Devoted but Disconnected: Managing Role Conflict Through Interactional Control

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.13517

References

  • Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gend. Soc. 4(2):139–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aeon B, Aguinis H (2017) It’s about time: New perspectives and insights on time management. Acad. Management Perspect. 31(4):309–330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al Dabbagh M, Bowles HR, Thomason B (2016) Status reinforcement in emerging economies: The psychological experience of local candidates striving for global employment. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1453–1471.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TD, French KA (2023) Work-family research: A review and next steps. Personnel Psych. 76(2):437–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen TD, Cho E, Meier LL (2014) Work–family boundary dynamics. Annual Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. 1(1):99–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Altmann EM, Trafton JG (2007) Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model. Psych. Bull. 14(6):1079–1084.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ammons SK (2013) Work-family boundary strategies: Stability and alignment between preferred and enacted boundaries. J. Vocat. Behav. 82(1):49–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baethge A, Rigotti T (2013) Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands. Work Stress 27(1):43–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailyn L (2006) Breaking the Mold: Redesigning Work for Productive and Satisfying Lives (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Bakker AB (2009) The crossover of burnout and its relation to partner health. Stress Health 25(4):343–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes CM, Wagner DT, Ghumman S (2012) Borrowing from sleep to pay work and family: Expanding time‐based conflict to the broader nonwork domain. Personnel Psych. 65(4):789–819.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Mazmanian M (2020) Dreams of the Overworked: Living, Working, and Parenting in the Digital Age (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman CM, Stanko TL (2020) It takes three: Relational boundary work, resilience, and commitment among navy couples. Acad. Management J. 63(2):411–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M (2003) Competing Devotions: Career and Family Among Women Executives (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Blair-Loy M, Cech EA (2022) Misconceiving Merit: Paradoxes of Excellence and Devotion in Academic Science and Engineering (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradbury H, Lichtenstein BMB (2000) Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between. Organ. Sci. 11(5):551–564.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron LD, Thomason B, Conzon VM (2021) Risky business: Gig workers and the navigation of ideal worker expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(12):1821–1833.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cech EA, Blair-Loy M (2014) Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work Occup. 41(1):86–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chung H (2020) Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Soc. Indic. Res. 151(2):521–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colbert AE, Bono JE, Purvanova RK (2016) Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving beyond instrumental support. Acad. Management J. 59(4):1199–1223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007) Cognitive bias and the motherhood penalty. Hastings Law J. 59(6):1359–1387.Google Scholar
  • Correll SJ, Kelly EL, O’Connor LT, Williams JC (2014) Redesigning, redefining work. Work Occup. 41(1):3–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Craig L, Kuykendall L (2019) Examining the role of friendship for employee well-being. J. Vocat. Behav. 115:103313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crouter AC, Bumpus MF, Head MR, McHale SM (2001) Implications of overwork and overload for the quality of men’s family relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 63(2):404–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damaske S, Ecklund EH, Lincoln AE, White VJ (2014) Male scientists’ competing devotions to work and family: Changing norms in a male-dominated profession. Work Occup. 41(4):477–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davies AR, Frink BD (2014) The origins of the ideal worker: The separation of work and home in the United States from the market revolution to 1950. Work Occup. 41(1):18–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Laat K (2023) Living to work (from home): Overwork, remote work, and gendered dual devotion to work and family. Work Occup., ePub ahead of print October 23, https://doi.org/10.1177/07308884231207772.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Sanchez-Burks J (2015) The professional, the personal, and the ideal worker: Pressures and objectives shaping the boundary between life domains. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):803–843.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Stanko TL (2017) Married with children: How family role identification shapes leadership behaviors at work. Personnel Psych. 70(3):597–633.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumas TL, Phillips KW, Rothbard NP (2013) Getting closer at the company party: Integration experiences, racial dissimilarity, and workplace relationships. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1377–1401.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton JE, Heaphy ED (2003) The power of high quality connections. Cameron KS, Dutton JE, Quinn RE, eds. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA), 263–278.Google Scholar
