Ensuring Adaptation While Seeking Efficiency: Tiered Outsourcing and Skip-Level Supplier Ties in the Airbus A350 Program

References

• Airbus (2013) FAST (Flight Airworthiness Support Technology), Special Edition A350 XWB. Accessed February 17, 2020, https://www.airbus.com/content/dam/corporate-topics/publications/fast/FAST_specialA350.pdf.Google Scholar
• Altfeld H (2010) Commercial Aircraft Projects: Managing the Development of Highly Complex Products (Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham, UK).Google Scholar
• Aoki K, Wilhelm M (2017) The role of ambidexterity in managing buyer–supplier relationships: The Toyota case. Organ. Sci. 28(6):1080–1097.Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives vs. transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Houghton S, Tadelis S (2014) Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of adaptation costs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1288–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker G, Gibbons R, Murphy KJ (2002) Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):39–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Furlan AA, Rettore E (2007) Risk sharing in supplier relations: an agency model for the Italian air-conditioning industry. Strategic Management J. 28(12):1257–1266.Google Scholar
• Choi T, Linton T (2011) Don’t let your supply chain control your business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(12):112–117.Google Scholar
• Choi TY, Wu Z (2009) Triads in supply networks: Theorizing buyer-supplier-supplier relationships. J. Supply Chain Management 45(1):8–25.Google Scholar
• Clark KB, Fujimoto T (1991) Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH (1996) Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of Japanese competitive advantage. Organ. Sci. 7(6):649–666.Link, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012a) Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1350–1364.Link, Google Scholar
• Gibbons R, Henderson R (2012b) What do managers do? Exploring persistent performance differences among seemingly similar enterprises. Gibbons R, Roberts J, eds. The Handbook of Organizational Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ), 680–731.Google Scholar
• Gilson RJ, Sabel CF, Scott RE (2009) Contracting for innovation: Vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration. Columbia Law Rev. 109(3):431–502.Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2013) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girschik SR, Rossi A, Boutellier R (2009) Bargaining in the European automotive industry: Coopetitive models and laboratory experiments. Dagnino GB, Rocco E, eds. Coopetition Strategy: Theory, Experiments and Cases (Routledge, London), 221–239.Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. 38(1):85–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P (2009) Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organ. Sci. 20(2):422–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, Henderson R (2014) Management practices, relational contracts, and the decline of General Motors. J. Econom. Perspect. 28(1):49–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobday M (1998) Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation. Res. Policy 26(6):689–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hobday M, Davies A, Prencipe A (2005) Systems integration: A core capability of the modern corporation. Indust. Corporate Change 14(6):1109–1143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, MacDuffie JP, Tae CJ (2016) Agency, structure, and the dominance of OEMs: Change and stability in the automotive sector. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1942–1967.Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Srikanth K (2013) Managing a global partnership model: Lessons from the Boeing 787 “Dreamliner” program. Global Strategy J. 3(1):41–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Workiewicz M (2018) When two bosses are better than one: Nearly decomposable systems and organizational adaptation. Organ. Sci. 29(2):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Mishra A (2015) Managing the performance trade-offs from partner integration: Implications of contract choice in R&D projects. Production Oper. Management 24(10):1552–1569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacDuffie JP, Helper S (2006) Collaboration in supply chains—With and without trust. Heckscher C, Adler PS, eds. The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 417–466.Google Scholar
• Mena C, Humphries A, Choi TY (2013) Toward a theory of multi-tier supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Management 49(2):58–77.Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Okamuro H (2001) Risk sharing in the supplier relationship: New evidence from the Japanese automotive industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 45(4):361–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zenger T (2002) Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. 23(8):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poppo L, Zhou KZ, Ryu S (2008) Alternative origins to interorganizational trust: An interdependence perspective on the shadow of the past and the shadow of the future. Organ. Sci. 19(1):39–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Reichelstein S (1992) Constructing incentive schemes for government contracts: An application of agency theory. Accounting Rev. 67(4):712–731.Google Scholar
• Ryall MD, Sampson RC (2009) Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: Evidence from technology development projects. Management Sci. 55(6):906–925.Link, Google Scholar
• Schepker DJ, Oh WY, Martynov A, Poppo L (2014) The many futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Management 40(1):193–225.Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Sinha KK, van de Ven AH (2005) Designing work within and between organizations. Organ. Sci. 16(4):389–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1253–1271.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (2001) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tadelis S (2002) Complexity, flexibility, and the make-or-buy decision. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(2):433–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeishi A (2001) Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management J. 22(5):403–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripathy A, Eppinger SD (2011) Organizing global product development for complex engineered systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 58(3):510–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(1):35–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1979) Reclaiming qualitative methods for organizational research: A preface. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):520–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanneste BS, Puranam P, Kretschmer T (2014) Trust over time in exchange relationships: Meta-analysis and theory. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1891–1902.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (2007) The generative properties of richness. Acad. Management J. 50(1):14–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1980) Efficient incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. 94(4):719–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Choi TY (2005) Supplier–supplier relationships in the buyer–supplier triad: Building theories from eight case studies. J. Oper. Management 24(1):27–52.Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Choi TY, Rungtusanatham MJ (2010) Supplier–supplier relationships in buyer–supplier–supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. J. Oper. Management 28(2):115–123.Google Scholar
• Wynstra F, Spring M, Schoenherr T (2015) Service triads: A research agenda for buyer–supplier–customer triads in business services. J. Oper. Management 35(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2013) Designing for complexity: Using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ. Sci. 24(2):339–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Zirpoli F, Becker MC (2011) The limits of design and engineering outsourcing: Performance integration and the unfulfilled promises of modularity. R&D Management 41(1):21–43.Crossref, Google Scholar