Work-Family Programs and Nonwork Networks: Within-Group Inequality, Network Activation, and Labor Market Attachment

References

• Aassve A, Arpino B, Goisis A (2012) Grandparenting and mothers’ labour force participation: A comparative analysis using the generations and gender survey. Demographic Res. 27(3):53–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abraham M (2020) Gender-role incongruity and audience-based gender bias: An examination of networking among entrepreneurs. Admin. Sci. Quart. 65(1):151–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen SG (1983) How much does absenteeism cost? J. Human Resources 18(3):379–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allison P (1999) Comparing logit and probit coefficients across groups. Sociol. Methods Res. 28(2):186–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alon S, Donahoe D, Tienda M (2001) The effects of early work experience on young women’s labor force attachment. Soc. Forces 79(3):1005–1035.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnold F, Choe MK, Roy TK (1998) Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Stud. 52(3):301–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bainbridge J, Meyers M, Waldfogel J (2003) Child care policy reform and the employment of single mothers. Soc. Sci. Quart. 84(4):771–791.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker-McClearn D, Greasley K, Dale J, Griffith F (2010) Absence management and presenteeism: The pressures of employees to attend work and the impact of attendance on performance. Human Resources Management 20(3):311–328.Google Scholar
• Barbulescu R, Bidwell M (2013) Do women choose different jobs from men? Mechanisms of application segregation in the market for managerial workers. Organ. Sci. 24(3):737–756.Link, Google Scholar
• Barcellos SH, Carvalho LS, Lleras-Muney A (2014) Child gender and parental investments in India: Are boys and girls treated differently? Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 6(1):157–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger JM, Fisek H, Norman RZ, Zelditch M (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction (Elsevier, New York).Google Scholar
• Berger MC, Black DA (1992) Child care subsidies, quality of care, and the labor supply of low-income, single mothers. Rev. Econom. Statist. 74(4):635–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berlinski S, Galiani S (2007) The effect of a large expansion of pre-primary school facilities on preschool attendance and maternal employment. Labour Econom. 14(3):665–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair-Loy M, Wharton AS (2002) Employees’ use of work-family policies and the workplace social context. Soc. Forces 80(3):813–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bretz RD, Judge TA (1994) Person-organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. J. Vocational Behav. 44(1):32–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briscoe F, Kellogg K (2011) The initial assignment effect: Local employer practices and positive career outcomes for work-family program users. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76:291–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byker TS (2016) Paid parental leave laws in the United States: Does short-duration leave affect women’s labor-force attachment? Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):242–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio EU (2009) Maternal labor supply and the introduction of kindergartens into American public schools. J. Human Resources 44(1):140–170.Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (2012) India’s clothing workers. The Guardian (November 24), https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/25/india-clothing-workers-slave-wages.Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark MA, Rudolph CW, Zhdanova L, Michel JS, Baltes BB (2017) Organizational support factors and work-family outcomes: Exploring gender differences. J. Family Issues 38(11):1520–1545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark S (2000) Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography 37(1):95–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark S, Kabiru CW, Laszlo S, Muthuri S (2019) The impact of childcare on poor urban women's economic empowerment in Africa. Demography 56(4):1247–1272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clawson D, Gerstel N (2014) Unequal Time: Gender, Class, and Family in Employment Schedules (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Correll SJ, Ridgeway CL (2003) Expectations states theory. Delamater J, ed., Handbook of Social Psychology (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York), 29–51.Google Scholar
• Crowley K, Callanan MA, Tenenbaum HR, Allen E (2001) Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychol. Sci. 12(3):258–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damaske S (2011) For the Family?: How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Das Gupta M, Jiang Z, Li B, Xie Z, Chung W, Hwa-Ok B (2003) Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. J. Development Stud. 40(3):153–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodson L (2009) The Moral Underground: How Ordinary Americans Subvert an Unfair Economy (The New Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Eby LT, Casper WJ, Lockwood A, Bordeaux C, Brinley A (2005) Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J. Vocational Behav. 66(1):124–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Factories Act (1948) Act No. 63 of 1948 (Manager of Publications, Government of India, Delhi).Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Mateo I, Kaplan S (2018) Gender and organization science: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Organ. Sci. 29(6):1229–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghysels J (2011) The provision of informal childcare by European grandparents: Constraints versus selective preferences. Working paper, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