  • Feldman E, Reid EM, Mazmanian M (2020) Signs of our time: Time-use as dedication, performance, identity, and power in contemporary workplaces. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):598–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson M, Carlson D, Zivnuska S, Whitten D (2012) Support at work and home: The path to satisfaction through balance. J. Vocat. Behav. 80(2):299–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris GR, Epitropaki O, Kapoutsis I, Ellen BP III, Drivas K, Ntotsi A (2016) Navigating uneven terrain: The roles of political skill and LMX differentiation in prediction of work relationship quality and work outcomes. J. Organ. Behav. 37(7):1078–1103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flaherty MG (2003) Time work: Customizing temporal experience. Soc. Psych. Quart. 66(1):17–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming P, Spicer A (2004) ‘You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave’: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations 57(1):75–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming P, Sturdy A (2011) ‘Being yourself’ in the electronic sweatshop: New forms of normative control. Human Relations 64(2):177–200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox KE, Johnson ST, Berkman LF, Sianoja M, Soh Y, Kubzansky LD, Kelly EL (2022) Organisational-and group-level workplace interventions and their effect on multiple domains of worker well-being: A systematic review. Work Stress 36(1):30–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • French KA, Dumani S, Allen TD, Shockley KM (2018) A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and social support. Psych. Bull. 144(3):284–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatrell C, Ladge JJ, Powell GN (2022) A review of fatherhood and employment: Introducing new perspectives for management research. J. Management Stud. 59(5):1198–1226.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH (2002) Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Sci. 48(11):1408–1426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH, Seidner R, Wimbush J (2010) A relational model of how high-performance work systems work. Organ. Sci. 21(2):490–506.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Gonsalves L (2020) From face time to flex time: The role of physical space in worker temporal flexibility. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(4):1058–1091.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonsalves L (2023) Work (un)interrupted: How non-territorial space shapes worker control over social interaction. Organ. Sci. 34(5):1651–1671.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Parker SK (2009) 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):317–375.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad. Management Rev. 10(1):76–88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus JH, Powell GN (2003) When work and family collide: Deciding between competing role demands. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 90(2):291–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenhaus JH, Powell GN (2006) When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):72–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Slino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haas MR, Park S (2010) To share or not to share? Professional norms, reference groups, and information withholding among life scientists. Organ. Sci. 21(4):873–891.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR (2012) Positive coworker exchanges. Eby LT, Allen TD, eds. Personal Relationships: The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-Being (Routledge, New York), 107–130.Google Scholar
  • Halbesleben JR, Harvey J, Bolino MC (2009) Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. J. Appl. Psych. 94(6):1452–1465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer LB, Ernst KE, Bodner T, Crain T (2013) Measurement development and validation of the family supportive supervisor behavior short-form (FSSB-SF). J. Occup. Health Psych. 18(3):285–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heaphy ED, Trefalt Š (2023) Hiding in plain sight: Co-enacting the sustainable worker schema in a consulting firm. Organ. Sci., ePub ahead of print November 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.14201.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hennekam S, Ladge JJ, Powell GN (2021) Confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic: How multi-domain work-life shock events may result in positive identity change. J. Vocat. Behav. 130:103621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (1989) The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home (Viking Penguin, New York).Google Scholar
  • Hochschild AR (1997) The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work (Metropolitan Books, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(4):435–449.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jett QR, George JM (2003) Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Management Rev. 28(3):494–507.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn RL, Wolfe DM, Quinn R, Snoek JD, Rosenthal RA (1964) Organizational Stress (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kelly EL, Moen P (2007) Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Adv. Developing Human Resources 9(4):487–506.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly EL, Moen P (2020) Overload (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Kelly EL, Ammons SK, Chermack K, Moen P (2010) Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gend. Soc. 24(3):281–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kmec JA, O’Connor LT, Schieman S (2014) Not ideal: The association between working anything but full time and perceived unfair treatment. Work Occup. 41(1):63–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopman J, Lanaj K, Scott BA (2016) Integrating the bright and dark sides of OCB: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Acad. Management J. 59(2):414–435.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossek EE, Lautsch BA (2008) CEO of Me: Creating a Life That Works in the Flexible Age (Pearson Prentice Hall, Old Bridge, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Kossek EE, Lautsch BA (2012) Work-family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organ. Psych. Rev. 2(2):152–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossek EE, Perrigino M, Rock AG (2021b) From ideal workers to ideal work for all: A 50-year review integrating careers and work-family research with a future research agenda. J. Vocat. Behav. 126:1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kossek EE, Dumas TL, Piszczek MM, Allen TD (2021a) Pushing the boundaries: A qualitative study of how STEM women adapted to disrupted work–nonwork boundaries during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1615–1629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreiner GE, Hollensbe EC, Sheep ML (2009) Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Acad. Management J. 52(4):704–730.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Greenberg D (2015) Becoming a working mother: Managing identity and efficacy uncertainties during resocialization. Human Resource Management J. 54(6):977–998.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Greenberg D (2019) Maternal Optimism: Forging Positive Paths Through Work and Motherhood (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Little LM (2019) When expectations become reality: Work-family image management and identity adaptation. Acad. Management Rev. 44(1):126–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ladge JJ, Clair JA, Greenberg D (2012) Cross-domain identity transition during liminal periods: Constructing multiple selves as professional and mother during pregnancy. Acad. Management J. 55(6):1449–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapierre LM, Allen TD (2006) Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. J. Occup. Health Psych. 11(2):169–181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lautsch BA, Kossek EE, Eaton SC (2009) Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations 62(6):795–827.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leslie LM, King EB, Clair JA (2019) Work-life ideologies: The contextual basis and consequences of beliefs about work and life. Acad. Management J. 44(1):72–98.Google Scholar
  • Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park TY, Mehng SA (2012) Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Acad. Management J. 55(6):1407–1428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levin DZ, Walter J, Murnighan JK (2011) Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organ. Sci. 22(4):923–939.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lin BC, Kain JM, Fritz C (2013) Don’t interrupt me! An examination of the relationship between intrusions at work and employee strain. Internat. J. Stress Management 20(2):77–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Little LM, Major VS, Hinojosa AS, Nelson DL (2015) Professional image maintenance: How women navigate pregnancy in the workplace. Acad. Management J. 58(1):8–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lorde A (1984) Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches (Crossing Press, Trumansburg, NY).Google Scholar
  • Lovejoy M, Kelly EL, Kubzansky LD, Berkman LF (2021) Work redesign for the 21st century: Promising strategies for enhancing worker well-being. Amer. J. Public Health 111(10):1787–1795.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lupu I, Ruiz-Castro M, Leca B (2022) Role distancing and the persistence of long work hours in professional service firms. Organ. Stud. 43(1):7–33.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Major DA, Fletcher TD, Donald DD, Germano LM (2008) The influence of work-family culture and workplace relationships on work interference with family: A multilevel model. J. Organ. Behav. 29(7):881–897.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathison S (1988) Why triangulate? Ed. Res. 17(2):13–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazmanian M, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2013) The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1337–1357.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McMullan AD, Lapierre LM, Li Y (2018) A qualitative investigation of work-family-supportive coworker behaviors. J. Vocat. Behav. 107:25–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Methot JR, Rosado-Solomon EH, Downes PE, Gabriel AS (2021) Office chitchat as a social ritual: The uplifting yet distracting effects of daily small talk at work. Acad. Management J. 64(5):1445–1471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michel A (2011) Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):325–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moen P, Sweet S (2003) Time clocks: Work-hour. Moen P, ed. It’s About Time: Couples and Careers (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 17–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moen P, Kelly E, Huang Q (2008) Work, family and life-course fit: Does control over work time matter? J. Vocat. Behav. 73(3):414–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moen P, Lam J, Ammons S, Kelly EL (2013) Time work by overworked professionals: Strategies in response to the stress of higher status. Work Occup. 40(2):79–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moen P, Kelly E, Fan W, Lee S, Almeida DM, Kossek EE, Buxton OM (2016) Does a flexibility/support organizational initiative improve high-tech employees’ well-being? Evidence from the work, family, and health network. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(1):177–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Munsch CL, Ridgeway CL, Williams JC (2014) Pluralistic ignorance and the flexibility bias: Understanding and mitigating flextime and flexplace bias at work. Work Occup. 41(1):40–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy LD, Thomas CL, Cobb HR, Hartman AE (2021) A review of the LGBTQ+ work–family interface: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Organ. Behav. 42(2):139–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neely MT (2020) The portfolio ideal worker: Insecurity and inequality in the new economy. Qual. Sociol. 43(2):271–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson AJ (2016) How to share “a really good secret”: Managing sharing/secrecy tensions around scientific knowledge disclosure. Organ. Sci. 27(2):265–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Netemeyer RG, Boles JS, McMurrian R (1996) Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. J. Appl. Psych. 81(4):400–410.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oelberger CR (2019) The dark side of deeply meaningful work: Work‐relationship turmoil and the moderating role of occupational value homophily. J. Management Stud. 56(3):558–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1998) Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(2):328–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1999) The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):57–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow LA (2012) Sleeping with Your Smartphone: How to Break the 24/7 Habit and Change the Way You Work (Harvard Business Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Perlow LA, Kelly EL (2014) Toward a model of work redesign for better work and better life. Work Occup. 41(1):111–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petriglieri JL, Obodaru O (2019) Secure base relationships as drivers of professional identity construction in dual career couples. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(3):694–736.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pillemer J, Rothbard NP (2018) Friends without benefits: Understanding the dark sides of workplace friendship. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):635–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Rosa JA (2003) Transforming work-family conflict into commitment in network marketing organizations. Acad. Management J. 46(4):395–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Puranik H, Koopman J, Vough H (2020) Pardon the interruption: An integrative review and future research agenda for research on work interruptions. J. Management 46(6):806–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramarajan L, Reid E (2013) Shattering the myth of separate worlds: Negotiating nonwork identities at work. Acad. Management Rev. 38(4):621–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan A, Pedulla DS (2021) Work-family programs and nonwork networks: Within-group inequality, network activation, and labor market attachment. Organ. Sci. 32(2):315–333.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reid EM (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reid EM, Ashford SJ, Caza BB (2018) From surviving to thriving in the gig economy: A research agenda for individuals in the new world of work. Res. Organ. Behav. 38(3):23–41.Google Scholar
  • Ren H, Gray B, Harrison DA (2015) Triggering faultline effects in teams: The importance of bridging friendship ties and breaching animosity ties. Organ. Sci. 26(2):390–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson B (2023) In-office mandates attacking progress and company growth, but ‘big guns’ not backing down. Forbes (September 10), https://www.forbes.com/sites/bryanrobinson/2023/09/10/in-office-mandates-attacking-progress-and-company-growth-but-big-guns-not-backing-down/?sh=34bc44a618dd.Google Scholar
  • Roeters A, van der Lippe T, Kluwer ES (2010) Work characteristics and parent-child relationship quality: The mediating role of temporal involvement. J. Marriage Fam. 72(5):1317–1328.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Ollier-Malaterre A (2016) Boundary management. Allen TD, Eby L, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Work and Family (Oxford University Press, New York), 109–122.Google Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16(3):243–258.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothbard NP, Ramarajan L, Ollier-Malaterre A, Lee SS (2022) OMG! My boss just friended me: How evaluations of colleagues’ disclosure, gender, and rank shape personal/professional boundary blurring online. Acad. Management J. 65(1):35–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russo M, Buonocore F, Carmeli A, Guo L (2018) When family supportive supervisors meet employees’ need for caring: Implications for work–family enrichment and thriving. J. Management 44(4):1678–1702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sawyer KB, Thoroughgood C, Ladge J (2017) Invisible families, invisible conflicts: Examining the added layer of work-family conflict for employees with LGB families. J. Vocat. Behav. 103(A):23–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schinoff BS, Ashforth BE, Corley KG (2020) Virtually (in)separable: The centrality of relational cadence in the formation of virtual multiplex relationships. Acad. Management J. 63(5):1395–1424.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schweisfurth TG, Greul A (2023) Unexpected interruptions, idle time, and creativity: Evidence from a natural experiment. Organ. Sci. 35(1):116–137.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Settoon RP, Mossholder KW (2002) Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person- and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 87(2):255–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small ML (2009) ‘How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography 10(1):5–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith CE, Wayne JH, Matthews RA, Lance CE, Griggs TL, Pattie MW (2022) Stability and change in levels of work–family conflict: A multi‐study, longitudinal investigation. J. Occup. Organ. Psych. 95(1):1–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stephens JP, Heaphy E, Dutton JE (2011) High-quality connections. Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (Oxford Academic, New York), 385–399.Google Scholar
  • Stone P (2007) Opting Out?: Why Women Really Quit Careers and Head Home (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ten Brummelhuis LL, Bakker AB (2012) A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. Amer. Psych. 67(7):545–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ten Brummelhuis LL, Greenhaus JH (2018) How role jugglers maintain relationships at home and at work: A gender comparison. J. Appl. Psych. 103(12):1265–1282.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomason B (2022) Ideal or idiosyncratic? How women manage work-family role conflict with focal and peripheral role senders. Organ. Sci. 33(3):901–925.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tienari J, Quack S, Theobald H (2002) Organizational reforms, ‘ideal workers’ and gender orders: A cross-societal comparison. Organ. Stud. 23(2):249–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B (2012) Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23(4):1024–1039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Trefalt Š (2013) Between you and me: Setting work-nonwork boundaries in the context of workplace relationships. Acad. Management J. 56(6):1802–1829.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Turco CJ (2010) Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(6):894–913.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman V, Frenkel M (2011) Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organ. Sci. 22(2):503–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Williams J (2001) Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Williams JC, Berdahl JL, Vandello JA (2016) Beyond work-life “integration.” Annual Rev. Psych. 67:515–539.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams JC, Blair‐Loy M, Berdahl JL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):209–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Windeler JB, Chudoba KM, Sundrup RZ (2017) Getting away from them all: Managing exhaustion from social interaction with telework. J. Organ. Behav. 38(7):977–995.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellmer-Bruhn ME (2003) Interruptive events and team knowledge acquisition. Management Sci. 49(4):514–528.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.