Algorithm Supported Induction for Building Theory: How Can We Use Prediction Models to Theorize?

References

• Abu-Mostafa YS , Magdon-Ismail M , Lin HT (2012) Learning from Data (AMLBook, New York).Google Scholar
• Aguinis H , Solarino AM (2019) Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management J. 40(8):1291–1315.Google Scholar
• Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Google Scholar
• Athey S , Imbens G (2016) Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 113(27):7353–7360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S , Tibshirani J , Wager S (2019) Generalized random forests. Ann. Statist. 47(2):1148–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2018) AMD—Clarifying what we are about and where we are going. Acad. Management Discovery 4(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bao Y , Datta A (2014) Simultaneously discovering and quantifying risk types from textual risk disclosures. Management Sci. 60(6):1371–1391.Link, Google Scholar
• Behfar K , Okhuysen GA (2018) Perspective—Discovery within validation logic: Deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ. Sci. 29(2):323–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Belloni A , Chernozhukov V , Hansen C (2013) Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls. Rev. Econom. Stud. 81(2):608–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop CM (2006) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Blei DM (2012) Probabilistic topic models. Comm. ACM 55(4):77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boughorbel S , Jarray F , El-Anbari M (2017) Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews correlation coefficient metric. PLoS One 12(6):e0177678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1):5–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton RM , Obel B (2011) Computational modeling for what-is, what-might-be, and what-should-be studies—And triangulation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1195–1202.Link, Google Scholar
• Bzdok D (2017) Classical statistics and statistical learning in imaging neuroscience. Frontiers Neurosci. 11:543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen LF , Liao HYM , Ko MT , Lin JC , Yu GJ (2000) A new LDA-based face recognition system which can solve the small sample size problem. Pattern Recognition 33(10):1713–1726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen K , Nørskov S , Frederiksen L , Scholderer J (2017) In search of new product ideas: Identifying ideas in online communities by machine learning and text mining. Creative Innovative Management 26(1):17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K , Allen EE , Heckman R (2012) Using natural language processing technology for qualitative data analysis. Internat. J. Soc. Res. Methodology 15(6):523–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K , Liu X , Allen EE (2010) Machine learning and rule-based automated coding of qualitative data. Marshall C, Toms E, Grove A, eds. Proc. ASIST Annual Meeting (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 1–2.Google Scholar
• Davis JMV , Heller SB (2017) Using causal forests to predict treatment heterogeneity: An application to summer jobs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107:546–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deetz S (1996) Crossroads—Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking burrell and morgan and their legacy. Organ. Sci. 7(2):191–207.Link, Google Scholar
• Dua D , Graff C (2017) Machine learning repository. Accessed June 1, 2016, http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml.Google Scholar
• Eastman W , Bailey JR (1998) Mediating the fact-value antinomy: Patterns in managerial and legal rhetoric, 1890–1990. Organ. Sci. 9(2):232–245.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer T , Krauss C (2018) Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270(2):654–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A , Loken E (2014) The statistical crisis in science. Amer. Sci. 102(6):460–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (2008) Doing Quantitative Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser B , Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London). Google Scholar
• Goldfarb B , King A (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: Significance tests and mistaken inference. Strategic Management J. 37(1):167–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guidotti R , Monreale A , Ruggieri S , Turini F , Giannotti F , Pedreschi D (2018) A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Survey 51(5):1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RFJ , Pieters C , He Z (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan KR (1985) An application of clustering for strategic group analysis. Strategic Management J. 6(1):55–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannigan TR , Seidel VP , Yakis-Douglas B (2018) Product innovation rumors as forms of open innovation. Res. Policy 47(5):953–964.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannigan TR , Haans RFJ , Vakili K , Tchalian H , Glaser VL , Wang MS , Kaplan S , et al. . (2019) Topic modeling in management research: Rendering new theory from textual data. Acad. Management Ann. 13(2):586–632.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He F , Puranam P , Shrestha YR , von Krogh G (2020) Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions. Strategic Management J. 41(10):1837–1868.Google Scholar
• Helfat CE (2007) Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organ. 5(2):185–192.Google Scholar
• Huang AH , Lehavy R , Zang AY , Zheng R (2018) Analyst information discovery and interpretation roles: a topic modeling approach. Management Sci. 64(6):2833–2855.Link, Google Scholar
• Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management J. 20(2):195–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunter JE , Schmidt FL , Jackson GB (1982) Meta-Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings across Studies (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar
• Jiang Y , Li M , Zhou ZH (2009) Mining extremely small data sets with application to software reuse. Software Practice Experience 39(4):423–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalnins A (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management J. 39(8):2362–2385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamishima T , Akaho S , Sakuma J (2011) Fairness-aware learning through regularization approach.Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J , Ludwig J , Mullainathan S , Obermeyer Z (2015) Prediction policy problems. Amer. Econom. Rev. Paper Proc. 105(5):491–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson SC (1931) The shrinkage of the coefficient of multiple correlation. J. Edu. Psychol. 22(1):45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lave CA , March JG (1993) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (University Press of America, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
• LeCun Y , Bengio Y , Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1990) A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organ. Sci. 1(3):248–266.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis MW , Grimes AJ (1999) Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple paradigms. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):672–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipton ZC (2016) The mythos of model interpretability. Accessed December 11, 2015, http://www.kdnuggets.com/2015/04/model-interpretability-neural-networks-deep-learning.html.Google Scholar
