Transaction Costs in Resource Redeployment for Multiniche Firms

References

• Ahuja G, Lampert CM, Tandon V (2014) Paradigm-changing vs. paradigm-deepening innovation: How firm scope influences firm technological response to shocks. Organ. Sci. 25(3):653–669.Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G, Novelli E (2017) Redirecting research efforts on the diversification-performance linkage: The search for synergy. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):342–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Fosfuri A (2003) Licensing the market for technology. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52(2):277–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardolet D, Fox CR, Lovallo D (2011) Corporate capital allocation: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management J. 32(13):1465–1483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barroso A, Giarratana MS (2013) Product proliferation strategies and firm performance: The moderating role of product space complexity. Strategic Management J. 34(12):1435–1452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brahm F, Tarziján J, Singer M (2017) The impact of frictions in routine execution on economies of scope. Strategic Management J. 38(10):2121–2142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk SM, Hoyer WD, McAlister L (1998) Consumers’ perceptions of the assortment offered in a grocery category: The impact of item reduction. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):166–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Gallino S, Olivares M (2019) Does adding inventory increase sales? Evidence of a scarcity effect in U.S. automobile dealerships. Management Sci. 65(4):1469–1485.Link, Google Scholar
• Canato A, Ravasi D, Phillips N (2013) Coerced practice implementation in cases of low cultural fit: Cultural change and practice adaptation during the implementation of Six Sigma at 3M. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1724–1753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D (2019) The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children. J. Health Econom. 67:102225.Google Scholar
• Chandler AD (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran D, Tellis GJ (2008) Global takeoff of new products: Culture, wealth, or vanishing differences? Marketing Sci. 27(5):844–860.Link, Google Scholar
• Curhan RC (1972) The relationship between shelf space and unit sales in supermarkets. J. Marketing Res. 9(4):406–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickler TA, Folta TB (2018) Identifying internal markets for resource redeployment. Working paper, IE University, Madrid.Google Scholar
• Feldman MP, Yoon JW (2011) An empirical test for general purpose technology: an examination of the Cohen–Boyer rDNA technology. Indust. Corporate Change 21(2):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flammer C (2015) Does product market competition foster corporate social responsibility? Evidence from trade liberalization. Strategic Management J. 36(10):1469–1485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Folta TB, Helfat CE, Karim S (2016) Examining resource redeployment in multi-business firms. Adv. Strategic Management 35:1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foss K, Foss NJ (2008) Understanding opportunity discovery and sustainable advantage: The role of transaction costs and propriety rights. Strategic Management J. 2(3):191–207.Google Scholar
• Gancarczyk M (2016) The integrated resource-based and transaction cost approach to the growth process of firms. J. Organ. Change Management 29(7):1189–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P, Khanna T (1998) The nature of diversified business groups: A research design and two case studies. J. Indust. Econom. 46(1):35–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Nohria N (1993) Horses for courses: Organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Management Rev. 34(2):23–35.Google Scholar
• Hashai N (2015) Within-industry diversification and firm performance—An S-shaped hypothesis. Strategic Management J. 36(9):1378–1400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helfat CE, Eisenhardt KM (2004) Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. 25(13):1217–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1996) Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. RAND J. Econom. 27(1):32–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang J (2014) Pricing Strategy for Cloud Computing Services, Dissertations and Theses Collection (Singapore Management University, Singapore).Google Scholar
• Klepper S, Thompson P (2006) Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):861–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, Wu B (2010) Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. 31(7):780–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy DT, Haber LJ (1986) The advantage of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 7(3):291–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman MB, Lee GK, Folta TB (2017) Entry, exit, and the potential for resource redeployment. Strategic Management J. 38(3):526–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebeskind JP (1996) Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17(S2):93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten SE, Meehan JW, Snyder EA (1991) The costs of organization. J. Law Econom. Organ. 7(1):1–25.Google Scholar
• Markides C, Williamson P (1996) Corporate diversification and organizational structure. Acad. Management J. 39(2):340–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell MF (2000) The scope and organization of production: Firm dynamics over the learning curve. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):180–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery CA, Wernerfelt B (1988) Diversification, Ricardian rents, and Tobin’s q. RAND J. Econom. 19(4):623–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB, Satterthwaite M (1983) Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econom. Theory 29(2):265–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natividad G, Sorenson O (2015) Competitive threats, constraint, and contagion in the multiunit firm. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1721–1733.Link, Google Scholar
• Palich LE, Cardinal LB, Miller CC (2000) Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management J. 21(2):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Penrose E (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(6):61–78.Google Scholar
• Priem RL (2007) A consumer perspective on value creation. Acad. Management Rev. 32(1):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raith M (2003) Competition, risk and managerial incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(4):1425–1436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins J, Wiersema MF (1995) A resource-based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance. Strategic Management J. 16(4):277–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakhartov AV, Folta TB (2014) Resource relatedness, redeployability, and firm value. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1781–1797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santalo J, Becerra M (2008) Competition from specialized firms and the diversification-performance linkage. J. Finance 63(2):851–883.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (2000) The dark side of internal capital markets: Divisional rent‐seeking and inefficient investment. J. Finance 55(6):2537–2564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman BS (1999) Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Sci. 45(8):1109–1124.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Mcevily S, Roy R (2006) Niche width revisited: Organizational scope, behavior and performance. Strategic Management J. 27(10):915–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Lee CH (2008) Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence for the software industry. Acad. Management J. 51(2):381–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tate G, Yang L (2015) The bright side of corporate diversification: Evidence from internal labor markets. Rev. Financial Stud. 28(8):2203–2249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D (1980) Economies of the scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 1(3):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece DJ (1982) Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 3(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomassen O, Smith H, Seiler S, Schiraldi P (2017) Multi-category competition and market power: A model of supermarket pricing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(8):2308–2351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Nordenflycht A (2011) Firm size and industry structure under human capital intensity: Insights from the evolution of the global advertising industry. Organ. Sci. 22(1):141–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1973) Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 63(2):316–325.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3):548–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu B (2013) Opportunity costs, industry dynamics, and corporate diversification: Evidence from the cardiovascular medical device industry, 1976–2004. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1265–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ye G, Priem RL, Alshwer A (2012) Achieving demand-side synergy from strategic diversification: How combining mundane assets can leverage consumer utilities. Organ. Sci. 23(1):207–224.Link, Google Scholar
• Zahavi T, Lavie D (2013) Intra-industry diversification and firm performance. Strategic Management J. 34(8):978–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou YM (2011) Synergy, coordination costs, and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. 32(6):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar