Penalizing the Underdogs? Employment Protection and the Competitive Dynamics of Firm Innovation

References

• Acharya V, Baghai R, Subramanian K (2014) Wrongful discharge laws and innovation. Rev. Financial Stud. 27(1):301–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.Link, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal DA (2004) Real options and real tradeoffs. Acad. Management Rev. 29(1):120–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Aghion P, Bloom NR, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P (2005) Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):701–728.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2008) Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):1–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akkermans D, Castaldi C, Los B (2009) Do “liberal market economies” really innovate more radically than “coordinated market economies?”: Hall and Soskice reconsidered. Res. Policy 38(1):181–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman EI (1983) Corporate Distress: A Complete Guide to Predicting, Avoiding and Dealing with Bankruptcy (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Anderson A, Cabral L (2007) Go for broke or play it safe? Dynamic competition with choice of variance. RAND J. Econom. 38(3):593–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arend RJ, Bromiley P (2009) Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone? Strategic Organ. 7(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Mahoney JT, Nickerson J (2019) Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs. Strategic Management J. 40(3):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armour HO, Teece DJ (1980) Vertical integration and technological innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62(3):470–474.Google Scholar
• Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios LA (2014) Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strategic Management J. 35(3):317–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH (2003) Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. J. Labor Econom. 21(1):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Donohue JJ, Schwab SJ (2006) The costs of wrongful-discharge laws. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(2):211–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Kerr WR, Kugler AD (2007) Does employment protection reduce productivity? Evidence from US states. Econom. J. 117(521):F189–F217.Google Scholar
• Autor DH, Dorn D, Katz LF, Patterson C, Van Reenen J (2017) The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Benmelech E, Bergman N, Kim H (2018) Strong employers and weak employees: How does employer concentration affect wages? NBER Working Paper 24307, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Benner MJ (2010) Securities analysts and incumbent response to radical technological change: Evidence from digital photography and internet telephony. Organ. Sci. 21(1):42–62.Google Scholar
• Benner MJ, Tushman M (2002) Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47(4):676–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernstein S (2015) Does going public affect innovation? J. Finance 70(4):1365–1403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird RC, Knopf JD (2009) Do wrongful discharge laws impair firm performance? J. Law Econom. 52(2):197–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Romer PM, Terry SJ, Reenen JV (2013) A trapped-factors model of innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(3):208–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Kim I, Tian X (2017) Do unions affect innovation? Management Sci. 63(7):2049–2395.Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Cerqueiro G, Hegde D, Penas MF, Seamans RC (2016) Debtor rights, credit supply, and innovation. Management Sci. 63(10):3311–3327.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen W, Miller KD (2007) Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management J. 28(4):369–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Google Scholar
• Collins CJ, Smith KG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Acad. Management J. 49(3):544–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis EM (2018) Who loses under cap-and-trade programs? The labor market effects of the NOX budget trading program. Rev. Econom. Statist. 100(1):151–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Damanpour F, Aravind D (2012) Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. Mumford M, ed. Handbook of Organizational Creativity (Elsevier, Oxford, UK), 483–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis JP, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2009) Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Admin. Sci. Quart. 54(3):413–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Aveni RA (1994) Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2012) Falling flat. Failed technologies and investment under uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):47–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP (2014) Competing technologies and industry evolution: The benefits of making mistakes in the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management J. 35(2):159–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggers JP, Kaul A (2018) Motivation and ability? A behavioral perspective on the pursuit of radical invention in multi-technology incumbents. Acad. Management J. 61(1):67–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Furr NR, Bingham CB (2010) CROSSROADS—Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21(6):1263–1273.Link, Google Scholar
• Ericson R, Pakes A (1995) Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):53–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fabrizio KR, Tsolmon U (2014) An empirical examination of the procyclicality of R&D investment and innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(4):662–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Findikoglu M, Lavie D (2019) The contingent value of the dedicated alliance function. Strategic Organ. 17(2):177–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franco AM, Mitchell MF (2008) Covenants not to compete, labor mobility, and industry dynamics. J. Econom. Management Strategy 17(3):581–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Snow DC (2014) Intergenerational hybrids: Spillbacks, spillforwards, and adapting to technology discontinuities. Organ. Sci. 26(2):475–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (1991) Commitment: The Dynamics of Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Gilbert R (2006) Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where are we in the competition-innovation debate? Innovation Policy Econom. 6:159–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert RJ, Newbery DM (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
• Giroud X, Mueller HM (2010) Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? J. Financial Econom. 95(3):312–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Gordon BR (2011) Does AMD spur Intel to innovate more? J. Political Econom. 119(6):1141–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2011) Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms. Strategic Management J. 32(1):103–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith R, Macartney G (2014) Employment protection legislation, multinational firms, and innovation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 96(1):135–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Hall PA, Soskice D (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS, Pfann GA (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. J. Econom. Literature 34(3):1264–1292.Google Scholar