• Locke K (2015) Pragmatic reflections on a conversation about grounded theory in management and organization studies. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):612–619.Google Scholar
• Lu H, Eng HL, Guan C, Plataniotis KN, Venetsanopoulos AN (2010) Regularized common spatial pattern with aggregation for EEG classification in small-sample setting. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engrg. 57(12):2936–2946.Google Scholar
• March JG , Sproull LS , Tamuz M (1991) Learning from samples of one or fewer. Organ. Sci. 2(1):1–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Marquardt DW , Snee RD (1975) Ridge regression in practice. Amer. Statist. 29(1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Medlock B , Briscoe T (2007) Weakly supervised learning for hedge classification in scientific literature. Carroll JA, van den Bosch A, Zaenen A, eds. Proc. 45th Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Prague, Czech Republic), 992–999.Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) An emerging strategy of” direct” research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 24(4):582–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell TM (1997) Machine Learning (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Mosteller F , Wallace DL (1963) Inference in an authorship problem: A comparative study of discrimination methods applied to the authorship of the disputed Federalist Papers. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(302):275–309.Google Scholar
• Mullainathan S , Spiess J (2017) Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2):87–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy AL , Pietro PG , Roman GC (2006) LIME: A coordination model and middleware supporting mobility of hosts and agents. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology 15(3):279–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (2000) Causal inference without counterfactuals. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95(450):428–431.Google Scholar
• Peirce CS (1878) Deduction, induction and hypothesis. Popular Sci. Monthly 13:470–482.Google Scholar
• Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Basic Books, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Pratt MG , Kaplan S , Whittington R (2019) Editorial essay: The tumult over transparency: decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):1–19.Google Scholar
• Puranam D , Narayan V , Kadiyali V (2017) The effect of calorie posting regulation on consumer opinion: A flexible latent dirichlet allocation model with informative priors. Marketing Sci. 36(5):726–746.Link, Google Scholar
• Puranam P , Stieglitz N , Osman M , Pillutla MM (2015) Modelling bounded rationality in organizations: Progress and prospects. Acad. Management Ann. 9(1):337–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (1987) The Comparative Method (University of California Press, Berkeley). Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science . (University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar
• Robert C (2014) Machine learning, a probabilistic perspective. Chance 27(2):62–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudin C (2014) Algorithms for interpretable machine learning. Macskassy S, Perlich C, Leskovec J, Wang W, Ghani R, eds. Proc. 20th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1519.Google Scholar
• Samek W , Montavon G, Vedaldi A, Hansen LK, Müller KR, eds. (2017) Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning (Springer Nature, New York).Google Scholar
• Sami Ul Haq Q , Tao L , Sun F , Yang S (2012) A fast and robust sparse approach for hyperspectral data classification using a few labeled samples. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 50(6):2287–2302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuel AL (1959) Eight-move opening utilizing generalization learning. IBM J. 3(3):210–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shadish WR , Cook TD , Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (Houghton Mifflin, Boston). Google Scholar
• Shah SK , Corley KG (2006) Building better theory by bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. J. Management Stud. 43(8):1821–1835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaikhina T , Khovanova NA (2017) Handling limited datasets with neural networks in medical applications: A small-data approach. Artificial Intelligence Medicine 75:51–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shalev-Shwartz S , Ben-David S (2014) Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK). Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2019) Interpreting interactions in linear fixed-effect regression models: When fixed-effect estimates are no longer within-effects. Strategy Sci. 4(1):25–40.Link, Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR , Yang Y (2019) Fairness in algorithmic decision-making: Applications in multi-winner voting, machine learning, and recommender systems. Algorithms (Basel) 12(9):199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrestha YR , Ben-Menahem SM , von Krogh G (2019) Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Rev. 61(4):66–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton RI (1997) Crossroads—The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organ. Sci. 8(1):97–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tonidandel S , King EB , Cortina JM (2018) Big data methods. Organ. Res. Methods 21(3):525–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2014) Big data: New tricks for econometrics. J. Econom. Perspective 28(2):3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2016) How to build an economic model in your spare time. Amer. Econom. 61(1):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G (2018) Artificial intelligence in organizations: New opportunities for phenomenon-based theorizing. Acad. Managment Discovery 4(4):404–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I , Holton JA , Bailyn L , Fernandez W , Levina N , Glaser B (2015) Rejoinder: Moving the management field forward. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):620–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolpert DH , Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolution Comput. 1(1):67–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yan JLS , McCracken N , Crowston K (2014) Semi-automatic content analysis of qualitative data. Accessed June 1, 2016, http://socqa.org/iConf2014.Google Scholar
• Yang JB , Shen KQ , Ong CJ , Li XP (2009) Feature selection for MLP neural network: The use of random permutation of probabilistic outputs. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 20(12):1911–1922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao S , Huang B (2017) Beyond parity: Fairness objectives for collaborative filtering. Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, Garnett R eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 2921–2930.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA). Google Scholar
• Zelner BA (2009) Using simulation to interpret results from logit, probit, and other nonlinear models. Strategic Management J. 30(12):1335–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zemel R , Wu Y , Swersky K , Pitassi T , Dwork C (2013) Learning fair representations. Dasgupta S, McAllester D, eds. Proc. 30th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (PMLR, Atlanta), 325–333.Google Scholar
• Zhou ZH , Jiang Y (2003) Medical diagnosis with C4.5 Rule preceded by artificial neural network ensemble. IEEE Trans. Inform. Tech. Biomedicine 7(1):37–42.Crossref, Google Scholar