Committed Diversification: Why Authenticity Insulates Against Penalties for Diversification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1317

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The Market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albert S, Whetten DA (1985) Organizational identity. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:263–295.Google Scholar
  • Argote L, Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 82(1):150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
  • Baker GP (1992) Beatrice: A study in the creation and destruction of value. J. Finance 47(3):1081–1119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber F, Goold M (2007) The strategic secret of private equity. Retrieved November 23, 2016, https://hbr.org/2007/09/the-strategic-secret-of-private-equity.Google Scholar
  • Baron JN (2004) Employing identities in organizational ecology. Indust. Corporate Change 13(1):3–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bartneck C, Duenser A, Moltchanova E, Zawieska K (2015) Comparing the similarity of responses received from studies in Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to studies conducted online and with direct recruitment. PLoS One 10(4):e0121595.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baugh B (1988) Authenticity revisited. J. Aesthetics Art Criticism 46(4):477–487.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum JAC (1999) The rise of chain nursing homes in Ontario, 1971-1996. Soc. Forces 78(2):543–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker HS (1960) Notes on the concept of commitment. Amer. J. Sociol. 66(1):32–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger PG, Ofek E (1995) Diversification’s effect on firm value. J. Financial Econom. 37(1):39–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bird RB, Smith EA (2005) Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology 46(2):221–248.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1985) The market of symbolic goods. Poetics 14(1):13–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P (1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Swaminathan A (2000) Why the microbrewery movement? Organizational dynamics of resource partitioning in the U.S. brewing industry. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(3):715–762.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll GR, Wheaton DR (2009) The organizational construction of authenticity: An examination of contemporary food and dining in the U.S. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:255–282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cattani G, Dunbar RLM, Shapira Z (2017) How commitment to craftsmanship leads to unique value: Steinway & Sons’ differentiation strategy. Strategy Sci. 2(1):13–38.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chandler AD (1994) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Clay RA (2011) The future of behavioral healthcare. Monitor Psych. 42(5):52–53.Google Scholar
  • Dulleck U, Kerschbamer R (2006) On doctors, mechanics, and computer specialists: The economics of credence goods. J. Econom. Literature 44(1):5–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elsbach KD (1994) Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(1):57–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine GA (2003) Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory Soc. 32(2):153–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fine GA, Elsbach KD (2000) Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative laboratory data. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 36(1):51–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Folta TB, Janney JJ (2004) Strategic benefits to firms issuing private equity placements. Strategic Management J. 25(3):223–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frake J (2016) Selling out: The inauthenticity discount in the craft beer industry. Management Sci. 63(11):3930–3943.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frisch D, Baron J (1988) Ambiguity and rationality. J. Behav. Decision Making 1(3):149–157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galperin RV, Hahl O, Sterling AD, Guo J (2019) Too good to hire: Capability and inferences about commitment in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print March 28, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219840022.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Given LM (2008) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Anchor Books, Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
  • Gompers PA, Kaplan SN, Mukharlyamov V (2014) What Do Private Equity Firms (Say They) Do? (Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grazian D (2005) Blue Chicago: The Search for Authenticity in Urban Blues Clubs (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hahl O (2016) Turning back the clock in baseball: The increased prominence of extrinsic rewards and demand for authenticity. Organ. Sci. 27(4):929–953.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hahl O, Kim M, Zuckerman Sivan EW (2018) The authentic appeal of the lying demagogue: Proclaiming the deeper truth about political illegitimacy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 83(1):1–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahl O, Zuckerman EW, Kim M (2017) Why elites love authentic lowbrow culture: Overcoming high-status denigration with outsider art. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 82(4):828–856.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris Williams & Co. (2014) Behavioral health industry overview. Report, Harris Williams & Co., Richmond, VA.Google Scholar
  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hörner J (2002) Reputation and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):644–663.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G (2006) Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Admin. Sci. Quart. 51(3):420–450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu G, Hannan MT, Kocak O (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74:150–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Interlandi J (2014) A Revolutionary Approach to Treating PTSD. New York Times (May 22), http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/25/magazine/a-revolutionary-approach-to-treating-ptsd.html.Google Scholar
  • Kang SK, DeCelles KA, Tilcsik A, Jun S (2016) Whitened résumés: Race and self-presentation in the labor market. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(3):469–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S (2015) Mixing qualitative and quantitative research method. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research (Routledge, London), 423–433.Google Scholar
  • Karpik L (2010) Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim M, Zuckerman EW (2017) Faking it is hard to do: Entrepreneurial norm enforcement and suspicions of deviance. Sociol. Sci. 4:580–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Hannan M (2015) Conceptual spaces and the consequences of category spanning. Sociol. Sci. 2:252–286.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovács B, Carroll GR, Lehman DW (2013) Authenticity and consumer value ratings: Empirical tests from the restaurant domain. Organ. Sci. 25(2):458–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kutscher B (2013) Behavioral health market surging because of healthcare reform. Modern Healthcare (February 15), http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20130215/MAGAZINE/302169970.Google Scholar
  • Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1994) Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification, and firm performance. J. Political Econom. 102(6):1248–1280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DW, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2014) Conflicting social codes and organizations: Hygiene and authenticity in consumer evaluations of restaurants. Management Sci. 60(10):2602–2617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DW, O’Connor K, Kovacs B, Newman GE (2018) Authenticity. Acad. Management Ann. 13(1):1–42.Google Scholar
  • Leung MD (2014) Dilettante or Renaissance person? How the order of job experiences affects hiring in an external labor market. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(1):136–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leung MD, Sharkey AJ (2014) Out of sight, out of mind? Evidence of perceptual factors in the multiple-category discount. Organ. Sci. 25(1):171–184.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin L, Nigrinis A, Christidis P, Stamm K (2015) 2005-13: Demographics of the U.S. Psychology Workforce (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Litman L, Robinson J, Abberbock T (2017) TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 49(2):433–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markides CC, Williamson PJ (1994) Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance. Strategic Management J. 15:149–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason W, Suri S (2013) Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mellody P, Miller AW, Miller JK (2003) Facing Codependence: What It Is, Where It Comes from, How It Sabotages Our Lives, 1st ed. (Harper & Row, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Merluzzi J, Phillips DJ (2016) The specialist discount: Negative returns for MBAs with focused profiles in investment banking. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(1):87–124.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1987) Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Rev. Sociol. 13(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Natividad G, Rawley E (2016) Interdependence and performance: A natural experiment in firm scope. Strategy Sci. 1(1):12–31.Google Scholar
  • Negro G, Leung MD (2012) “Actual” and perceptual effects of category spanning. Organ. Sci. 24(3):684–696.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman GE, Bloom P (2012) Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. J. Experiment. Psych. General 141(3):558–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paolella L, Durand R (2015) Category spanning, evaluation, and performance: Revised theory and test on the corporate law market. Acad. Management J. 59(1):330–351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson RA (1997) Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson RA (2005) In search of authenticity. J. Management Stud. 42(5):1083–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (Harper and Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW (2013) Betrayal as market barrier: Identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Amer. J. Sociol. 118(4):1023–1054.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podolny JM (2005) Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan A (2018) The artisan and his audience: Identification with work and price setting in a handicraft cluster in southern India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):637–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rawley E (2010) Diversification, coordination costs, and organizational rigidity: Evidence from microdata. Strategic Management J. 31(8):873–891.Google Scholar
  • Rawley E, Simcoe TS (2010) Diversification, diseconomies of scope, and vertical contracting: Evidence from the taxicab industry. Management Sci. 56(9):1534–1550.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rehabs (2016) Addiction rehabilitation therapy – drug rehab therapists. Retrieved May 13, 2016, http://www.rehabs.com/about/addiction-therapy/.Google Scholar
  • Reichertz J (2004) Abduction, deduction and induction in qualitative research. Flick U, von Kardoff E, Steinke I, eds. Companion to Qualitative Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 159–164.Google Scholar
  • Sagiv T (2014) Reinvesting dance with meaning: Authenticity and ingenuity in the artistic dance field. Honig B, Lampel J, Drori I, eds. Handbook of Organizational and Entrepreneurial Ingenuity (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 155–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sakhartov AV (2018) Stock market undervaluation of resource redeployability. Strategic Management J. 39(4):1059–1082.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling TC (1956) An essay on bargaining. Amer. Econom. Rev. 46(3):281–306.Google Scholar
  • Servaes H (1996) The value of diversification during the conglomerate merger wave. J. Finance 51(4):1201–1225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sgourev SV, Althuizen N (2014) “Notable” or “not able”: When are acts of inconsistency rewarded? Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):282–302.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharkey AJ (2014) Categories and organizational status: The role of industry status in the response to organizational deviance. Amer. J. Sociol. 119(5):1380–1433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trilling L (1972) Sincerity and Authenticity, 1st ed. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Turner RH (1976) The real self: From institution to impulse. Amer. J. Sociol. 81(5):989–1016.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veblen T (2008) The Theory of the Leisure Class (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Villalonga B (2004a) Does diversification cause the “diversification discount”? Financial Management 33(2):5–27.Google Scholar
  • Villalonga B (2004b) Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance 59(2):479–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B, Montgomery CA (1988) Tobin’s Q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):246–250.Google Scholar
  • Yin RK (2017) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2000) Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):591–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (2017) The categorical imperative revisited: Implications of categorization as a theoretical tool. Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 51 (Emerald Publishing, Bingley, UK), 31–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim TY (2003) The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Indust. Corporate Change 12(1):27–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim TY, Ukanwa K, von Rittman J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.