Losing Touch: An Embodiment Perspective on Coordination in Robotic Surgery

References

• Ancona DG, Chong CL (1996) Entrainment: pace, cycle and rhythm in organizational behaviour. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behaviour, vol. 18 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 251–284.Google Scholar
• Azad B, King N (2008) Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):264–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM (2015) Technology Choices: Why Occupations Differ in Their Embrace of New Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Beane M (2018) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.Google Scholar
• Beane M, Orlikowski WJ (2015) What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1553–1573.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, Okhuysen GA (2011) Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Acad. Management J. 54(2):239–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton & Company, New York).Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Cassell J (1987) On control, certitude, and the “paranoia” of surgeons. Culture Medicine Psychiatry 11(2):229–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1982) Mind over Machine (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (2005) Peripheral vision: Expertise in real world contexts. Organ. Stud. 26(5):779–792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Xiao Y (2006) Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Sci. 52(8):1155–1169.Link, Google Scholar
• Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Tech. Forecasting Social Change 114(January):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gasser L (1986) The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 4(3):205–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gherardi S (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations 54(1):131–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittell JH (2001) Supervisory span, relational coordination and flight departure performance: A reassessment of postbureaucracy theory. Organ. Sci. 12(4):468–483.Link, Google Scholar
• Goodwin C (1995) Seeing in depth. Social Stud. Sci. 25(2):237–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heaphy ED, Dutton JE (2008) Positive social interactions and the human body at work: Linking organizations and physiology. Acad. Management Rev. 33(1):137–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Luff P (1992) Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground line control rooms. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 1(1):69–94 (CSCW).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh J, Heath C (2007) Video-based studies of work practice. Sociol. Compass 1(1):156–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh J, Pilnick A (2007) Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anesthesia. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1395–1416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. 14(6):615–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Roberts TL, Jones H (2004) Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human Comput. Interaction 19(1):151–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschauer S (1991) The manufacture of bodies in surgery. Social Stud. Sci. 21(2):279–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ihde D (1979) Technics and Praxis (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland).Google Scholar
• Ihde D (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A (2013) The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Quart. 37(2):357–370.Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC (2014) Brokerage professions and implementing reform in an age of experts. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(5):912–941.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg KC, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):22–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (2004) How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body Soc. 10(2-3):205–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2013) Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Inform. Organ. 23(2):59–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin DC, Rao VM, Bonn J (2005) Turf wars in radiology: the battle for peripheral vascular interventions. J. Amer. College Radiology 2(1):68–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A (2014) Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations 67(4):389–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of Perception (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Michel A (2011) Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):325–368.Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Moreira T (2004) Coordination and embodiment in the operating room. Body Soc. 10(1):109–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson AJ, Irwin J (2014) “Defining what we do—All over again”: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/Internet-search relationship. Acad. Management J. 57(3):892–928.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noble DF (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (Transaction Publishers, New York).Google Scholar
• Olson J, Teasley S, Covi L, Olson G (2002) The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 113–135.Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2008) 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):433–474.Google Scholar
• Parmiggiani E, Monteiro E (2019) Synthetic knowing: The politics of Internet of things. MIS Quart. 43(1):167–184.Google Scholar
• Pelikan HR, Cheatle A, Jung MF, Jackson SJ (2018) Operating at a distance—how a teleoperated surgical robot reconfigures teamwork in the operating room. Karahalios K, Monroy-Hernández A, Lampinen A, Fitzpatrick G, eds. Proc. ACM Human-Comput. Interaction, (ACM, New York), 138.Google Scholar
• Pine KH, Mazmanian M (2017) Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice. Acad. Management J. 60(2):720–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice R (2007) Drilling surgeons: The social lessons of embodied surgical learning. Sci. Tech. Human Values 32(5):534–553.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice R (2014) Swimming in the joint. Coopmans V, Lynch W, eds. Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 89–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polanyi M (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Qaurooni D, Ekbia H (2017) The “enhanced” warrior: Drone warfare and the problematics of separation. Phenomenology Cognitive Sci. 16(1):53–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riemer K, Johnston RB (2017) Clarifying ontological inseparability with Heidegger analysis of equipment. MIS Quart. 41(4):1059–1081.Google Scholar
• Sabiston DC, Townsend CM (2012) Sabiston Textbook of Surgery: The Biological Basis of Modern Surgical Practice, 19th ed. (Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
• Schakel JK, van Fenema PC, Faraj S (2016) Shots fired! Switching between practices in police work. Organ. Sci. 27(2):391–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Shapiro L (2010) Embodied Cognition (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steffens D, Thanigasalam R, Leslie S, Maneck B, Young JM, Solomon M (2017) Robotic surgery in uro-oncology: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Urology 106(August):9–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strati A (2007) Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learn. 38(1):61–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Streeck J, Goodwin C, LeBaron C, eds. (2011) Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Tan A, Ashrafian H, Scott AJ, Mason SE, Harling L, Athanasiou T, Darzi A (2016) Robotic surgery: Disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years. Surgical Endoscopy 30(10):4330–4352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truelove E, Kellogg KC (2016) The radical flank effect and cross-occupational collaboration for technology development during a power shift. Admin. Sci. Quart. 61(4):662–701.Google Scholar
• Valentine MA, Edmondson AC (2014) Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organ. Sci. 26(2):405–422.Link, Google Scholar
• Vallas SP, Beck JP (1996) The transformation of work revisited: The limits of flexibility in American manufacturing. Social Problems 43(3):339–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vertesi J (2012) Seeing like a Rover: Visualization, embodiment, and interaction on the Mars exploration Rover mission. Social Stud. Sci. 42(3):393–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zetka JR (2001) Occupational divisions of labor and their technology politics: The case of surgical scopes and gastrointestinal medicine. Social Forces 79(4):1495–1520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar