser DJ, Ellsworth PC, Gonzalez R (2018) Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers Psych. 9:1–10.Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British J. Math. Stat. Psych. 67:451–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemshorn de Sanchez CS, Gerpott FH, Lehmann-Willenbrock N (2022) A review and future agenda for behavioral research on leader–follower interactions at different temporal scopes. J. Organ. Behav. 43(2):342–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt A, Barclay LJ (2017) Comparing integral and incidental emotions: Testing insights from emotions as social information theory and attribution theory. J. Appl. Psych. 102(5):732–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoever IJ, Zhou J, van Knippenberg D (2018) Different strokes for different teams: The contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2159–2181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions on hierarchical linear models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational sciences. J. Management 23(5):623–641.Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Structure Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang L, Gino F, Galinsky AD (2015) The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 131(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Hughes DJ, Lee A, Tian AW, Newman A, Legood A (2018) Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. Leadership Quart. 29(5):549–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaacson W (2011) Steve Jobs (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Muraven M, Donaldson T, Lin SH (2018) Self-control in work organizations. Ferris DL, Johnson RE, Sedikides C, eds. Self Work Fundamental Theory Research (Routledge, New York), 119–144.Google Scholar
• Kapadia C, Melwani S (2021) More tasks, more ideas: The positive spillover effects of multitasking on subsequent creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 106(4):542–559.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kitayama S, Mesquita B, Karasawa M (2006) Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 91(5):890–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knutson B (1996) Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 20(1):165–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J. Chiropractic Medicine 15(2):155–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Lanaj K, Scott BA (2016) Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Acad. Management J. 59(2):414–435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopman J, Lin SH, Lennard AC, Matta FK, Johnson RE (2020) My coworkers are treated more fairly than me! A self-regulatory perspective on justice social comparisons. Acad. Management J. 63(3):857–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW (1989) Lay Epistemics and Human Knowledge: Cognitive and Motivational Bases (Plenum, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Mayseless O (1988) Contextual effects in hypothesis testing: The role of competing alternatives and epistemic motivations. Soc. Cognition 6(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Orehek E (2012) The need for certainty as a psychological nexus for individuals and society. Hogg MA, Blaylock DL, eds. Extremism Psychology Uncertainty (Wiley-Blackwell, New York), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1991) Group members’ reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 61(2):212–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski AW, Webster DM (1996) Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psych. Rev. 103(2):263–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanaj K, Johnson RE, Barnes CM (2014) Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 124(1):11–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psych. Bull. 125(2):255–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim JH, Tai K, Kouchaki M (2021) Ambivalent bosses: An examination of supervisor expressed emotional ambivalence on subordinate task engagement. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 165(1):139–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin SH, Scott BA, Matta FK (2019) The dark side of transformational leader behaviors for leaders themselves: A conservation of resources perspective. Acad. Management J. 62(5):1556–1582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin SJ, Johnson RE (2015) A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. J. Appl. Psych. 100(5):1381–1397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madrid HP, Patterson MG, Birdi KS (2014) The role of weekly high-activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: A multilevel and interactional model. J. Organ. Behav. 35(2):234–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mainemelis C, Kark R, Epitropaki O (2015) Creative leadership: A multi-context conceptualization. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):393–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin MM, Rubin RB (1995) A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psych. Rep. 76(2):623–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer JD, Salovey P (1997) What is emotional intelligence? Salovey P, Sluyter D, eds. Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence (Basic Books, New York), 3–31.Google Scholar
• Mayseless O, Kruglanski AW (1987) What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgemental confidence. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(2):162–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mednick SA (1962) The associative basis of the creative process. Psych. Rev. 69(3):220–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melwani S, Mueller JS, Overbeck JR (2012) Looking down: The influence of contempt and compassion on emergent leadership categorizations. J. Appl. Psych. 97(6):1171–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, Melwani S, Rothman NB (2017) The space between us: A social-functional emotions view of ambivalent and indifferent workplace relationships. J. Management 43(6):1789–1819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Methot JR, Rosado-Solomon EH, Downes P, Gabriel AS (2021) Office chit-chat as a social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Acad. Management J. 64(5):1445–1471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meurs JA, Perrewé PL (2011) Cognitive activation theory of stress: An integrative theoretical approach to work stress. J. Management 37(4):1043–1068.Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Beenen G (2015) Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 127(1):53–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L (2011a) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116(2):229–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor E, Efrat-Treister D, Rafaeli A, Schwarz-Cohen O (2011b) Others’ anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. J. Appl. Psych. 96(5):1065–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moskowitz GB (1993) Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(1):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motro D, Ellis APJ (2017) Boys, don’t cry: Gender and reactions to negative performance feedback. J. Appl. Psych. 102(2):227–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muraven M, Baumeister RF (2000) Self-regualtion and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psych. Bull. 126(2):247–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neuberg SL, Newsom JT (1993) Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 65(1):113–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng TW, Feldman DC (2012) A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations 65(8):1021–1047.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):186–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, de Dreu CKW, Rietzschel EF, Baas M (2010) The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 21(1):37–77.Google Scholar
• Oldham GR, Cummings A (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Acad. Management J. 39(3):607–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Seo MG, Sherf EN (2015) Regulating and facilitating : The role of emotional intelligence in maintaining and using positive affect for creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 100(3):917–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker SK, Atkins PWB, Axtell CM (2008) Building better workplaces through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process. Internat. Rev. Industry Organ. Psych. 23:149–196.Google Scholar
• Parkinson B (1996) Emotions are social. British J. Psych. 87(4):663–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng K, Nisbett RE (1999) Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Amer. Psych. 54(9):741–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith JE (2006) Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Management J. 49(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pillaud V, Cavazza N, Butera F (2018) The social utility of ambivalence: Being ambivalent on controversial issues is recognized as competence. Frontiers Psych. 9:1–13.Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2012) Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annu. Rev. Psych. 63:539–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Selig JP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Comm. Methods Measures 6(2):77–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zhang Z, Zyphur MJ (2016) Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis. Psych. Methods 21(2):189–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Zyphur MJ, Zhang Z (2010) A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psych. Methods 15(3):209–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn RW, Spreitzer GM, Lam CF (2012) Building a sustainable model of human energy in organizations: Exploring the critical role of resources. Acad. Management Ann. 6(1):337–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF, De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA (2007) Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(6):855–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ritter SM, Damian RI, Simonton DK, van Baaren RB, Strick M, Derks J, Dijksterhuis A (2012) Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 48(4):961–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin W, Diestel S, Stollberger J, Sacramento CA (2023) The role of regulatory-, affective-, and motivational resources in the spillover of sleep in the home domain to employee effectiveness in the work domain. Human Relations 76(2):199–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman NB (2011) Steering sheep: How expressed emotional ambivalence elicits dominance in interdependent decision making contexts. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 116:66–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman NB, Melwani S (2017) Feeling mixed, ambivalent and in flux: The social functions of emotional complexity for leaders. Acad. Management Rev. 42(2):259–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman NB, Northcraft GB (2015) Unlocking integrative potential: Expressed emotional ambivalence and negotiation outcomes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 126:65–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothman N, Pratt M, Rees L, Vogus T (2017) Understanding the dual nature of ambivalence: Why and when ambivalence leads to good and bad outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):33–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell JA, Barrett LF (1999) Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 76(5):805–819.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacramento CA, Fay D, West MA (2013) Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 121:141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scherer KR (2009) The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognitive Emotion 23(7):1307–1351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Selig JP, Preacher KJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects (computer software). Working paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
• Shalley CE, Gilson LL (2004) What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quart. 15(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shamir B, House RJ, Arthur MB (1993) The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organ. Sci. 4:577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Nijstad BA, Täuber S (2019) Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 155(1):7–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sims HP Jr, Manz CC (1982) Social learning theory: The role of modeling in the exercise of leadership. J. Organ. Behav. Management 3(4):55–63.Google Scholar
• Sinaceur M, Adam H, van Kleef GA, Galinsky AD (2013) The advantages of being unpredictable: How emotional inconsistency extracts concessions in negotiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 49(3):498–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Ellsworth PC (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(4):813–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith WK, Tushman ML (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organ. Sci. 16(5):522–536.Link, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (2012) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London, UK).Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S, Kühnel J (2016) Coming back to work in the morning: Psychological detachment and reattachment as predictors of Work engagement. J. Occupation Health Psych. 21(4):379–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stollberger J, Las Heras M, Rofcanin Y (2022) Sharing is caring: The role of compassionate love in sharing coworker work-family support at home to promote partners’ creativity at work. J. Appl. Psych. 107(10):1824–1842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher AF, Champagne MV (2000) The impact of time pressure and information on negotiation process and decisions. Group Decision Negotiation 9(1):471–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor CL (2021) Task instructions influence the effects of impaired self-control on creative cognition. Psych. Aesthetics Creative Arts 15(1):165–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tee EYJ, Ng YL, Paulsen N (2014) To be one of us, you have to feel like one of us. Ashkanasy NM, Zerbe WJ, Härtel CEJ, eds. Research on Emotion in Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing), 247–270.Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE, Peterson RS, Berry JM (1993) Flattering and unflattering personality portraits of integratively simple and complex managers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(3):500–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thau S, Mitchell MS (2010) Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. J. Appl. Psych. 95(6):1009–1031.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas G, Martin R, Epitropaki O, Guillaume Y, Lee A (2013) Social cognition in leader–follower relationships: Applying insights from relationship science to understanding relationship-based approaches to leadership. J. Organ. Behav. 81(1):63–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiedens LZ (2001) Anger and advancement vs. sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(1):86–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• To ML, Fisher CD, Ashkanasy NM, Rowe PA (2012) Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. J. Appl. Psych. 97(3):599–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trougakos JP, Hideg I, Cheng BH, Beal DJ (2014) Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Acad. Management J. 57(2):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Twenge JM, Muraven M, Tice DM (2004) Measuring state self-control: Reliability, validity, and correlations with physical and psychological stress. Unpublished manuscript, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
• van Harreveld F, Nohlen HU, Schneider IK (2015) The ABC of ambivalence: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences of attitudinal conflict. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35:235–291.Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, Anastasopoulou C, Nijstad BA (2010a) Can expressions of anger enhance creativity? A test of the emotions as social information (EASI) model. J. Experimnet. Soc. Psych. 46(6):1042–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, de Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR (2010b) An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42:45–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, De Dreu GKW, Pietroni D, Manstead ASR (2006) Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(4):557–581.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Cheshin A (2012) Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organ. Psych. Rev. 2(4):311–339.Google Scholar
• van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Beersma B, van Knippenberg D, van Knippenberg B, Damen F (2009) Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation. Acad. Management J. 52(3):562–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB (2013) A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):1–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, van Kleef GA (2016) Leadership and affect: Moving the hearts and minds of followers. Acad. Management Ann. 10(1):799–840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Visser VA, van Knippenberg D, van Kleef GA, Wisse B (2013) How leader displays of happiness and sadness influence follower performance: Emotional contagion and creative vs. analytical performance. Leadership Quart. 24(1):172–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Soest T, Hagtvet KA (2011) Mediation analysis in a latent growth curve modeling framework. Structural Equation Modeling 18(2):289–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark L, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 56(6):1063–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Management Rev. 18(2):293–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu H, Jiang S, Land KC (2015) Multicollinearity in hierarchical linear models. Soc. Sci. Res. 53(1):118–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bartol KM (2010) Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Management J. 53(1):107–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB (2015) Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Acad. Management J. 58(2):538–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Law KS, Zhou J (2022) Paradoxical leadership, subjective ambivalence, and employee creativity: Effects of employee holistic thinking. J. Management Stud. 59(3):695–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Hoever IJ (2014) Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1:333–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wang XM, Bavato D, Tasselli S, Wu J (2019) Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. J. Management 45(6):2570–2595.Crossref, Google Scholar