How Can Pluralistic Organizations Proceed with Strategic Change? A Processual Account of Rhetorical Contestation, Convergence, and Partial Agreement in a Nordic City Organization

References

• Abdallah C, Langley A (2014) The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. J. Management Stud. 51(2):235–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggerholm H, Asmuss B, Thomsen C (2012) The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing. J. Management Stud. 21(4):413–428.Google Scholar
• Aristotle (1954) Rhetoric. Roberts WR, Bywater I, Solmsen F, trans. (Modern Library, New York).Google Scholar
• Balogun J, Johnson G (2004) Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 47(4):523–549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balogun J, Bartunek J, Do B (2015) Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organ. Sci. 26(4):960–979.Link, Google Scholar
• Balogun J, Jacobs C, Jarzabkowski P, Mantere S, Vaara E (2014) Placing strategy discourse in context: Sociomateriality, sensemaking and power. J. Management Stud. 51(2):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry D, Elmes M (1997) Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Acad. Management Rev. 22(2):429–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartunek J (1984) Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Admin. Sci. Quart. 29(3):355–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bednarek R, Paroutis S, Sillince J (2017) Transcendence through rhetorical practices: Responding to paradox in the science sector. Organ. Stud. 1(38):77–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandtner C, Höllerer M, Meyer R, Kornberger M (2016) Enacting governance through strategy: A comparative study of governance configurations in Sydney and Vienna. Urban Stud. 1(1):1–17.Google Scholar
• Brown A (1998) Organizational Culture, 2nd ed. (Pitman Publishing, London).Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Floyd SW, Laamanen T, Mantere S, Vaara E, Whittington R (2018) Strategy processes and practices: Dialogues and intersections. Strategic Management J. 39(3):531–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheney G, Christensen LT, Conrad C, Lair DJ (2004) Corporate rhetoric as organizational discourse. Grant D, Hardy C, Oswick C, Putnam L, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse (Sage, London), 79–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooren F (2010) Figures of communication and dialogue: Passion, ventriloquism and incarnation. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(1):131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corley KG, Gioia DA (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(2):173–208.Google Scholar
• Czarniawska B (2004) Narratives in Social Science Research (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalpiaz E, Di Stefano G (2018) A universe of stories: Mobilizing narrative practices during transformative change. Strategic Management J. 39(3):664–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis JL, Lamothe L, Langley A (2001) The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Acad. Management J. 44(4):809–837.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis JL, Langley A, Rouleau L (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations 60(1):179–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denis JL, Dompierre G, Langley A, Rouleau L (2011) Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 22(1):225–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Dodge J (2017) Crowded advocacy: Framing dynamic in the fracking controversy in New York. Voluntas 28(3):888–915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donnellon A, Gray B, Bougon MG (1986) Communication, meaning, and organized action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):43–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM (1984) Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Comm. Monographs 51(3):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg EM (2007) Strategic Ambiguities: Essays on Communication, Organization, and Identity (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2002) Toward an organic perspective on strategy. Strategic Management J. 23(7):561–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M (2005) Management and public management. Acad. Management J. 48(6):958–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Sköldberg K (2002) Stories and the rhetoric of contrariety: Subtexts of organizing (change). Culture Organ. 8(4):275–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M, Sköldberg K, Brown R, Horner D (2004) Making sense of stories: A rhetorical approach to narrative analysis. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 4(2):147–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenton C, Langley A (2011) Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organ. Stud. 32(9):1171–1196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher P (1988) State venture capital funds as an economic development strategy. J. Amer. Planning Assoc. 54(2):166–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Floyd SW, Wolf C (2017) Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. J. Management 43(6):1754–1788.Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management J. 12(6):433–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E (2015) Introduction: What is strategy as practice? Golsorkhi D, Rouleau L, Seidl D, Vaara E, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodnight G (1993) Legitimation inferences: An additional component for the Toulmin model. Informal Logic 15(1):41–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodnight G (2006) Complex cases and legitimation inference: Extending the Toulmin model to deliberative argument in controversy. Hitchcock D, Verheij B, eds. Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation (Springer, New York), 39–48.Google Scholar
• Green S (2004) A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):653–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S, Larsen G, Kao C (2008) Competitive strategy revisited: Contested concepts and dynamic capabilities. Construction Management Econom. 26(1):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green S, Li Y, Nohria N (2009) Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Acad. Management J. 52(1):11–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardy C, Maguire S (2010) Discourse, field-configuring events, and change in organizations and institutional fields: Narratives of DDT and the Stockholm Convention. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1365–1392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harmon D, Green S, Goodnight G (2015) A model of rhetorical legitimation: The structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Acad. Management Rev. 40(1): 76–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heracleous L (2006) A tale of three discourses: The dominant, the strategic and the marginalized. J. Management Stud. 43(5): 1059–1087.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heracleous L, Barrett M (2001) Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Acad. Management J. 44(4):755–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutzschenreuter T, Kleindienst I (2006) Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored. J. Management 32(5):673–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jalonen K, Schildt H, Vaara E (2018) Strategic concepts as micro-level tools in strategic sensemaking. Strategic Management J. 39(5):2794–2826.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Kaplan S (2015) Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management J. 36(4):537–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Sillince J, Shaw D (2010) Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple strategic goals. Human Relations 63(2):219–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• Kellermanns F, Walter J, Lechner C, Floyd S (2005) The lack of consensus about strategic consensus: Advancing theory and research. J. Management 31(5):719–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketokivi M, Mantere S, Cornelissen J (2017) Reasoning by analogy and the progress of theory. Acad. Management Rev. 42(4):637–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knights D, Morgan G (1991) Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: A critique. Organ. Stud. 12(2):251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornberger M, Clegg S (2011) Strategy as performative practice: The case of Sydney 2030. Strategic Organ. 