• Glass JL (2004) Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work Occupations 31(3):367–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass JL, Estes SB (1997) The family responsive workplace. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23(1):289–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goff SJ, Mount MK, Jamison RL (1990) Employer supported child care, work/family conflict, and absenteeism: A field study. Personnel Psychol. 43(4):793–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon RA, Kaestner R, Korenman S (2008) Child care and work absences: Trade-offs by type of care. J. Marriage Families 70(1):239–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gornick JC, Meyers MK (2003) Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment (Russell Sage Foundation, New York).Google Scholar
• Greenhaus JH, Powell GN (2006) When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Acad. Management Rev. 31(1):72–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Srivastava SB (2014) Bringing agency back into network research: Constrained agency and network action. Res. Sociol. Organ. 40:73–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hipp L, Morrissey TW, Warner ME (2017) Who participates and who benefits from employer-provided child-care assistance? J. Marriage Families 79(3):614–635.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hornby G, Ashworth T (1994) Grandparents’ support for families who have children with disabilities. J. Child Family Stud. 3(4):403–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayachandran S, Pande R (2017) Why are Indian children so short? The role of birth order and son preference. Amer. Econom. Rev. 107(9):2600–2629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P, Tranby E (2011) Changing workplaces to reduce work-family conflict schedule control in a white-collar organization. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 76(2):265–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Ammons SK, Chermack K, Moen P (2010) Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender Soc. 24(3):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Kossek EE, Hammer LB, Durham M, Bray J, Chermack K, Murphy LA, Kaskubar D (2008) Getting there from here: Research on the effects of work-family initiatives on work-family conflict and business outcomes. Acad. Management Ann. 2(1):305–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly EL, Moen P, Oakes JM, Fan W, Okechukwu C, Davis KD, Hammer LB, et al.. (2014) Changing work and work-family conflict evidence from the work, family, and health network. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(3):485–516.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaushal N, Muchomba F (2018) Missing time with parents: Son preference among Asians in the USA. J. Population Econom. 31(2):397–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kimmel J (1995) The effectiveness of child-care subsidies in encouraging the welfare-to-work transition of low-income single mothers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(2):271–275.Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Nichol V (1992) The effects of on-site child care on employee attitudes and performance. Personnel Psychol. 45(3):485–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kossek EE, Pichler S, Bodner T, Hammer LB (2011) Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychol. 64(2):289–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwon S-W, Adler PS (2014) Social capital: Maturation of a field of research. Acad. Management Rev. 39(4):412–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapierre LM, Li Y, Kwan HK, Greenhaus JH, DiRenzo MS, Shao P (2018) A meta-analysis of the antecedents of work-family enrichment. J. Organ. Behav. 39(4):285–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lefebvre P, Merrigan P, Verstraete M (2009) Dynamic labor supply effects of childcare subsidies: Evidence from a Canadian natural experiment on low-fee universal child care. Labour Econom. 16(5):490–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyness KS, Gornick JC, Stone P, Grotto AR (2012) It’s all about control: Worker control of schedule and hours in cross-national context. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 77(6):1023–1049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchester CF, Leslie LM, Kramer A (2010) Stop the clock policies and career success in academia. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(2):219–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marin A (2012) Don’t mention it: Why people don’t share job information, when they do, and why it matters. Soc. Networks 34(2):181–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller RT, Murnane RJ, Willett JB (2008) Do worker absences affect productivity? The case of teachers. Internat. Labour Rev. 147(1):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moen P, Kelly EL, Lee S-R, Oakes JM, Fan W, Bray J, Almeida D, Hammer L, Hurtado D, Buxton O (2016) Can a flexibility/support initiative reduce turnover intentions and exits? Results from the work, family, and health network. Soc. Problems 64(1):53–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munsch CL (2016) Flexible work, flexible penalties: The effect of gender, childcare, and type of request on the flexibility bias. Soc. Forces 94(4):1567–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumark D, McLennan M (1995) Sex discrimination and women’s labor market outcomes. J. Human Resources 30(4):713–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicholson S, Pauly MV, Polsky D, Sharda C, Szrek H, Berger ML (2006) Measuring the effects of work loss on productivity with team production. Health Econom. 15(2):111–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nollenberger N, Rodriguez-Planas N (2011) Child care, maternal employment and persistence: A natural experiment from Spain. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5888 (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain).Google Scholar
