Mavericks and Diplomats: Bridging Commercial and Institutional Entrepreneurship for Society’s Grand Challenges

References

• Andries P, Debackere K, Van Looy B (2013) Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: Business model development under uncertainty. Strategic Entrep. J. 7(4):288–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansari SS, Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (2016) The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management J. 37(9):1829–1853.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker T, Nelson RE (2005) Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(3):329–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Dorado S (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Management J. 53(6):1419–1440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: Toward a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):65–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann O, Siggelkow N (2013) Dealing with complexity: Integrated vs. chunky search processes. Organ. Sci. 24(1):116–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Bechky BA, O’Mahony S (2015) Leveraging comparative field data for theory generation. Handb. Qual. Organ. Res. Innov. Pathways Methods (Routledge, Abingdon, UK).Google Scholar
• Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2011) Rational heuristics: The “simple rules” that strategists learn from process experience. Strategic Management J. 32(1):1437–1464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blank S (2013) Why the lean starty-up changes everything. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May):1–10.Google Scholar
• Bremner RP, Eisenhardt KM (2022) Organizing form, experimentation, and performance: Innovation in the nascent civilian drone industry. Organ. Sci. 33(4):1645–1674.Link, Google Scholar
• Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Management Sci. 66(2):564–586.Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhury P, Allen RT, Endres MG (2021) Machine learning for pattern discovery in management research. Strategic Management J. 42(1):30–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen CM, Raynor ME, McDonald R (2015) What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 93(12):44–53.Google Scholar
• Clarysse B, Andries P, Boone S, Roelandt J (2023) Institutional logics and founders’ identity orientation: Why academic entrepreneurs aspire lower venture growth. Res. Policy 52(3):104713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contigiani A, Levinthal DA (2019) Situating the construct of lean start-up: Adjacent conversations and possible future directions. Indust. Corporate Change 28(3):551–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David RJ, Sine WD, Haveman HA (2013) Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 24(2):356–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Eesley C, Wu L (2020) For startups, adapatability and mentor network diversity can be pivotal: Evidence from a randomized experiment on a MOOC platform. MIS Quart. 44(2):661–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (2021) What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organ. 19(1):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME (2007) Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Management J. 50(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fauchart E, Gruber M (2011) Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 54(5):935–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frank DJ, Meyer JW (2020) The University and the Global Knowledge Society (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Freeman CW (1997) Arts of Power: Statecraft and Diplomacy (United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Furr NR, Eisenhardt KM (2021) Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. J. Management 47(7):1915–1935.Google Scholar
• Gao C, McDonald R (2022) Shaping nascent industries: Innovation strategy and regulatory uncertainty in personal genomics. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):915–967.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Glaser VL, Eisenhardt KM, Gioia D, Langley A, Corley KG (2018) Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. J. Management Inquiry 27(3):284–300.Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Theory (Aldine Publishing Co, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
• Grimes MG (2018) The pivot: How founders respond to feedback through idea and identity work. Acad. Management J. 61(5):1692–1717.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grodal S, Anteby M, Holm AL (2021) Achieving rigor in qualitative analysis: The role of active categorization in theory building. Acad. Management Rev. 46(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurses K, Ozcan P (2015) Entrepreneurship in regulated markets: Framing contests and collective action to introduce pay TV in the U.S. Acad. Management J. 58(6):1709–1739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannah DP, Eisenhardt KM (2018) How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management J. 39(12):3163–3192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon AB, Douglas Y (2001) When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(3):476–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiatt SR, Park S (2013) Lords of the harvest: Third-party influence and regulatory approval of genetically modified organisms. Acad. Management J. 56(4):923–944.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GP, Power DJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. 6(2):171–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karunakaran A (2022) In cloud we trust? Co-opting occupational gatekeepers to produce normalized trust in platform-mediated interorganizational relationships. Organ. Sci. 33(3):1188–1211.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirtley J, O’Mahony S (2023) What is a pivot? Explaining when and how entrepreneurial firms decide to make strategic change and pivot. Strategic Management J. 44(1):197–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kissinger HA (1994) Diplomacy (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
• Koning R, Hasan S, Chatterji A (2022) Experimentation and start-up performance: Evidence from A/B testing. Management Sci. 68(9):6434–6453.Link, Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Meziani N (2020) Making interviews meaningful. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 56(3):370–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Struben J, Bingham CB (2018) Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework. Strategic Management J. 39(1):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M, Ventresca M, Hirsch PM (2003) Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: A cultural-political perspective on US recycling. Socio-economic Rev. 1(1):71–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald RM, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and the search for a viable business model. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):483–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Gao C (2019) Pivoting isn’t enough? Managing strategic reorientation in new ventures. Organ. Sci. 30(6):1289–1318.Link, Google Scholar
• Moeen M, Agarwal R, Shah SK (2020) Building industries by building knowledge: Uncertainty reduction over industry milestones. Strategy Sci. 5(3):218–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Monsell S (2003) Task switching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7(3):134–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Musselin C (2021) University governance in meso and macro perspectives. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 47:305–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Navis C, Glynn MA (2010) How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990 − 2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(3):439–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng A, Widom J (2014) Origins of the modern MOOC (xMOOC). Hrsg. Fiona M. Hollands Devayani Tirthali MOOCs Expect. Real. Full Rep. 34–47.Google Scholar
• North DC (1991) Towards a theory of institutional change. Quart. Rev. Econom. Bus. 31(4):3–12.Google Scholar
• Nye J (2008) Public diplomacy and soft power. Ann. Am. Acad. Pol. Soc. Sci. 616(1):94–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Decision weaving: Forming novel, complex strategy in entrepreneurial settings. Strategic Management J. 11(3):306–325.Google Scholar
• Ott TE, Eisenhardt KM, Bingham CB (2017) Strategy formation in entrepreneurial settings: Past insights and future directions. Strategic Entrep. J. 11(3):306–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozcan CP, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Origin of alliance portfolios: Entrepreneurs, network strategies and firm performance. Acad. Management J. 52(2):246–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pache A-C, Santos F (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):972–1001.Google Scholar
• Pacheco DF, York JG, Dean TJ, Sarasvathy SD (2010) The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. J. Management 36(4):974–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400 − 1434. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(6):1259–1319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM (2015) Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):596–633.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pappano L (2012) The year of the MOOC. New York Times (November 2), https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-onlinecourses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html.Google Scholar
• Pillai SD, Goldfarb B, Kirsch DA (2020) The origins of firm strategy: Learning by economic experimentation and strategic pivots in the early automobile industry. Strategic Management J. 41(3):369–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (December):1–20.Google Scholar
• Powell EE, Baker T (2014) It’s what you make of it: Founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1406–1433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Kotha S (2001) Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1263–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivkin JW (2000) Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. 46(6):824–844.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein JS, Meyer DE, Evans JE (2001) Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27(4):763–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos FM, Eisenhardt KM (2009) Constructing markets and shaping boundaries: Entrepreneurial power in nascent fields. Acad. Management J. 52(4):643–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schofer E, Meyer JW, Ramirez FO, Frank DJ (2007) Higher education as an institution. Gumport PJ, ed. Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts (The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore), 187–221.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2008) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Biag M (2016) The Changing Ecology of US Higher Education: An Organization Field Perspective. Berman EP, Paradeise C, eds. University Under Pressure, Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 25–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatchenkery S, Katila R (2021) Seeing what others miss: A competition network lens on product innovation. Organ. Sci. 32(5):1346–1370.Link, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tidhar R, Eisenhardt KM (2020) Get rich or die trying… finding revenue model fit using machine learning and multiple cases. Strategic Management J. 41(7):1245–1273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tidhar R, Hallen BL, Eisenhardt KM (2024) Measure twice, cut once: Unit profitability, scalability and the exceptional growth of new firms. Conditional acceptance. Organ. Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Tolbert PS, David RJ, Sine WD (2011) Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1332–1344.Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. State Department (2021) Diplomatic dictionary. Accessed January 23, 2021, https://diplomacy.state.gov/discover-diplomacy/diplomatic-dictionary/.Google Scholar
• Van Angeren J, Karunakaran A (2023) Anchored inferential learning: Platform-specific uncertainty, venture capital investments by the platform owner, and the impact on complementors. Organ. Sci. 34(3):1027–1050.Link, Google Scholar
• Wry T, Lounsbury M, Jennnings PD (2014) Hybrid vigor: Securing venture capital by spanning categories in nanotechnology. Acad. Management J. 57(5):1309–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• York JG, Hargrave TJ, Pacheco DF (2016) Converging winds: Logic hybridization in the Colorado wind energy field. Acad. Management J. 59(2):579–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yue LQ, Wang J (2024) Policy learning in nascent industries’ venue shifting: A study of the US small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) industry. Bus. Soc. 63(5):1203–1251.Google Scholar
• Zhao EY, Fisher G, Lounsbury M, Miller D (2017) Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 38(1):93–113.Google Scholar
• Zietsma C, Groenewegen P, Logue DM, Hinings CR (2017) Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Acad. Management Ann. 11(1):391–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Edmondson AC (2017) The advocacy trap: When legitimacy building inhibits organizational learning. Acad. Management Discov. 3(3):302–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuzul T, Tripsas M (2020) Start-up inertia versus flexibility: The role of founder identity in a nascent industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(2):395–433.Google Scholar