9(2):136–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornberger M, Meyer RE, Brandtner C, Höllerer MA (2017) When bureaucracy meets the crowd: Studying “open government” in the Vienna city administration. Organ. Stud. 38(2):179–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunisch S, Bartunek J, Mueller J, Huy Q (2017) Time in strategic change research. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):1005–1064.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon W, Wodak R, Clarke I (2014) Micro-level discursive strategies for constructing shared views around strategic issues in team meetings. J. Management Stud. 51(2):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laine P, Vaara E (2007) Struggling over subjectivity: A discursive analysis of strategic development in an engineering group. Human Relations 60(1):29–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Orlikowski WJ (2009) Understanding shifting power relations within and across fields of practice: A critical genre analysis. Acad. Management J. 52(4):672–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindblom CE (1959) The science of ”muddling through.“ Public Admin. Rev. 19(2):79–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke K, Golden-Biddle K, Feldman M (2008) Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in research process. Organ. Sci. 19(6):907–918.Link, Google Scholar
• Maitlis S (2005) The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Acad. Management J. 48(1):21–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantere S (2013) What is organizational strategy? A language‐based view. J. Management Stud. 50(8):1408–1426.Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Ketokivi M (2013) Reasoning in organization science. Acad. Management Rev. 38(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mantere S, Vaara E (2008) On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discourse perspective. Organ. Sci. 19(2):341–358.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG (1994) A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Sci. 24(9):934–948.Link, Google Scholar
• Morrell K, Hewison A (2013) Rhetoric in policy texts: The role of enthymeme in Darzi’s review of the NHS. Policy Politics 41(1):59–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mueller F, Sillince J, Harvey C, Howorth C (2004) ‘A rounded picture is what we need’: Rhetorical strategies, arguments and the negotiation of change in a UK hospital trust. Organ. Stud. 25(1):75–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers DG, Lamm H (1975) The polarizing effect of group discussion: The discovery that discussion tends to enhance the average prediscussion tendency has stimulated new insights about the nature of group influence. Amer. Sci. 63(3):297–303.Google Scholar
• Nutt P (1987) Identifying and appraising how managers install strategy. Strategic Management J. 8(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons W (2002) From muddling through to muddling up: Evidence based policy making and the modernization of British government. Public Policy Admin. 17(3):43–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perelman C (1977) The Realm of Rhetoric (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).Google Scholar
• Perelman C, Olbrechts-Tyteca L (1969) The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A (1973) The Politics of Organizational Decision Making (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1992) The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management J. 13(S2):5–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quick KS, Feldman MS (2011) Distinguishing participation and inclusion. J. Planning Ed. Res. 31(3):272–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robichaud D, Giroux H, Taylor J (2004) The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Acad. Management Rev. 29(4):617–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouleau L, Balogun J (2011) Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. J. Management Stud. 48(5):953–983.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samra-Fredericks D (2005) Strategic practice, ‘discourse’, and the everyday interactional constitution of ‘power effects.’ Organ. 12(6):803–841.Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn D, Blaschke S (2014) The three schools of CCO thinking: Interactive dialogue and systematic comparison. Management Comm. Quart. 28(2):285–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sillince J, Jarzabkowski P, Shaw D (2012) Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organ. Sci. 23(3):743–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Sonenshein S (2010) We’re changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Acad. Management J. 53(3):477–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spee A, Jarzabkowski P (2011) Strategic planning as communicative process. Organ. Stud. 32(9):1217–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spee P, Jarzabkowski P (2017) Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change. Organ. Sci. 28(1):152–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor JR, Robichaud D (2004) Finding the organization in the communication: Discourse as action and sensemaking. Organ. 11(3):395–413.Google Scholar
• Taylor JR, Van Every EJ (2000) The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Toulmin S (1958) The Uses of Argument (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Toulmin S, Rieke R, Janik A (1984) An Introduction to Reasoning (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Vaara E (2010) Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon. Adv. Strategic Management 27:29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Tienari J (2008) A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs. Acad. Management Rev. 33(4):985–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Sorsa V, Pälli P (2010) On the force potential of strategy texts: A critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organ. 17(6):685–702.Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH, Huber GP (1990) Longitudinal field research methods for studying processes of organizational change. Organ. Sci. 1(3):213–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Eemeren F, Garssen B, Krabbe E, Henkemans A, Verheij B, Wagemans J (2014) Handbook of Argumentation Theory (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J, Sodersen J, Mitchell T (2007) The interplay between theory and method. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1145–1154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh IJ, Bartunek JM (2011) Cheating the fates: Organizational foundings in the wake of demise. Acad. Management J. 54(5):1017–1044.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walter J, Kellermans FW, Floyd SW, Veiga JF, Matherne K (2013) Strategic alignment: A missing link in the relationship between strategic consensus and organizational performance. Strategic Organ. 11(3):304–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westley F (1990) Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusion. Strategic Management J. 11(5):337–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittle A, Housley W, Gilchrist A, Mueller F, Lenney P (2014) Power, politics and organizational communication: An ethnomethodological perspective. Cooren F, Vaara E, Langley A, Tsoukas H, eds. Perspectives on Process Organization Studies, vol. 4 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 71–94.Google Scholar
• Wodak R, Kwon W, Clarke I (2011) Getting people on board: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. Discourse Soc. 22(5):592–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge B, Floyd SW (1989) Research notes and communications strategic process effects on consensus. Strategic Management J. 10(3):295–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge B, Floyd SW (1990) The strategy process, middle management involvement and organizational performance. Strategic Management J. 11(3):231–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge B, Schmid T, Floyd SW (2008) The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research. J. Management 34(6):1190– 1221.Crossref, Google Scholar