• Noonan MC, Estes SB, Glass JL (2007) Do workplace flexibility policies influence time spent in domestic labor? J. Family Issues 28(2):263–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh E (2018) Who deserves to work? How women develop expectations of child care support in Korea. Gender Soc. 32(4):493–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osterman P (1995) Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(4):681–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pande RP, Astone NM (2007) Explaining son preference in rural India: The independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Res. Policy Rev. 26(1):1–29.Google Scholar
• Pedulla DS (2016) Penalized or protected? Gender and the consequences of nonstandard and mismatched employment histories. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 81(2):262–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettit B, Hook J (2005) The structure of women’s employment in comparative perspective. Soc. Forces 84(2):779–801.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poster WR, Prasad S (2005) Work-family relations in transnational perspective: A view from high-tech firms in India and the United States. Soc. Problems 52(1):122–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell GN, Greenhaus JH (2010) Sex, gender, and the work-to-family interface: Exploring negative and positive interdependencies. Acad. Management J. 53(3):513–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha U (2012) Work-life balance in South East Asia: The Indian experience. South Asian J. Global Bus. Res. 1(1):108–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ranganathan A (2018) Train them to retain them: Work readiness and the retention of first-time women workers in India. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):879–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rau BL, Hyland MM (2002) Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psych. 55(1):111–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid E (2015) Embracing, passing, revealing, and the ideal worker image: How people navigate expected and experienced professional identities. Organ. Sci. 26(4):997–1017.Link, Google Scholar
• Ridgeway C (1991) The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Soc. Forces 70(2):367–386.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP (2001) Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(4):655–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothbard NP, Phillips KW, Dumas TL (2005) Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organ. Sci. 16(3):243–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Royster DA (2003) Race and the Invisible Hand: How White Networks Exclude Black Men from Blue-Collar Jobs (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudman LA, Mescher K (2013) Penalizing men who request a family leave: Is flexibility stigma a femininity stigma? J. Soc. Issues 69(2):322–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scandura TA, Lankau MJ (1997) Relationships of gender, family responsibility and flexible work hours to organizational commitment and job satisfaction. J. Organ. Behav. 18(4):377–391.Google Scholar
• Sherman EL (2020) Discretionary remote working helps mothers without harming non-mothers: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Sci. 66(3):1351–1374.Link, Google Scholar
• Shetty A, Shetty S (2014) The influence of female literacy on the sex ratio in Indian states. Internat. J. Medical Sci. Public Health 3(10):1219–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small ML (2009) Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SS (2005) ‘Don’t put my name on it’: Social capital activation and job-finding assistance among the black urban poor. Amer. J. Sociol. 111(1):1–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spradley J (1979) The Ethnographic Interview (Wadsworth Group, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Thébaud S (2015) Business as plan B: Institutional foundations of gender inequality in entrepreneurship across 24 industrialized countries. Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(4):671–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandello JA, Hettinger VE, Bosson JK, Siddiqi J (2013) When equal isn’t really equal: The masculine dilemma of seeking work flexibility. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):303–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Shaw JD, Sykes TA, Wamba SF, Macharia M (2017) Networks, technology, and entrepreneurship: A field quasi-experiment among women in rural India. Acad. Management J. 60(5):1709–1740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walia P (2013) Work life balance of bank employees: A comparison. Indian J. Commerce Management Stud. 5(3):80–82.Google Scholar
• Weeden K (2005) Is there a flexiglass ceiling? Flexible work arrangements and wages in the United States. Soc. Sci. Res. 34(2):454–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Blair-Loy M, Berdahl JL (2013) Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. J. Soc. Issues 69(2):209–234.Crossref, Google Scholar