• Hashmi AR (2013) Competition and innovation: The inverted-U relationship revisited. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(5):1653–1668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2003) The dynamic resource‐based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management J. 24(10):997–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf MA, Singh H, Teece DJ, Winter SG (2007) Dynamic Capabilities. Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B (1989) Agency costs and innovation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 12(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Sci. 52(11):1661–1674.Google Scholar
• Kaplan SN, Zingales L (1997) Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):169–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaul A (2012) Technology and corporate scope: Firm and rival innovation as antecedents of corporate transactions. Strategic Management J. 33(4):347–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keum DD (2019) Cog in the wheel: Resource release and the scope of interdependencies in corporate adjustment activities. Strategic Management J., ePub ahead of print September 30, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3093.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogan L, Papanikolaou D, Seru A, Stoffman N (2017) Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. Quart. J. Econom. 132(2):665–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Kulatilaka N (2001) Capabilities as real options. Organ. Sci. 12(6):744–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Lavie D, Rosenkopf L (2006) Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):797–818.Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(S1):111–125.Google Scholar
• Lerner J (1997) An empirical exploration of a technology race. RAND J. Econom. 28(2):228–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14(S2):95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li G-C, Lai R, D’Amour A, Doolin DM, Sun Y, Torvik VI, Yu AZ, Fleming L (2014) Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010). Res. Policy 43(6):941–955.Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Lee GK, Folta TB (2017) Entry, exit, and the potential for resource redeployment. Strategic Management J. 38(3):526–544.Google Scholar
• Lungeanu R, Stern I, Zajac EJ (2016) When do firms change technology‐sourcing vehicles? The role of poor innovative performance and financial slack. Strategic Management J. 37(5):855–869.Google Scholar
• Manso G (2011) Motivating innovation. J. Finance 66(5):1823–1860.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. 33(11):1404–1418.Link, Google Scholar
• Marx M, Strumsky D, Fleming L (2009) Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. 55(6):875–889.Link, Google Scholar
• Mastracci SH (2009) Evaluating HR management strategies for recruiting and retaining IT professionals in the US federal government. Public Personnel Management 38(2):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGahan AM, Porter ME (1999) The persistence of shocks to profitability. Rev. Econom. Statist. 81(1):143–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) The Schumpeterian tradeoff revisited. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(1):114–132.Google Scholar
• Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36(4):859–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management J. 14(3):179–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piketty T, Saez E (2003) Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):1–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polidoro F, Toh PK (2011) Letting rivals come close or warding them off? The effects of substitution threat on imitation deterrence. Acad. Management J. 54(2):369–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Posen HE, Lee J, Yi S (2013) The power of imperfect imitation. Strategic Management J. 34(2):149–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn DP, Rivoli P (1991) The effects of American- and Japanese-style employment and compensation practices on innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(4):323–341.Link, Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1983) Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 73(4):741–748.Google Scholar
• Reinganum JF (1989) The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion. Schmalensee R, Willig R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 849–908.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross JM, Sharapov D (2015) When the leader follows: Avoiding dethronement through imitation. Acad. Management J. 58(3):658–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saint-Paul G (2002) Employment protection, international specialization, and innovation. Eur. Econom. Rev. 46(2):375–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samila S, Sorenson O (2011) Noncompete covenants: Incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Management Sci. 57(3):425–438.Link, Google Scholar
• Schilke O (2014) On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management J. 35(2):179–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling MA (2015) Towards dynamic efficiency: Innovation and its implications for antitrust. Antitrust Bull. 60(3):191–207.Google Scholar
• Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (Harper & Brothers, New York).Google Scholar
• Stettner U, Lavie D (2014) Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management J. 35(13):1903–1929.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G (1939) Production and distribution in the short run. J. Political Econom. 47(3):305–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy 15(6):285–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tegarden LF, Hatfield DE, Echols AE (1999) Doomed from the start: What is the value of selecting a future dominant design? Strategic Management J. 20(6):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Toh PK, Kim T (2013) Why put all your eggs in one basket? A competition-based view of how technological uncertainty affects a firm’s technological specialization. Organ. Sci. 24(4):1214–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Utterback JM, Abernathy WJ (1975) A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3(6):639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang RD, Shaver JM (2014) Competition‐driven repositioning. Strategic Management J. 35(11):1585–1604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Zhao S, He J (2016) Increase in takeover protection and firm knowledge accumulation strategy. Strategic Management J. 37(12):2393–2412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weintraub GY, Benkard CL, Van Roy B (2008) Markov perfect industry dynamics with many firms. Econometrica 76(6):1375–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiggins RR, Ruefli TW (2005) Schumpeter’s ghost: Is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strategic Management J. 26(10):887–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilden R, Hohberger J, Devinney TM, Lavie D (2018) Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation? Strategic Organ. 16(3):352–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1999) Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management J. 20(12):1087–1108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management J. 24(10):991–995.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woodward J (1965) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
• Wu B, Wan Z, Levinthal DA (2014) Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices. Strategic Management J. 35(9):1257–1278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2005) The value premium. J. Finance 60(1):67–103.Crossref, Google Scholar