High-Status Teammates: Award Evaluation in the National Basketball Association

References

• Allport G (1954) The Nature of Prejudice (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y (2014) Matthew: Effect or fable? Management Sci. 60(1):92–109.Link, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman S, Down J, Hill C (2002) Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Acad. Management J. 45(1):13–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berri D, Schmidt M, Brook S (2004) Stars at the gate: The impact of star power on NBA gate revenues. J. Sports Econom. 5(1):33–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change in informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J (2011) Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. J. Political Econom. 119(5):982–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne A, Barling J (2017) When she brings home the job status: Wives’ job status, status leakage, and marital instability. Organ. Sci. 28(2):177–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Call M, Nyberg A, Ployhart R, Weekley J (2015) The dynamic nature of collective turnover and unit performance: The impact of time, quality, and replacements. Acad. Management J. 58(4):1208–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cattani G, Ferriani S, Allison P (2014) Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 79(2):258–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. 94:S95–S120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabbagh MA, Bowles H, Thomason B (2016) Status reinforcement in emerging economies: The psychological experience of local candidates striving for global employment. Organ. Sci. 27(6):1453–1471.Link, Google Scholar
• Debackere K, Clarysse B, Wijnberg N, Rappa M (1994) Science and industry: A theory of networks and paradigms. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management 6(1):21–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eco U (1979) A Theory of Semiotics (Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
• Feldman D (2019) NBA rosters churning more than ever. How did we get here? Retrieved September 1, 2020, www.nba.nbcsports.com/2019/09/24/nba-rosters-churning-more-than-ever-how-did-we-get-gere/.Google Scholar
• Firestone W (1993) Alternative arguments for generalizing from data as applied to qualitative research. Ed. Res. 22(4):16–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gensch D (1987) A two-stage disaggregate attribute choice model. Marketing Sci. 6(3):223–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Gould R (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(5):1143–1178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Lee L-E, Nanda A (2008) Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Sci. 54(7):1213–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Groysberg B, Polzer J, Elfenbein H (2011) Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 22(3):722–737.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahl O, Ha J (2017) Committed diversification: Why authenticity insulates against penalties for diversification. Organ. Sci. 31(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• Haubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Comm. Monographs 76(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2013) Model templates for PROCESS for SPSS and SAS. Accessed May 3, 2024, https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://osf.io/29c8p/download&ved=2ahUKEwiNxZ78jO-FAxUjg4kEHRxvDTYQFnoECBUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0ykKRH79ZEGiYH_dseDvDm.Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Hayes A (2020) PROCESS for R version 3.5.3 beta0.6. Accessed May 3, 2024, https://www.processmacro.org/index.html.Google Scholar
• Hsu G, Hannan M, Koçak Ö (2009) Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 74(1):150–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husserl E (1931) Ideas: A General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology (Allen and Unwin, London).Google Scholar
• Jane W-J (2016) The effect of star quality on attendance demand: The case of the National Basketball Association. J. Sports Econom. 17(4):396–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kehoe R, Tzabbar D (2015) Lighting the way or stealing the shine? An examination of the duality in star scientists’ effects on firm innovative performance. Strateg. Management J. 36(5):709–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kendall T (2003) Spillovers, complementarities, and sorting in labor markets with an application to professional sports. Southern Econom. J. 70(2):389–402.Google Scholar
• Kim J, King B (2014) Seeing stars: Matthew effects and status bias in Major League baseball umpiring. Management Sci. 60(11):2619–2644.Link, Google Scholar
• Kovács B, Sharkey A (2014) The paradox of publicity: How awards can negatively affect the evaluation of quality. Admin. Sci. Quart. 59(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kubatko J, Oliver D, Pelton K, Rosenbaum D (2007) A starting point for analyzing basketball statistics. J. Quant. Anal. Sports 3(3):1–22.Google Scholar
• Lamont M (2012) Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(21):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leibovich M (2018) Tom Brady gave a filmmaker unusual access to his private life. New York Times (January 9), www.nytimes.com/2018/01/09/sports/football/tom-brady-patriots.html.Google Scholar
• Leone A, Wu J (2007) What does it take to become a superstar? Evidence from institutional investor rankings of financial analysts. Simon School of Business Working Paper No. FR 02-12, Simon School of Business, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
