Moving Violations: Pairing an Illegitimate Learning Hierarchy with Trainee Status Mobility for Acquiring New Skills When Traditional Expertise Erodes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1374

References

  • Adler PS (1995) Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. 6(2):147–167.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1997) Ergonomics, employee involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A case study of NUMMI’s 1993 model introduction. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 50(3):416–437.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility vs. efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ. Sci. 10(1):43–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anteby M, Chan CK (2018) A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers’ invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organ. Sci. 29(2):247–263.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anthony C (2018) To question or accept? How status differences influence responses to new epistemic technologies in knowledge work. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):661–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Barley SR (2011) Teaching-learning ecologies: Mapping the environment to structure through action. Organ. Sci. 22(1):262–285.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong J (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailyn L (1993) Breaking the Mold: Women, Men, and Time in the New Corporate World (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bamberger P (2009) Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research. Martocchio JJ, Liao H, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol. 28 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 49–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR (2015) Why the internet makes buying a car less loathsome: How technologies change role relations. Acad. Management Discoveries 1(1):5–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley SR, Kunda G (2006) Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Beane M (2019) Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Admin. Sci. Quart. 64(1):87–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2006) Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organ. Sci. 17(1):3–21.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky BA (2019) Evaluative spillovers from technological change: The effects of “DNA envy” on occupational practices in forensic science. Admin. Sci. Quart., ePub ahead of print June 14, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219855329.Google Scholar
  • Becker HS, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL (1961) Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Bendersky C, Hays NA (2012) Status conflict in groups. Organ. Sci. 23(2):323–340.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein ES (2012) The transparency paradox: A role for privacy in organizational learning and operational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(2):181–216.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Black LJ, Carlile PR, Repenning NP (2004) A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley’s study of CT scanning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(4):572–607.Google Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Borgatti SP, Cross R (2003) A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. 49(4):432–445.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bosk CL (1979) Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Brennecke J (2020) Dissonant ties in intraorganizational networks: Why individuals seek problem-solving assistance from difficult colleagues. Acad. Management J. 63(3):743–778.Google Scholar
  • Brooks JV, Singer S, Sheridan B, Chien A, Peters A (2020) Working around hierarchy: Resident and medical assistant teaming. Health Care Management Rev. 45(3):232–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1):40–57.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Canales R (2018) Assessing the effectiveness of procedural justice training for police officers: Evidence from the Mexico City Police. Paper presented at the MIT Institute for Work and Employment Research seminar, October 16, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Canales R (2019) How procedural justice training changes police officer behavior in the field: Experimental evidence. Yale SOM working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile PR (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christin A (2017) Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data Soc. 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717718855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deken F, Carlile PR, Berends H, Lauche K (2016) Generating novelty through interdependent routines: A process model of routine work. Organ. Sci. 27(3):659–677.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiBenigno J (2020) Rapid relationality: How peripheral experts build a foundation for influence with line managers. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):20–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle SP, Lount RB Jr, Wilk SL, Pettit NC (2016) Helping others most when they are not too close: Status distance as a determinant of interpersonal helping in organizations. Acad. Management Discoveries 2(2):155–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP (2001) Disrupted routines: Team learning and new-technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):685–716.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N, Van Knippenberg A, Wilke H (1990) The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(3):233–246.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N, Wilke H, Van Knippenberg A (1993) Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(5):766–778.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellemers N, Van Knippenberg A, De Vries N, Wilke H (1988) Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 18(6):497–513.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. Amer. J. Sociol. 113(1):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher CM, Pillemer J, Amabile TM (2018) Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1524–1553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn FJ (2003) How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad. Management J. 46(5):539–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman A, Carmeli A, Dutton JE (2018) When does respectful engagement with one’s supervisor foster help-seeking behaviors and performance? J. Vocational Behav. 104(February):184–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH (2016) Transforming Relationships for High Performance: The Power of Relational Coordination (Stanford University Press, Redwood City, CA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittell JH, von Nordenflycht A, Kochan TA (2004) Mutual gains or zero sum? Labor relations and firm performance in the airline industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 57(2):163–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glance NS, Hogg T, Huberman BA (1997) Training and turnover in the evolution of organizations. Organ. Sci. 8(1):84–96.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Goode WJ (1978) The Celebration of Heroes (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
  • Grant AM, Patil SV (2012) Challenging the norm of self-interest: Minority influence and transitions to helping norms in work units. Acad. Management Rev. 37(4):547–568.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grodal S, Nelson AJ, Siino RM (2015) Help-seeking and help-giving as an organizational routine: Continual engagement in innovative work. Acad. Management J. 58(1):136–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman JR, Wageman R (1995) Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(2):309–342.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon AB, Bechky BA (2006) When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organ. Sci. 17(4):484–500.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harper DA (1987) Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  • Hodson R, Hooks G, Rieble S (1992) Customized training in the workplace. Work Occupations 19(3):272–292.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann DA, Lei Z, Grant AM (2009) Seeking help in the shadow of doubt: The sensemaking processes underlying how nurses decide whom to ask for advice. J. Appl. Psych. 94(5):1261–1274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huising R (2014) The erosion of expert control through censure episodes. Organ. Sci. 25(6):1633–1661.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E, Lintern G (1995) Cognition in the Wild, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H (1999) Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):764–791.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karunakaran A (2019) Front-line professionals in the wake of social media scrutiny: Examining the paradox of public accountability. Acad. Management Proc. 2019(1): 13114.Google Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2009) Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):657–711.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellogg KC (2011) Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery. Organ. Sci. 22(2):482–502.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kessinger R, Kellogg KC (2020) Pairing big data assessment with friendship in a firm. Presentation, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  • Kochan TA (2015) Shaping the Future of Work: What Future Worker, Business, Government, and Education Leaders Need to Do for All to Prosper (Business Expert Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Kochan TA, Rubinstein SA (2000) Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn Partnership. Organ. Sci. 11(4):367–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kochan TA, Eaton AE, McKersie RB, Adler PS (2013) Healing Together: The Labor-Management Partnership at Kaiser Permanente Permanente (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Kochan TA, Adler PS, McKersie RB, Eaton AE, Segal P, Gerhart P (2008) The potential and precariousness of partnership: The case of the Kaiser Permanente Permanente Labor Management Partnership. Indust. Relations 47(1):36–65.Google Scholar
  • Lave J (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee MY, Mazmanian MA, Perlow L (2020) Fostering positive relational dynamics: The power of spaces and interaction scripts. Acad. Management J. 63(1):96–123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2007) Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18(5):813–831.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2018) Social media and the development of shared cognition: The roles of network expansion, content integration, and triggered recalling. Organ. Sci. 29(4):547–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM, Bailey DE (2008) Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: Making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring. MIS Quart. 32(2):411–436.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lifshitz-Assaf H (2018) Dismantling knowledge boundaries at NASA: The critical role of professional identity in open innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):746–782.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim JH, Tai K, Bamberger PA, Morrison EW (2020) Soliciting resources from others: An integrative review. Acad. Management Ann. 14(1):122–159.Google Scholar
  • Litwin AS (2011) Technological change at work: The impact of employee involvement on the effectiveness of health information technology. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 64(5):863–888.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Litwin AS (2015) Nose to tail: Using the whole employment relationship to link worker participation to operational performance. Lewin D, Gollan PJ, eds. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 21 (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 143–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Batt R (2007) The economic pay-offs to informal training: Evidence from routine service work. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 61(1):75–89.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounsbury M (2002) Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Acad. Management J. 45(1):255–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacDuffie JP, Krafcik J (1992) Integrating technology and human resources for high-performance manufacturing: Evidence from the international auto industry. Kochan TA, Useem M, eds. Transforming Organizations (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 209–226.Google Scholar
  • Marchand TH (2008) Muscles, morals and mind: Craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. British J. Ed. Stud. 56(3):245–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martorana PV, Galinsky AD, Rao H (2005) From system justification to system condemnation: Antecedents of attempts to change power hierarchies. Thomas-Hunt MC, ed. Status and Groups (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 283–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michel A (2011) Transcending socialization: A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):325–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mills CW (1956) The Power Elite (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Myers JE, Kellogg KC (2020) State actor orchestration for achieving workforce development at scale: Evidence from four U.S. states. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orr JE (1996) Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
  • Osterman P (1995) Skill, training, and work organization in American establishments. Indust. Relations 34(2):125–146.Google Scholar
  • Pachidi S, Tschan AM (2019) Learning through the algorithm: Algorithmic technologies and learning in the legal profession. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 12, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY.Google Scholar
  • Perlow LA (1997) Finding Time: How Corporations, Individuals, and Families Can Benefit from New Work Practices (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perlow L, Weeks J (2002) Who’s helping whom? Layers of culture and workplace behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 23(4):345–361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pine KH, Mazmanian M (2017) Artful and contorted coordinating: The ramifications of imposing formal logics of task jurisdiction on situated practice. Acad. Management J. 60(2):720–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Piore MJ (1968) On-the-job training and adjustment to technological change. J. Human Resources 3(4):435–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad. Management J. 49(2):235–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan A (2018) Train them to retain them: Work readiness and the retention of first-time women-workers in India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):879–909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranganathan AR, Shivaram R (2020) Getting your hands dirty: How female supervisors motivate female worker productivity through subordinate scut work. Management Sci. Forthcoming. Google Scholar
  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2005) Border crossing: Bricolage and the erosion of categorical boundaries in French gastronomy. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 70(6):968–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts PW, Reagans R (2007) Critical exposure and price-quality relationships for new world wines in the US market. J. Wine Econom. 2(1):84–97.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saganski G (1995) A worker-centered approach to education and training. Babson S, ed. Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry (Wayne State University Press, Detroit), 326–342.Google Scholar
  • Suchman LA (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Austin WG, Worchel S, eds. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA), 33–47.Google Scholar
  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) An integrative theory of intergroup relations. Worchel S, Austin WG, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd ed. (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
  • Taylor DM, McKirnan DJ (1984) Theoretical contributions: A five‐stage model of intergroup relations. British J. Soc. Psych. 23(4):291–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Toegel G, Kilduff M, Anand N (2013) Emotion helping by managers: An emergent understanding of discrepant role expectations and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 56(2):334–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treem JW, Leonardi PM (2017) Recognizing expertise: Factors promoting congruity between individuals’ perceptions of their own expertise and the perceptions of their coworkers. Comm. Res. 44(2):198–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Truelove E (2020) Participation control: How organization members exercise influence over crowds. Presentation, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  • Valentine MA (2017) Renegotiating spheres of obligation: The role of hierarchy in organizational learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(3):570–606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1973) Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organ. 32(4):407–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J (1975) Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department. Admin. Sci. Quart. 20(2):207–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J, Barley SR (1982) Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Report TR-ONR-10, Alfred P Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  • Van Maanen J, Schein EH (1979) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Staw BM, ed. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 209–264.Google Scholar
  • Veblen T (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker 9(5):2–3.Google Scholar
  • Wright SC, Taylor DM, Moghaddam FM (1990) Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(6):994–1003.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW (1999) The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. Amer. J. Sociol. 104(5):1398–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zuckerman EW, Kim T-Y, Ukanwa K, von Rittmann J (2003) Robust identities or nonentities? Typecasting in the feature-film labor market. Amer. J. Sociol. 108(5):1018–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.