Long Jump Learning: Absorbing Distant Knowledge via Familiar Components

References

• Afuah A, Tucci CL (2012) Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):355–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aharonson BS, Schilling MA (2016) Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution. Res. Policy 45(1):81–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. 22(3):197–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Katila R (2004) Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):887–907.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM (2001) Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. 22(6–7):521–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tripsas M (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management J. 33(3):277–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (Doubleday, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2009) NBER PDP project user documentation: Matching patent data to Compustat firms. Beta Version.Google Scholar
• Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa. Gumperz JJ, Levinson SC, eds. Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 141–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breschi S, Lissoni F, Malerba F (2003) Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Res. Policy 32(1):69–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M (1995) General purpose technologies “engines of growth”? J. Econometrics 65(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnabuci G, Operti E (2013) Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination. Strategic Management J. 34(13):1591–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu J (2018) Insulator or superconductor? Physicists find graphene is both. MIT News Online (March 5), https://news.mit.edu/2018/graphene-insulator-superconductor-0305.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen SL, Tripsas M (2018) Managing technological transitions by building bridges. Acad. Management J. 61(6):2319–2342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colapinto J (2014) Material question. The New Yorker Online (December 22), http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/12/22/material-question.Google Scholar
• Corradini C, De Propris L (2017) Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and intersectoral technological integration. Res. Policy 46(1):196–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E (2002) The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. 23(12):1095–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dechenaux E, Goldfarb B, Shane S, Thursby M (2008) Appropriability and commercialization: Evidence from MIT inventions. Management Sci. 54(5):893–906.Link, Google Scholar
• Deken F, Berends H, Gemser G, Lauche K (2018) Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1920–1950.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dretske F (1981) Knowledge and the Flow of Information (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaplan S (2013) Cognition and capabilities: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management Ann. 7(1):295–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR (2009) Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Res. Policy 38(2):255–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS (2004) Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organ. Sci. 15(3):295–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2004) Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. 25(8–9):909–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Snow DC (2015) Intergenerational hybrids: Spillbacks, spillforwards, and adapting to technology discontinuities. Organ. Sci. 26(2):475–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G, Tripsas M, Aoshima Y (2007) Fujifilm: A Second Foundation (Harvard Business School, Boston).Google Scholar
• Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nature Materials 6(3):183–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilsing V, Nooteboom B, Vanhaverbeke W, Duysters G, van den Oord A (2008) Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Res. Policy 37(10):1717–1731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators—A survey. J. Econom. Literature 28(4):1661–1707.Google Scholar
• Haas MR, Ham W (2015) Microfoundations of knowledge recombination: Peripheral knowledge and breakthrough innovation in teams. Adv. Strategic Management 32:47–87.Google Scholar
• Hall BH (2005) A note on the bias in Herfindahl-type measures based on count data. Revue d’économie Industrielle 110(1):149–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Bessen J (2010) Name standardization routines. Accessed September 21, 2016, https://sites.google.com/site/patentdataproject/Home/posts/namestandardizationroutinesuploaded.Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights, and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Lieberman MB (2002) The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre‐history. Indust. Corporate Change 11(4):725–760.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homma T, Igarashi Y, Kanazawa K, Orikas A, Omura G, Tashiro T (2017) Development of “Astalift Moist Lotion.” Fujifilm Res. Development 62:71–75.Google Scholar
• Iwata H, Shimada K (2013) Formulas, Ingredients and Production of Cosmetics (Springer Japan, Tokyo).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R & D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):577–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S, Vakili K (2014) The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1435–1457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. 45(6):1183–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keupp MM, Gassmann O (2013) Resource constraints as triggers of radical innovation: Longitudinal evidence from the manufacturing sector. Res. Policy 42(8):1457–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komori S (2015) Innovating out of Crisis: How Fujifilm Survived (and Thrived) as Its Core Business Was Vanishing (Stone Bridge Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Kuhn TS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Kusuda F, Kubo T, Sudo Y, Kawabuchi T, Orikasa A, Nakamura Y (2010) Development of functional cosmetics “Astalift Whitening Essence.” Fujifilm Res. Development 55:33–37.Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. 19(5):461–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Management Rev. 31(4):833–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management J. 27(2):131–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA (1997) Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. 43(7):934–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(52):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14:319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G-C, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Glynn MA (2001) Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management J. 22(6/7):545–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Makri M, Hitt MA, Lane PJ (2010) Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 31(6):602–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medin DL, Schaffer MM (1978) Context theory of classification learning. Psych. Rev. 85(3):207–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morrison G, Riccaboni M, Pammolli F (2017) Disambiguation of patent inventors and assignees using high-resolution geolocation data. Sci. Data 4:170064Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):77–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy GL (2002) The Big Book of Concepts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik G (2013) Wonder material ignites scientific gold rush: Atom-thin graphene beats steel, silicon; A patent “land rush.” The Wall Street Journal (August 24), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323664204578610092869213354.Google Scholar
• Ng D (2017) How FujiFilm survived the digital age with an unexpected makeover. Channel News Asia Insider Online (November 7), https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/cnainsider/how-fujifilm-survived-the-digital-age-with-an-unexpected-makeove-7626418.Google Scholar
• Novoselov KS, Falko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim K (2012) A roadmap for graphene. Nature 490(7419):192–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality Quantity 41(5):673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (1996) Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates: Summary. J. Appl. Econometrics 11(6):619–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Papke LE, Wooldridge JM (2008) Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates. J. Econometrics 145(1):121–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose ET (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Phillips DJ, Zuckerman EW (2001) Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(2):379–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pontikes EG (2012) Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):81–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers D (2007) The Chemistry of Photography: From Classical to Digital Technologies (Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Rosch E (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. J. Experiment. Psych. General 104(3):192–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psych. 8(3):382–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Almeida P (2003) Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. 49(6):751–766.Link, Google Scholar
• Ross BH (1996) Category representations and the effects of interacting with instances. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 22(5):1249–1265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross BH, Perkins SJ, Tenpenny PL (1990) Reminding-based category learning. Cognitive Psych. 22(4):460–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2014) How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Acad. Management J. 57(3):814–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tashiro T (2017) Inside the Storm Season 2 Episode 2: Fujifilm. Channel News Asia Online (February 1), https://www.channelnewsasia.com/watch/inside-storm/fujifilm-1593891.Google Scholar
• Tiwari S, Wang N, Ha SK (2019) Graphene-based advanced materials: Properties and their key applications. Sahoo S, Tiwari S, Nayak G, eds. Surface Engineering of Graphene. Carbon Nanostructures (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorova G, Durisin B (2007) Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. 32(3):774–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson E (2021) Physicists discover important new property for graphene. MIT News Online (February 8), https://news.mit.edu/2021/physicists-discover-important-new-property-graphene-0208.Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M, Henderson R, Jaffe A (1997) University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 5(1):19–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasudeva G, Anand J (2011) Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Acad. Management J. 54(3):611–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jenni PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yayavaram S, Ahuja G (2008) Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(2):333–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. 27(2):185–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li H (2010) Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management J. 31(1):88–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao ZJ, Chadwick C (2013) What we will do versus what we can do: The relative effects of unit-level NPD motivation and capability. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1867–1880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wu Z, Guo S, Zhou Z, Miao Z, Xie S, Huang R, Li L (2022) Hyperbranched graphene oxide structure-based epoxy nanocomposite with simultaneous enhanced mechanical properties, thermal conductivity, and superior electrical insulation. Composites Sci. Tech. 217:109082.Crossref, Google Scholar