Make Way for the Algorithms: Symbolic Actions and Change in a Regime of Knowing

References

• Abbott A (1988) The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alvesson M (2004) Knowledge Work and Knowledge-Intensive Firms (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony C (2018) To question or accept? How status differences influence responses to new epistemic technologies in knowledge work. Acad. Management Rev. 43(4):661–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azad B, King N (2008) Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):264–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Barley SR (2011) Teaching-learning ecologies: Mapping the environment to structure through action. Organ. Sci. 22(1):262–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM (2015) Technology Choices: Why Occupations Differ in their Embrace of New Technology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2012) The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1485–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong J (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1990) The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):61–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2012) Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1448–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ. Sci. 14(3):312–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Berends H, Deken F (2020) Composing qualitative process research. Strategic Organ. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Robey D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organ. Sci. 16(1):3–18.Link, Google Scholar
• Bourgoin A, Bencherki N, Faraj S (2020) “And who are you?”: A performative perspective on authority in organizations. Acad. Management J. 63(4):1134–1165.Google Scholar
• Boyd D, Crawford K (2012) Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inform. Comm. Soc. 15(5):662–679.Google Scholar
• Brown AD (1994) Politics, symbolic action and myth making in pursuit of legitimacy. Organ. Stud. 15(6):861–878.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown AD (1995) Managing understandings: Politics, symbolism, niche marketing and the quest for legitimacy in IT implementation. Organ. Stud. 16(6):951–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cambrosio A, Keating P, Schlich T, Weisz G (2006) Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine. Soc. Sci. Med. 63(1):189–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile PR (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Christin A (2017) Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice. Big Data Soc. 4(2):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cloutier C, Langley A (2013) The logic of institutional logics: Insights from French pragmatist sociology. J. Management Inquiry 22(4):360–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daston LJ, Galison P (2007) Objectivity (Zone Books, Brooklyn, NY).Google Scholar
• Dodgson M, Gann DM, Salter A (2007) “In case of fire, please use the elevator”: Simulation technology and organization in fire engineering. Organ. Sci. 18(5):849–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Dussauge I, Helgesson CF, Lee F, Woolgar S (2015) On the omnipresence, diversity, and elusiveness of values in the life sciences and medicine. Dussauge I, Helgesson CF, Lee F, eds. Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine (Oxford University Press, New York), 1–28.Google Scholar
• Ehn P (1988) Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts (Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm).Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Pachidi S, Sayegh K (2018) Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inform. Organ. 28(1):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayard AL, Gkeredakis E, Levina N (2016) Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):302–323.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2006) The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Acad. Management J. 49(6):1173–1193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1975) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Galison P (1997) Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Hallett T (2010) The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):52–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hewlin PF (2003) And the award for best actor goes to…: Facades of conformity in organizational settings. Acad. Management Rev. 28(4):633–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilgartner S (2017) Reordering Life: Knowledge and Control in the Genomics Revolution (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard-Grenville JA, Carlile PR (2006) The incompatibility of knowledge regimes: Consequences of the material world for cross-domain work. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(5):473–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Introna LD (2016) Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: On governing academic writing. Sci. Tech. Human Values 41(1):17–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasanoff S (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S (2011) Strategy and PowerPoint: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organ. Sci. 22(2):320–346.Link, Google Scholar
• King JL, Kraemer KL (1993) Models, facts, and the policy process: The political ecology of estimated truth. Goodchild MF, Parks BO, Steyaerts LT, eds. Environmental Modeling with GIS (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 353–360.Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists Make Knowledge (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kraemer KL, Dickhoven S, Tierney SF, King JL (1987) Datawars: The Politics of Modeling in Federal Policymaking (Columbia University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapointe L, Rivard S (2007) A triple take on information system implementation. Organ. Sci. 18(1):89–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quart. 37(3):749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM, Barley SR (2010) What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Acad. Management Ann. 4(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacIntyre A (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (Duckworth, London).Google Scholar
• Markus ML (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Comm. ACM 26(6):430–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Parmiggiani E (2019) Synthetic knowing: The politics of the internet of things. MIS Quart. 43(1):167–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newell S, Robertson M, Scarbrough H, Swan J (2009) Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Noble DE (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. 16(1):145–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2006) Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(5):460–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Scott SV (2014) What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3):868–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Patriotta G, Gond JP, Schultz F (2011) Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. J. Management Stud. 48(8):1804–1836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.Link, Google Scholar
• Poole MS, Van de Ven AH, Dooley KJ, Holmes ME (2000) Organizational Change and Innovation Processes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):338–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schatzki T (2001) Introduction: practice theory. Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, Von Savigny EE, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Routledge, London), 10–23.Google Scholar
• Spradley JP (1980) Participant Observation (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Thévenot L (2001) Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. Schatzki T, Knorr-Cetina K, Von Savigny EE, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Routledge, London), 64–82.Google Scholar
• Vallas SP, Beck JP (1996) The transformation of work revisited: The limits of flexibility in American manufacturing. Soc. Problems 43(3):339–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss RS (1995) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies (Simon and Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar
• Zbaracki MJ (1998) The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(3):602–636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Profile Books, London).Google Scholar