• Lockwood P, Kunda Z (1997) Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 73(1):91–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn F (2014) Diffusing through disciplines: Insiders, outsiders, and socially influenced citation behavior. Soc. Forces 93(1):355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynn F, Podolny J, Tao L (2009) A sociological (de)construction of the relationship between status and quality. Amer. J. Sociol. 115(3):755–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D, Krull J, Lockwood C (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Sci. 1(4):173–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzo G, Baldassarri D (2014) Heuristics, interactions, and status hierarchies: An agent-based model of deference exchange. Sociol. Methods Res. 44(2):329–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J, Simon H (1958) Organizations (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Merton R (1968) The Matthew effect in science. Science 159(3810):56–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy E (2004) Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British J. Ed. Tech. 35(4):421–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Basketball Association (2017) 1951 NBA All-Star recap. Retrieved September 1, 2020, https://www.nba.com/history/all-star/1951.Google Scholar
• Nickerson R (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. General Psych. 2(2):175–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oettl A (2012) Reconceptualizing stars: Scientist helpfulness and peer performance. Management Sci. 58(6):1122–1140.Link, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Heuristic search processes in decision making. Adv. Consumer Res. 3(1):321–327.Google Scholar
• Pettigrew A (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 1(3):267–292.Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav. Res. 42(1):185–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reschke B, Azoulay P, Stuart T (2017) Status spillovers: The effect of status conferring prizes on the allocation of attention. Admin. Sci. Quart. 63(4):819–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosen S (1981) The economics of superstars: Reply. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(3):845–858.Google Scholar
• Rossingh D (2018) How to train, eat and sleep like an Olympic champion. CNN (January 9), https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/09/sport/train-like-an-olympian/index.html.Google Scholar
• Rossman G, Esparza N, Bonacich P (2010) I’d like to thank the Academy, team spillovers, and network centrality. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 75(1):31–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rucker D, Preacher K, Tormala Z, Petty R (2011) Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 5(6):359–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver JM (2005) Testing for mediating variables in management research: Concerns, implications, and alternative strategies. J. Management 31(3):330–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shocker AD, Ben-Akiva ME, Bruno DSB, Nedungadi P (1991) Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Lett. 2(3):181–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout P, Bolger N (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 7(4):422–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simcoe T, Waguespack D (2011) Status, quality, and attention: What’s in a (missing) name? Management Sci. 57(2):274–290.Link, Google Scholar
• Stake R (2000) Case studies. Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 435–454.Google Scholar
• Tervio M (2009) Superstars and mediocrities: Market failure in the discovery of talent. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):829–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torgler B, Schmidt S (2007) What shapes player performance in soccer? Empirical findings from a panel analysis. Appl. Econom. 39(18):2355–2369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi Y (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien G (2004) Two-stage partial observability models of innovation adoption. Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC, McCulloch CE (2011) Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Wijnberg N (1995) Selection processes and appropriability in art, science and technology. J. Cultural Econom. 19(3):221–235.Google Scholar
• Wright M (2020) How much does an All-Star selection mean to players? Retrieved September 1, 2020, https://www.nba.com/news/what-all-star-selections-mean-players.Google Scholar
• Young P (2009) Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: Contagion, social influence, and social learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1899–1924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang L (2017) A fair game? Racial bias and repeated interaction between NBA coaches and players. Admin. Sci. Quart. 62(4):603–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch J, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2):197–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziller T (2018) Why NBA stars are always changing teams now. Retrieved September 1, 2020, https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2018/7/23/17594660/nba-trades-all-stars-free-agency-2018.Google Scholar
• Zucker L, Darby M (1996) Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93(23):12709–12716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L, Darby M, Brewer M (1998) Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. 88(1):290–306.Google Scholar
• Zuckerman E (2012) Construction, concentration, and (dis)continuities in social valuations. Annual Rev. Sociol. 38(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar